
Proper Adoption Of AI Requires A Fundamental Change In Culture
For months now, there has been almost constant coverage of AI and the potentially transformative role it could play in fields as wide-ranging as professional services and healthcare. But in recent weeks that attention seems to have intensified, as even the political classes wake up to the possible impact. On consecutive days last week, for example, the Financial Times carried opinion articles suggesting that, first, politicians must overcome their insecurity over technology matters and make a significant contribution to the debate over future developments, and, second, that they needed to be aware of the ramifications if anything like the predicted numbers of white-collar job losses come to fruition.
Now, it is, of course, possible that this is all over-dramatic and that the AI revolution will, like the industrial revolution before it, create all kinds of jobs that we are now only just beginning to imagine. It could even be that the power of AI is being overstated. The cultural commentator Ted Gioia, for one, seems to think so. In a just-published column, he suggests that 'growing AI resistance is forcing companies to reconsider their bot mania.' Moreover, he cites a Gartner report that predicts that 40% of AI agent programs will be cancelled before 2027.
Wishful thinking (Gioia is a longstanding critic of what he sees as AI's detrimental effect on culture) or not, it seems that the adoption of the technology could be a less than smooth process. Earlier this year, a study by the networking and security company Cisco found 'a paradox among CEOs.' While 4 in 5 recognized AI's potential benefits and almost all planned to integrate AI into their operations, many feared gaps in their knowledge would hinder decisions in the boardroom (74%) and stifle growth (58%) – risking missed opportunities and falling behind competitors. Another study, by the professional services firm EY, suggested that companies were racing ahead to implement AI while not putting in place sufficient safeguards against the risks involved.
What the survey identifies as a gap between senior executives' concerns about adherence to responsible AI principles and those of consumers in general is potentially serious because it will only feed into the sorts of worries outlined by the opinion formers in the FT and elsewhere. Much of this debate centres on whether AI is seen as very much a cost-saving exercise through replacing people with machines or whether — as many proponents increasingly emphasize — it is a complement that enables humans to do better work and so become more productive. With rising levels of unemployment among young graduates causing increasing alarm, there are fears that the former scenario is in the ascendancy.
Experts in the field, such as Erica Orange of the futurist consulting firm The Future Hunters and Pascal Bornet, a member of the Forbes Technology Council, are attempting to redress the balance with books like AI and the New Human Frontier and Irreplaceable. But, as David De Cremer, author of The AI-Savvy Leader, points out, many AI projects continue to be what he calls 'tech-driving-tech transformations' with people valuing AI's computational prowess over human understanding.
It is possible that these caveats are contributing to some over-valuations of businesses centered on AI and that we may be in the midst of something like the dotcom bubble of earlier this century. But Steve Garnett, a former senior executive with Oracle, Siebel Systems and Salesforce who is now an active investor in technology businesses, believes that, rather than being overhyped, the AI revolution is 'if anything underhyped.'
Indeed, he is so convinced that this is something different that he has stopped investing in traditional software businesses and is instead focusing on AI. While acknowledging that there is 'some frothiness in there' and that companies just saying they are adopting AI does not really make them AI-focused, he insists that what came to wider prominence with the launch of ChatGPT by OpenAI in November 2022 represents a significant departure from what has come before. 'We have had four decades of incremental technology,' he said in an interview earlier this month, pointing to customer relationship management, enterprise resource planning and various human resources applications. While introducing fundamental changes to how organizations operated, he argued that they were not sufficiently wide in scope for the board and senior executives other than those closely involved in IT to become involved.
On the other hand, the technology seemingly becoming more sophisticated by the week was 'a digital labour revolution,' he said. As such, the board and the senior executive team could not afford not to be involved. As the person responsible for motivating the human workforce, the HR director would obviously need to have a view on how AI agents would be integrated, while the chief executive and the chief financial officer would be concerned with costs and assessing the risks that that EY report indicated were receiving insufficient attention at present. At the very least, both the executive team and the board need training in how this technology works and what it has the potential to do. But — mindful of what has happened in the past to companies that failed to respond to change quickly enough — Garnett is urging them to see the need to redesign their processes and indeed in some cases their products and services if they are not to be left behind.
