Rachel Reeves to announce review of workplace pensions contributions — here's what it could mean
The chancellor is due to appoint a commission looking at the adequacy of the pensions system, including the amount of savings among the self-employed, the state pension and auto-enrolment rates.
It was announced last July after Labour won the general election, but put on hold after the chancellor's brutal tax-hiking Budget amid anger at the pressure piled on businesses.
But two executives familiar with the plans told the Financial Times she plans to appoint the commission in the 15 July speech, with the chancellor believing the UK pensions industry has long been ripe for reform.
The chancellor's overhaul is reportedly planning to shake-up auto-enrolment rules, which mandate that staff pay at least 8 per cent of their earnings above £6,240 into the pot each year, with at least 3 per cent coming from their employer.
Experts, including the influential Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), have warned that the current rate of contribution will leave many pensioners without enough money in retirement.
Almost four in 10 pensioners who have worked in the private sector face a cliff-edge in retirement with the current contribution level, the think tank warned.
It called last week for 'decisive action' to create a pension system 'fit for the next generation'.
It called for an end to the system of employer pension contributions only having to be made if the employee also contributes, recommending that all employees should receive at least 3 per cent of their total pay as contributions.
And the IFS called for targeted support for those hardest hit by increases in the state pension age, as well as solutions to help people manage their pension wealth through retirement.
Former work and pensions secretary David Gauke said the IFS report was timed perfectly to coincide with the imminent conclusion of the chancellor's pensions review.
'The government should provide a secure pension income, further increases in the state pension age should be accompanied by more support for those hardest hit, and both employees and employers should gradually contribute more to help achieve greater financial security in retirement,' the ex-Tory minister, who has advised the Labour government, said.
And IFS director Paul Johnson said: 'There is a risk that policymakers have become complacent when it comes to pensions. Without decisive action, too many of today's working-age population face lower living standards and greater financial insecurity through their retirement.'
Mr Johnson said the think tank's recommendations would 'shore up the state pension, help workers save more – but only in periods when they are better placed to do so – and help individuals to make the most of their pension pots through retirement'.
The government's review will also look at the level of the state pension, currently £230.25 per week, or £11,973 per year for those who have contributed through national insurance for 35 years.
Labour has repeatedly committed to the triple lock, which increases the state pension amount by the highest of inflation, average earnings growth or 2.5 per cent.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was asked to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How much is immigration going to transform YOUR area in the next two decades? Search tool reveals the astonishing population projections of every council
Nearly 30 councils are set to welcome at least 200,000 immigrants each over the next two decades, projections reveal. That is, for context, enough people to fill Norwich or Reading. Government data laying bare how mass migration is going to transform Britain shows that in Birmingham alone, another 543,000 foreign nationals are expected to call the city home by 2047. This figure is the equivalent to 47 per cent of the local authority's current population, thought to be around 1.15million. But looking at the immigration statistics this way excludes hundreds of thousands of residents who will emigrate between now and then. Doing so also fails to factor into account internal migration, births and deaths. This makes it impossible to predict exactly how many residents will be immigrants in all of England's 330-plus local authorities. The population projections, published by the Office for National Statistics this week, gave a stark glimpse of the future. Nationwide, England's population is set to increase from 57m to 64m by 2047. But the overall numbers laid bare sharp differences in fortunes between local areas. According to the ONS projections, South Derbyshire will grow by 38 per cent over the time period to accommodate 153,000 people. No other council, with the exception of the City of London, is expected to undergo a bigger expansion in terms of percentage growth. In contrast, Gosport's population is projected to fall by 4 per cent to 79,000, mainly because of deaths outstripping births. This is the largest decline in the country. In terms of raw figures, Birmingham is set to see the greatest number of immigrants (542,957), followed by Manchester (462,486) and Newham (456,342) between 2022 and 2047. But when compared against current populations, Westminster tops the table – when excluding City of London. In that London borough, almost 50,000 immigrants are set to arrive in the next two decades. By comparison, only 11,500 people live there at present. All but seven authorities will see a net increase in international migration – defined as more people from overseas arriving than leaving. The councils which buck the trend are Fylde, South Hams, Isles of Scilly, Ribble Valley, North Kesteven, Amber Valley and Rutland. One of the country's most esteemed voices on immigration believes the public has had enough over the past few years. Professor David Coleman, emeritus professor of demography at the University of Oxford and co-founder of pressure group of Migration Watch, said: 'Some focused immigration, preferably without dependents is desirable. 'But it is well known that immigration cannot "solve" population ageing, only moderate it. Otherwise more and more migrants are needed, leading to astronomical population growth. 'But it is absurd to speak of more immigration after the huge recent inflows. Surely the public will not endure it? 'We have nothing to show by way of prosperity from the very large number of immigrants in recent years.' Alp Mehmet, of Migration Watch UK, said: 'Immigration is now the sole driver of unprecedented of population growth. 'The pace of demographic change is ever more rapid while the reshaping of our society as deaths exceed births will soon be irreversible. 