Hazmat spill on I-205 North causes delays after crash
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — A crash involving a tractor trailer and a box truck caused a hazmat spill, closing all lanes of traffic on a section of I-205 N Thursday afternoon, authorities said.
At 4:45 p.m., Portland Fire & Rescue crews responded to a section of the highway between Burnside and Glisan, finding a barrel on the box truck was punctured and leaking 'unknown liquid' onto the road.
The Hazardous Materials team was then called to the scene to identify the liquid. Officials said they found it was an 'acidic cleaning liquid' which was safely picked up using absorbent pellets, then discarded.
All northbound lanes of I-205 were taken off the freeway and diverted around the location of the crash.
Overall, authorities said traffic was affected for over two hours while officials cleaned up the scene.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Summit Racing Equipment NHRA Nationals Pairings
Saturday At Summit Racing Equipment Motorsport Park Norwalk, Ohio Sunday's Pairings Top Fuel 1. Justin Ashley, 3.752 seconds, 330.88 mph vs. 16. Scott Farley, 3.973, 257.48; 2. Antron Brown, 3.755, 333.33 vs. 15. Doug Kalitta, 3.953, 294.37; 3. Tony Stewart, 3.755, 327.11 vs. 14. Kyle Wurtzel, 3.895, 305.29; 4. Brittany Force, 3.784, 334.65 vs. 13. Lex Joon, 3.882, 313.73; 5. Shawn Langdon, 3.789, 324.59 vs. 12. Doug Foley, 3.841, 317.49; 6. Steve Torrence, 3.812, 329.34 vs. 11. Shawn Reed, 3.826, 322.42; 7. Dan Mercier, 3.813, 330.15 vs. 10. Clay Millican, 3.823, 324.20; 8. Spencer Massey, 3.816, 319.37 vs. 9. Josh Hart, 3.818, 325.37. Did Not Qualify: 17. Will Smith, 3.997, 283.85. Funny Car 1. Cruz Pedregon, Dodge Charger, 3.890, 318.39 vs. 16. Buddy Hull, Charger, 4.127, 276.75; 2. Austin Prock, Chevy Camaro, 3.900, 331.28 vs. 15. Dale Creasy Jr., Charger, 4.087, 312.57; 3. Ron Capps, Toyota GR Supra, 3.908, 325.06 vs. 14. Paul Lee, Charger, 4.079, 306.26; 4. Jack Beckman, Camaro, 3.913, 321.35 vs. 13. Chad Green, Ford Mustang, 4.072, 311.56; 5. Matt Hagan, Charger, 3.926, 329.67 vs. 12. J.R. Todd, GR Supra, 4.061, 322.50; 6. Alexis DeJoria, Charger, 3.960, 327.11 vs. 11. Dave Richards, Mustang, 4.040, 317.19; 7. Hunter Green, Charger, 3.972, 322.50 vs. 10. Bob Tasca III, Mustang, 4.012, 322.73; 8. Daniel Wilkerson, Mustang, 3.997, 321.50 vs. 9. Spencer Hyde, Mustang, 4.005, 314.97. Did Not Qualify: 17. Julie Nataas, 4.148, 294.11; 18. Chris King, 4.267, 249.72; 19. Bobby Bode, 4.386, 205.19; 20. Mike McIntire, 4.927, 173.14; 21. Joe Morrison, 5.248, 147.04. Pro Stock 1. Greg Anderson, Chevy Camaro, 6.594, 207.30 vs. 16. Derrick Reese, Ford Mustang, 6.721, 203.98; 2. Dallas Glenn, Camaro, 6.596, 207.37 vs. 15. Val Smeland, Camaro, 6.703, 204.82; 3. Matt Hartford, Camaro, 6.603, 207.88 vs. 14. Chris McGaha, Camaro, 6.652, 207.59; 4. Greg Stanfield, Camaro, 6.613, 206.73 vs. 13. Mason McGaha, Camaro, 6.650, 207.53; 5. Cory Reed, Camaro, 6.616, 208.17 vs. 12. Troy Coughlin Jr., Camaro, 6.640, 205.32; 6. Eric Latino, Camaro, 6.619, 206.45 vs. 11. Deric Kramer, Camaro, 6.632, 209.07; 7. Cody Coughlin, Camaro, 6.626, 206.57 vs. 10. Jeg Coughlin, Camaro, 6.631, 205.66; 8. Aaron Stanfield, Camaro, 6.626, 207.05 vs. 9. Erica Enders, Camaro, 6.630, 206.95. Pro Stock Motorcycle 1. Matt Smith, Buell, 6.816, 200.86 vs. Bye; 2. Gaige Herrera, Suzuki, 6.820, 199.11 vs. 13. Odolph Daniels, Suzuki, 7.336, 182.85; 3. John Hall, Beull, 6.832, 199.35 vs. 12. Wesley Wells, Suzuki, 7.233, 183.69; 4. Angie Smith, Buell, 6.839, 198.32 vs. 11. Chris Bostick, Suzuki, 6.970, 193.32; 5. Richard Gadson, Suzuki, 6.853, 197.28 vs. 10. Chase Van Sant, Suzuki, 6.922, 195.76; 6. Ron Tornow, Victory, 6.862, 197.88 vs. 9. Marc Ingwersen, EBR, 6.901, 192.99; 7. Jianna Evaristo, Buell, 6.886, 199.08 vs. 8. Steve Johnson, Suzuki, 6.891, 195.05.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Mechanic: These Are the 5 Cars I Would Never Buy in 2025
Not all cars are reliable. Some vehicles have high maintenance costs and persistent mechanical issues. Even if they have the most attractive designs, it's best to avoid such cars if you don't want to drain your wallet. Read Next: Explore More: Alan Gelfand, a mechanic and owner of German Car Depot, shared five cars he would never buy in 2025 because they're expensive to maintain and are prone to mechanical problems. The Chrysler 200 has been out of production since 2017, but preowned vehicles are still available for purchase. 'They end up being expensive to maintain,' Gelfand said. Besides being costly to service, Gelfand also noted that the Chrysler 200 has poor transmission quality, electrical system issues and uncomfortable driving dynamics. 'The 9-speed automatic transmission is notorious for jerky shifting and premature failure,' he said. Check Out: This midsize sedan has a luxurious look but has a major continuously variable transmission (CVT) issue, which can be costly to replace. 'I would never purchase this vehicle because the CVT is its major flaw,' Gelfand said. 'We have had to replace numerous Altima transmissions because they tend to fail at approximately 60,000 miles.' The Jeep Renegade may appeal to many people because it's a compact SUV, but Gelfand said it's one of the most unreliable cars. 'The vehicle presents itself as modern, yet it experiences multiple electrical breakdowns while its driving comfort remains poor,' he said. 'It will experience powertrain lights and shifting issues and connectivity problems that will require frequent visits to the shop.' This luxury compact SUV's sleek design looks attractive in many ways. However, the Range Rover Evoque will let you visit the repair shop regularly. 'It looks stylish yet lacks reliability. We have observed engine oil leaks together with transmission problems and total electrical shutdowns, which occur frequently below 80,000 miles,' Gelfand said. While the Chevrolet Spark is an affordable car, it's not worth the price. 'The vehicle demonstrates low construction quality together with high noise levels and weak engine performance,' Gelfand said. Rather than settling for this vehicle, Gelfand recommended a used Honda or Toyota since these models cost less and offer better durability. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on I'm a Mechanic: These Are the 5 Cars I Would Never Buy in 2025
