Four arrested on suspicion of terrorism offences during pro-Palestine protest
More than 100 people were arrested across the country during demonstrations this weekend protesting against the proscription of Palestine Action, which was banned as a terrorist organisation in June.
Police said four people from Merseyside – a 74-year-old woman from Kensington, a 65-year-old man from Brighton-le-Sands, a 28-year-old man from Garston and a 72-year-old man from Mossley Hill – were arrested on suspicion of wearing or carrying an article supporting a proscribed organisation.
All had been taken to police stations for questioning.
Protests were held in London, Manchester, Edinburgh, Bristol and Truro on Saturday as part of a campaign co-ordinated by Defend Our Juries.
The Metropolitan Police said 55 people were arrested in Parliament Square under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for displaying placards in support of Palestine Action.
Greater Manchester Police said it had arrested 16 people on Saturday on suspicion of support of a proscribed organisation, adding that they remained in custody for questioning.
Eight people were arrested near Truro Cathedral in Cornwall after protesters gathered to show support for Palestine Action.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action last month (Jacob King/PA)
And Avon and Somerset Police said 17 people were arrested during a protest in Bristol.
Palestine Action was banned after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by the direct action group, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying that the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.
The ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Toxteth fire: Residents tell of 'shock' after two houses torched
The home of a couple and their young child was gutted by fire along with the house next door in a suspected arson attack. Merseyside Police said petrol had been poured into the front porch of one of the properties, in the Toxteth area of Liverpool, to ignite the blaze, which then spread to the second house.A relative of the woman living in the house said she was out of the country on holiday with her family but was "in shock" after the attack in Carlingford Close, just before midnight on Saturday night. It is the second serious house fire believed to have been deliberately started in Liverpool within just over 24 hours after a man also escaped a property in Everton. The second property is also believed to have been empty at the time according to neighbours, with the family also understood to be on holiday. Both houses had suffered visibly extensive damage throughout, with charred and blackened furniture piled into the front gardens by forensic investigators. The relative, who did not wish to be named, lives close by but said he was at his father's house when his wife called with news of the fire. He said: "I think the whole close was out, everybody was in shock."I can't think why anyone would do this, there is no logic to it at all."He said both families had been "very lucky" not to be at home, although his relative had been informed and was "in shock". He added: "This close is normally very nice and peaceful, all the kids who live here all go out and play and it's very peaceful, very multi-cultural with people from all around the world. "Nobody expected for this to happen, it's shocking." Merseyside Police said no injuries had been reported. The investigation comes after another attack on Roxburgh Street in Everton on Friday evening. The force has also recently charged a man with murder after an elderly couple, Eric Greener and Sheila Jackson, died in a fire in St Helens on 15 July. Det Insp Victoria Lanceley: "We all know too well the devastation and fatal consequences such an incredibly dangerous act can cause and puts the lives of residents in the street at risk. "It's only down to sheer fortune that no one was injured in this incident and clearly it could have been a lot worse." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram, and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
The National
14 hours ago
- The National
Torture survivors condemn new rules from UK Home Office
TORTURE survivors and charities in Scotland have condemned the UK Government's citizenship ban for refugees, arguing it means people with the legal right to live here are now 'second-class' citizens living in fear of deportation. New Home Office rules mean thousands of people who have come to the UK in small boats or hidden in lorries will normally be refused citizenship – even if their claim for political asylum is granted. Most people who enter the UK on small boats to claim political asylum, having escaped war and persecution, are eventually granted refugee status and many claim British citizenship. The new ban could affect at least 71,000 people and it prompted 148 organisations and individuals to write to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, urging her to reverse the decision. READ MORE: 'He belongs in The Hague': Keir Starmer fiercely criticised over Gaza speech Signatories to the letter claim the new rules break international law and discriminate against refugees, thousands of whom will be denied rights and left living their lives in 'limbo'. Campaigners also argued the ban makes it more difficult for refugees to integrate into society and risks 'playing into toxic politics' which is 'manipulated by the far-right to bring hate and disorder to our streets'. Last summer, rioters in England attacked mosques and tried to burn down hotels housing asylum seekers, and in recent days, protests down south