Former Trump DOJ lawyer Jeffrey Clark faces possible DC disbarment over 2020 election claims
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulatory czar Jeffrey Clark will be suspended from practicing law for 30 days — and banned entirely unless the DC Court of Appeals strikes down the ruling.
'Lawyers cannot advocate for any outcome based on false statements and they certainly cannot urge others to do so,' the DC Bar's Board of Professional Responsibility stated.
Advertisement
4 Office of Management and Budget regulatory czar Jeffrey Clark will be suspended from practicing law for 30 days — and banned entirely unless the DC Court of Appeals strikes down the ruling.
AP
Clark 'persistently and energetically sought to do just that on an important national issue,' the board wrote in their ruling. 'He should be disbarred as a consequence and to send a message to the rest of the Bar and to the public that this behavior will not be tolerated.'
'Yesterday, I received disappointing news from a 100% politicized DC Bar process,' Clark posted on his X in response. 'But I also received an outpouring of support from a host of my friends in the law, many thoughtful legal and political commentators, but most importantly, from thousands of ordinary Americans like you. I am very grateful for that.
Advertisement
'And even though a major part of my identity is under assault — a law license the son of a truck driver who never graduated from high school managed to achieve though birthed to parents who could not themselves fully afford my fancy education — I am and remain surprisingly calm,' he added.
4 'I know I did the right thing in 2020 and 2021 during the first President Trump Administration and wouldn't be able to look at myself in the mirror if I had not proceeded to internally raise the election questions I did,' Clark said.
AFP via Getty Images
'I know I did the right thing in 2020 and 2021 during the first President Trump Administration and wouldn't be able to look at myself in the mirror if I had not proceeded to internally raise the election questions I did.'
In 2021, Democrats in Congress pointed to evidence that Clark, a former assistant attorney general in the DOJ's Civil Division, had 'attempted to involve the Department of Justice in efforts to interrupt the peaceful transfer of power' and urged special state legislative sessions to 'evaluate' possible election fraud.
Advertisement
Trump had considered appointing Clark as acting attorney general in between his electoral loss to Joe Biden and the certification of the 2020 count by Congress on Jan. 6, 2021.
4 Former AG Bill Barr had resigned in December 2020 after announcing there was no widespread fraud in the election.
REUTERS
Former AG Bill Barr had resigned in December 2020 after announcing there was no widespread fraud in the election.
Other Trump attorneys have faced disbarment, including John Eastman, the author of a memo claiming then-Vice President Mike Pence had the authority to reject vote counts from swing states; and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Advertisement
Clark serves as the acting head of OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. It's unclear how the suspension would affect his ability to undertake the role.
4 Clark serves as Trump's acting head of OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, but it's unclear how the suspension would affect his ability to undertake the role.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
James Burnham, a lawyer who recently left the Department of Government Efficiency to start an AI policy group, called the decision 'an outrageous weaponization of the bar ethics process' and warned it 'could be turned against any lawyer serving in government at any time. All steps must be taken to push back.'
Burnham and Clark 'worked closely' together in the first and second Trump administrations, the ex-DOGE official noted.
