
Record share of US kindergartners missed required vaccinations last year, ahead of surge in measles cases
About 3.6% of incoming kindergartners in the 2024-25 school year had an exemption for a required vaccine, leaving about 138,000 new schoolchildren without full coverage for at least one state-mandated vaccine, the new data shows. Exemptions jumped more than a full percentage point over the past four years, the CDC data shows, and the vast majority – all but 0.2% – were for non-medical reasons.
About 286,000 kindergartners had not completed the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination series in the 2024-25 school year, as cases climbed this year to the highest they've been since the disease was declared eliminated in the US a quarter-century ago.
MMR coverage dropped to 92.5%, marking the fifth year in a row that coverage has been below the federal target of 95%, according to the CDC data. The vast majority of this year's measles cases have been in unvaccinated children.
Forty-five states allow religious beliefs to be used as a basis for a vaccine exemption for children beginning school, and 15 states allow exemptions for other personal or philosophical reasons, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.
This week, the organization reaffirmed its longstanding position that non-medical exemptions to school immunization requirements should be eliminated.
'The science behind vaccines demonstrates that the benefits greatly outweigh any potential risks,' said Dr. Sean O'Leary, a pediatric infectious disease specialist and chair of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases. 'There really aren't good reasons to opt out.'
However, in the 2024-25 school year, vaccine exemptions increased in 36 states, according to the new CDC data. In 17 states, more than 5% of kindergartners had exemptions – meaning reminders from administrators to complete paperwork or doctor's visits won't be enough to raise coverage to the 95% goal for two doses of MMR vaccine set by US Department of Health and Human Services, a threshold necessary to help prevent outbreaks of the highly contagious disease.
'There are more and more states where even the potentially achievable coverage that we can get by catching everyone up who's overdue is getting lower and lower,' said Dr. Josh Williams, a pediatrician with Denver Health and associate professor at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. 'So we are now in a situation where in many states, and certainly in many communities within certain states, there's simply not enough herd immunity to protect against outbreaks of these vaccine-preventable diseases, especially measles.'
In a study from 2019, Williams and fellow researchers found interesting patterns in vaccine exemptions: When both religious and personal belief exemptions are available in a state, religious exemptions tend to be low, but rates of religious exemptions increase significantly when the personal belief exemption goes away.
'That leads to the kinds of recommendations that you see from organizations like the AAP, basically saying it appears that these exemption policies are not really doing what they were intended to do, that people are kind of using these perhaps in the ways that they were not intended,' he said.
Only five states limit vaccine exemptions to medical reasons, according to the AAP: California, Connecticut, Maine, New York and West Virginia. Numbers on MMR coverage in West Virginia were not available in the latest data from the CDC, but the four other states are among the small group of 10 states that reached the federal goal of 95% coverage among kindergartners.
In 2023, a federal court paved the way for religious exemptions to be added to Mississippi school vaccination policy. Exemption rates immediately jumped in the state, and MMR coverage has dropped about 1 percentage point, CDC data shows.
Overall, nationwide MMR coverage among kindergartners dropped from 92.7% in the 2023-24 school year to 92.5% in the 2024-25 school year, according to the CDC.
Experts say that a change like this may seem small but can significantly raise risks.
'It's a small percentage point change that adds up if it happens year over year, and that is what we've been seeing,' Williams said, and the change isn't distributed evenly. 'Individuals who tend to refuse vaccines tend to cluster together. … It's probably that the areas where there have been low uptake now have even worse uptake, and the areas where there have been more reasonable uptake continue to stay reasonable.'
The vast majority of measles cases reported in this record-breaking year have been concentrated in Texas.
MMR coverage in the state has been trending down for at least the past decade, CDC data shows, with just 93.2% coverage among kindergartners. Exemptions have surged past 4% – well above the national rate – and a law passed by the state legislature this year would make it even easier to get an exemption. Starting in September, the affidavit form to file for an exemption will be available to print from the state health department's website, without the need to file a written request.
There was a lot of testimony opposing this change, said Dr. Philip Huang, director of the Dallas County health department.
'We were making the point during the whole thing that there needs to be a consistent message of unequivocal support for vaccinations from the top,' he said. 'We're very concerned about what's happening with HHS and the messaging sort of undermining that.'
