AI startup Genspark raises $100 million to compete with Google, source says
The Palo Alto-based company currently has over 2 million monthly active users, and the round was led by a group of U.S. and Singapore-based investors, the source said.
The company raised a $60 million seed round last June. Its CEO Eric Jing led Baidu's (9888.HK), opens new tab AI-powered smartphone and smart speaker Xiaodu unit.
Genspark is one of a number of startups attempting to uproot the search engine market dominated by Alphabet's Google. AI-generated search results can offer a single answer with citations, a potential user experience improvement compared to Google's link lists.
Google itself is experimenting with AI search results, while OpenAI's ChatGPT recently integrated internet search capabilities. Another big player in the AI search space, Perplexity, has raised funds valuing it at $9 billion.
According to its blog, Genspark says it has developed a feature capable of using multiple AI models that work together to conduct in-depth research online. OpenAI, Perplexity and You.com have also released similar products.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
3 hours ago
- Leader Live
Chancellor faces fiscal risks and ‘significant challenges' amid trade war
The IMF said the UK's 'limited' so-called headroom on its public finances gave little room to manoeuvre and called on Rachel Reeves to consider some tax changes or spending cuts. In its annual report on the UK economy, the IMF said: 'Risks to this strategy must be carefully managed. 'In an uncertain global environment and with limited fiscal headroom, fiscal rules could easily be breached if growth disappoints or interest rate shocks materialise.' The IMF praised the Government's fiscal plans, saying they 'strike a good balance between supporting growth and safeguarding fiscal sustainability'. It added that the pro-growth agenda 'covers the right areas to lift productivity'. But the IMF cautioned that 'delivering on this agenda will require overcoming significant challenges' amid the fallout from US President Donald Trump's trade war. 'Shockwaves from trade policies and rapid geopolitical developments are affecting global growth and creating heightened levels of volatility in financial markets,' it said. Added to this, it said, 'fiscal space is limited and constrained by an elevated interest burden and increasing demands on public resources, including defence and aging-related spending'. Ms Reeves said the report 'confirms that the choices we've taken have ensured Britain's economic recovery is under way, and that our plans will tackle the deep-rooted economic challenges that we inherited in the face of global headwinds'. 'Our fiscal rules allow us to confront those challenges by investing in Britain's renewal,' she said. The Washington-based IMF also recommended cutting the number of assessments of whether the Government is on track with its fiscal rules by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) from two to just once a year, ahead of the autumn budget. This could 'reduce pressure for overly frequent changes to fiscal policy', it said. The Chancellor's headroom against her main fiscal rule was estimated at £9.9 billion at the time of the spring statement in March. But the Government's U-turns on planned cuts to spending since then, such as changes to the welfare bill, are seen as having wiped this out, according to experts. This has raised fears that Ms Reeves will be forced to raise taxes or cut spending in the autumn budget. The IMF left its forecasts unchanged for the economy to grow by 1.2% this year and 1.4% in 2026. However, it added a note of caution, saying that 'risks to growth remain to the downside'. 'Tighter-than-expected financial conditions, combined with rising precautionary saving by households, would hinder the rebound in private consumption and slow the recovery,' the IMF said. Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: 'This is yet more confirmation that Labour's mismanagement means that yet more tax rises are coming in the autumn.'
Belfast Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
NI menswear brand opening new store in city centre
Remus Uomo, which is part of the Carrickfergus-based Douglas & Grahame business, is planning to convert the Jack Wills store on Arthur Street into a new retail spot for the brand. It could see the B1 listed building refurbished as well as ground floor retail unit partly being turned into a café space. 'The proposed works consist of internal refurbishment to the existing unit; including the partial removal of existing partition walls and construction of new [walls]. '[It also include] partial removal of an existing non-original partition with archways at ground floor level to be made wider and create a more open space.' Adam Finlay is managing director of the Northern Ireland family-run menswear company Douglas & Grahame, which is behind the Remus Uomo brand. There are three standalone Remus Uomo shops in Dublin off St Stephen's Green, as well as Glasgow and Belfast's Victoria Square. The brand Remus Uomo was thought up by Mr Finlay's father Donald and uncle Richard, the second generation of Finlays in the business, as they travelled between Pisa and Florence in 1991 on a fabric-sourcing trip. Remus Uomo and sister brands Daniel Grahame, DG's Drifter and 1880 CLUB are stocked in independent men's retailers and department stores on both sides of the border. Speaking to the Belfast Telegraph last year, Mr Finlay said: 'Our product is so much about fit and form and about the tactility of the fabrications we use.' He also said expansion was on the cards for the business, which marked its centenary last year. 'The most particular target for us would be strategic locations in Great Britain. 'We're very conscious to be respectful to our existing independent retailers, where for example on the island of Ireland we're extremely well-served by that part of the industry. 'But in mainland Great Britain, we've always found it that bit more difficult. There's not that same spread of the independent retailers and so we have great swathes of the mainland where we don't have any significant business at all.' Its ambitions are to set up stores in cities like Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds, Sheffield and Edinburgh.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Artificial Intelligencer: Why AI's math gold wins matter
