Even after Texas floods, S.F. has no plans to fix its defunct tsunami warning sirens
Though the system has been defunct since 2019 and officials have discussed whether to fix or replace the sirens, Mayor Daniel Lurie did not include funding for it in his budget proposal that the Board of Supervisors is set to approve within weeks. The cost of repair or replacement has been estimated as high as $20 million, and cell phone alerts, while far from a perfect warning system, is the primary technology the city relies on.
Still, the deadly Texas floods and the lack of a siren system there stirred debate online.
'This horrible event in Texas should be a sign for our local elected officials to take action and not divert money to other programs and get this done now,' one San Francisco resident posted on Nextdoor.
The mayor's office referred the Chronicle to the San Francisco Department of Emergency Management for questions about the sirens. The department did not comment specifically on plans for the defunct warning system.
Emergency officials said the siren system was 'paused for maintenance and assessment in 2019' because officials found 'much of the infrastructure was no longer functional,' and that the costs to repair it would be 'substantial.'
When the sirens were turned off, the expected price tag to boost the system's security and reliability was about $2.5 million, but the money was never allocated. In 2023, then-Supervisor Aaron Peskin tried to fast-track the project with a $5 million injection of funds, but then-Mayor London Breed didn't include the funding in her budget.
The cost of an entirely new system is expected to be upward of $20 million, before factoring in the operating costs, and it could continue to grow the longer the city waits.
For the city, the question has been whether the system should be repaired or replaced.
Lurie did not identify any funding for the repair or replacement project in his proposed budget, which seeks to close an $800 million budget gap with funding and staffing cuts.
Without the sirens, the city still has other ways of communicating danger to residents.
'The recent tragic flooding in Texas is a powerful reminder of how critical it is to reach people quickly and effectively during emergencies,' emergency management department spokesperson Leah Greenbaum said in a statement. 'While Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) and cell phone-based systems like AlertSF are essential tools, we know no single method reaches everyone. That's why we're continually working to improve how we alert and warn the public.'
The WEA are 'short emergency messages from authorized federal, state, local, tribal and territorial public alerting authorities that can be broadcast from cell towers,' according to FEMA, while the city's own AlertSF system does the same thing but also sends text messages and more localized warnings.
The department said it is 'committed to reaching as many people as effectively as possible in an emergency and continues to build on our alert and warning programs.'
Former FEMA and California Office of Emergency Services emergency management expert Art Botterell said the sirens can only be part of a wider emergency response network — they can't be the only way people are notified.
'You have to look at sirens in coordination with other systems — like WEA alerts, which work well in urban environments but struggle in less developed areas,' Botterell said, like where floodwaters have wrought devastation in Texas. 'It's easy to get fixated on a single warning technology like sirens — but there is no magic bullet that works best in all circumstances.'
Botterell said sirens are best for wide open areas where large crowds need to be warned of danger. Botterell said that places along the coast could use the sirens, such as Ocean Beach, where tsunami warnings should be as loud as possible. Otherwise, the sirens can actually be primitive warning systems, he said.
'Sirens are essentially a one-bit message,' Botterell said. 'They don't give you any insight into what to do next.'
Botterell added that new construction techniques in the past several decades have made sirens essentially obsolete. Advances in window and insulation technology mean most homes are so closed off from the outside that sound has trouble reaching inside. Boterrell called it an 'unintended consequence' of tech advancements.
Today the best warning systems are pocket-sized: everyone has a mini siren on their phone, he said. He said he's not surprised the city isn't funding a replacement for the sirens.
The city's emergency management department also made clear that warnings are no substitute for good emergency planning.
'Notification is just one part of San Francisco's comprehensive emergency preparedness strategy,' the department said. 'We encourage all San Franciscans to take steps to prepare themselves and their families for disasters.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
‘We don't deserve this.' Women held in limbo at ICE's downtown S.F. center awaiting bed space
Three women who were detained by federal immigration officers at court Wednesday were held overnight inside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement's downtown San Francisco field office and remained there Thursday afternoon because there were no available beds at migrant detention facilities, one of the women and her attorney told the Chronicle. The 27-year-old Colombian woman from San Jose said in an interview she was held overnight in a cell on the sixth floor of 630 Sansome St., along with two other women who were also detained on Wednesday afternoon at the U.S. Department of Justice's San Francisco Immigration Court. She described the room as a small space with a toilet, a bench, a thin mattress and a small window where she could see officers standing outside. ICE representatives did not immediately respond to questions about the woman's arrest and detention. The Chronicle is not naming her, per its anonymous source policy, due to her fears of retaliation. The women are among many immigrants who have been held at the San Francisco ICE field office in recent weeks while officials make arrangements to transfer people to detention centers, said Jessica Yamane, an immigration attorney with Pangea Legal Services and Santa Clara County's Rapid Response Network. Some have been held for days, she said, a source of additional trauma as they already face uncertainty over what will happen to them. Yamane said ICE representatives told her that the woman was being held at the field office because there were no available beds at migrant detention facilities. Detained migrants from the Bay Area are typically transferred to detention centers in Southern California. Immigration attorneys and advocates have reported overcrowding and deteriorating conditions at ICE detention facilities across the country. An ICE representative told NPR that 'some ICE facilities are experiencing temporary overcrowding due to recent increases in detention populations' and implementing measures to manage capacity. ICE typically places immigrants in holding cells in its field offices for a few hours at a time before transferring them elsewhere, but there have been reports of longer stays and overcrowding in these facilities as well. Yamane said the overnight detentions at the 630 Sansome St. building reminded her of when immigration officials used the upper floors of the building as a detention center for Chinese immigrants post-World War II. 'It's been the same mechanism of terror through detention that have broken people's spirits for generations,' she said. On Thursday afternoon in a cold visitation room, the Colombian woman told the Chronicle through a glass window that plainclothes ICE officers arrested her as she exited a courtroom at 100 Montgomery St. around 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday. An asylum seeker, the woman said she had just attended her first courthouse appointment, where the judge rescheduled her appointment for October because she didn't have an attorney. 'Everything was going well. I didn't see any risk because the judge gave me another date,' she said. Two men identified themselves as ICE agents, handcuffed her and walked out the building through a back door, she said. They forcefully pushed her into an unmarked car and told her they were taking her to the ICE field office, she said. 'They were hurting me,' she said, tears falling down her cheeks. 'I hadn't done anything wrong.' She was placed in a cell with two other women. During the interview with the Chronicle, an immigration official walked into the visitation room to drop off a meal — a bean and cheese burrito, a breakfast bar and bottled water. She said ICE officials have not told her where she will be sent. 'They're treating us like criminals,' she said. 'We don't deserve this treatment. We are just trying to do the right thing.' She said she flew to Mexico and crossed the U.S. border in December 2022, fleeing violence she experienced in her hometown of Bogota. In the U.S., she moved in with her boyfriend in San Jose and worked at a local restaurant and delivered food via UberEats with her partner. Their dream, she said, was to save enough money to open their own auto repair and body shop. 'It's a dream that I don't know will happen now,' she said.
