Iran casts doubt on Israel's ceasefire commitment after 12-day war; demands UN name aggressors
Six days into a fragile ceasefire brokered by the United States, Iran on Sunday said it does not trust Israel to uphold its end of the truce, as both nations continue to reel from the most violent confrontation in their history.
The 12-day war, triggered by an Israeli bombing campaign that targeted Iran's top nuclear scientists and commanders, has left hundreds dead, diplomatic efforts in disarray, and fresh geopolitical scars on an already tense region.
'We have serious doubts over the enemy's compliance with its commitments including the ceasefire,' said Abdolrahim Mousavi, chief of staff of Iran's armed forces, in a statement aired by state television.
'We are ready to respond with force if attacked again.'
The conflict began on June 13, when Israel launched what it called a pre-emptive bombing campaign targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure. It claimed the strikes were aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon—a charge Tehran has consistently denied.
Iran accuses US and Israel of aggression
In a strongly-worded letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi urged the United Nations Security Council to officially hold Israel and the United States responsible for initiating what Tehran described as an act of aggression.
'We officially request that the Security Council recognise the Israeli regime and the United States as the initiators of the act of aggression and acknowledge their subsequent responsibility, including the payment of compensation and reparations,' Araghchi wrote.
The US military had joined Israeli forces in the campaign, carrying out airstrikes on three of Iran's key nuclear facilities during the conflict. American President Donald Trump, who announced the ceasefire last week, had also threatened further strikes if Iran resumed uranium enrichment at weapons-grade levels.
Nuclear talks derailed, casualties mount
The war has derailed nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States, talks that were already hanging by a thread after the US withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal in 2018. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran had enriched uranium up to 60% purity in 2021, well beyond the 3.67% limit set by the original agreement but still short of the 90% threshold needed for weaponization.
Meanwhile, the human toll of the war continues to emerge.
Iran's health ministry said on Sunday that at least 627 civilians were killed and 4,900 injured in Israeli airstrikes. In retaliation, Iranian missiles killed 28 people in Israel, according to official figures from Tel Aviv.
Iran also arrested dozens of alleged Israeli spies, claiming to have seized weapons, drones, and surveillance equipment during security operations conducted alongside its retaliatory military actions.
'Unacceptable': Strike on Evin prison draws global criticism
Among the most controversial strikes of the conflict was an Israeli missile attack on Tehran's Evin prison, which Iran's judiciary confirmed on Sunday killed at least 71 people. The victims reportedly included prison guards, administrative staff, inmates, visiting relatives, and civilians in nearby buildings.
Iranian officials said the strike destroyed part of the prison's administrative block, sparking an international outcry.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot condemned the bombing as 'unacceptable,' though confirmed that detained French nationals Cecile Kohler and Jacques Paris were unharmed.
Evin prison, long known for holding political prisoners and dual nationals, also houses Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi and several European citizens. Authorities later said inmates had been transferred, but did not disclose how many or to where.
Crackdown on foreign tech and internal dissent
In a further sign of tightening internal controls, Iran's parliament on Sunday passed a law banning unauthorized use of communication tools, including Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service. The move follows reports of protesters and independent journalists using Starlink to evade state censorship during the conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Khamenei holds the Iran key as Trump pushes for new nuclear deal
Senior Iranian officials are prepared to enter talks with the Trump administration over a civilian nuclear deal, but the final decision rests with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei read more Despite public denials, senior Iranian officials are quietly signaling their willingness to resume nuclear negotiations with the Trump administration. However, as with all critical decisions in the Islamic Republic, the ultimate authority rests with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei . A source familiar with the matter told The Jerusalem Post that Iran's leadership has indicated a readiness to talk, but they are still awaiting a green light from Khamenei. It remains unclear whether Khamenei is deliberately holding back his approval or if communication difficulties are contributing to the delay. Some reports suggest that Khamenei has retreated to a secure underground location — an apparent wartime measure—that has hampered contact with top officials. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khamenei previously blocked key talks Journalist Barak Ravid recently reported that Khamenei previously blocked attempts by Iran's foreign minister to engage with US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Vice President JD Vance. That obstruction, during the recent conflict, was a decisive factor in US President Donald Trump 's choice to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. A deal is still on the table Despite the tensions and military strikes between Iran, Israel, and the US, efforts to bring Tehran back to the negotiating table are ongoing. Trump administration officials have floated a range of proposals — some highly ambitious — including potentially allowing Iran to access up to $30 billion for a civilian nuclear energy program. The proposals are contingent on a firm, non-negotiable condition: zero uranium enrichment by Iran. The US insists that any civilian nuclear programme must be powered by imported, not domestically enriched, uranium. This idea mirrors the model followed by the United Arab Emirates. Secret White House meetings and regional involvement Much of the recent diplomacy has been conducted in secret. A critical meeting occurred last Friday between US envoy Steve Witkoff and officials from Gulf states at the White House, just one day before the US military launched strikes against Iran. During this meeting, terms for a revamped Iranian nuclear program were laid out, including a $20–30 billion investment, primarily expected to come from US-aligned Gulf partners, not American taxpayers. One floated idea involves Gulf states funding the replacement of Iran's Fordow nuclear facility — recently bombed by the US — with a new non-enrichment energy site. Whether Iran would have access to or control over the facility remains unclear. Sanctions relief and access to frozen funds Another incentive under discussion is the removal of select economic sanctions and the unlocking of $6 billion in Iranian assets currently frozen in foreign bank accounts. These financial carrots are part of a broader strategy to draw Iran back into a compliance framework without direct concessions from Washington DC. Still, reports quoting senior Trump administration officials said these proposals are preliminary and subject to change. The US is not offering unilateral benefits but is open to facilitating peace and long-term stability. Trump's public indifference belies behind-the-scenes diplomacy In public statements, President Trump has struck a dismissive tone, stating he doesn't care whether a new deal is signed or not. However, CNN cited sources to say that the administration sees real value in locking down a longer-term nuclear agreement to reinforce the recent ceasefire between Iran and Israel. Witkoff has echoed similar views in his interviews. He said the US is pursuing a 'comprehensive peace agreement' and sees signs that Iran is open to one. He said multiple intermediaries — especially Qatar — are actively facilitating discussions. Road to a new agreement remains uncertain While a sixth round of negotiations had been scheduled before Israel's strikes disrupted talks, no formal date has been set to resume them. President Trump claimed that US-Iran talks might take place next week, though Iranian officials have not confirmed this and sources say the logistics are still being finalised. Before the recent military escalation, five rounds of preliminary talks had already been held. A proposal from the US was on the table and Iran was expected to respond in Oman — plans which were derailed by the Israeli assault. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Potential turning point or point of no return? The Trump administration hopes that the recent show of military force will pressure Iran into abandoning its pursuit of nuclear capabilities. However, some experts warn the opposite outcome is just as plausible: that Iran may now double down on its nuclear ambitions out of self-preservation. In a troubling sign, the Iranian parliament has recently voted to end cooperation with the UN's nuclear watchdog agency — a move widely interpreted as a signal of Tehran's intent to further conceal its nuclear activities. Direct talks are still uncertain US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reinforced that any future agreement depends on Iran's willingness to engage in direct negotiations. Still, back-channel communication continues, with Qatar playing a central role in conveying messages and helping maintain the fragile ceasefire. The coming days may determine whether this fragile diplomatic moment yields a new nuclear agreement — or slides into deeper mistrust and confrontation.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
As US trade deal nears, India reviews timing, scope of digital economy policy
New Delhi: As India and the US move closer to finalising a bilateral trade pact ahead of the 9 July tariff deadline, New Delhi is reassessing the timing and contours of pending policy measures that are sensitive to the interests of American tech giants. These include the proposed Digital Competition Bill, a comprehensive e-commerce framework, and new income attribution rules for non-resident enterprises, according to three people familiar with the matter. The recalibrations are being weighed to ensure the policy measures align with the broader objectives of the India-US trade deal and reflect India's commitment to a trust-based regulatory framework and investment requirements, one of them said. 'Policy measures which are on the drawing board can also be a bargaining chip in bilateral treaty negotiations," said the second person quoted above. Both of them spoke on condition of anonymity. The ministry of finance, the departments for promotion of industry and internal trade and commerce, and the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) did not reply to queries emailed on Friday. India has offered several concessions to US exporters of goods and services in the previous two Union budgets, including customs duty reductions and scrapping of the equalisation levy on digital services rendered to Indian businesses by non-resident entities such as tech giants Google and Meta. New Delhi is looking to finalise a bilateral agreement with Washington before the US's 9 July reciprocal tariffs deadline. The US wants India to significantly reduce duties on American agricultural goods, dairy products, and shrimp, and remove non-tariff barriers restricting US dairy exports. Washington, too, is under pressure to ensure the India-US trade deal passes before the deadline. A 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian exports into the US, which includes the 10% universal baseline tariff that now applies to Indian exports, along with tariffs on imports from other countries, could push up retail price inflation in the