
Proper Adoption Of AI Requires A Fundamental Change In Culture
For months now, there has been almost constant coverage of AI and the potentially transformative role it could play in fields as wide-ranging as professional services and healthcare. But in recent weeks that attention seems to have intensified, as even the political classes wake up to the possible impact. On consecutive days last week, for example, the Financial Times carried opinion articles suggesting that, first, politicians must overcome their insecurity over technology matters and make a significant contribution to the debate over future developments, and, second, that they needed to be aware of the ramifications if anything like the predicted numbers of white-collar job losses come to fruition.
Now, it is, of course, possible that this is all over-dramatic and that the AI revolution will, like the industrial revolution before it, create all kinds of jobs that we are now only just beginning to imagine. It could even be that the power of AI is being overstated. The cultural commentator Ted Gioia, for one, seems to think so. In a just-published column, he suggests that 'growing AI resistance is forcing companies to reconsider their bot mania.' Moreover, he cites a Gartner report that predicts that 40% of AI agent programs will be cancelled before 2027.
Wishful thinking (Gioia is a longstanding critic of what he sees as AI's detrimental effect on culture) or not, it seems that the adoption of the technology could be a less than smooth process. Earlier this year, a study by the networking and security company Cisco found 'a paradox among CEOs.' While 4 in 5 recognized AI's potential benefits and almost all planned to integrate AI into their operations, many feared gaps in their knowledge would hinder decisions in the boardroom (74%) and stifle growth (58%) – risking missed opportunities and falling behind competitors. Another study, by the professional services firm EY, suggested that companies were racing ahead to implement AI while not putting in place sufficient safeguards against the risks involved.
What the survey identifies as a gap between senior executives' concerns about adherence to responsible AI principles and those of consumers in general is potentially serious because it will only feed into the sorts of worries outlined by the opinion formers in the FT and elsewhere. Much of this debate centres on whether AI is seen as very much a cost-saving exercise through replacing people with machines or whether — as many proponents increasingly emphasize — it is a complement that enables humans to do better work and so become more productive. With rising levels of unemployment among young graduates causing increasing alarm, there are fears that the former scenario is in the ascendancy.
Experts in the field, such as Erica Orange of the futurist consulting firm The Future Hunters and Pascal Bornet, a member of the Forbes Technology Council, are attempting to redress the balance with books like AI and the New Human Frontier and Irreplaceable. But, as David De Cremer, author of The AI-Savvy Leader, points out, many AI projects continue to be what he calls 'tech-driving-tech transformations' with people valuing AI's computational prowess over human understanding.
It is possible that these caveats are contributing to some over-valuations of businesses centered on AI and that we may be in the midst of something like the dotcom bubble of earlier this century. But Steve Garnett, a former senior executive with Oracle, Siebel Systems and Salesforce who is now an active investor in technology businesses, believes that, rather than being overhyped, the AI revolution is 'if anything underhyped.'
Indeed, he is so convinced that this is something different that he has stopped investing in traditional software businesses and is instead focusing on AI. While acknowledging that there is 'some frothiness in there' and that companies just saying they are adopting AI does not really make them AI-focused, he insists that what came to wider prominence with the launch of ChatGPT by OpenAI in November 2022 represents a significant departure from what has come before. 'We have had four decades of incremental technology,' he said in an interview earlier this month, pointing to customer relationship management, enterprise resource planning and various human resources applications. While introducing fundamental changes to how organizations operated, he argued that they were not sufficiently wide in scope for the board and senior executives other than those closely involved in IT to become involved.
On the other hand, the technology seemingly becoming more sophisticated by the week was 'a digital labour revolution,' he said. As such, the board and the senior executive team could not afford not to be involved. As the person responsible for motivating the human workforce, the HR director would obviously need to have a view on how AI agents would be integrated, while the chief executive and the chief financial officer would be concerned with costs and assessing the risks that that EY report indicated were receiving insufficient attention at present. At the very least, both the executive team and the board need training in how this technology works and what it has the potential to do. But — mindful of what has happened in the past to companies that failed to respond to change quickly enough — Garnett is urging them to see the need to redesign their processes and indeed in some cases their products and services if they are not to be left behind.
