logo
'Lasted 7 Minutes': Internet Goes Berserk As India & England Players Clash At Lord's

'Lasted 7 Minutes': Internet Goes Berserk As India & England Players Clash At Lord's

News18a day ago
Indian and English players clashed during Day 3's final over at Lord's. Shubman Gill and Zak Crawley exchanged words before umpires intervened to prevent escalation.
The internet was in splits as well as in debate as sparks flew between the Indian and the English players during the final over of Day 3 at Lord's, as some words were exchanged with India blaming the hosts of deliberately wasting time and ensuring that a second over isn't bowled in their second innings.
In the last five minutes on Day 3, there was enough drama with India skipper Shubman Gill and Zak Crawley engaged in a confrontation, which could have turned uglier after the former, in some choicest language, requested Crawley to show some guts while facing ace pacer Jasprit Bumrah.
'I've been moaning about slow play, so it feels strange to me that my favourite over of the series, the final one of the day, lasted 7 minutes 😂," former England pacer Stuart Broad tweeted in the wee hours of Sunday, July 13.
I've been moaning about slow play so feels strange to me that my favourite over of the series, the final one of the day, lasted 7 minutes 😂— Stuart Broad (@StuartBroad8) July 12, 2025
'The last 5 minutes sum up everything about this series. Phenomenal. Loved the drama," Dinesh Karthik tweeted.
Memes flooded the internet, with several fans saying that Gill reminded them of ace batter Virat Kohli's aggression against opposition teams. Let us take a look at some of the memes:
Shubman Gill's father to Virat Kohli https://t.co/GdjGbuR6qS pic.twitter.com/SPphdD6G9v — Sagar (@sagarcasm) July 12, 2025
Zak Crawley must be thankful that London doesn't come under the jurisdiction of DSP Siraj pic.twitter.com/BtjzolaJzJ — Dinda Academy (@academy_dinda) July 12, 2025
Re bhaiyya chutte Lagaan 🔥 pic.twitter.com/OK5JRFPK3q — Rajasthan Royals (@rajasthanroyals) July 12, 2025
At stumps, England were 2/0, leading by just two runs after the first innings scores of both teams were tied.
view comments
First Published:
July 13, 2025, 08:05 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mohammed Siraj fined 15 per cent of his match fee for Ben Duckett sendoff
Mohammed Siraj fined 15 per cent of his match fee for Ben Duckett sendoff

Indian Express

time27 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Mohammed Siraj fined 15 per cent of his match fee for Ben Duckett sendoff

India's Mohammed Siraj has been fined 15 per cent of his match fee for his sendoff to Ben Duckett after dismissing the England batter in the third Test at Lord's. Siraj's aggressive celebrations after picking up Duckett's wicket included their shoulders brushing against each other as the England batter walked back to the hut. Siraj also let out a couple of roars and stared at the batter in anger. The incident happened in the second innings of England, when Siraj dismissed Duckett for 12 to give India its first wicket. Just two balls earlier, the batter had hit Siraj for a boundary. But the pacer had hit back after managing to get Duckett to hit the ball into the palms of Jasprit Bumrah. The Indian pacer has also been docked a demerit point – his second in a 24-month period. This means that Siraj is walking a tightrope going forward: four or more demerit points within a 24-month period are converted into suspension points and a player is banned. An ICC statement on the incident noted that the Indian pacer 'was guilty of breaching Article 2.5 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which relates to using language, actions or gestures which disparage or which could provoke an aggressive reaction from a batter upon his/her dismissal during an International Match.' The ICC statement added: 'After the dismissal, Siraj celebrated close to the batter in his follow-through and made contact as Duckett began his walk back to the Lord's long room.' The game has seen tempers rise as both sides are trying to win the Lord's Test and take a 2-1 lead in the five-match series. The third Test — and the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy — is finely poised with India needing 135 runs more to secure their second victory in the series. England, meanwhile, need six wickets to go 2-1 up. 'Find this ridiculous. Siraj (fined) 15% for aggressive celebration. Gill swears live on tv & carries on and what? It's either both or neither. Players aren't and shouldn't be robots but consistency is key,' wrote former England cricketer Stuart Broad on X.

