Alberta's measles outbreaks surpass case counts reported for entire U.S.
The province has been battling outbreaks since March and as of noon Monday, total case counts in the province had ballooned to 1,314.
The latest update from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that country has amassed 1,288 cases this year.
"Looking at the numbers it saddens me," said Dr. Sam Wong, the president of the section of pediatrics with the Alberta Medical Association.
"I think if we had gotten to it sooner — and taken it more seriously sooner — then maybe we would not have reached this milestone where one province actually exceeds the entire case count for the United States, which has got 10 times the population as Canada."
Thirty new cases were reported between midday Friday and noon Monday.
"It's absolutely terrible," said Dr. Lynora Saxinger, an infectious diseases specialist with the University of Alberta.
"It is really a massive scale of spread that's going on right now."
It is widely believed by experts and health officials that Alberta's case counts are higher than the confirmed numbers reflect. A standing exposure advisory remains in effect for the entire south zone and parts of the north due to widespread transmission.
And the Alberta government's measles website says cases are likely going unreported and undetected.
Saxinger worries about the impact of large summer gatherings such as the Calgary Stampede, which just ended on Sunday.
"I don't think we've seen a suggestion of things levelling off and now there's large meetings of people and after that school will be back in. So I think there's still a period of serious vulnerability to increasing numbers for a while," said Saxinger.
"As an infectious diseases specialist I never would have guessed this was going to happen because measles is supposed to be eradicated."
The south, north and central health zones have been the hardest hit by outbreaks.
According to provincial data, there had been 102 hospitalizations, including 15 ICU admissions, as of July 5. No deaths have been reported.
The latest national statistics show 58 per cent of the new cases reported during the week of June 22 to June 28 were in Alberta.
"We know that per capita we have more measles cases in Alberta than really anywhere else in North America," said Craig Jenne, a professor in the department of microbiology, immunology and infectious diseases at the University of Calgary.
"We have heard stories that there may be underreporting in the U.S. but even the fact that we're close to those numbers is quite concerning given we have almost a hundredth the population."
The latest case breakdown shows there have been a total of 774 cases in the south zone, 35 in Calgary zone, 107 in central zone, 13 in the Edmonton zone and 385 in the north.
"Perhaps the more concerning aspect, at least for me, is not the total number of cases, it's how quickly we've gotten here," said Jenne, who is also the deputy director of the Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases.
Alberta's measles outbreaks have snowballed more quickly than Ontario's, which started in October, according to Jenne.
That province, which has three times the population of Alberta, had confirmed 1,934 as of July 8, with another 310 probable cases.
"It is growing much more rapidly here…[The] rate of transmission is very concerning."
Measles is highly contagious and can lead to serious complications, including pneumonia, brain inflammation, premature delivery and even death.
Young children, pregnant individuals and those with weakened immune systems are at highest risk.
"I'm really afraid that we're going to see terrible outcomes in babies and kids under five because that's the most vulnerable group across the board," said Saxinger.
She's calling on the provincial government to take key steps to rein in the outbreaks, including setting up mass vaccination clinics and campaigns.
"I think there can be a lot of unintended barriers for people who even want to get their vaccines updated…It can be really hard to book actually getting it," she said.
Saxinger also wants the province to target school-aged children for vaccination before they head back to school in the fall.
And, like other physicians, Saxinger is calling on the province to offer an early and extra vaccine dose to babies as young as six months old in all regions. The extra shot is only being offered in the south, central and north zones.
CBC News asked the government for a response but did not immediately hear back.
Pregnant Albertans, who are at high risk as well, need to know they should seek help if they've potentially been exposed, according to Saxinger, and vaccine messaging in general needs to be improved.
"I think it really has to be a big priority for elected officials to remind people, because not everyone watches the news [and] not everyone gets the same information."
The Alberta government is defending its measles response, saying it's working to limit further spread and support those impacted.
"Expanded vaccination clinics, targeted outreach, and clear public health guidance are already in place and showing positive results," an emailed statement from the Ministry of Primary and Preventative Health Services read in part.
