Va. lawmaker's federal PEER Support Act aims to bolster recovery specialists
The U.S. Capitol is shown on March 14, 2024. (Photo by Jennifer Shutt/States Newsroom)
As someone with the lived experience of battling addiction — to include the criminal record that often goes hand in hand with the disease — Rachel Alderman is among the best-suited people to help others cope.
Alderman is a peer recovery specialist and community health worker at the Community Health Center of the New River Valley, where she helps people overcome drug addiction. Lately, she's felt a fresh sense of pride in her role, since new federal and state efforts to support these types of mental health workers have made headway.
But it's often been challenging for professionals like her to land their dream job because it's common for people coping with substance use disorders to have also entered the criminal justice system.
Then their past convictions, time-served, probation status or fines still owed can prevent them from obtaining many types of jobs. In Alderman's case, her possession charges could have prevented her from working in the field, if not for law changes and permissive employers.
While private or nonprofit organizations have been able to more freely hire people with certain criminal records, state or federal-funded facilities often can't.
Virginia state lawmakers have chipped away at some of these barriers over the years and U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, now hopes to support those efforts nationwide.
Peer recovery specialists like Alderman interface directly with patients and collaborate with clinical social workers or medical officers to help patients address their physical and mental health while they try to overcome their addiction.
Alderman always had an interest in working in the mental health field, but her struggles with substance use disorder held her back. When she was seeking care from clinicians, she said it was a visit with a peer recovery specialist who helped her both recover and realize her professional pathway was still possible.
'I knew my clinicians cared about me. I knew that they wanted to see me get better, but they didn't really get (how addiction feels). And then this guy comes in, and somehow he's figured it out,' Alderman explained. 'So I'm like 'Well he did it, so maybe I'll listen to his suggestions that I might have been hard-headed against at first.''
This week, Kaine and Indiana Republican Sen. Jim Banks introduced the Providing Empathetic and Effective Recovery (PEER) Support Act. If it becomes law, it would direct the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as well as the U.S. Department of Justice to study states' screening processes for peer support specialists and examine which factors are barriers for certification or hiring.
This matters, Kaine said, because not every state has taken the steps to reform that workforce the way that Virginia has. The bill would also direct the U.S. Office of Management and Budget to revise the Standard Operational Classification system to recognize peer support specialists as a profession to help ensure data reporting on the field.
His bill is 'driven by conversations' he's had with his constituents around the state, Kaine said.
'It is only acts like this bill that hopefully will allow for these changes to be made,' said Michelle Brauns, Community Health Center of New River Valley's CEO.
Kaine also suggested that he believes his bill can inspire more public esteem for the work peer support specialists do.
'Let's raise the respect for this profession,' Kaine said.
Alderman said it could also boost respect for people recovering from addictions.
'We're often seen as less-than or not a whole person,' Alderman said. 'This kind of recognition on this kind of level really feels good.'
While his efforts at the federal level can't overwrite the way states regulate their professionals, Kaine said that the PEER Act can help guide the way for states to rethink how they regulate peer recovery specialists.
It's something Virginia has already been tackling. Del. Cia Price, D-Newport News, and Sen. Todd Pillion, R-Washington, passed legislation to prevent certain criminal convictions from barring people from peer recovery work. Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed their bills last year.
Other barriers have also been addressed in the statehouse, such as a bill this year by Del. Katrina Callsen, D-Charlottesville, which t eliminates the need to have paid off any owed fines or fees to be considered for peer recovery jobs. Youngkin signed this bill, too.
'If you can't get a job that you're best-poised to do, how do we expect people to ever be able to pay?' Price said.
Price also emphasized the racial disparities at play in the criminal justice system. She noted that people of color are more likely to have interactions with law enforcement, so people of color with substance use disorders are also more likely to serve time as a result of their disease. But the bipartisan work she and others have achieved in this space is something she wants to see continue.