Shubman Gill's Lord's outburst draws comparisons to Virat Kohli's aggressive captaincy style
Shubman Gill's Lord's outburst draws comparisons to Virat Kohli's aggressive captaincy style

Pink Villa

time29 minutes ago

  • Pink Villa

Shubman Gill's Lord's outburst draws comparisons to Virat Kohli's aggressive captaincy style

For years, Shubman Gill has been hailed as the golden boy of Indian cricket: all grace, timing, and effortless charm. But on July 13 at Lord's, the usually composed India captain tore off that genteel mask to confront England's Zak Crawley for what he believed was deliberate time-wasting. The last over of Day 3, already a pressure cooker, exploded into verbal fireworks as Gill stormed toward Crawley, sarcastically clapping and throwing verbal jabs. The fiery incident didn't just rattle the English; it also reignited debates over whether Gill is morphing into the next Virat Kohli, both in style and spirit. The incident: Crawley's delay sparks verbal duel With six minutes left on the clock, India had time to bowl two overs. But Crawley, nursing what looked like a suspiciously sudden hand injury, stalled. Sensing a tactical delay, Gill lost patience. As reported by NDTV Sports, the Indian skipper charged Crawley and lashed out. Ben Duckett stepped in, only to receive his share of the captain's rage. The situation prompted former England batter Jonathan Trott to criticize Gill's outburst, calling it 'reminiscent of a previous captain,' a thinly veiled reference to Virat Kohli. Trott took issue with what he saw as 'acting' from Gill, adding that confrontational behavior diminishes the spirit of the game. Yet to many fans, this was more than drama—it was Gill asserting leadership, refusing to be manipulated by tactics. Shubman Gill: Not just a poster boy The Lord's confrontation was not a one-off. Gill has a history of verbal jousts, from jabbing Jimmy Anderson last year to sledging alongside his teammates in recent Tests. His rise through North India's ultra-competitive cricket circuit ensured he never shied away from confrontation—he simply hadn't needed to show it until now. KL Rahul confirmed the team had expected two overs to be bowled and was frustrated by England's theatrics. Jos Buttler, Gill's IPL teammate, had already predicted that the young captain would blend Kohli's intensity with Rohit Sharma's calm. On Saturday, it was Kohli's imprint that was unmistakable. A new India under Gill and Gambhir? The episode also offered insight into India's evolving team culture. Coach Gautam Gambhir, no stranger to on-field aggression, has seemingly given his players and captain the license to fight back. Verbal jabs are no longer incidental; they are part of the playbook. Whether it's Siraj mocking 'Bazball' or Gill confronting Crawley, this is a team that talks—and won't be talked down to. As the Test series hangs in the balance, one thing is clear: the nice-guy image of Shubman Gill has changed. For better or worse, there's now a visible edge to the captain, one that carries echoes of Kohli's relentless fire.

Ram Gopal Varma on the ongoing Sandeep Vanga-Deepika Padukone fiasco over working hours: 'This is all exaggerated and...'
Ram Gopal Varma on the ongoing Sandeep Vanga-Deepika Padukone fiasco over working hours: 'This is all exaggerated and...'

First Post

time30 minutes ago

  • First Post

Ram Gopal Varma on the ongoing Sandeep Vanga-Deepika Padukone fiasco over working hours: 'This is all exaggerated and...'

The filmmaker added, 'That's their call. But how can one human being force another human being to do something?' read more After exiting from Sandeep Reddy Vanga-Prabhas' biggie Spirit, the latest reports suggest that the actress has taken the same step for Kalki 2898 AD 2. While the fiasco between Deepika and Vanga has been garnering headlines for quite some time, a new report has emerged discussing the actress's demands for Spirit. 'The actor had reportedly demanded ₹25 crores for approximately 35 days of shoot, along with a 10% profit share, extensive entourage expenses, and even expressed unwillingness to deliver dialogues in Telugu—something the director felt strongly about. To top it off, confidential plot details from Spirit were allegedly leaked, which raised serious concerns among the producers," the source told News18. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Now, after half of the industry, Ram Gopal Varma also had a say- 'The whole thing (between Deepika and Sandeep) was a very exaggerated thing in my opinion. Because I can say, I want to work for 23 hours, and the actor can say I want to work only for one hour.' The filmmaker added, 'That's their call. But how can one human being force another human being to do something? And they can agree to work or not work with each other… But that thing was just kind of blown up in the media.' RGV also said, 'The director might need a particular light. He might want some combination of another actor, or maybe the location is not available. There are too many factors which can factor in.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store