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's early birthday present to himself—the first Tesla just drove itself from its factory straight to the customer
In its second milestone in a week, Tesla arranged for a Model Y crossover to drive itself from its Texas factory to a customer in downtown Austin some 30 minutes away. It follows the successful launch of its robotaxi service this past Sunday. City officials, however, told Fortune they had no choice in the matter: 'the City does not have the authority to regulate these vehicles.' Tesla celebrated a historic first on Friday when a new Model Y left the factory in Austin and—without anyone in the vehicle—drove itself to a waiting customer a half-hour away. Already the second milestone this week after the commercial deployment of his robotaxi service, it marks an early birthday present for CEO Elon Musk. The entrepreneur had promised it to Tesla supporters for June 28, which is coincidentally when he turns 54 years old. 'The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule,' Musk posted on Friday. 'There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous.' Since this is completely unsupervised full-self driving (FSD) in its first-ever practical application for the brand, Tesla uploaded a video as proof. It documents from various angles the roughly 30-minute drive from the Austin factory to 1515 S. Lamar Blvd. downtown, where its new owner took possession. Whether this delivery is just a one-off test or part of a broader plan to revamp distribution remains unclear. While it might in theory save on at least part of the $1,390 destination fee Tesla charges, it risks scratching or denting the vehicle in transit—or even just arriving at the customer dirty, looking like it had just been through a rainstorm. Additionally, the Model Y's range maxes out at an official 357 miles with real world tests indicating a lower range. Unless it could drive from one Tesla service center to the next, so that an employee could recharge it, the range would limit it to a radius inside Texas. Lastly, regulations on the ground could make it outright illegal as state governments currently determine under what conditions autonomous vehicles, if at all, can drive on their roads. In the case of Austin, for example, city officials told Fortune they had no say in what Musk's company did. 'Tesla made the City aware of their intent to deliver a fully autonomous vehicle,' a spokesman for the Texas state capital said. 'While the City does not have the authority to regulate these vehicles, we will continue to work with the company to provide feedback if public safety issues arise.' The autonomous delivery also elicited skepticism as to whether Tesla might be misleading people into believing the technology is more robust than it really is. Some pointed to the fact the video was not livestreamed, but rather uploaded later. In addition, the robotaxi service that began operation in Austin on Sunday still only operates during certain hours, does not drive to the airport, and features a safety monitor in the front passenger seat at all times. Moreover, the timing is advantageous, as Musk has been attempting to shift investor focus towards the rollout of his robotaxi technology and away from its struggling core business of selling EVs. This coming week, Tesla is expected to publish second-quarter global production and delivery figures that show a 14% decline in deliveries to 383,000 vehicles, according to the median estimate polled by the company's investor relations team. While a few skeptics are bound to remain mistrustful no matter what, the suspicion is rooted in part in experience. Nearly nine years ago, Tesla posted a similar demonstration when it released the 'Paint It Black' video. It claimed that a vehicle was driving entirely on its own and the human behind the wheel was not even there to monitor for safety. 'The person in the driver's seat is only there for legal reasons,' it stated in the video posted in October 2016. 'He is not doing anything. The car is driving itself.' Tesla's AI director Ashok Elluswamy later testified in a sworn deposition the footage was not meant to be an accurate representation of the technology. Both the video and the blog post have since been expunged entirely from Tesla's site, but thanks to YouTube and web archives they are still viewable. There was another, more recent example, as well. In October 2024, Musk showcased prototype robots interacting with human guests at an event without telling anyone they were tele-operated remotely by humans. Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment from Fortune. But Elluswamy, who has risen the ranks at Tesla since working on the 2016 video, denied there was any trickery with the self-driving delivery video on Friday. 'Literally chose a random customer who ordered a Model Y in the Austin area. Vehicle is exactly the same as every Model Y produced in the Tesla factory,' he replied to a question on X. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