While Kaine has introduced his bill previously, he's said he is hopeful this time it will gain more traction and pass, particularly since it has bipartisan support from numerous cosponsors.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Republicans defend cuts to Medicaid and renewable energy in Big Beautiful Bill: ‘absolutely out of control'
Key Republican senators pushed back Sunday against criticism of cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill, including Medicaid work restrictions and the elimination of many green energy subsidies. The Senate version of President Trump's signature tax and spending legislation imposes 80 hours a month work requirements on able-bodied adults, including those with children ages 15 and up. It also reduces the health care provider tax, which helps fund state Medicaid plans. Critics argue that those changes could result in millions of people losing access to Medicaid, which provides health care to over 70 million low-income Americans. 'There's 35 million people under the poverty line inside the United States, and there's 70 million people that are signed up for Medicaid,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) told NBC's 'Meet the Press' Sunday. 'What we are focused on is making sure that Medicaid is there for people in the future that need it and get rid of the fraud, waste and abuse.' 5 Progressive activists have protested against the Medicaid reform provisions in the megabill. Getty Images 5 President Trump has lashed out at senators who have opposed advancing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Getty Images Medicaid reform is the largest source of savings in the megabill, with the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimating the legislative bundle would reduce Medicaid costs by about $930 billion over the next decade. Several senators have been uneasy about the Medicaid reform in the Senate bill, which goes further than the House version of the megabill. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), for example, voted against proceeding with the bill Saturday, citing Medicaid as his top concern. 'I cannot support this bill in its current form. It would result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities,' Tillis said in a statement Saturday. 'This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population.' 5 Sen. Markwayne Mullin defended the Medicaid reforms as reasonable. REUTERS Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) had raged against the Medicaid provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, but stopped short of opposing the measure. 'We can't be cutting health care for working people and for poor people in order to constantly give special tax treatment to corporations and other entities,' Hawley told NBC News last week. The Senate bill includes bigger cuts to business taxes, including a permanent deductions for R&D spending. Despite those concerns, key senators defended the Medicaid reforms on the Sunday shows as the Senate forges ahead with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'The entitlement spending in this nation is absolutely out of control. You can rewind back to the 1960s, when actual mandatory spending, which is what these entitlements are, only made up about a third of federal spending,' Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) told CNN's 'State of the Union' Sunday. 'Now, if you take that, plus the interest on our debt, it's about 73 percent of what we spend.' 5 Sen. Katie Britt called the reforms reminiscent of Clinton-era policies. Bloomberg via Getty Images Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) also touted plans to consider an amendment that would ensure illegal immigrants don't get access to Medicaid. 'Remember, the Medicaid reforms in this bill are about work requirements and taking illegals off of Medicaid,' Banks told 'Fox News Sunday.' Another closely watched amendment from Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) would lower the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), which determines the percentage of Medicaid costs covered by Uncle Sam. Scott's amendment would lower FMAP for able-bodied, childless adults. The amendment has been used to win over fiscal hawks such as Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who had threatened to vote against the megabill due to concerns about the deficit. 5 Sen. Jim Banks hailed the legislative bundle for slashing green energy subsidies. Getty Images In addition to the Medicaid reform, senators also defended the cuts to Biden-era renewable energy subsidies, something that has infuriated tech mogul and one-time Trump 'first buddy' Elon Musk. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Musk fumed on X Saturday. 'Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' The Senate version of the megabill significantly rolls back tax credits for green energy in the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act and requires key projects to go into service by the conclusion of 2027 to qualify. It also features an excise tax that takes aim at solar and wind projects. 'Again, $1.6 trillion in spending cuts by eliminating the Green New Deal tax credits. Those scams that were passed during the Biden administration,' Banks added. 'Much of it is phased out in a quick period of time over the next two or three years.'


Politico
10 hours ago
- Politico
All that text
Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) pushed back on concerns voiced by fellow Republican Sen. Thom Tillis over how President Donald Trump's megabill will impact hospitals and rural communities in Tillis' North Carolina. Tillis on Saturday announced he would vote against the GOP bill because it would 'result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities.' But during an appearance on 'Fox News Sunday,' Banks said Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Trump heard the concerns and made changes in the bill to win over Tillis and other senators with similar concerns. 'Leader Thune and President Trump have added a fund specifically geared towards keeping those hospitals going and making up for the losses that might be incurred,' Banks said, referring to a $15 billion stabilization fund for rural hospitals impacted by the spending bill. 'Remember: The Medicaid reforms in this bill are about work requirements and taking illegals off Medicaid,' Banks added. 'That is what is in the bill and what the clerk's reading on the floor right now. That is the truth.' Trump's sweeping spending bill has drawn backlash from Democrats and Republicans alike for language regarding Medicaid. The Congressional Budget Office projected that by 2034, some 16 million individuals may be uninsured in part because of the bill. More than a dozen House Republicans have privately indicated they won't vote for the Senate text unless Medicaid language moves much closer to the House version, POLITICO learned Saturday.


Politico
10 hours ago
- Politico
Banks pushes back on Tillis' concerns about Medicaid cuts
Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) pushed back on concerns voiced by fellow Republican Sen. Thom Tillis over how President Donald Trump's megabill will impact hospitals and rural communities in Tillis' North Carolina. Tillis on Saturday announced he would vote against the GOP bill because it would 'result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities.' But during an appearance on 'Fox News Sunday,' Banks said Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Trump heard the concerns and made changes in the bill to win over Tillis and other senators with similar concerns. 'Leader Thune and President Trump have added a fund specifically geared towards keeping those hospitals going and making up for the losses that might be incurred,' Banks said, referring to a $15 billion stabilization fund for rural hospitals impacted by the spending bill. 'Remember: The Medicaid reforms in this bill are about work requirements and taking illegals off Medicaid,' Banks added. 'That is what is in the bill and what the clerk's reading on the floor right now. That is the truth.' Trump's sweeping spending bill has drawn backlash from Democrats and Republicans alike for language regarding Medicaid. The Congressional Budget Office projected that by 2034, some 16 million individuals may be uninsured in part because of the bill. More than a dozen House Republicans have privately indicated they won't vote for the Senate text unless Medicaid language moves much closer to the House version, POLITICO learned Saturday.