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
Mayor Daniel Lurie signs $15.9 billion budget
With Mayor Daniel Lurie and the Board of Supervisors approving San Francisco's $15.9 billion budget, the city's fiscal winners and losers are coming into focus. Why it matters: The two-year plan signed by Lurie on Friday marks the clearest signal yet of San Francisco's shifting priorities under his administration: leaner city government and a stronger public safety push. To close an $800 million deficit, Lurie is cutting jobs and slashing nonprofit funding. What they're saying: "The budget that I signed today is responsible, balanced and focused on the priorities that will drive our city's recovery," Lurie said in a statement. Between the lines: Funding for law enforcement rose, with police receiving a 3% boost to $849 million, the Sheriff's Department growing by 7% to $345 million and the District Attorney's Office climbing 3% to $96 million, as reported by The Standard. About 40 city workers will be laid off and roughly 1,300 vacant positions will be eliminated — down from the 100 positions that were initially proposed. The move is expected to save as much as $300 million every year in future budgets, per the mayor's office. The Board of Supervisors also granted Lurie expanded control over Proposition C, allowing him to redirect funds originally designated for homelessness services without securing supermajority approval. Yes, but: Nonprofit grants and other contracts were cut by about $171 million, a move advocates say prioritizes policing over support for working-class families, immigrants and low-income residents — a friction point likely to resurface as Lurie's agenda moves forward. District 9 Supervisor Jackie Fielder, who is among the most progressive supervisors on the board, cast the lone no vote against passing the budget and did not attend the signing ceremony Thursday, citing opposition to such cuts. "We appreciate the mayor's dedication to address this budget crisis head on, but we are concerned at who these cuts target and who they spare," Anya Worley-Ziegmann, a coordinator at the People's Budget Coalition, which is made up of 150 local nonprofits and public sector unions, said in a written statement.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Alameda Supervisors allocate $170 million a year to help the homeless
The Brief The Alameda County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted to allocate $170 million annually to addressing homelessness in the county. Those funds come from Measure W, a 2020 .5% sales tax. The tax faced legal challenges that were resolved earlier this year, which allowed the funds to be disbursed. OAKLAND, Calif. - The Alameda County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted to allocate over $1.4 billion toward homeless initiatives across the county. The money, pulled from Measure W funds, will fund shelter, permanent housing, services for the unhoused and strategies to prevent homelessness. "Homelessness is one of the greatest challenges facing Alameda County. My office engages hundreds of residents and advocates who joined our call for seizing this moment to invest deeply in proven solutions to homelessness," Supervisor Nikki Fortunato Bass said in a press release. "I am proud that our collective advocacy achieved this historic investment. No one should have to live on our streets or in their vehicle, or be one unexpected expense away from being unhoused." The board directed 80% of anticipated Measure W revenues — $170 million per year — to be allocated to homelessness solutions, and the remaining 20% go toward essential county services, including some responses to recent state and federal budget shortages. Bas requested that any additional Measure W funds go toward homelessness, to which the board agreed. Those extra funds could mean up to an additional $120 million for homelessness solutions, based on previous revenue collections. Money in the making The backstory Measure W is a .5% general sales tax approved by voters in November 2020, which is projected to raise over $1.8 billion over 10 years. The county began collecting the tax, but the disbursal of those funds was held up by a legal challenge filed following the measure's passage. An anti-tax group sued over the tax, arguing that Measure W was a "special tax," which legally requires a two-thirds vote to pass. Campaign literature for the measure stated the tax revenue was specifically intended to address homelessness. Measure W passed with 50.09% of the vote. The courts ruled earlier this year that W was in fact a general tax, and that the county could use the funds for anything it wanted. Tuesday night's Board of Supervisors meeting saw heavy attendance from county residents, who filled three overflow rooms. City leaders, services providers, advocates and members of the public spoke in favor of using the money for its intended purpose. Solve the daily Crossword