The Post reached out to Clark's lawyer for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Justice Department seeks voter and election information from at least 19 states, AP finds
NEW YORK (AP) — The requests have come in letters, emails and phone calls. The specifics vary, but the target is consistent: The U.S. Department of Justice is ramping up an effort to get voter data and other election information from the states. Over the past three months, the department's voting section has requested copies of voter registration lists from state election administrators in at least 15 states, according to an Associated Press tally. Of those, nine are Democrats, five are Republicans and one is a bipartisan commission. In Colorado, the department demanded 'all records' relating to the 2024 election and any records the state retained from the 2020 election. Department lawyers have contacted officials in at least seven states to propose a meeting about forging an information-sharing agreement related to instances of voting or election fraud. The idea, they say in the emails, is for states to help the department enforce the law. The unusually expansive outreach has raised alarm among some election officials because states have the constitutional authority to run elections and federal law protects the sharing of individual data with the government. It also signals the transformation of the Justice Department's involvement in elections under President Donald Trump. The department historically has focused on protecting access to the ballot box. Today, it is taking steps to crack down on voter fraud and noncitizen voting, both of which are rare but have been the subject of years of false claims from Trump and his allies. The department's actions come alongside a broader effort by the administration to investigate past elections and influence the 2026 midterms. The Republican president has called for a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election that he lost to Democrat Joe Biden and continues to falsely claim he won. Trump also has pushed Texas Republicans to redraw their congressional maps to create more House seats favorable to the GOP. The Justice Department does not typically 'engage in fishing expeditions' to find laws that may potentially have been broken and has traditionally been independent from the president, said David Becker, a former department lawyer who leads the nonprofit Center for Election Innovation and Research. 'Now it seems to be operating differently,' he said. The department responded with an emailed 'no comment' to a list of questions submitted by the AP seeking details about the communications with state officials. Requests to states vary and some are specific Election offices in Alaska, Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, Utah, and Wisconsin confirmed to the AP that they received letters from the voting section requesting their statewide voter registration lists. At least one other, Oklahoma, received the request by phone. Many requests included basic questions about the procedures states use to comply with federal voting laws, such as how states identify and remove duplicate voter registrations or deceased or otherwise ineligible voters. Certain questions were more state-specific and referenced data points or perceived inconsistencies from a recent survey from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, an AP review of several of the letters showed. The Justice Department already has filed suit against the state election board in North Carolina alleging it failed to comply with a part of the federal Help America Vote Act that relates to voter registration records. More inquiries are likely on the way There are signs the department's outreach isn't done. It told the National Association of Secretaries of State that 'all states would be contacted eventually,' said Maria Benson, a NASS spokeswoman. The organization has asked the department to join a virtual meeting of its elections committee to answer questions about the letters, Benson said. Some officials have raised concerns about how the voter data will be used and protected. Election officials in at least four California counties — Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego and San Francisco —said the Justice Department sent them letters asking for voter roll records. The letters asked for the number of people removed from the rolls for being noncitizens and for their voting records, dates of birth and ID numbers. Officials in Arizona, Connecticut, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Wisconsin confirmed to the AP that they received an email from two department lawyers requesting a call about a potential 'information-sharing agreement.' The goal, according to several copies of the emails reviewed by the AP, was for states to provide the government with information about instances of election fraud to help the Justice Department 'enforce Federal election laws and protect the integrity of Federal elections.' One of those sending the emails was a senior counsel in the criminal division. The emails referred to Trump's March executive order on elections, part of which directs the attorney general to enter information-sharing agreements with state election officials to the 'maximum extent possible." Skeptical state election officials assess how to reply Election officials in several states that received requests for their voter registration information have not responded. Some said they were reviewing the inquiries. Officials in some other states provided public versions of voter registration lists to the department, with certain personal information such as Social Security numbers blacked out. Elsewhere, state