Two private schools in Kingston and Bromley to close
'Heartbreaking'
According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), the board of trustees at Bishop Challoner confirmed on Thursday the Catholic independent school for children aged three to 18 would close on 4 July.The school, which opened in 1950, stated it had been "an incredibly difficult decision" to close but it had to be made due to the "increasingly challenging environment for schools". Amanda, whose 18-year-old son Barney is in Year 13 at Bishop Challoner, told BBC London the news was "heartbreaking" and came as a "complete shock". "I feel very much aware of this huge community of people who are being affected: members of staff, support staff, students and parents," she said.She added not all independent schools were "full of wealthy families", and this was a "small, caring school".Barney is neurodiverse and Amanda said: "We chose the school because of its small, community-feel, very calm environment. It's given Barney a social environment that feels safe."I feel very lucky that my son is going to university in September but I can't imagine how parents are feeling with their children in the middle of their GCSEs or A-levels." The school's Chair of Trustees Patricia Colling said: "This is a very difficult time for our parents, pupils and staff. "We are saddened that, despite our best efforts, the school has to close."
'Quality of education'
LDRS said ILG was offering parents of pupils at Park Hill the option to move to its sister school Westbury House School, in New Malden, from September, which is a 12-minute drive away. Park Hill will be converted into a dedicated full-time nursery, offering 51 weeks of provision for children aged between three months and four years old.ILG said closing the preparatory school, which opened in 1949, and moving its pupils to Westbury House would protect both education settings for the future.Sarah Nunn, Park Hill's head teacher, said in a message on the school's website the move would provide pupils with greater opportunities for social development, a wider friendship network and an expanded extracurricular programme – including sport, music and drama. An ILG spokesperson said: "The benefit of being in a private group is that we can protect both settings, and ensure the continuity and quality of education for our children, who will always remain our top priority."
Additional reporting by Olivia Demetriades, BBC London
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Influencer sues Guardian for defamation in Mumford & Sons review
A Right-wing influencer is suing the Guardian for defamation over its review of a new Mumford & Sons album. Andy Ngo, an American social media influencer and journalist, has filed a High Court claim against Guardian News & Media (GNM) over allegations about his political leanings in a recent article. The 200-word review was published in March in The Observer, when GNM still owned the Sunday title. The Observer was taken over shortly afterwards by news start-up Tortoise Media. The Telegraph is not reproducing the part of the text believed to be allegedly defamatory. The scathing two-star review described Mumford & Sons' latest album Rushmere as 'utterly insipid balladry', adding that the mood was 'self-pitying and self-justifying'. The article referred to the fact that the folk rock band have reverted to being a trio following the departure of guitarist and banjo player Winston Marshall in 2021. Mr Marshall, the son of Sir Paul Marshall, the co-founder of GB News, left the band in a storm of controversy after he praised Mr Ngo's book Unmasked, a critical account of the Left-wing Antifa movement. In a post to Mr Ngo on social media, Mr Marshall wrote: 'Congratulations. Finally had the time to read your important book. You're a brave man.' Following an outcry, Mr Marshall stepped back from the band saying he would 'examine my blind spots', before quitting just weeks later. In a blog post, he wrote: 'The truth is that my commenting on a book that documents the extreme far-Left and their activities is in no way an endorsement of the equally repugnant far-Right. 