Starlink hit by hours-long outage, raising concerns over resilience
The outage, which began around 3 p.m. EDT (1900 GMT), triggered more than 61,000 reports on Downdetector, a website that tracks service interruptions. The disruption affected users across the U.S. and Europe and lasted roughly 2.5 hours.
Starlink, which has over six million users in approximately 140 countries and territories, acknowledged the issue on its X account and said it was "actively implementing a solution." The company later confirmed the service had resumed.
Michael Nicolls, vice president of Starlink Engineering, said the cause was a failure of "key internal software services that operate the core network." He apologized for the disruption and said efforts were underway to identify and fix the root cause.
Elon Musk also apologized on X, writing: "Sorry for the outage. SpaceX will remedy the root cause to ensure it doesn't happen again."
The failure marked one of Starlink's largest-ever outages and sparked questions about the satellite system's resilience. The system has become increasingly critical for global connectivity in underserved regions.
Doug Madory, an analyst at internet monitoring firm Kentik, described the incident as "likely the longest outage ever for Starlink" since it became a major player in the internet services space. The scale of the disruption led some experts to speculate on whether it was triggered by a faulty update or possibly even a cyberattack.
"I'd speculate this is a bad software update, not entirely dissimilar to the CrowdStrike mess with Windows last year, or a cyberattack," said Gregory Falco, director of a space and cybersecurity lab at Cornell University.
While no evidence has surfaced suggesting malicious activity, the failure raises concerns as SpaceX expands Starlink's scope. The company is launching larger satellites as part of a partnership with T-Mobile to offer direct-to-cell services, including emergency messaging from rural areas.
Since 2020, SpaceX has launched more than 8,000 Starlink satellites, creating a vast constellation in low-Earth orbit that provides internet access to both consumers and critical sectors such as military and maritime operations.
It remains unclear whether the outage impacted Starlink-powered services under SpaceX's Starshield unit, which holds major contracts with the U.S. government and military.
While service was quickly restored, the rare failure highlights how even the most advanced networks can falter, and just how dependent the world has become on space-based connectivity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Neuralink to test brain implant in UK for spinal injury patients
FREMONT, California: Elon Musk's Neuralink is taking its brain-computer interface technology to the UK, with a clinical trial aimed at helping patients with severe paralysis operate devices using only their thoughts. The company announced it will partner with the University College London Hospitals trust and Newcastle Hospitals to conduct the study. Neuralink said the trial will involve patients suffering from conditions like spinal cord injuries and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). These individuals may qualify to test the company's implant, which is designed to enable control of digital and physical tools via brain signals. The UK study comes as part of Neuralink's broader efforts to scale human testing of its brain chip. The company began human trials in 2024 after addressing safety issues flagged by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which initially rejected its application in 2022. According to Neuralink, five patients with severe paralysis are already using the device to control external tools with their thoughts. Founded in 2016, Neuralink has raised about US$1.3 billion from investors and is reportedly valued at approximately $9 billion, according to PitchBook data cited in media reports. Last month, the company secured $650 million in fresh funding to advance its work on brain-machine interfaces.
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
1 AI Robotics Stock to Buy Before It Soars 758% to $8 Trillion, According to a Wall Street Analyst
Key Points Several Wall Street experts anticipate substantial upside in Tesla stock as the company leans into autonomous driving and robotics. Tesla reported dismal first-quarter financial results as increased competition and CEO Elon Musk's political activities eroded its market share. Musk believes Tesla will eventually dominate the trillion-dollar robotaxi market, and he sees a $10 trillion opportunity in humanoid robots. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) shares have declined 25% year to date as the electric carmaker has struggled with weak demand amid growing competition and consumer backlash against CEO Elon Musk's politics. The company is currently worth $976 billion, but several Wall Street experts anticipate substantial upside in the years ahead. Ark Invest analysts, led by Tasha Keeney, think Tesla stock will reach $2,600 per share by 2029. That forecast implies 758% upside from its current share price of $303. It also implies a market value of $8.3 trillion. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives recently told Yahoo Finance that Tesla could be a $2 trillion company within 12 months. That implies 105% upside from its current market value of $976 billion. It also implies a share price of $620. Hedge fund billionaire Ron Baron told CNBC last year that Tesla could be a $5 trillion company within a decade. That implies 410% upside from its current market value. It also implies a share price of $1,550. CEO Elon Musk has said Tesla could eventually be a $30 trillion company as it benefits from autonomous driving and robotics. That implies 2,975% upside from its current market value. It also implies a share price of $9,310. Tesla is one of the most controversial stocks on the market. Investors tend to have binary opinions, either seeing Tesla as an overrated automaker or a revolutionary company poised to reshape the global mobility and labor markets with artificial intelligence. Read on to learn more. Tesla is losing market share in electric vehicles, and Musk warned of rough quarters ahead Tesla ceded significant market share in electric vehicles during the past year as competition increased and CEO Elon Musk damaged the brand with his political activities. The company accounted for just 10% of battery electric vehicle sales through May, down from 16% in the same period last year, according to Morgan Stanley. Tesla reported weak second-quarter financial results. Deliveries decreased by 