officials answered procedural questions from the Justice Department but refused to provide the voter lists. In Minnesota, the office of Secretary of State Steve Simon, a Democrat, said the federal agency is not legally entitled to the information. In a July 25 letter to the Justice Department's voting section, Simon's general counsel, Justin Erickson, said the list 'contains sensitive personal identifying information on several million individuals.' He said the office had obligations under federal and state law to not disclose any information from the statewide list unless expressly required by law. In a recent letter, Republican lawmakers in the state called on Simon to comply with the federal request as a way "to protect the voting rights of the citizens of Minnesota.' Maine's secretary of state, Democrat Shenna Bellows, said the administration's request overstepped the federal government's bounds and that the state will not fulfill it. She said doing so would violate voter privacy. The department 'doesn't get to know everything about you just because they want to,' Bellows said. Some Justice Department requests are questionable, lawyers say There is nothing inherently wrong with the Justice Department requesting information on state procedures or the states providing it, said Justin Levitt, a former deputy assistant attorney general who teaches at Loyola Law School. But the department's requests for voter registration data are more problematic, he said. That is because of the Privacy Act of 1974, which put strict guidelines on data collection by the federal government. The government is required to issue a notice in the Federal Register and notify appropriate congressional committees when it seeks personally identifiable information about individuals. Becker said there is nothing in federal law that compels states to comply with requests for sensitive personal data about their residents. He added that while the outreach about information-sharing agreements was largely innocuous, the involvement of a criminal attorney could be seen as intimidating. 'You can understand how people would be concerned,' he said. ___ Fields reported from Washington. Associated Press state government reporters from around the country contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From friend to foe: Behind the tangled relationship between Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump
President Trump once called Rupert Murdoch "my very good friend." But the 94-year-old media baron, whose fortunes have risen in tandem with Trump's political ascent, has turned into an unlikely foe. Trump has bristled over a Wall Street Journal report that he allegedly sent a suggestive letter to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003. Trump denied sending the message, calling it a "fake," and last month he filed a $10-billion defamation suit against Journal publisher Dow Jones & Co., Murdoch and others. The billionaire — who sits at the top of the world's most prominent conservative media empire — has become the focus of the president's fury. "I hope Rupert and his 'friends' are looking forward to the many hours of depositions and testimonies they will have to provide in this case," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, a nod to "Fox & Friends," one of his favorite TV programs. The Journal, he wrote, is a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag," and Murdoch's "'pile of garbage' newspaper." Trump's attorneys applied more heat last week in a startling bid to force Murdoch to promptly appear for a deposition. In a motion, Trump's lawyers cited the mogul's age and health complications, which they said includes a recent fainting episode, and over the last five years, a broken back, a torn Achilles tendon and atrial fibrillation, which could make Murdoch "unavailable for in-person testimony at trial." Through a spokesman, Murdoch declined to comment. The tussle provides a rare glimpse into the tangled relationship of two titans whose dealings date back a half-century when the Australian-born Murdoch arrived in the U.S. and bought the New York Post, a punchy tabloid with screaming headlines. Trump forged his reputation as a New York real estate tycoon, in part, by dishing scoops to the paper's celebrity-hungry Page Six. And Fox News would become one of Trump's biggest champions. The network has long heaped on positive attention that helped Trump transform himself from reality TV star to the political hero of his Make America Great Again base. The cable network gave Trump a platform for his unfounded "birther" conspiracies about former President Obama. And Trump's political rise helped cement Fox News' status as a ratings and financial juggernaut. This summer, Fox News ranks as America's No. 1 network, according to measurement firm Nielsen, attracting more viewers in prime time than broadcast leaders NBC and CBS. What's more, a string of Fox News personalities have joined Trump's administration, including former weekend host, now secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth. Murdoch and Trump "feed off one another — they've had this relationship since the '70s where they kind of benefit from one another," said Andrew Dodd, a journalism professor at the University of Melbourne. "But they also have these turns where they're against each other." Gabriel Kahn, a USC journalism professor and former Wall Street Journal reporter, said the tension is real. "As much as Rupert has pumped up Trump World over the last 10 years, Rupert really sees himself as the kingmaker — not the lackey," Kahn said. Trump's social media posts over the years reveal bouts of frustration with Murdoch and his media properties. Read