'The truth is that reporting on extremism at the great risk of endangering oneself is unquestionably brave.' Mr Ngo, who is represented by London-based Patron Law, is a senior editor at The Post Millennial, a Canadian news website. He is an outspoken figure who has garnered controversy for his coverage of Antifa and Muslims. Reposted by Elon Musk The influencer, who lives in the UK, wrote an opinion piece published in the Wall Street Journal in 2018 titled 'A visit to Islamic England'. He has live-streamed coverage of rallies and protests to his 1.6 million followers on X. Mr Ngo's political views and prominence on social media have brought him into contact with Elon Musk, who has reposted the influencer's videos. In 2022, several high-profile Left-wing Twitter accounts were banned after Mr Ngo and other prominent figures urged Mr Musk to take action against the 'large number of Antifa accounts' operating on the site. A Guardian spokesman said: 'This relates to a 190-word review published by the Observer in March.' The lawsuit comes as the Guardian awaits a judgment in a separate defamation claim filed by Kidulthood actor Noel Clarke. Mr Clarke is suing GNM for libel over seven articles and a podcast in which more than 20 women accused him of sexual misconduct. Mr Clarke denies the allegations. GNM is defending its stories, with editor-in-chief Katharine Viner telling the court there was a 'very high public interest' in reporting the claims.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
My pension is up £167k — and I've only put £7k in
When Jaspal Saund transferred £743,000 that he had spent years building up in workplace pensions into his own self-invested personal pension (Sipp), he was terrified. 'If you lose the money, it is on you, nobody is going to step in and help you,' said Saund, 56, who is a chartered accountant. Yet he felt it was something he had to do to turbocharge his pension, as getting a Sipp would allow him to invest more heavily in the stock market. Now, nearly 20 months and 95 trades later, Saund, who lives in South Woodford, east London, has grown his pot by £167,000, to £910,000, despite saving only £7,200. His goal is to have a pension pot of £2 million before his planned retirement at 67. 'Pension portfolio theory tells you that at my age you should really be much heavier in bonds and gilts and less in equities,' Saund said. 'But staying more heavily invested in shares has paid off and propelled me closer to my goal.' • Top of the pension pots: the best place for your Sipp Saund's decision to take control of his pension and concentrate his investments on the stock market is not the usual strategy for people who are approaching retirement. Most of the 22 million employees who are signed up to workplace pensions are part of their companies' default schemes. Many of these schemes automatically move clients into less risky assets in the years leading up to retirement. Helen Morrissey from the investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown said: 'A popular approach taken by many default funds is to adapt to what is known as lifestyling, where you are switched out of equities to lower-risk assets such as bonds, the closer you get to retirement.' Equities are considered to be more risky because they are subject to market volatility and potential losses. Bonds are effectively IOUs from the government or companies. The returns are guaranteed and in the case of UK government bonds — known as gilts — there is very little chance of default. They also provide regular interest payments. By switching to bonds, savers can ensure their pots are protected from the ups and downs of the stock market. This lifestyling process can happen up to 15 years before someone's stated retirement date. But it can mean missing out on significant returns. Someone on a starting salary of £25,000 at 22, who retired at 65 and saved 8 per cent into their pension throughout their career would have a pot worth £283,000 if it was moved into less risky assets (with 33 per cent stocks and 42 per cent bonds) 15 years before retirement, according to the consultancy Isio. If that pot stayed in the typical growth fund (with 83 per cent shares and 6 per cent bonds), it would be worth £308,000. This assumes a salary increase of 2 per cent a year and investment growth of 7 per cent a year after fees. Saving enough for retirement has become increasingly important as life expectancy and the cost of living have risen. In June the trade association Pensions UK reported that the minimum amount required for a single retired person to live a comfortable retirement was £43,900 a year after tax, assuming you don't have to pay rent or a mortgage, up from £33,600 in 2021. You would need pension savings of at least £800,000 to afford that standard of living, according to the wealth manager Quilter. Laith Khalaf from the investment platform AJ Bell said: 'For many people, there is a fundamental mismatch in terms of what the lifestyle investment strategy is trying to achieve and what is going to happen in their retirement.' Saund puts £400 into his Sipp every month. He also has a workplace pension into which £780 is paid by his employer every month and a £20,000 pension from a former employer that could not be moved into his Sipp. • The cheap and easy way to invest (without the risk) 'I've got three kids and because of the nature of what I do, and how intense it is, I probably can't keep doing this past 67,' Saund said. 