13%, the second straight drop. Revenue declined 12% to $22 billion, operating margin narrowed by 2 percentage points, and non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) earnings fell 23% to $0.40 per diluted share. Musk also warned that the next few quarters could be rough as the company ramps up its autonomous driving business. "We probably could have a few rough quarters. I'm not saying we will, but we could," he told analysts on the earnings call. "But once we get autonomous to scale in the second half of next year, certainly by the end of next year, I'd be really surprised if the economics are not very compelling." Tesla has substantial opportunities in autonomous ride-hailing services and humanoid robots Tesla has been developing its autonomous driving software for more than a decade. Its vision-only approach (meaning its cars are equipped only with cameras) gives the company a theoretical edge over the market leader Alphabet 's Waymo, which relies on a more costly array of cameras, lidar, and radar. Tesla also has more camera-equipped cars on the road collecting data to train the underlying artificial intelligence (AI) models. Importantly, while Waymo is currently the market leader, with commercial autonomous ride-hailing services in five U.S. cities, Elon Musk thinks Tesla will catch up quickly because its vision-only strategy is more scalable. Indeed, the company recently started its first robotaxi service in Austin, but Musk says the coverage area could include half the U.S. population by year-end. Additionally, Musk says Tesla could eventually have 99% market share in autonomous ride-hailing, which itself is forecast to be a trillion-dollar market in about 15 years. Tom Narayan at RBC Capital expects global robotaxi revenue to reach $1.7 trillion by 2040. He also says Tesla could earn $115 billion in revenue from robotaxi services in that year. Beyond robotaxis, Tesla is also developing an autonomous humanoid robot, called Optimus, to revolutionize the labor industry. Robots could be particularly useful in handling tasks too dangerous, tedious, or physically demanding for humans. Musk says Optimus production will hit 100,000 units monthly (more than 1 million annually) within five years. He also says humanoid robots could be a $10 trillion opportunity for Tesla. The Ark Invest analysts, led by Tasha Keeney, built their 2029 forecast around autonomous driving. Robotaxis are projected to account for more than 60% of revenue, roughly $750 billion, while electric car sales account for less than 30%. The remaining portion will come from energy storage and insurance. Keeney did not factor Optimus into the calculations, but her robotaxi estimates are much more aggressive than those from Narayan at RBC. Tesla's valuation looks absurdly expensive, but autonomous driving and robotics could change the narrative Wall Street estimates Tesla's earnings will increase by 20% annually over the next three to five years. That makes the current valuation of 175 times earnings look absurdly expensive. But Tesla bulls think most analysts are underestimating the impact that robotaxis and robots will have on the business. For instance, Ark Invest estimates that Tesla's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) will increase by over 3,000% to $440 billion by 2029, which implies a compound annual growth rate of about 115%. While I find that scenario highly unlikely, earnings growth of that magnitude would justify the current valuation. Here's the bottom line: Traders who lack confidence in the robotaxi and robotics narrative should avoid this stock. But patient investors who believe Tesla could revolutionize the mobility and labor markets with AI products like self-driving cars and humanoid robots should own a position. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $450,531!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,420!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $624,823!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025
Globe and Mail
2 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Jury orders Tesla to pay more than $240 million in Autopilot crash case
MIAMI (AP) — A Miami jury decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $200 million in damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million in compensatory damages, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. 'It's a big number that will send shockwaves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.' Tesla said it will appeal. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust generally in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks, falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like 'driver assist' and 'copilot' to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. 'Words matter,' Schreiber said. 'And if someone is playing fast and lose with words, they're playing fast and lose with information and facts.' Schreiber acknowledged that the driver, George McGee, was negligent when he blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles an hour before slamming into a Chevrolet Tahoe that the couple had parked to get a look at the stars. The Tahoe spun around so hard it was able to launch Benavides 75 feet through the air into nearby woods where her body was later found. It also left Angulo, who walked into the courtroom Friday with a limp and cushion to sit on, with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury. But Schreiber said Tesla was at fault nonetheless. He said Tesla allowed drivers to act recklessly by not disengaging the Autopilot as soon as they begin to show signs of distraction and by allowing them to use the system on smaller roads that it was not designed for, like the one McGee was driving on. 'I trusted the technology too much,' said McGee at one point in his testimony. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.' The lead defense lawyer in the Miami case, Joel Smith, countered that Tesla warns drivers that they must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel yet McGee chose not to do that while he looked for a dropped cell phone, adding to the danger by speeding. Noting that McGee had gone through the same intersection 30 or 40 times previously and hadn't crashed during any of those trips, Smith said that isolated the cause to one thing alone: 'The cause is that he dropped his cell phone.' The auto industry has been watching the case closely because a finding of Tesla liability despite a driver's admission of reckless behavior would pose significant legal risks for every company as they develop cars that increasingly drive themselves.