more: Fox News' Jesse Watters admits mistake in program claiming Newsom lied about Trump call The two men have different political philosophies: Murdoch is known to be a small-government Reagan Republican, "not a true conservative populist" in the MAGA vein, according to one Republican political operative who was not authorized to speak publicly. Insiders and observers point to a series of slights, including a 2015 remark Murdoch made on Twitter a month after Trump descended on the golden escalator at Trump Tower to announce his first presidential bid, and then ignited a firestorm with anti-immigrant comments. "When is Donald Trump going to stop embarrassing his friends, let alone the whole country?" Murdoch asked a decade ago. Murdoch, at turns, tried to recruit or boost rival presidential hopefuls. Florida's Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis received flattering coverage on Fox News early in President Biden's term. By that time, Trump was back at Mar-a-Lago after losing the 2020 election and Fox News was navigating treacherous terrain. The network was the first major outlet to call Arizona for Biden on election night, riling Trump and his supporters who viewed the move as a betrayal, one that short-circuited their claims the election had been stolen. Fox News witnessed an immediate viewer exodus. Read more: How will cable news thrive without Donald Trump in the White House? To win back Trump supporters, the network gave a platform to Trump surrogates who suggested machines flipped votes for Biden, despite the fact that Murdoch and others knew such claims were false, court filings revealed. Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic sued for defamation. Discovery in the Dominion lawsuit revealed that, two days after the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, Murdoch wanted to carve some distance, writing a former executive: "We want to make Trump a non person." In a 2023 deposition, Murdoch conceded missteps of spreading the unfounded theories. Fox that spring agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million — one of the largest payouts ever for a U.S. libel suit. The Smartmatic case is still pending. "They promulgated the 'Big Lie,'" Dodd said of Fox News' post-2020 election coverage. "Now, in the twilight years of his life, Murdoch [may be] thinking: 'Well, this man really is not worth supporting any longer.'" Read more: Murdoch has survived scandal after scandal. Will Dominion-Fox News lawsuit be different? Such a shift would not be out of character. Murdoch, in the past, has promoted political leaders and governments, only to pull that support. In the 1970s, after initially backing Australia's then-Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, Murdoch allegedly directed his editors to "Kill Whitlam," in a political (not violent) sense. Twenty years later in Britain, Murdoch abandoned the Conservatives after being a close ally of former leader Margaret Thatcher. He famously threw the weight of his tabloid, the Sun, behind Labor's Tony Blair. After years of backing Tories, the Sun shifted back to Labor and Keir Starmer last year, saying that "it is time for a change." "Murdoch has a long career of breaking what he makes," Dodd said. His vast empire, divvied between News Corp. and Fox Corp., allows his outlets to have different leanings. The Journal has lent more skeptical coverage to Trump. It broke stories about Trump's hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels and former Playboy bunny Karen McDougal. This year, its editorial board called his high tariffs "the dumbest trade war in history." Fox News, however, remains staunchly in the president's camp. Murdoch is "putting one part of the organization in attack mode while keeping the other [Fox News] in reserve while it benefits from the base of the person that he's attacking," Dodd said. Read more: Rupert Murdoch, scrappy Fox mogul who transformed media, begins his Hollywood goodbye The media baron has long relished his proximity to power. He attended Trump's second inauguration in January and participated with business leaders in an Oval Office meeting a few weeks later. Murdoch was reportedly among Trump's circle of VIPs in New Jersey on July 13 for the FIFA Club World Cup soccer championship match. Two days later, a Journal reporter emailed White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, advising that the paper was preparing to publish a story about the Epstein birthday letter, according to Trump's lawsuit. Trump's lawyers pushed back, saying the allegations were false. Trump called Murdoch, according to court filings. "Murdoch advised President Trump that 'he would take care of it,'" Trump wrote in a July 17 post on Truth Social, the day the story published. "Obviously, he didn't have the power to do so," Trump wrote. Trump sued the next day. A Dow Jones spokeswoman responded: "We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit." Read more: How Paramount's $16-million Trump settlement came together — and could've fallen apart The legal dustup comes after a string of controversial wins for the president. Last month, Paramount Global agreed to pay Trump $16 million to settle a dispute over "60 Minutes" edits of a Kamala Harris interview, a lawsuit that 1st Amendment experts said had no merit. In December, Walt Disney Co. paid $16 million to end a defamation lawsuit brought by Trump over inaccurate statements by ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos — an outcome derided by some 1st Amendment experts who thought Disney would eventually prevail. "President Trump has already beaten George Stephanopoulos/ABC, 60 Minutes/CBS, and others, and looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal," Trump wrote. "It has truly turned out to be a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag.'' Murdoch watchers don't expect him to capitulate. "In this bizarre world that we live in, Rupert is actually one of the few people who might be willing to stand up to Trump," Kahn said. "Remember, Rupert loves newspapers, he loves the scoop and he loves to stir the pot." Times staff writer Stephen Battaglio contributed to this report. Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