With so many factors — including cyber-security concerns, use of data and how to prevent AI agents going rogue — to be considered, it looks like nothing short of a fundamental cultural change will be required.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta names ChatGPT co-creator as chief scientist of Superintelligence Lab
By Echo Wang NEW YORK (Reuters) -Meta Platforms has appointed Shengjia Zhao, co-creator of ChatGPT, as chief scientist of its Superintelligence Lab, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on Friday, as the company accelerates its push into advanced AI. "In this role, Shengjia will set the research agenda and scientific direction for our new lab working directly with me and Alex," Zuckerberg wrote in a Threads post, referring to Meta's Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang, who Zuckerberg hired from startup Scale AI when Meta took a big stake in it. Zhao, a former research scientist at OpenAI, co-created ChatGPT, GPT-4 and several of OpenAI's mini models, including 4.1 and o3. He is among several researchers who have moved from OpenAI to Meta in recent weeks, part of a broader talent arms race as Zuckerberg aggressively hires from rivals to close the gap in advanced AI. Meta has been offering some of Silicon Valley's most lucrative pay packages and striking startup deals to attract top researchers, a strategy that follows the underwhelming performance of its Llama 4 model. Meta launched the Superintelligence Lab recently to consolidate work on its Llama models and long‑term artificial general intelligence ambitions. Zhao is a co-founder of the lab, according to the Threads post, which operates separately from FAIR, Meta's established AI research division led by deep learning pioneer Yann LeCun. Zuckerberg has said Meta aims to build 'full general intelligence' and release its work as open source — a strategy that has drawn both praise and concern within the AI community.


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump official says administration will change visa, citizenship tests
The new head of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in an interview with The New York Times Thursday that the Trump administration would make changes to the visa system for skilled workers and look to make the test for U.S. citizenship more difficult. 'The test as it's laid out right now, it's not very difficult,' said Joseph Edlow, who assumed the role in mid-July. 'It's very easy to kind of memorize the answers. I don't think we're really comporting with the spirit of the law.' The first Trump administration instituted a version of the test with an expanded pool of questions that was later rolled back under former President Biden. Edlow told the Times that the government planned to return to a version of the test from the first term. Edlow also told the Times that the administration would seek to modify the H1-B visa program for skilled workers by prioritizing people who will earn higher wages. 'I really do think that the way H-1B needs to be used, and this is one of my favorite phrases, is to, along with a lot of other parts of immigration, supplement, not supplant, U.S. economy and U.S. businesses and U.S. workers,' Edlow said. The program was a flashpoint among Trump's allies in December, before the president took office. Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy faced backlash from the MAGA base after they defended the use of the program to hire highly skilled engineers. Alongside an aggressive push to deport immigrants, Trump also took aim at several avenues for legal immigration at the beginning of his term. A phone app run by Customs and Border used during the Biden administration to register asylum claims now allows immigrants to register their departures from the United States if they choose to self-deport.


CBS News
6 minutes ago
- CBS News
McCormick, Fetterman and HUD Secretary Turner tour Edgar Thompson works plant
U.S. Sens. Dave McCormick and John Fetterman joined Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner on a tour of the Edgar Thompson works plant in Braddock on Friday. Fetterman, a Democrat, and McCormick, a Republican, emerged from a tour of the 150-year-old plant touting its recent sale to Japan-based Nippon Steel. "This Nippon-U.S. Steel partnership is great for our country, it's great for Pennsylvania," McCorcmick said. "This way of life now has been effectively guaranteed now for decades to come," Fetterman said. The long-awaited partnership between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel was finalized on June 18, with Nippon Steel promising to invest $14 billion into U.S. operations, with $2.4 billion set aside for operations in the Mon Valley. The partnership is expected to create more than 100,000 jobs throughout the U.S., including in the Mon Valley. "You know when you create jobs, there's a housing need," Turner said. Braddock is replete with rundown and blighted buildings and homes. Turner said the sale will go a long way in solving that issue. Turner and McCormick specifically say one thing stands in the way. "When you have burdensome regulations, it cripples development, it cripples building," Turner said. "It's all about supply, it's all about reducing regulations," McCormick said. "And that's going to be a big boost in supply. When there's a big boost in supply, people are going to be able to afford it." Nippon says it will not cut production and honor present union contracts for the next 10 years. In May, however, United Steel Workers International President David McCall released a statement on Nippon's promises, saying: "Issuing press releases and making political speeches is easy. Binding commitments are hard. The devil is always in the details. "Our members know from decades of negotiating contracts: Trust nothing until you see it in writing."