July 24 (Reuters) - This was originally published in the Artificial Intelligencer newsletter, which is issued every Wednesday. Sign up here to learn about the latest breakthroughs in AI and tech. At the Reuters Momentum AI conference, opens new tab in Silicon Valley last week, I heard two phrases over and over from Fortune 500 executives: "human in the loop" and "flat is the new up." They reflect a cautious but ambitious strategy: While nearly every company still keeps humans working alongside AI, the early impact is already showing that companies are growing revenue without hiring more people. What's changed? The nature of work within organizations. The first cuts are already hitting outsourced labor. Employees are shifting to higher-value work, such as handling complicated tasks and reviewing AI's output. Revenue per head is on the rise, or as some say, 'flat headcount is the new up.' Despite the narrative that 2025 will be the year of the AI agent, truly agentic workflows still seem distant for complex use cases. In fact, some executives still view AI models as just pattern matchers, not true reasoners. Researchers at Google and OpenAI would beg to differ, as I learned after speaking with them following both labs' gold medal wins at this year's International Mathematical Olympiad. I believe this is an exciting milestone for the reasoning paradigm that AI models are striving to advance. Scroll down to read why this matters. Email me at opens new tab or follow me on LinkedIn, opens new tab to share any feedback, and what you want to read about next in AI. Our latest reporting in Tech & AI Exclusive-Blackstone drops out of group bid for TikTok US White House to unveil plan to push US AI abroad, crackdown on US AI rules Trump administration seeks pathway for US companies to export AI chips Nvidia CEO's China charm offensive underscores rock star status in key market AI models with systemic risks given pointers on how to comply with EU AI rules TSMC posts record quarterly profit on AI demand, but wary about tariffs How AI won math gold AI crossed a threshold that even caught the best researchers by surprise. For the first time, an AI from Google DeepMind won a gold medal at the International Mathematical Olympiad, the world's most elite high school math competition. OpenAI, which did not officially participate in this year's IMO, said its model also achieved gold-medal performance, based on solutions graded by external experts using IMO guidelines. While it's tempting to see this as just another headline in AI's relentless march, I spent time speaking with the minds behind these models—some of whom are former IMO medalists themselves—to understand how we got here and what these wins reveal about the frontier of AI. The main takeaway? The reasoning abilities demonstrated by models like DeepMind's Gemini Pro and OpenAI's o1 series have endless possibilities. This win is also a testament to the classic recipe for model improvement: high-quality data and huge amounts of compute. While neither lab revealed the full details of their methods, both demonstrated the power of thinking for longer. Since last year, top AI labs have shifted focus from scaling up pre-training and increasing model sizes to using test-time compute to give models more 'thinking time'. OpenAI described how its model tackled each problem dozens of times simultaneously, using consensus and multi-agent strategies to aggregate the best solutions. DeepMind, meanwhile, employed its 'Deep Think' technique, enabling Gemini to explore many solution paths at the same time, synthesize ideas, and generate rigorous, human-readable proofs. In what researchers dubbed a 'paradigm shift,' DeepMind's AI has gone from needing expert human translation just a year ago to solving five of six IMO problems in natural language this week. This breakthrough directly challenges the long-held skepticism that AI models are just clever mimics, predicting the next word. Math, requiring multi-step, creative proofs, has become the ultimate test of true reasoning, and AI just passed. We don't know exactly how much parallel computation went into solving each question, but OpenAI told us it was 'very expensive.' After all, the models were given about 4.5 hours—just like human contestants—to work through each set. This highlights how today's most intelligent models demand vast compute resources, helping explain AI labs' insatiable appetite for chips like Nvidia's GPUs. And as these methods expand into other domains—coding, science, creative writing—the computational demands will continue to grow. Both labs also credit their breakthroughs to high-quality data: step-by-step, annotated proofs, not just final answers. DeepMind, in particular, pointed to new reinforcement learning techniques that reward not just correctness, but the elegance and clarity of a proof. So what does this mean for the future? The 'can AI reason?' debate may be settled—at least for domains as challenging as Olympiad mathematics. The ever-growing emergence of true thinking capabilities inside AI models has the potential to transform many domains as researchers crack the code on math and move on to new frontiers. DeepMind is already working to put its system in the hands of mathematicians and, soon, the wider public. OpenAI says it's using what it's learned from this model to train others, but this particular capability won't be included in the upcoming GPT-5 release this summer. Chart of the week You're probably reading this AI newsletter because you're already an AI user, which will put you in the basket of 61% of Americans who have welcomed AI into their lives. The rest, a solid 39%, remain unconvinced, according to a report from Menlo Ventures, opens new tab. The top blocker? Good old-fashioned human connection. About 80% of non-adopters say they'd rather deal with a person than a machine, especially for important decisions. In fact, 53% say they want accountability and oversight from another human, not just a digital assistant who always gives instant responses. Other top hurdles include data privacy worries (71%), skepticism about AI's usefulness (63%), and a healthy distrust of the information AI serves up (58%). So, while the bots may be ready, the humans are holding out for more trust, transparency, and—let's face it—a bit more humanity.