turned violent again after crowds targeted a hotel in Epping, Essex, which houses people seeking sanctuary in the UK. The Government faces a 'powder keg' situation, amid fears that far-right violence targeting migrants could erupt across England again in coming days and weeks. People in Scotland affected by the citizenship ban spoke to The Ferret following debates this month at Westminster over the government's Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Borders Bill) which is making its way through the UK Parliament. The UK Government's bill – a response to the small boats crossing issue – is designed to 'strengthen UK border security'. Peers supportive of refugees, however, have tabled amendments to the bill and, if accepted, they would change the new Home Office guidance on citizenship. Citizenship applications The new guidance for Home Office visa and immigration staff update the 'good character' requirement for British citizenship applications. Anyone who arrived without valid entry clearance or electronic travel authorisation after undertaking a 'dangerous journey' – such as crossing the English Channel in small boats or concealed in vehicles – will almost certainly be refused citizenship, critics said. These changes apply to applications made on or after February 10, 2025, but people who came to the UK prior to then are still affected, even though they could have lived in the UK legally for years. The new guidance says: 'A person who applies for citizenship from February 10, 2025 who has previously arrived without a required valid entry clearance or electronic travel authorisation, having made a dangerous journey will normally be refused citizenship.' Critics of the ban say most refugees have no choice but to take irregular routes to reach the UK due to the lack of safe and legal alternatives. They claim the guidance breaches international law, because Article 31 of the UN Refugee Convention protects refugees from penalties for irregular illegal entry. Seeking UK citizenship costs £1735 an application, and there is no right of appeal against a refusal. Borders bill THE Government's Borders Bill has passed through the House of Commons and is now with the House of Lords for consideration. An amendment – tabled by the Bishop of Chelmsford with support from Baroness Lister of Burtersett, Lord German and Lord Kerr of Kinlochard – aims to mitigate the 'most damaging impacts' of the citizenship ban. The new clause would ensure the good character requirement is not applied contrary to the UK's international legal obligations. With Westminster now in summer recess, the bill won't be debated again until September/early October. Once peers have finished examining the draft legislation, any amendments made will be sent back to the House of Commons for agreement or further negotiation – a political process often referred to as 'ping pong'. Reaction Those affected by the ban include Yahya Fasi, a youth football coach with the St Mirren football club charitable foundation who is a refugee from Syria. A former professional football player in Damascus, he has lived in Rothesay, Bute, since 2020, where his family has a barbershop, beautician business and a patisserie. He told The Ferret that he and his family have 'worked hard' towards getting citizenship, and did everything asked of them, adding that the ban is 'heartbreaking'. (Image: SNS) 'To now be told we can't even apply is deeply disappointing. We've built our lives here from nothing. We've always tried to give back to the community and to contribute in any way we can, because Bute feels like home,' Fasi said. 'It's where we finally felt safe, where our children are growing, and where we've started to heal. We don't want to go back to Syria. We have no one left there, no family, no home. Everything we had was destroyed. Even speaking about it brings back painful memories we try to forget.' Gulan, a refugee who came to Scotland with her two children to escape torture in Iraq, said she faced 'horrible and unbearable violence' at home and had 'no choice but to leave', adding that the journey was 'extremely dangerous'. She said: 'Over the years, we have integrated into the community and found happiness. With our skills and experiences, we deserve to be treated with dignity and respect as any citizen. 'We haven't done anything wrong; we shouldn't be punished for taking the only option we had left when other legal ways to survive just weren't available.' Ahlam Souidi, a senior community development worker at Freedom from Torture, a charity in Glasgow that helps refugees, said many of the torture survivors she works with took 'extraordinarily dangerous journeys, compelled by desperation' and with no 'viable alternatives'. 'If the Government really follows through with blocking refugees from getting citizenship, the UK will be taking a huge step backwards,' she argued. 'This approach doesn't align with our values as a compassionate society and will only cause further distress to the survivors I work with every day. We urge the Government to immediately reconsider.' Her views were echoed by Sabir Zazai, chief executive at the Scottish Refugee Council, who claimed the policy change will have a 'significant long-term impact' on many people already in Scotland, who are 'working and contributing' to the economy and culture. 'This change doesn't discriminate between refugees, victims of trafficking, or children,' he said. 'It doesn't consider the unique vulnerabilities and complex backgrounds of people seeking protection, many of whom have fled unthinkable circumstances. 