'My target is to get to £2 million to be comfortable, which is achievable over the next ten years, if I don't do anything stupid.' After consolidating four of his workplace pensions into a Sipp with AJ Bell, he was given full control of the stocks and funds he invested in. His wisest move has been to heavily back US tech stocks. This included ploughing £262,000 into JP Morgan's US Select Equity fund, and £200,000 into the bank's US Technology fund. After seeing what he called a 'wobble in the US market' last July, he sold the US Select Equity fund, which invests in Apple, Microsoft and Amazon, for £332,000, while the US Technology fund was sold for £223,058. Saund is also one of many winners from investing in the US chipmaker Nvidia, which was recently valued at $4 trillion. He has a stake worth about £188,000, having bought the shares for £143,700. This included buying £75,000 worth between late February and early March, after they fell 8 per cent on news of a weaker-than-expected quarterly forecast. That £75,000 investment is now worth more than £98,000. Saund's decision to keep heavily invested in equities instead of following the lifestyling approach has paid dividends. Analysis by AJ Bell found that if he had transferred all his £743,000 pension pot to the average lifestyle bond fund (which is fully invested in long-dated bonds with the purpose of preparing for retirement) in October 2023, it would be worth about £792,000. But even Saund has decided to reduce his risk in the past year amid market volatility. Last August he used some of the proceeds from selling the JP Morgan Funds to buy £400,000 of 30-year UK Treasury bonds with an interest rate of 4.25 per cent. He bought another £100,000 of bonds in March. In total they return about £22,000 a year, providing another boost to his retirement funds. • Banks to push cash savers towards investing While the potential returns of having all of your pension in equities might be appealing, it comes with its risks. 'If you take out a full equity approach and are reliant on it for income, you could be having to sell shares when they are at market lows,' Khalaf said. And lifestyling still has a place, particularly for those who don't want to actively manage their investments, according to Sonia Kataora from the investment consultancy Barnett Waddingham. 'Lifestyling can offer a hands-off approach, which can be reassuring to individuals not confident or interested in managing their pension investments.'
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
London stock market on the cusp of a comeback, says metals boss
The London stock market is on the cusp of a major comeback, the head of a £6 billion Greek-based metals and energy company has insisted as its shares begin trading on Monday. Evangelos Mytilineos, chairman and chief executive of Metlen, said the company's listing in London was confirmation that the City was still the predominant financial centre in Europe after Brexit. He harbours hopes that it will kick-start a revival of the London Stock Exchange, which has been suffering from a dearth of initial public offerings (IPOs). 'The City has been through a very tough time,' he said. 'Frankfurt, Paris, Amsterdam, they try to take a big chunk of the City business. '[But] after quite a few years the City has remained the position of the top financial hub in Europe. The City can make a comeback and we will be very happy to make our contribution to that end' Formerly a family firm that traces its roots back to 1908, Mytilineos agreed to change the name of the Mytilineos Energy and Metals business to Metlen after investment bankers working on the London listing told him it would be too difficult to pronounce. Wall Street firms Citibank and Morgan Stanley are leading the Metlen listing. The business makes 10 per cent of its revenue in Britain. It is building four gas-fired plants across Britain, completed the Cleve Hill solar park in Kent earlier this month, and is part of the £1 billion consortium building the east coast subsea link. Under the terms of the listing, he has agreed to conform with London corporate governance standards by splitting his chairman and chief executive roles in the next 18 months. He aims for it to be included in the FTSE 100 index, eventually. Metlen moving its main listing to London from Athens is not an IPO but its arrival is regarded as a boost for the City where more companies are being taken over than new ones joined. Metlen picked London rather than Amsterdam for its main listing. It is making the move in an effort to boost its 'visibility'. Mytilineos said it would have been easier to list in Amsterdam because the regulatory requirements were not as stringent as London but said the Financial Conduct Authority had been 'tough but fair'. He did not look at New York because 'it would be extremely hard to attract attention' because of the vast number and greater valuations of companies listed there.
