Canberra footpaths blocked by construction, making streets inaccessible and causing safety risks
"That means if there's brightness or lights or something I might notice it, other than that sometimes I notice shadows, but not much," she said.
With significant construction around Canberra's city centre, Ms Hou's been facing increasing challenges navigating the area.
She said she tries to be as independent as possible, learning how to safely walk different routes with her guide dog Flash, but when construction sees footpaths temporarily blocked off there isn't a lot either of them can do.
"My guide dog, as smart as he is, he's not very good at reading signs," Ms Hou said.
"He definitely can't tell me what he's just seen on the sign.
"Quite often I will have to rely on some wonderful pedestrian to help me, if there's anyone around.
"Sometimes I just call out and say, 'Is anyone around to give me a hand?', but that's not very good because I just like to be able to get around quite independently without needing extra help."
Ms Hou attends the Canberra Blind Society and group activities at Eyes For Life Canberra in the city centre, which is already obstacle-filled for people with vision impairment, but with significant construction in the London Circuit area she's begun avoiding the city.
"In the city there's … obstacles like A-frame [signs] from the shops [which] they quite often like to stick it right in the middle of the footpath, scooters that have been left over the footpath, tables from the coffee shops, and then [there's] the construction zones," she said.
"I know for a fact that a lot of other people with blindness or other disabilities, they just stay home because [it's] just too stressful for them to try to overcome these challenges.
"So all those things are a challenge for someone like me, and it's also for people [who use] wheelchairs, mums or dads with strollers with young kids, so quite often they can't get around those obstacles."
The loss of pedestrian access has also angered commuter groups, who are pushing for the ACT to follow the lead of other Australian cities by introducing alternative solutions that prioritise maintaining public access.
According to Canberra By Bike Design Company founder Paris Lord, people are regularly having to walk on ACT roads because a construction site has cut off footpath access.
"Yes, there are signs saying, 'Use alternative footpath', but … to have to turn around and go another 500 metres when the footpath could be kept open, it just creates unnecessary conflict," Mr Lord said.
"And more than that it's dangerous. This is all preventable, these footpaths being closed.
"Other jurisdictions, they don't do this. They keep footpaths open during construction, and we're curious as to why that sort of skill is bereft of the ACT government."
He said it was "a constant problem across the territory".
"We're finding in the inner north, in Belconnen, in the far south, in Civic, usually by default when a construction project happens the footpath is the first thing to go," Mr Lord said.
"We don't want to hear of instances where there's a coronial inquiry or a parliamentary inquiry [looking into] how did this person pushing a pram, or this person pulling a suitcase, come to be injured?
The ACT government paid more than $1.7 million in personal injury claims associated with community paths last financial year.
It has led to calls for the ACT to follow other states and use shipping containers, including from Mr Lord.
"The city of Adelaide, for example, when they have construction sites happening on King William Street — which also features a light rail — they use shipping containers, and people use that to go through," he said.
"The territory has plenty of shipping containers, they're about to be no longer used at the Woden bus interchange, we could repurpose them to make sure public footpath access is maintained.
"We can fix it now, we know how to do it, the engineering solutions are there, it's just now a matter of political will."
The government has said the shipping container solution is something it could use, but it's not a one-size-fits-all fix.
Deputy Director-General for the ACT City and Environment Directorate, Bruce Fitzgerald, said the temporary traffic management methods are "never set and forget".
"[It's about finding] the right balance between the efficiency of the development plus also making sure the community can get through as easily as possible," Mr Fitzgerald said.
"We understand that disruption in the city has consequence for everyone, so we're happy to work with them, we're always keen to hear different ways of doing things. There is no one fix-it.
"[But] if we put too many more restrictions on development that comes through in higher unit prices as the cost of actually doing business increases as well."
Mr Fitzgerald said the government has also begun consultations on a new fee structure with developers, to incentivise them to limit the number of roads and footpaths their developments close.
"The fee structure as proposed looks at a per-day basis for closures, and that includes footpaths, roads and associated infrastructure," he said.
"For a development, say on Northbourne, where you are proposing closing a major arterial road, the cost differentiation may be into the thousands, to potentially the hundreds of thousands.
"So that gives the developer pause to think about, 'How best can we do that? How can we limit the disruption on the network?' and make sure that they're putting in other solutions that maybe they hadn't thought about previously."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Two in five young Australians feel lonely
Loneliness is usually considered a problem for older people but a new report has found that 43 per cent of young Australians, feel lonely.


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
호주 뉴스 3분 브리핑: 2025년 8월 5일 화요일
Independent news and stories connecting you to life in Australia and Korean-speaking Australians. Ease into the English language and Australian culture. We make learning English convenient, fun and practical.