US. Concerns over the impact of reciprocal tariffs on inflation are already top on the mind of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who has refused to buckle under pressure from President Trump to cut the benchmark lending rate. President Trump is pitching for rate cuts which could help lower the government's interest payments and the budget deficit. India's cautious approach Among the measures being reviewed is India's proposed Digital Competition Bill which seeks to introduce an ex-ante or forward-looking approach to regulating the digital economy. This will mandate influential tech firms to follow a code of conduct. The draft Bill, as it is framed now, will affect digital economy firms' ability to show targeted advertisements and the way people use Google services like maps, Mint reported on 24 April and 7 June, respectively, last year. The government is also reviewing the proposed profit attribution rules to be rolled out by the Income Tax department. These are meant to levy tax on non-resident companies which have a 'significant economic presence' in India, defined on the basis of transaction value and user base. But India's double tax avoidance deal with the US makes it difficult to tax these entities, as only those defined as having a 'permanent establishment' here under the treaty can be taxed. India abolished other efforts to tax tech giants catering to Indian customers remotely by removing the equalisation levy (6% on digital advertisements and 2% on e-commerce) over the last few months to ease trade tensions with the US and to remain aligned with OECD's framework to check tax base erosion, said Amit Maheshwari, tax partner at AKM Global, a tax and consulting firm. 'However, it still has domestic rules like the Significant Economic Presence (SEP) concept and draft profit attribution rules under Section 9 of the Income Tax Act and Rule 10. For now, the profit attribution rules have not been made effective, and US-based companies can still claim tax treaty benefits in case of a SEP existing in India unless they have a permanent establishment here," said Maheshwari. On Saturday, Canada rescinded a 3% digital services tax on big tech companies that was to take effect on 30 June. This was in response to Trump's announcement on Friday that he was cutting off trade talks with Canada for going ahead with this tax. E-commerce and FDI India's proposed comprehensive e-commerce policy, which has drawn strong interest from global entities such as Amazon and Walmart, is another measure under review as the countries reassess priorities in the wake of an eventful regime change in the US. 'This may not be the right time to push ahead with the e-commerce policy discussion, given the shifting global geopolitical scenario," a senior government official said. India is also considering a tweak to its foreign direct investment (FDI) policy in retail to allow foreign investment in building inventory, which is currently permitted only for domestic players. The idea is to enable US-based retailers to invest in warehousing infrastructure. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023 took into account some of the concerns of digital economy firms. 'It is true that a lot of discussions have been happening on issues like the Digital Competition Bill and the e-commerce policy. Some of these developments may also come up during bilateral discussions with the relevant foreign governments," said Amol Kulkarni, director of research at CUTS International, a non-profit, non-governmental organization working on public interest issues. The timing and form of these policy developments can offer India leverage in these discussions, Kulkarni said. "It is for the government to strike a fine balance in these talks taking into consideration the need for policy certainty and predictability and the gains that could come to the overall economy from specific policies," said Kulkarni. 'For instance, the regulation of cross border data flow had been subject to intense negotiation and the final framing under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 was quite accommodating, however, the requirements under the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules 2025 introduce some ambiguities, which could have been avoided, in the interest of policy certainty and predictability," said Kulkarni. After signing a major tariff deal with China, President Trump has hinted at a 'big trade deal' with India too. Whether India's moves so far, including removal of the equalisation levy and pause on contentious digital rules, are enough to soften the US stance remains to be seen, said Maheshwari.
United News of India
29 minutes ago
- United News of India
Former Pentagon Aide claims US warned Iran about strikes 2 hours before attack
Washington, June 30 (UNI) Former Pentagon adviser, retired US Army Col. Douglas Macgregor claims that Washington warned Iran about strikes on its nuclear facilities two hours before they were carried out. "Just to be clear, The United States warned the Iranians 2 hours prior to the bombing of their nuclear facilities that an attack was coming," Macgregor said on X. Israel launched an operation against Iran on the night of June 13, accusing it of implementing a secret military nuclear program. The targets of aerial bombardments and raids by sabotage groups were nuclear facilities, generals, prominent nuclear physicists, and air bases. Iran rejected the accusations and responded with its own attacks. The two sides exchanged strikes for 12 days, with the US joining in with a one-off attack on Iran's nuclear facilities on the night of June 22. Tehran then launched missile strikes on the US base Al Udeid in Qatar on the evening of June 23, stating that the Iranian side had no intention of further escalation. US President Donald Trump then expressed hope that the strike on the US military base in Qatar had "let off steam" and that a path to peace and harmony in the Middle East was now possible. He also said that Israel and Iran had agreed to a ceasefire, which after 24 hours should formally end the 12-day war. UNI SPUTNIK ARN