Experts say that vaccines can sometimes be 'victims of their own success,' with people not realizing how much protection they offer until they see the suffering that can happen when they're not utilized.
This year's measles outbreak – which has led to three deaths and dozens of hospitalizations, mostly among children – may raise the urgency around the need to vaccinate and help to start to turn the trend around, experts say.
'The declines that we're seeing for measles and for other vaccines are always concerning, but perhaps in the context of one of our larger measles outbreaks in recent memory, I think a lot of people have it in mind with returning to school this fall,' Williams said. 'In my clinical practice here in Denver, we are getting requests from families who are worried about measles transmission in school and in day care. We've had some families coming in who want to get that protection on board prior to the school year beginning to make sure that their child is going to be as protected as possible prior to going back to school this fall.'
Williams says he likes to remind parents that most people support vaccination and that he works hard to gain the trust of parents who are hesitant.
'It's always good to remember that the vast majority of parents vaccinate their kids on time and according to the recommended schedule,' he said. 'When that's not true in a school or in a community, I think that's an opportunity for advocates to speak up and talk to other parents and be partners in the process of improving vaccine confidence.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
2 minutes ago
- Medscape
CDC Bars Medical and Professional Groups From ACIP
The CDC has essentially fired some of the medical and professional organizations that assist the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in evaluating evidence and offering input on vaccine recommendations, accusing them of being biased. There are 30 such liaison organizations that provide year-round assistance to ACIP work groups who prepare evidence and briefing books for voting panel members to review before making decisions. The organizations include medical societies, county and state health officials, epidemiologists, nurses, public health and immunization groups, pharmacists, and the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. At least some of the 30 organizations received an email from the ACIP secretariat. They were informed that 'by definition, liaison organizations are special interest groups and therefore are expected to have a 'bias' based on their constituency and/or population that they represent.' The email said that 'ACIP work groups will no longer include liaison organizations,' but that 'approved liaison organizations' could continue to participate in open meetings. One group that received the email, the American Pharmacists Association, said its representatives had voluntarily served as scientific advisors to ACIP work groups for more than 25 years. 'To hear after two decades of providing boundless scientific and clinical expertise to protect the public and keep patients safe that liaison organizations are considered 'special interest groups' and therefore expected to have 'bias' is disgraceful and disrespectful,' the group wrote in a statement. Similarly, the American Medical Association (AMA) and seven other groups said in a statement that the organizations were 'deeply disappointed and alarmed' that they were being accused of bias 'and therefore barred from reviewing scientific data and informing the development of vaccine recommendations that have long helped ensure our nation's vaccine program is safe, effective, and free from bias.' The AMA was joined by the American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Physicians (ACP), American Geriatrics Society, American Osteopathic Association, Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and National Medical Association. When asked by Medscape Medical News to comment on the removals, a spokesperson for the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said, 'Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions.' Previous ACIP members — HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, fired all 17 in June — 'were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence, and bias,' said the HHS spokesperson. 'Experts will continue to be included based on relevant experience and expertise, not because of what organization they are with,' said the HHS spokesperson. It is not clear whether any other groups were barred, although a spokesperson for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which is one of the 30 liaison organizations, told Medscape Medical News that it had not received any communication from ACIP as of press time. HHS did not answer repeated requests for clarification on which or how many groups would be barred from work groups. The AMA — and many of the same organizations removed from the ACIP liaison positions, including the AAP and the IDSA — were among those who condemned the firings of the 17 ACIP members. The AAP, ACP, and IDSA also were among a handful of organizations that sued HHS in early July seeking to overturn ACIP guidance that removed a recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women and changed guidance for children from a recommendation to shared decision-making. The 17 former voting members of ACIP expressed their dismay with HHS actions in a New England Journal of Medicine editorial published on July 30. 'The rigor and discipline of these vaccine recommendation processes are rapidly eroding,' they wrote, adding that HHS had 'abruptly changed vaccine policy through social media postings and publications in news media.' The government 'circumvented the standard methodology, whereby committees of scientists and clinicians conduct rigorous scientific review and open deliberation to make vaccine recommendations, which are published with clear justification of the decision-making process,' they wrote. The authors predicted a future of ever-declining trust in vaccines; rising circulation of misinformation; and confusion and uncertainty among clinicians, parents, and patients. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, has now opened an inquiry into the firings of the ACIP members. Sanders — along with seven Democratic senators — wrote to Kennedy on July 29, seeking more information about his actions, including what was characterized as 'the administration's attempts to muzzle scientists.' The senators also sought more information on the seven new ACIP members who have been appointed so far, including how they were vetted, and documentation that they completed required ethics forms.