SBS Australia
6 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Why Australia's divorce rate is the lowest it's been in 50 years
At first glance, it might seem like good news. Divorces in Australia have dropped to their lowest rate since no-fault divorce was introduced. And on average, marriages are lasting longer. Latest data show 2.1 divorces registered for every 1,000 Australians aged 16 and over in 2024. But while greater longevity of marriages has been heralded as a sign of more successful relationships, the reality is far more nuanced. Australians are marrying and divorcing less and having fewer children amid increasing economic insecurity. It's emblematic of deep and complex social change. Fifty years of divorce without fault Divorce in Australia has changed significantly since the 1975 reform that removed the requirements to show fault. That is, couples could now go their separate ways without having to explain themselves. For 20 years before no-fault divorce, marriage dissolution was reported by court-decreed fault and included among official crime statistics. Included among the more than a dozen grounds for divorce were adultery, drunkenness and non-consummation. The "faults" that prompted divorce in the 1950s included drunkenness and non-consummation. Source: The Conversation / ABS Year Book for Australia 1956 When Australians divorce now, they're older — 47 years for men and 44 for women — reflecting increasing age when marrying and longer duration in marriage. Marriages are typically lasting just over eight months more to separation and nearly 11 months longer to divorce than in 2019, the year before the COVID pandemic started. Such an increase points to a swift and sharp change likely brought on during and since the pandemic. But this doesn't mean we're getting better at navigating relationships — rather, Australians are remaining longer in marriages due to economics. Cohabiting before marriage is also increasingly common, enabling relationship testing. Most Australians believe marriage isn't necessarily a lifelong thing, reflecting widespread acceptance of divorce. But marriage remains an important aspect of our lives. Fewer brides and grooms Marriage remains a major part of Australian society, with most Australians marrying at some point in their lives. Marriage equality, enshrined in law in 2017, reflects the enduring relevance of formal marriage. But there have been some changes. Religion no longer dominates marriage, with most weddings officiated by celebrants. This trend has continued since the late 1990s. In 2023, more than 83 per cent of marriages were conducted by civil celebrants, not a religious minister. Overall, the rate of marriage has more than halved since 1971, dropping from 13 marriages per 1,000 people aged 16 years and over to 5.5 in 2024. Marriage rates are now well down from the peak set during Australia's post-war baby boom, where increased and younger coupling drove record birth rates in the 1960s. While most children are born to married parents, the proportion has changed substantially over the years. In 1971, 91 per cent of births were to married parents, declining to 60 per cent in 2023. The paradox of choice Choice is generally increasing when it comes to relationships, but also becoming more constrained on the family front. Many Australians now won't achieve their desired family size because the barriers to having a much-wanted child, or subsequent child, are insurmountable. Financial and social costs of raising a child while juggling housing affordability, economic insecurity, gender inequality and climate change are just too high. The proportion of women without children over their lifetime nearly doubled from 8.5 per cent in 1981 to 16.4 per cent in 2021. On average, Australians are having fewer children than ever, with the total fertility rate at a record low of 1.5 births per woman. Changing expectations and norms concerning coupling and childbearing have enabled greater empowerment for Australians to choose whether they marry at all. Women especially benefit from more progressive attitudes towards remaining single and childfree. The costs of divorce Costs associated with a divorce can be high, with a "cheap" marriage dissolution starting upwards of $10,000. Couples have become creative in navigating marriage breakups during a cost-of-living crisis. Where children are present — 47 per cent of divorced couple families — parents are looking to new ways to minimise adverse social and economic consequences. "Birdnesting", where kids remain in the family home as parents rotate in and out according to care arrangements, is one such solution. Novel child-centred approaches to family separation are most successful where relationship breakups are amicable. Around 70 per cent of separations and divorces involving children are negotiated among parents themselves. Ever-increasing numbers of Australians are living apart together (known as LATs), where they are a couple but live separately. This is particularly common among parents raising children. It's a novel solution for parents who don't want the headache of having a new partner move in with them post-divorce. Rising housing costs and widening economic insecurity mean separation may not even be an option, especially where children are involved. Research shows soaring house prices can keep people in marriages they might otherwise leave. Living under the same roof and raising children while separated is increasingly a response to financial pressures. Where relationships involve financial dependence and high conflict, such arrangements are forcing families into potentially highly volatile circumstances. Families are changing and diversifying, and policy must reflect this. Cost-of-living pressures are increasingly denying couples much-wanted families and making it more difficult for families to thrive, divorced or not. Liz Allen is a demographer at POLIS Centre for Social Policy Research.