Montana Federation of Public Employees members rally at Capitol
'Union busting bills' and a school voucher bill that threatened to siphon $100 million from public schools were on the table earlier this session, said Amanda Curtis, president of the Montana Federation of Public Employees.
And back in February, the state pay play wasn't scheduled for a hearing in the Senate yet, she said.
But despite snowstorms and single digit temperatures, union members showed up to engage with lawmakers, Curtis said.
'Because we broke bread and had thoughtful, one-on-one conversations with legislators of both parties, we won,' Curtis told a few dozen rally-goers.
She said union members helped push off unfriendly bills and pulled the pay plan forward..
At a rally Friday at the Capitol with, at most, 18 days left in the session, Curtis praised the work union members had done, including 22 MFPE members who serve in the Montana Legislature.
The MFPE is the largest union in the state with more than 20,000 members.
Rep. Eric Matthews, D-Bozeman, said the legislature has passed the pay plan, and it's a fair one. Matthews, a teacher, said the STARS Act, a comprehensive bill addressing starting teacher pay, still needs to pass, but it's a positive proposal.
The Student and Teacher Advancement for Results and Success Act, House Bill 252, passed the House 88-9 and is making its way through the Senate.
'We still have to get the STARS Act out, which will definitely help the education system across Montana,' Matthews said.
Rep. Denise Baum, D-Billings, said Montana's pensions are healthy, and they need to resist attacks. She said 73% of public employees report they would be more likely to leave their work if their pensions are cut.
Baum, a recently retired detective with the Billings Police Department, also urged Gov. Greg Gianforte to sign Senate Bill 7, which she said helps correct a wrong from last session.
The bill revises the retirement criteria for some law enforcement officers.
Instead of being eligible after 20 years of service and at the age of 50, it allows an officer to tap their retirement after reaching just one of the criteria.
The bill passed the legislature and is headed to Gianforte's desk. A spokesperson for the Governor's Office did not respond to an email for comment about the governor's planned action.
Rep. Jill Cohenour, D-Helena, praised increases in the pay plan, including a minimum $10,400 for employees working for the state of Montana and the university system over the course of three years, 'raises exceeding anything that has been there in the past two decades.'
'Hear me when I say that public employees in Montana deserve the pay plans that we have negotiated,' Cohenour said. 'We deserve so much more.
'We are the people that Montanans go to when they need help starting a business, when they're trying to find a job, when they're trying to get back on their feet, when their roads need plowed, and when they're experiencing a health crisis. We make families successful in communities across Montana.'
At the rally, Curtis also encouraged other union members to run for office in the future, even though '22 member legislators may be unheard of.'
'We need reinforcements in 2027, and it doesn't matter what party you identify with,' Curtis said.
'If you believe that public service is a public good, if you believe that we must support public employees, if you believe that working people should have a voice and protections at work, we need you in this Capitol building.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
Van Hollen blocks FBI funding bill from floor debate over Trump headquarters dispute
The simmering dispute over the FBI's future headquarters derailed Senate efforts Thursday night to launch floor debate on the legislation that funds the agency, as well as the departments of Commerce and Justice, NASA and science programs. Sen. Chris Van Hollen objected Thursday night to including the bill in a larger package of funding measures. The Maryland Democrat demanded that the Senate agree to adopt language that would require the FBI to meet a specific security threshold for its headquarters, as the Trump administration keeps the agency in downtown Washington instead of relocating it to the suburban Maryland campus previously selected after a yearslong competition. But Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), who chairs the funding panel that handles the bill, shot down that request on the Senate floor Thursday night, after the dispute over the FBI headquarters already snagged committee action on the bill. Tearing up as he spoke on the floor, Moran said he knows 'no path forward' that would allow Van Hollen's amendment. 'Our appropriations process is fragile,' he said. If Van Hollen, who serves as the ranking member on the Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee, hadn't objected, his amendment would have been teed up for a vote. But Van Hollen didn't want to take the risk that the language would not have been adopted. 'That is a simple request that I would have thought all of us could stand behind,' Van Hollen said, 'making sure that the new headquarters of the men and women of the FBI meets the security requirements that we and they have set out.' Senate appropriators already killed another amendment Van Hollen proposed in committee, which would have barred the Trump administration from dipping into a $1.4 billion construction account for anything besides relocating the FBI to the previously selected site. After the proposal was initially adopted, the committee later voted to strike the language because so many Republicans were threatening to tank the underlying bill if it rebuked Trump on the headquarters decision. 'We did it because the president of the United States was going to throw a fit if that provision stayed on, that's why people reversed the position,' Van Hollen said on the Senate floor Thursday night. 'And we shouldn't make our decisions out of fear about what somebody in the White House is going to do, because that distorts the entire process here in the United States Senate.' Moran's Thursday evening request was to tie together four bills to fund the government for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. Those bills would collectively fund the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, as well as military construction projects, the operations of Congress and the FDA. The Kansas Republican touted that those four measures had made it through the full Senate Appropriations Committee with bipartisan support and 'in some instances, unanimously.'
Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
Hillary pinned Trump as Russian agent to distract from email scandal, says Sen. Lindsey Graham
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., assesses newly declassified intelligence in the Trump-Russia 'hoax' investigation on 'Hannity.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump tirade against Grassley irritates Republican senators
Republican senators were appalled by President Trump's rough treatment of 91-year-old Sen. Chuck Grassley (Iowa), the Senate's most senior Republican, on social media and are pushing back on Trump's attempts to squeeze the senator into abolishing an arcane procedure known as the Senate blue slip. GOP senators were not pleased that Trump piled so much pressure on Grassley, the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to get rid of a long-established Senate tradition. Trump piled on by reposting on Truth Social posts accusing Grassley of being a 'RINO' and 'sneaky' and standing in the way of Trump's agenda. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee who has separately felt the wrath of Trump for his opposition to the tax and spending megabill earlier this month, said Trump appears to be getting bad advice from his staff. 'I think it was a bad — No. 1, Chuck is beloved in our conference. No. 2, the blue-slip policy helps the president. He's got staff giving him bad advice,' Tillis said. He argued that keeping in place the tradition of allowing senators to use documents known as blue slips to block district-court level judicial nominees and U.S. attorney nominees has preserved an important element of bipartisanship in the Senate. Tillis said getting rid of blue slips would make it even tougher to work with Democrats as Republicans attempt to move legislation that needs 60 votes to pass the Senate, such as the annual spending bills. 'I think the president's staff have a bad habit of advising him that was a good idea,' Tillis said of Trump's penchant of taking public shots at Republican allies in Congress when they disagree with him on an issue. Trump blasted Tillis last month on Truth Social after the North Carolina senator announced he would vote against the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act because of more than $900 billion in cuts to Medicaid. Shortly after the interaction, Tillis said he would not be running for reelection next year. Tillis said Trump's staff either failed to intervene before the president targeted Grassley or 'somebody told him, 'You ought to put pressure on him and go on Truth Social.'' 'The staff should have intervened and said, 'This is not a good idea,'' he said. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who has bucked the Trump administration on a number of votes, called the president's shots at Grassley, who has been in the Senate since 1981, 'unnecessary.' 'I talked to Sen. Grassley — I think Sen. Grassley has long, long, long been a great team player, and I think he was just a little bit offended at the tone, and that's not right,' she said, adding: 'I'm a defender of the blue slip.' A Republican senator who requested anonymity said Trump's targeting of Grassley on Truth Social crossed the line. 'There's a lot of negative reaction by me and my colleagues to the specific treatment of Sen. Grassley,' the lawmaker said, adding that Trump's social media posts were discussed by colleagues on the Senate floor during votes. 'There's a lot of desire to see Chuck Grassley treated correctly. It was really the talk of the floor last night,' the source said. Grassley has been a loyal Trump ally, steering some of his most controversial nominees through the Senate confirmation process this year, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and, most recently, Emil Bove, Trump's former defense attorney, whom senators confirmed Tuesday to serve on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Yet that didn't stop Trump from putting heavy pressure on Grassley on Tuesday night to 'step up' and get rid of the blue slip documents senators can use to block nominees to serve as federal district judges and U.S. attorneys in their home states. Trump declared that he got Grassley reelected to the Senate 'when he was down by a lot' and demanded he get rid of the long-established Senate tradition 'with a mere flick of a pen.' The president then reposted one commenter on Truth Social who urged followers to 'light up Grassley's office' and asked, 'What is wrong with these Republicans, they must hate America too.' Trump reposted another post on Truth Social that called Grassley a 'RINO,' the acronym for Republican in name only, 'sneaky' and 'good at playing the good guy instead of being the good guy.' Grassley said Wednesday that he was 'surprised' and 'insulted' by Trump's social media posts. 'Last night, I was surprised to see President Trump on Truth Social go after me and Senate Republicans over what we call the blue slip,' Grassley said in a statement to open a Judiciary Committee hearing on nominations. 'I was offended by what the president said, and I'm disappointed it would result in personal insults,' he said. Grassley's public remarks are notable since GOP senators have rarely aired their irritations with the president's pressure campaigns in public. Trump also went after Grassley's age and tenure in the Senate, reposting an item on Truth Social calling for term limits and to 'dethrone the kings,' which noted Grassley has served in Congress for more than 50 years. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, defended the tradition of blue slips and pleaded with Trump to 'back off' his pressure campaign on Grassley. 'I do not agree with the president on that,' he said of Trump's call to get rid of blue slips. 'I understand his frustration. President Biden had the same frustration,' he added, noting Republicans used blue slips to block Biden nominees to key judicial and law enforcement positions in their home states. Kennedy argued that 'for district court judges, senators are much better able … to pick a lawyer from their community that satisfies what I call 'community standards.'' 'With respect, Mr. President, pretty please, with sugar on top, back off this, because I don't think the Senate's going to go along, and I think it's just a needless fight,' he said. Even Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), one of Trump's staunchest allies in the Senate, pushed back on Trump's effort to eliminate blue slips. 'It happens on both sides,' he said. 'We were able to block some bad judges last time with a blue slip.' Tuberville said he knows Trump 'gets frustrated with it' but asserted 'it is what it is — it's why the Senate works.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) backed up Grassley. 'I think the blue slip process is something that's been used for a long time by both sides, and neither side has violated its usage in the past,' he said. 'I don't think there's any strong interest in changing that up here.' Grassley, when he was Judiciary Committee chair in 2017, decided not to honor Democrats' blue slip objections to nominees at the appellate court level. Republicans argued that appellate courts often cover several states, so it did not make sense to give one state's senators power over the nominees. GOP senators are more open to changing the rules for the floor consideration of lower-level nominees already approved by Senate committees amid efforts by Democrats to delay those nominees by demanding time-consuming procedural votes. Frustration over those delays is building, and Republican senators discussed various rules changes at a lunch meeting Tuesday. One proposal is to eliminate the need to vote on cloture to end debate before scheduling a final vote on a nominee. Another proposal is to further condense the two hours of debate time that must elapse between a cloture vote and a final vote. A third proposal is to group nominees in packages and vote on them as a bloc. 'At some point, we may need to look at doing things different on nominees generally if Democrats continue this path of obstruction that they're on right now,' Thune said. He noted Democrats have required procedural votes on more than 100 consecutive nominees considered on the floor and haven't allowed a single civilian Trump nominee to pass by unanimous consent or voice vote, calling it a 'historic level of obstruction.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
