Inquiry launched into appointment of football regulator chairman
But the revelation that he had donated money to both Sir Keir Starmer and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy – as well as other Labour figures – drew complaints from the Conservatives and calls for the commissioner for public appointments to investigate.
In a letter to the permanent secretary at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, commissioner Sir William Shawcross said he had carried out a series of 'spot checks' and now believed a full inquiry into Mr Kogan's appointment was 'necessary'.
David Kogan, the Government's preferred candidate (House of Commons/UK Parliament)
Sir William's inquiry will look into whether the rules on public appointments were followed, and is likely to involve interviews with both Mr Kogan and Ms Nandy.
Mr Kogan was originally approached about the football regulator job by the Conservatives while they were still in office, and has advised the Premier League, EFL and other leagues on broadcast rights.
He has also donated thousands of pounds to Labour MPs and candidates in recent years, and sat on the board of Labour news website LabourList.
During his pre-appointment hearing with the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee – which later backed his appointment – he revealed he had also donated 'very small sums' to Sir Keir and Ms Nandy's leadership campaigns in 2020.
Those donations had not previously been revealed as they were below the threshold for public declaration.
A week later, Ms Nandy wrote to the committee to inform MPs that she had stepped back from making the final decision on whether to appoint Mr Kogan, delegating the choice to sport minister Stephanie Peacock.
Stuart Andrew, the Conservative shadow culture secretary, said Mr Kogan's appointment 'bears all the hallmarks of yet more Labour cronyism', adding Ms Nandy's decision to step back 'highlights just how compromised this selection has become'.
He said: 'Number 10 must now come clean about the involvement of the Downing Street appointments unit and special advisers in promoting David Kogan as the preferred candidate.
'The public has a right to know whether this was a fair and impartial process, or yet another case of political patronage disguised as due diligence.'
Mr Kogan did not comment on the launch of the inquiry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
41 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor
Speaking to the BBC in his first interview since a threatened backbench revolt forced him to strip out a major part of his welfare reform plan, he acknowledged the past few days had been 'tough'. He said: 'Labour MPs are absolutely vested in this. It matters to them to get things like this right, and we didn't get that process right. We didn't engage in the way that we should have done.' But he insisted his Government would 'come through it stronger' as he vowed to 'reflect' on what needed to be done 'to ensure we don't get into a situation like that again'. Sir Keir also gave his full support to Chancellor Rachel Reeves after she was seen crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. Ms Reeves's visibly tearful appearance in the Commons came amid speculation that her job was at risk after the welfare U-turn put an almost £5 billion hole in her spending plans. But the Prime Minister insisted her appearance had 'nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week' and was 'a personal matter'. Asked if she would remain in her post, he said: 'She will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we've been working on to change the Labour Party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the Chancellor and I've been working on together.' On Thursday morning, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said Ms Reeves would 'bounce back' as he praised her 'leadership' on the economy. He also dismissed a suggestion that Sir Keir himself could be at risk, telling Sky News: 'Keir Starmer has been consistently underestimated. 'I wonder when people will learn. They said he couldn't win the Labour leadership, but he did. They said he couldn't change the Labour Party, but he did. They said he couldn't take the Labour Party from its worst defeat since the 1930s to election victory last year, and he did. 'And now the cynics say he can't change the country, but he will.' But Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said the scenes in the Commons over the past week had left bond markets 'twitchy' about the Government and 'their ability to actually grip things like spending going forward'. Appearing on BBC Breakfast, Sir Mel appeared to distance himself from Robert Jenrick, who had earlier posted a video on social media describing Ms Reeves's career as 'dead'. But he added that Mr Jenrick was making a 'valid' point that the Government had 'lost control of the economy', laying the blame with the Chancellor and Sir Keir and warning of tax rises to come.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
MP votes for benefits reform insisting Lanarkshire constituents won't receive less money