'British citizenship is the beginning of many people's integration journey. Without it, people do not have the right to vote in UK elections. They do not have the freedom to travel, or work in many government jobs. But worst of all, they remain at risk of detention or deportation.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Citizenship applications will continue to be considered on a case-by-case basis.' Syrian asylum claims resume It emerged this month that the UK Government would start processing Syrian asylum claims again. Last December, decisions were suspended after President Bashar al-Assad was overthrown by an Islamist militant group called Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, after years of civil war. This left in limbo more than 7000 Syrians in the UK waiting for a decision on an asylum claim. In parts of Syria, the security situation remains unstable and there has been fighting in the province of Suweida between Druze and Bedouin militias, as well as government forces, in recent weeks. The latest violence started last week. A few days later, Israel got involved and launched air strikes, saying it was protecting the Druze against government forces. At time of writing, more than 1100 people are reported to have been killed in Suweida, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is based in the UK. Meanwhile, the UK Government has published updated guidance for officials to make decisions on Syrian asylum claims. It says that about 60% of the population suffers from food insecurity, millions live in inadequate accommodation, roughly half of the hospitals are non-functional, and millions face issues accessing sufficient clean water and safe sanitation systems. The guidance continues: 'There are approximately 7.4 million internally displaced persons in Syria, with more than two million living in temporary shelter arrangements such as camps, which suffer from severe overcrowding and poor living conditions.' However, there is a caveat that 'the general humanitarian situation in Syria is not so severe that there are substantial grounds for believing that there is a real risk of serious harm' if someone is returned. 'All cases must be considered on their individual facts, with the onus on the person to demonstrate they face persecution or serious harm,' the guidance adds. The Home Office has been asked to comment.
Daily Mail
20 hours ago
- Daily Mail
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: A warning from Trump that Britain and Europe simply cannot ignore
Acting as if he was President of the world, Donald Trump marked his latest arrival in Britain by delivering a lecture to Europe on immigration. He proclaimed: 'You better get your act together or you're not going to have Europe any more. You got to get your act together… you got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe.' He also made a tremendous claim that 'last month we had nobody entering our country. Nobody. Shut it down'. We will wait for the research before accepting that assertion. But there is no doubt that Mr Trump has, by decisive action, significantly reduced illegal arrivals in the United States. No doubt it helps to have weak, compliant neighbours. And this policy has followed more than 30 years during which America has been transformed by colossal mass migration, legal and illegal. But the President is right that Europe cannot indefinitely sustain migration at current levels. And that warning, of course, includes this country. Whatever will he say about this when he meets his friend Sir Keir Starmer tomorrow in Scotland? The two men have an unlikely but undoubted rapport. But how will it survive if their conversation turns to the subject of migration? The Mail on Sunday reports today the latest plans of Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to find some way of restricting the cross-Channel boat traffic on the justified basis that these vessels are profoundly unsafe, especially for women and children. This is plainly well-intentioned but it is hard to see it as a game-changer. Those who pay small fortunes to board these boats are frighteningly ready to take grave risks. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister has inflicted a very serious wound on himself by his absurd claim – which will haunt him for years to come – that 'there is lots of housing and many local authorities that can be used, and we're identifying where it can be used', to accommodate both rising numbers of homeless people and migrants. His statement is disastrously wrong and out of kilter with years of official claims that we must build new housing in great numbers at all costs. It casts doubt on his awareness of the problems before him and on his knowledge of the true state of the country. He really said this, unlike France's Queen Marie Antoinette who never actually said 'let them eat cake' about starving peasants unable to afford bread. Even some on the Left are beginning to see that the social pressures created by the housing of migrants in hotels in towns across the country are dangerous. They simply cannot dismiss objections as bigotry. And while nasty troublemakers will no doubt do all they can to exploit these events, many of the protesters in such places as Epping are non-violent, respectable, open-minded people who have simply had enough of being treated as if they did not exist and their concerns don't matter. It is people very much like them, in the USA, who have upended politics in that country. They have cast aside old parties and played-out politicians who ignored them for too long. All the established British parties and their leaders should take note, and do so soon.