Measles clinics hours and locations have been expanded in higher risk areas, according to the spokesperson, particularly in southern Alberta.
"Comparisons to the United States can be misleading, as most U.S. cases this year are concentrated in a single state —Texas ... Measles is increasing at different times in various regions as it's introduced by travellers, as seen in both Texas and Ontario."
The CDC website shows most states are reporting some measles cases. Texas has reported 753 cases since late January.
"As of now, there are two [Alberta] patients in hospital, and at no point have more than three or four patients been hospitalized at once," the Alberta government spokesperson said.
"There are currently 13 active cases across the province, and that number has remained stable for several weeks. Three of the five health zones have not seen any significant recent increase in cases. Weekly case numbers have now declined for four consecutive weeks and are roughly half of what they were at the recent peak."
The Alberta government's own website explains the "active" case count is an estimate and does not reflect the risk level because it doesn't account for those who are undiagnosed or who have been exposed.
The Alberta government has also extended its Don't Get Measles, Get Immunized ad campaign into mid-August and public health teams are calling parents of young babies in the hardest hit zones to let them know their infants are eligible for an early vaccine dose.
The ministry said its efforts are working and between mid-March and early June, the number of vaccine doses administered across Alberta increased by 57 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
Cancer Survivors: If You're A Hero, Why Are You Hiding It?
Love, bonding and woman with her mom with cancer hugging, sitting and spending time together. Happy, ... More sweet and sick mature female person embracing her adult daughter with a smile in outdoor garden. Cancer survivors have a great story to tell. They should tell it. I started this campaign 15 years ago – and here's the latest iteration. Over the last few weeks, I spoke with five interesting people who had five things in common. Here are the first four. They are all cancer survivors, they are all returning to the workplace after a long battle, they are all having a monumentally hard time getting a job, and they are all over 55. However, the fifth thing they have in common is why today's column came to be. They are all doing everything they can to hide these facts, especially the first one: the cancer. Now jump to thing five, the difficulty in finding a job. That's why I got their calls and emails. I gave them all the same advice. Tell people about it. Don't hide it. Get it out front and out of the way. This seemed counterintuitive to them – it may to you as well – and when I first laid it out, it made them uncomfortable. By the time we finished our conversations, though, they all agreed. And I'll bet many people reading this disagree initially, too. In fact, the advice these five people had gotten from everyone to whom they had previously spoken was opposite to mine – don't mention it, don't bring it up, don't discuss it, employers are not allowed to ask about that, if employers know they'll never hire you, it's none of their business, your previous employer is not allowed to mention it. And so on, ad infinitum. Well then, if that's the right advice, why are these people unable to find work? If they've hidden these facts, shouldn't that – based on those others' advice – lead to job opportunities? No, because it's bad advice. If you follow that line of strategic (?) thinking, and it goes month after month – in two cases, over a year – doesn't that indicate it might be faulty? This advice came from people who meant well: doctors, social workers, psychologists, religious leaders, people from the state department of labor, lawyers, family, friends, and so on. They just don't know the realities of the job market. In each case, we got around to how these five answered the 'what-have-you-been-doing-since-your-last-job?' and 'why-did-you-leave-your-last-job?' questions. OK, so how did they answer those questions? With every half-baked cockamamie answer you can think of, none of which holds water. Other than the truth, any answer is weak and suspect. If you think otherwise, go ahead; try any other answer and get back to me if you come up with one that sounds convincing – and that sounds like one that will move you to the second round of interviews. Now, one might think this is asking for trouble, that (as they all said) employers would not hire them due to fear they would get sick again and … you know the rest. Underneath it all, what's wrong with all this is that, in the eyes of many – me included – cancer survivors are heroes, and nothing less. They know all about the important things in life, like vision, determination, patience, goals, positive thinking, decision-making, responsibility, team work, bravery, and fortitude. Are these not the characteristics an employer looks for? So why hide this? Is it because you feel you'll get fewer calls or second interviews? Indeed you will, but that's OK. This deception game is the same faulty thinking that goes into the hide-my-age-by-leaving-stuff-off-my-resume fallacy. C'mon, some employers might be unfair to older workers or cancer survivors or anyone else, but they're not stupid. Whatever you try to hide will come out sooner or later. If you do the deceptive dance, they'll just find out later (not sooner), and then you'll just have wasted an awful lot of your time, not to mention keeping your hopes up artificially. So my suggestion is this. Start your cover letters off with a bold statement: 'After spending the last 10 months battling cancer, I have won that battle and am now re-entering the workplace.' Continue your letter as you would normally. You know what's going to happen? For sure, you will get fewer responses. But the ones you get are going to be real – very real. Don't you think there are people who admire what you've done? Don't you think a large number of hiring managers have either had the same experience you did or had a family member who did? Don't you think there are companies who are such avid supporters of cancer research that they sponsor 5K runs, Relay for Life, and other events in which we now all participate? The answers are yes, yes, and yes. And don't you think that, to these companies and managers, you're a hero? Yes again. Well then, let them know! The ones who will disqualify you because of what you've been through are jerks, and if by any slim chance you get this by them initially, what do you think will happen once this comes out? Jerks are always jerks; don't forget that. I'll take fewer calls any day of the week if they're sincere and real, wouldn't you? And if you can create the conditions under which that happens, why wouldn't you? Do not lose sight of one thing. You're a hero. And if you're a hero, why are you hiding it? P.S. I subsequently received letters of thanks from two different offices of the Aamerican Cancer Society, one of which published it in their newsletter. E.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Smoke descends on Northeastern US. Map shows air quality impacts.
NEW YORK CITY − Wildfire smoke wafted from Canada to create unhealthy air quality levels across the Northeast on July 26. State officials from Maine to New York issued alerts for fine particulate matter, a toxic byproduct of wildfires that is small enough to be inhaled. Smoky conditions impacted cities including Boston and New York. Canada's fires could produce more smoke blowing into the Northeast through the afternoon, said Brooke Taber, a National Weather Service meteorologist stationed in Burlington, Vermont. Smoke is also causing limited visibility in some areas. Wind changes could provide a respite by the night, Taber said. Montreal had some of the worst air quality in the world due to fires in the Canadian Prairies, the Canadian Press reported, citing IQAir, a Swiss-based monitoring company. Several wildfires burning in Saskatchewan and Manitoba are sending large smoke plumes eastward, according to Quebec's fire provincial agency. Meanwhile, New York City climbed on IQAir's list of cities with unhealthy air levels. Hazy skies and the faint smell of smoke blanketed Manhattan on Saturday. Map shows US air quality Why air quality matters Officials urged people to stay indoors to reduce exposure, and to limit strenuous activity. Exposure can cause short-term effects such as irritation of the eyes, nose and throat, along with coughing, sneezing, runny nose and shortness of breath. It can be particularly dangerous for people in sensitive groups, such as children, older people and those with chronic health conditions, such as asthma or heart disease. Canada is experiencing another harsh wildfire season in a warming climate. Dozens of wildfires are blazing uncontrolled, according to Canada's natural resources department. In early July, Manitoba's government declared a state of emergency for its historic fires. July 17: Brace for more smoky skies as Canadian wildfires rage Eduardo Cuevas is based in New York City. Reach him by email at emcuevas1@ or on Signal at emcuevas.01. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Air quality map shows Canandian wildfire smoke impacts
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Continuous glucose monitors are in vogue. But do you really need to track your blood sugar?