Newsweek
3 minutes ago
- Newsweek
These Common Chemicals Could Be Harming Your Liver
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new review has found that exposure to particular chemicals can, when combined, enhance damage to the liver. The researchers of the July 2025 review, published in Toxicological Sciences, found that both alcohol and PFAS chemicals—a group of widely-used compounds—damage the liver in similar ways. This could be "causing fat buildup, inflammation, and oxidative stress," Vasilis Vasiliou, one of the authors of the review, and chair and professor of environmental health sciences at Yale School of Public Health, told Newsweek. While alcohol is a well-established cause of liver disease, PFAS chemicals may "act as a 'second hit,' especially in people who already drink alcohol or have other liver risk factors," he added. PFAS chemicals, also known as "forever chemicals" or Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, have been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a Group 1 carcinogen—with studies since finding the chemicals can cause a wide range of effects on public health. These chemicals can be found across various industries and consumer products, from nonstick cookware, waterproof clothing and stain-resistant furniture, to food packaging and even smartwatch wristbands. They can also be found in drinking water sources across the country. According to the review's researchers, detectable levels of PFAS chemicals have been found in over 98 percent of the human population. Meanwhile, more than half of all Americans drink alcohol—with 17 percent binge drinking, meaning, for women, they have four or more drinks on one occasion, while for men, they have five or more drinks, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data. Per the CDC's data, 6 percent also drink heavily, meaning, for women, they have eight or more drinks in a week and for men, they have 15 or more drinks. According to the review's researchers, while global consumption of alcohol has been decreasing since 2010, in the U.S. there has been an increase in consumption, meaning it is now nearly double the global average. File photo: A gastroenterologist doctor explaining liver and gallbladder problems using an anatomical model to a patient during a clinic visit. File photo: A gastroenterologist doctor explaining liver and gallbladder problems using an anatomical model to a patient during a clinic visit. peakSTOCK/Getty Images What The Review Found When people are exposed to both alcohol and PFAS chemicals, these "effects can add up or even multiply, leading to more serious liver injury," Vasiliou said. He added that vulnerable populations, or those with limited health care access, are particularly at risk. "Our review suggests that PFAS exposure may worsen the damage already caused by alcohol, raising the risk of progression from fatty liver to more severe conditions like cirrhosis or liver cancer," he said. The review noted that around two million deaths a year are estimated to occur due to advanced liver disease, predominantly cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, with alcohol consumption being a significant risk factor for these conditions. Alcohol contributed to nearly half of all cirrhosis deaths and over 150,000 new cases of liver cancer globally in 2016. "The findings are not unexpected," Dr. Suthat Liangpunsakul, a professor of medicine and of biochemistry and molecular biology at the Indiana University School of Medicine, told Newsweek. "Both alcohol and PFAS have independently been shown to affect the liver through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, lipid dysregulation, and mitochondrial dysfunction," Liangpunsakul said. "Given these overlapping pathways, the possibility that combined exposures may exacerbate liver injury is a reasonable hypothesis," he added. Liangpunsakul said the study therefore "brings together existing evidence in a way that highlights the need for further investigation." It adds to the "body of literature suggesting that multiple exposures, including lifestyle and environmental factors, can interact in complex ways to affect liver health," he said. However, "further research, particularly in human populations, will be important to better characterize these interactions and their potential clinical implications," he added. Vasiliou said that he and the other researchers in the laboratory are continuing to investigate the impact of PFAS chemicals on the liver in animal models and intend to expand research to human studies. In this photo illustration, water flows from a tap on July 06, 2023 in San Anselmo, California. In 2023, a study by the US Geological Survey found that nearly half of the tap water in... In this photo illustration, water flows from a tap on July 06, 2023 in San Anselmo, California. In 2023, a study by the US Geological Survey found that nearly half of the tap water in the United States was contaminated with "forever chemicals," considered dangerous to human health. More/Getty Images How PFAS Chemicals And Alcohol Could Harm The Liver PFAS chemicals may harm the liver by "disturbing fat metabolism, damaging