With so many factors — including cyber-security concerns, use of data and how to prevent AI agents going rogue — to be considered, it looks like nothing short of a fundamental cultural change will be required.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures hit pause after Trump downplays Powell tensions
US stock futures steadied near all-time highs on Friday as investors assessed a packed week of major earnings, trade deals, and President Trump's unusual visit to the Federal Reserve. Dow Jones Industrial Average futures (YM=F) ticked up 0.1%, while S&P 500 futures (ES=F) traded flat on the heels of notching its fourth record close in a row thanks to hopes for AI growth. Contracts on the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) were also little changed. Markets are hitting pause on the recent risk-on rally that has seen the S&P 500 (^GSPC) and Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) stack up records, setting the major gauges on track for weekly gains of around 1%. Spirits got a boost from a US-Japan trade pact that boosted optimism for more deals, while blue-chip and Big Tech results underpinned a solid start to earnings season. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Trump visited the Fed on Thursday afternoon to take a tour of its $2.5 billion renovation project, led by chair Jerome Powell. The president has spent weeks criticizing the project as too expensive, sparking speculation he might use it as a pretext to try to fire Powell for alleged mismanagement. During the tour, however, Trump indicated he wasn't considering firing the Fed chair. "To do that is a big move, and I just don't think it's necessary," he said. The president also downplayed his disagreements with Powell over interest rates, saying he believes the chair will "do the right thing." "I'd love him to lower interest rates," the president reiterated. Intel reported its earnings after the bell Thursday, beating Wall Street expectations on revenue. The company's stock turned negative, however, as CEO Lip-Bu Tan discussed layoffs and the cancelation of some factory plans. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs This week, Wall Street has largely shrugged off trade tensions as Big Tech earnings roll in. Next week brings more market-moving results from members of the "Magnificent Seven," including Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Meta (META), and Amazon (AMZN). Intel stock slides amid plans to cut 15% of workforce, cancel factories Intel (INTC) shares slid almost 6% in premarket after the struggling chipmaker said it will cut its workforce and drop plans for factories in Europe as it pursues a comeback. While the company posted a second quarter revenue beat late Thursday, its earnings fell short. Its profit forecast for the current quarter was also more downbeat than hoped: It expects to break even, rather than deliver the $0.04 earnings per share estimated. Yahoo Finance's Daniel Howley reports: Read more here. Oil prices climbed overnight Thursday, driven by renewed optimism over global trade negotiations, which bolstered confidence in economic growth and energy demand. The wave of positivity managing to overshadow concerns about a possible increase in Venezuelan oil supply. Reuters reports: Read more here. Intel stock slides amid plans to cut 15% of workforce, cancel factories Intel (INTC) shares slid almost 6% in premarket after the struggling chipmaker said it will cut its workforce and drop plans for factories in Europe as it pursues a comeback. While the company posted a second quarter revenue beat late Thursday, its earnings fell short. Its profit forecast for the current quarter was also more downbeat than hoped: It expects to break even, rather than deliver the $0.04 earnings per share estimated. Yahoo Finance's Daniel Howley reports: Read more here. Intel (INTC) shares slid almost 6% in premarket after the struggling chipmaker said it will cut its workforce and drop plans for factories in Europe as it pursues a comeback. While the company posted a second quarter revenue beat late Thursday, its earnings fell short. Its profit forecast for the current quarter was also more downbeat than hoped: It expects to break even, rather than deliver the $0.04 earnings per share estimated. Yahoo Finance's Daniel Howley reports: Read more here. Oil prices climbed overnight Thursday, driven by renewed optimism over global trade negotiations, which bolstered confidence in economic growth and energy demand. The wave of positivity managing to overshadow concerns about a possible increase in Venezuelan oil supply. Reuters reports: Read more here. Oil prices climbed overnight Thursday, driven by renewed optimism over global trade negotiations, which bolstered confidence in economic growth and energy demand. The wave of positivity managing to overshadow concerns about a possible increase in Venezuelan oil supply. Reuters reports: Read more here. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google Search is readying the next generation for AI: Morning Brief