34 minutes ago
Texas Democrats arrive in Illinois to block vote back home on redrawn House maps sought by Trump
A standoff in Texas over redrawn U.S. House maps sought by President Donald Trump sharply escalated Sunday when dozens of Democratic legislators left the state to block a vote, followed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott warning them that he will seek their removal from office if they don't return. The revolt by Democrats, and Abbott giving them until Monday to come home or face efforts to strip them of their elected positions, pushed a widening fight over congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections into new territory. At the center of the deepening impasse is Trump's pursuit of five more winnable congressional seats that will help bolster the GOP's chances of preserving their slim U.S. House majority. In response to Texas' rare mid-decade political gerrymander, Democratic governors have floated the possibility of redrawing their own state's maps in retaliation, but their options are limited. Many of the Texas Democrats were bound for Illinois and a welcoming from Gov. JB Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential contender, who in recent weeks has offered them support. House Democratic Caucus Chair Rep. Gene Wu declined to say how long lawmakers were prepared to stay out of Texas, and it was unclear whether the gambit would succeed. Four years ago, House Democrats left Texas for 38 days in protest of new voting restrictions that still wound up passing once the holdout ended. 'We will do whatever it takes. What that looks like, we don't know,' Wu said at a Sunday night news conference. Lawmakers can't pass bills in the 150-member Texas House without at least two-thirds of them present. Democrats hold 62 of the seats in the majority-Republican chamber and at least 51 left the state, said Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus. In addition to those in Illinois, delegations of Democratic lawmakers left Texas for Boston and Albany, New York, among other places, Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer said. Abbott threatened to seek the lawmakers' removal, saying they were not meeting under the state's constitution. 'This truancy ends now,' Abbott said in a statement released by his office Sunday night. Abbott also suggested the lawmakers may have committed felonies by raising money to help pay for fines they'd face. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows said the chamber would still meet as planned on Monday afternoon. 'If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table. . .,' he posted on X. Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is running for U.S. Senate, said on X that Democrats who 'try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.' A refusal by Texas lawmakers to show up is a civil violation of legislative rules. The Texas Supreme Court held in 2021 that House leaders had the authority to 'physically compel the attendance' of missing members, but no Democrats were forcibly brought back to the state after warrants were served that year. Two years later, Republicans pushed through new rules that allow daily fines of $500 for lawmakers who don't show up for work as punishment. In calling for the lawmakers' removal, Abbott cited a non-binding legal opinion that was issued by Paxton's office after the 2021 revolt by Democratic lawmakers. The quorum break will also delay votes on flood relief and new warning systems in the wake of last month's catastrophic floods in Texas that killed at least 136 people. Democrats had called for votes on the flooding response before taking up redistricting and have criticized Republicans for not doing so. Texas Republicans last week unveiled their planned new U.S. House map that would create five new Republican-leaning seats. Republicans currently hold 25 of the state's 38 seats. Pritzker, who has been one of Trump's most outspoken critics during his second term, had been in quiet talks with Texas Democrats for weeks about offering support if they chose to leave the state to break quorum. Last week, the governor hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his own state. Pritzker also met privately with Texas Democratic Chair Kendall Scudder in June to begin planning for the possibility that lawmakers would depart for Illinois if they did decide to break quorum to block the map, according to a source with direct knowledge who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. 'This is not just rigging the system in Texas, it's about rigging the system against the rights of all Americans for years to come,' Pritzker said Sunday night. Now, with Texas Democrats holed up in Illinois and blocking the Trump-backed congressional map, the stage may be set for a high-profile showdown between Pritzker and the president. Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House just two years into his presidency, and hopes the new Texas map will aid that effort. Trump officials have also looked at redrawing lines in other states, such as Missouri, according to a person familiar with conversations but unauthorized to speak publicly about them.