'The solution is not more immigration, which has for decades been a net cost to the exchequer. All that will do is add to our future problems. Much better to create conditions that encourage families to grow.' As well as high levels of immigration, England's changing demographics are set to be supercharged by falling birthrates in the UK. Deaths are set to outnumber births in two-thirds of all authorities, the ONS estimates also show. Demographers claim the free falling figures mean we may need to become reliant on immigration to prop up our economy and avoid the threat of 'underpopulation'. Otherwise, the nation could be left with too few younger people to work, pay tax and look after the elderly. Keir Starmer unveiled a crackdown on immigration last month, warning that failure to control the system risked turning Britain into an 'island of strangers'. Downing Street was forced to deny angry comparisons from MPs that it was an echo of Enoch Powell's infamous 'Rivers of Blood' speech. Scrambling to blunt the threat of Reform, Sir Keir vowed to give Brits what they had 'asked for time and time again' as he announced a package to 'take back control of our borders'. Under Number 10's long-awaited blueprint to curb immigration, skills thresholds will be hiked and rules on fluency in English toughened. Migrants will also be required to wait 10 years for citizenship rather than the current five and face deportation for even lower-level crimes. Policymakers estimate the government's package will bring down annual inflows by around 100,000. Methodology The projections were produced by the ONS for the sake of informing policy and planning, using past trends to inform how populations might change in the future. But it comes with caveats and warnings, including a section which explains that the demographic behaviour used to develop assumptions for projections is 'inherently uncertain'. It, therefore, warns that the projections become increasingly unreliable the further they are carried forward, particularly for smaller geographical areas and detailed age and sex breakdowns. At the local level, population change is influenced by economic development and housing policies, factors not included in these projections. It also warns that there is already a margin of error in the underlying input data used in the projections, for example, estimates of the current population and past migration flows. In addition, the ONS states that its assumptions about the future cannot be certain, as patterns of births, deaths, and migration are always liable to change and can be influenced by many factors. In a blog accompanying the release, head of population and household projections James Robards stressed that the projections 'don't take into account potential future policy changes'. He also highlighted that 'drivers behind the projected population increase vary significantly by area'.
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nigel Farage 'in touching distance' of being PM as new mega-poll puts Reform UK on course for 290 seats in the Commons... as Keir Starmer's ratings slump to an all-time low
Nigel Farage is on course to become PM with his Reform UK party within 'touching distance' of forming a majority government, a new mega-poll has suggested. The More In Common survey found, if a general election was held today, Reform would become the largest party in the House of Commons with 290 seats. Although this is below the number of MPs needed for an outright majority, meaning a hung parliament, it was more than twice as many as any other party. And the pollster said Reform is now 'close to the level where they could command an outright majority'. More In Common's new MRP (Multilevel Regression and Post-stratification) model, based on polling of more than 10,000 Britons, put Labour on 126 seats. This is a loss of 285 seats from Sir Keir Starmer 's general election landslide just a year ago, and leaves them with fewer than half as many seats as Reform. The research put the Tories on 81 seats, down 40 seats from last year, with the Liberal Democrats on 73 seats (up one seat) and the SNP on 42 seats (up 33 seats). Meanwhile, as Sir Keir marks one year in Downing Street this weekend, the poll found the Prime Minister's personal approval rating had slumped to an all-time low of -43. More In Common's projection showed a majority of Cabinet ministers would lose their seats in the face of a Reform surge. This includes Deputy PM Angela Rayner, Chancellor Rachel Reeves, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, and Health Secretary Wes Streeting. Labour's main losses were found to be to Reform, with 223 seats directly flipping from Sir Keir's party to Mr Farage's outfit. This includes many long-standing Labour constituencies in the North of England and in Wales. Reform was also shown to be growing support in Conservative areas, with the MRP projecting they would win 59 seats that the Tories held in 2024. The main reason that voters gave for turning away from Labour - regardless of who they would vote for instead - is broken promises and U-turns on previous pledges. More than a third (36 per cent) selected this as a reason, while also high on the list was failing to deliver on the cost of living (31 per cent), and Labour's changes to the wiinter fuel payments (27 per cent). Luke Tryl, UK director of More in Common, said: 'It is an unhappy birthday for the Prime Minister. 'His personal approval has hit an all-time low, while Britons blame him rather than his Chancellor for the welfare mess and think he has lost control of his party. 'Meanwhile our new MRP shows Reform UK as the big winners from the Government's failures. 'Although we are a long way from an election and much will change between, Nigel Farage's party are demonstrating that they are now close to the level where they could command an outright majority. 'Britain's political landscape has transformed entirely from just a year ago.'
BBC News
44 minutes ago
- BBC News
Education secretary and shadow chancellor to face questions from Laura Kuenssberg
Update: Date: 08:28 BST Title: Education secretary and shadow chancellor prepare to take the hot seat Content: As the Labour government marks a year in government, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson will be quizzed on this week's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg. Also in the hot seat this morning: Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride and the Metropolitan Police's most senior officer, Commissioner Mark Rowley. On this week's panel, Tortoise Media Editor James Harding, TV Presenter Susanna Reid and General Secretary of the National Education Union Daniel Kebede. We won't be posting regular updates during the show, but you can follow along live right here from 09:00 BST. Just click watch live at the top of this page.