In case there was any thought tech giants would ease up on AI spending sprees, Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL) threw another $10 billion into the mix just to be sure. The company's stellar quarter — flashing strength in advertising and its cloud businesses — appeared to more than justify the amped up investment, which is now set to reach $85 billion this year. But the Google parent also succeeded in advancing another urgent mission: convincing investors it can transition its search empire into an AI-infused one. AI Overviews, Google's search product that summarizes key information on a topic or question, has grown from 1.5 billion monthly users to more than 2 billion, underscoring its strong adoption. Google executives have framed its enhanced search features as an evolution of the company's core business. Along with AI Mode — an expansion of Overviews — the company says the tools are driving people to search even more. Double-digit revenue growth in search suggests AI is expanding the market. "We like the integration of AI features (AI Overviews and AI Mode) within Google Search and view these additions as important in maintaining Google Search's relevance, especially with younger users, while opening up new generative AI monetization vectors for the firm," said Malik Ahmed Khan, equity analyst at Morningstar, in a note on Thursday. The knock on Google's AI approach is that in trying to fend off a new wave of AI-powered answer engines, like those from Perplexity and OpenAI, its reinvention will cannibalize search revenues. But Google's advertising business has proven resilient, even as AI adoption has grown. "Another stable quarter for Search results increases our confidence in the AI transition and should ease concerns on a potential revenue reset," said Bank of America analysts Justin Post and Nitin Bansal in a note Thursday. It also helps that Google's cloud business is a force of its own. Executives said the cloud unit now touts an annual revenue run-rate of more than $50 billion, which means questions over AI monetization don't have to be answered right away. Besides, Google's AI-powered rivals aiming to disrupt the web browser also have to become advertising powerhouses to take on the search giant's dominant position. Of course, Google's race to integrate AI into the search experience has broader implications for online publishers and the way people interact with the web. Google users who are shown an AI summary are less likely to click on links to other websites than users who do not see one, according to a recent Pew Research Center report. Google users who encountered an AI summary also rarely clicked on a link in the summary itself, the study found. The findings, which were first published in May and reposted this week with additional analysis, add weight to concerns that AI-powered answer engines will steer people's attention away from the businesses, subject experts, writers, and artists that rely on Search to send people their way. And on one level, that's Google's problem too. Tearing down a successful ad model to build out an ambitious AI-centered regime could ultimately diminish the broader internet and Google's financial standing. But the company's leaders have expressed confidence they can usher in a new age of search. Whether the ecosystem Google helped create will be sacrificed in the process isn't yet answerable in a tidy box. Early returns suggest perhaps not. Hamza Shaban is a reporter for Yahoo Finance covering markets and the economy. Follow Hamza on X @hshaban.


Fast Company
6 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Turnout for July 26 Families First protests against Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' and Medicaid cuts expected in all 50 states: What to know
On Saturday, July 26, tens of thousands of people, including large numbers of families, are expected to join Families First protests and rallies against the Trump administration's policies. Those policies range from reversals of environmental protections to the newly passed 'big beautiful bill,' with its massive cuts to Medicaid, to the White House's immigration policy, which has led to raids and arrests carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) across the country. Here's what to know. What's happening? Thousands of parents, grandparents, immigrants, caregivers, children, and religious leaders are planning to gather in peaceful demonstrations in all 50 states, with major events scheduled in Washington, D.C.; Tucson, Arizona; and Chicago. 'At a time when too many families are already struggling to afford what they need, these cuts will take away families' healthcare coverage, food, and essential care, and some families have already had loved ones disappeared by ICE,' Ai-jen Poo, executive director of Caring Across Generations, told Fast Company. 'Our families come first, and we'll continue showing up for one another.' What to expect According to organizers, Families First is a nationwide day of action with family-friendly rallies, youth art-making fairs, teach-ins, canned-food drives, and community events to raise awareness about the need for healthcare, safety, food, education, and climate action to protect children and families in the United States. Like many of the recent anti-Trump protests, Families First is expected to include people from all walks of life and parts of the country. As previously reported, protestors have included struggling middle-class families with young children; retirees worried about cuts to Social Security and Medicaid; teachers in schools where funding has been pulled and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack; and recently laid-off government workers targeted by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).