A quarter-size device that tracks the rise and fall of sugar in your blood is the latest source of hope — and hype — in the growing buzz around wearable health technology. Continuous glucose monitors, small patches that provide 24-hour insight into concentrations of sugar in the blood, could be a tool for Americans to 'take control over their own health,' Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently told federal lawmakers. 'They can take responsibility,' Kennedy said. 'They can begin to make good judgments about their diet, about their physical activity, about the way they live their lives.' The devices have lifesaving benefits for people with diabetes, the disease caused when blood sugar remains high because their bodies don't make enough insulin or become resistant to it. The condition, which affects more than 38 million people in the U.S., raises the risk of serious health problems such as heart and kidney disease and vision loss. But the devices have surged in popularity among people without diabetes. Sales have been driven by high-profile marketers such as Casey Means, the nominee for U.S. surgeon general. There's scant evidence the monitors are useful for people with normal blood sugar levels, said Dr. Jody Dushay, an endocrine specialist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Healthy bodies can effectively regulate glucose after meals and provide the energy they need to function. Glucose monitors may lead people to misinterpret normal swings in blood sugar that happen after eating or activity. In addition, the devices can be 'notoriously inaccurate,' providing misleading readings, she said. 'The problem with wearing these is that you can just be zooming in on and creating pathology when it's not there,' Dushay said. Here's what you need to know about the devices: Here's what a continuous glucose monitor does The device is a small patch, about the size of two stacked quarters, usually placed on the upper arm or stomach. It uses a needle to painlessly pierce the skin for a tiny sensor. The sensor measures the glucose in fluid under the skin, delivering a signal every few minutes to a phone app or a handheld display. The apps typically record blood sugar levels and help people track the foods they eat and how they impact those levels. When healthy people eat a meal that contains carbohydrates, their blood sugar rises, peaks and falls in response to the food. A healthy fasting blood glucose level for a person without diabetes is roughly 70 milligrams per deciliter to 99 milligrams per deciliter. A range from 100 to 126 milligrams per deciliter indicates prediabetes and above 126 milligrams per deciliter indicates diabetes, according to the American Diabetes Association. In adults without diabetes, blood sugar levels can climb to 140 milligrams per deciliter or more within an hour of a meal, before falling back to baseline levels within two or three hours, according to the association. It's a sign the body is processing sugar normally. Continuous glucose monitors have been available since the late 1990s For decades, these devices were available only for people with diabetes. The monitors revolutionized care by allowing more precise adjustment of insulin used to treat diabetes and giving people the ability to modify meals and activity more accurately. Last year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first over-the-counter monitors. Since then, many companies have emerged to market them, claiming to provide intensive, individualized health monitoring. Cost is generally about $100 a month. They've really caught on with consumers curious about how food and activity affect their blood sugar levels. For instance, Noom, the weight-loss and fitness app, launched a blood glucose feature last year that has proven extremely popular, said Alexander Fabry, a company executive. 'Of the people who are using a CGM, the vast majority of them don't have a diabetes diagnosis,' he said. Who can use the monitors? The devices have been lifesaving for people with diabetes. And they can be helpful for people with risk factors for the disease, including obesity, prediabetes, a history of gestational diabetes or a family history of the condition. The devices can allow users to see how specific food and activity choices affect their blood sugar in near real-time, said Dr. Alaina Vidmar, a pediatric obesity specialist at Children's Hospital Los Angeles. 'After a large meal, you may watch your blood sugar go up and sort of learn something about yourself,' Vidmar said. 'For example, I drink a sugar-sweetened soda and my blood sugar goes up really high, really fast. And maybe I don't feel as good, right?' What are the cautions? People without risk factors for diabetes may turn to the monitors just because they're curious, said Dr. David Kessler. A former FDA commissioner, Kessler doesn't have diabetes, but he wore a monitor for a couple months during research for his recent book, 'Diet, Drugs and Dopamine.' 'I think it's a very interesting tool to experiment with if you're so inclined,' Kessler said. But, he noted, the devices can't be used to diagnose or treat disease. Even experts don't agree on how to interpret or provide health advice for people without diabetes based on blood sugar data. 'No one knows what's optimal in the nondiabetic state,' he said. Before using a monitor, Dushay asks patients to consider their motives. 'What do you think you're going to get from the data?' she said. 'What is to be gained from wearing that monitor?' ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Jonel Aleccia, The Associated Press