Only four Labour MPs out of 37 in Scotland voted against the watered-down Bill despite a revolt Pamela Nash MP backed Keir Starmer plans to cut benefits for people with disabilities and insisted that constituents in North Lanarkshire won't see any reduction in the amount they receive when the system is reformed. The MP for Motherwell, Wishaw and Carluke had previously criticised the Tories when they were in power over cuts to disability support but voted in favour of her own party's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill at the Second Reading, which she believes will create a fairer benefits system. A revolt in the party led to 49 Labour MPs voting against the motion but it had threatened to be many more as the government made a number of eleventh hour adjustments to gain support for the Bill. Only four Labour MPs out of 37 in Scotland voted against the watered-down Bill following a five-hour debate in the House of Commons. Brian Leishman MP for Alloa and Grangemouth was one of the four who voted against, he had labelled the Bill "shameful". He added: 'I did not come into politics to impoverish some of the most vulnerable people in society, and I did not join the Labour Party to make life even more difficult for the working class." Eligibility for new PIP (Personal Independence Payment) claimants will change from November 2026, but this won't apply to people in Scotland, as PIP here has been replaced by the Adult Disability Payment which has been protected by the Scottish Government and is delivered by Social Security Scotland. Pamela Nash MP cited her own experiences of being a benefits claimant, saying: 'I know what it is like to live on benefits, the unrelenting stress of trying to make ends meet while trying to find a job. Living with a health condition or disability brings additional pressures. 'It is important to me that these reforms do not add to this stress but alleviate it. 'Labour MPs have worked tirelessly together to make significant improvements to the bill, including making sure that no current claimants of PIP or Universal Credit will have their benefits cut, and bringing forward and increasing the support to provide genuine help for people to get the correct skills and find suitable work. 'This is a bill that takes action to improve our broken benefit system. But I know that there will be many who are worried as there has been much coverage in the media of this bill, and much misinformation spread too. 'Let's be crystal clear - no one currently in receipt of benefits in Motherwell, Wishaw and Carluke will see any reduction in the amount they receive as a result of this bill. 'Changes to Universal Credit will only apply to new claimants from April 2026, those currently in receipt of Universal Credit will see no reduction to their income. 'Changes to PIP do not apply to people in Scotland, as we now have a different, equivalent benefit called the Adult Disability Payment (ADP).' However, the Lanarkshire MP highlighted that the Bill includes an above-inflation rise to Universal Credit and an investment of £2.2 billion over four years on health, skills and work support. She continued: 'Welfare exists to provide a safety net for all of us for the times when life does not go to plan, when we are out of work or unable to work. 'But over the last few years it has been failing to achieve this. Benefits paid to jobseekers are not enough to live on, and people who can work go on to disability benefits with fewer and fewer prospects of ever coming off them. 'The reforms to Universal Credit this Labour Government has put forward will take steps to fix this.' And did you know Lanarkshire Live had its own app? Download yours for free here.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why Starmer finally came out to give his full backing to his tearful chancellor
There are moments in politics where the situation has spun so badly out of control that somebody has to step in quickly to end the chaos. Most famously in recent history it was former 1922 committee chairman Sir Graham Brady's visit to Liz Truss in Downing Street to force her to resign after the mini-budget fallout. But last night Keir Starmer had reached such a moment. His government was in meltdown. A brutal 48 hours had seen him apparently lose control of his government's policy agenda after the welfare reform rebellion by Labour backbenchers. This had been followed by him failing to guarantee his chancellor's future in PMQs as she sat behind him in tears. The optics of the drama at PMQs fed into the picture of a government that was rapidly going into a tailspin. With a £5bn black hole in the country's finances left by the welfare retreat, fevered speculation over a reshuffle, and no real sign of a plan to sort things out. But the real problem was that the gilt markets – the same issue that ended the Truss government – had taken notice of what was happening and not happening and reacted accordingly. The black hole in the finances, the lack of a vote of confidence in the chancellor and Rachel Reeves' apparently distraught personal state were all enough for the UK's credit rating to come under threat. A spokesperson from Downing Street trying to tell journalists that the prime minister had confidence in the chancellor after the fact was simply not enough. This was doubly true when various bits of spin about it being a personal matter or a row with the Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle were offered as explanation for the tears. As the front pages began to drop with pictures of Reeves and questions over whether Sir Keir backed her on them, the prime minister had to reassert his authority and personally give his chancellor his support. Without that, his big speech on NHS reform today would have been a sidenote to a story about a government that was in a state of collapse. It was always planned for him to do interviews to mark his first year in office, but the one with BBC's podcast Political Thinking with Nick Robinson gave an early opportunity to help fix the self-inflicted damage and restore order. He has now effusively given Reeves his backing, which will not please many Labour MPs and now may make it difficult to remove her if he was so minded. However, he has at least restored some semblance of order given himself some breathing space to work out how he is going to wrestle back the political agenda from his fractious backbench MPs.