mitochondria, increasing oxidative stress, and triggering inflammation," Vasiliou said, adding these were many of the same processes affected by alcohol. Liangpunsakul also said that PFAS chemicals "can accumulate in the liver" and cause the same problems mentioned by Vasiliou. Meanwhile, "alcohol has long-established and well-characterized hepatotoxic effects, particularly in the setting of chronic use," Liangpunsakul said. Therefore, the "real danger lies in their combined impact," Vasiliou said. "Together, they can accelerate liver damage in ways that neither might do alone." Liangpunsakul said that it is difficult to compare the "relative toxicity" of alcohol and PFAS, "as they operate under different exposure contexts and time courses." However, based on the review, he said that "PFAS may contribute additional stress to the liver, particularly in individuals with other risk factors such as alcohol use." While PFAS chemicals are in a wide range of everyday products, the most common way people are exposed to PFAS chemicals is through ingestion, Vasiliou said. "PFAS often enter our bodies through contaminated drinking water; food, especially fish [and] meat; fast-food packaging; and household products like nonstick cookware or stain-resistant fabrics," he said. Once ingested, PFAS chemicals can "circulate in the blood and accumulate in the liver, where they can persist for years due to their resistance to breakdown," he added. Those who are also occupationally exposed to the chemicals due to their work, such as firefighters or factory workers, may also "inhale PFAS or absorb them through the skin," he said. How Could The Research Shape The Treatment of Liver Disease? Liangpunsakul said the review highlights a growing area of scientific interest—"how environmental exposures might interact with more traditional risk factors like alcohol." He said that while "it is too early to say how this will influence clinical practice," the findings "may help guide future research into liver disease progression and its multifactorial drivers." "Improved understanding of co-exposures could eventually contribute to more refined risk assessment strategies," he added. The research also suggests that increasing awareness on individual PFAS exposure may become an important part of maintaining health. "For people with liver risk factors, such as alcohol abuse use or obesity, minimizing PFAS exposure could be especially important," Vasiliou said. However, "avoiding PFAS completely is difficult because they are so widespread, but people can take steps to reduce exposure," he added. He said individuals can use PFAS-free cookware and personal care products, filter drinking water with systems certified to remove PFAS, and check local advisories about contaminated water or fish. On a broader level, Vasiliou said that "stronger policies and better regulation are needed to reduce PFAS in our environment." Reference Arthur D Stem, Ricardo Scheufen Tieghi, Vaia Lida Chatzi, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Damaskini Valvi, David C Thompson, Vasilis Vasiliou, (2025). Synergistic Toxicity in Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease and PFAS Exposure, Toxicological Sciences,


USA Today
32 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Flesh-eating' bacteria cases are popping up along the Gulf Coast. What you need to know.
As temperatures continue to swelter and people flock to the Gulf Coast to enjoy its warm, salty waters, health officials are warning swimmers about a "flesh-eating" bacteria that has killed at least eight people this summer. The bacterium, Vibrio vulnificus, is commonly associated with the "flesh-eating" moniker thanks to its ability to cause infections that damage or "eat away" at skin and tissue. This year, Louisiana is reporting an abnormally high rate of infection. "Amid increasing water temperatures and extreme weather events (e.g., heat waves, flooding, and severe storms), people who are at increased risk for V. vulnificus infection (those with weakened immune systems and conditions like liver disease, diabetes and kidney failure) ... should exercise caution when engaging in coastal water activities," said a Louisiana Department of Health warning issued July 30. Despite a recent uptick in cases, Vibrio vulnificus infections are still rare. Even so, experts have advised that people in coastal areas exercise extra caution while enjoying the waning days of summer. Here's what to know. Dangerous waters: What to know about the flesh-eating bacteria and brain-eating amoebas Where are flesh-eating bacteria cases in the US? How common is it? Louisiana has reported the highest number of Vibrio vulnificus infections in a decade, with 17 reported cases and hospitalizations, including four deaths, as of July 30. This is compared to the 10 years prior, which saw an average of only seven cases and one death during the same time period. Florida has likewise reported four deaths caused by Vibrio vulnificus infections as of July 24. The state has counted 13 total cases so far, a rate that isn't necessarily abnormal at this point in the year, according to Florida health data. An average of 150 to 200 cases are reported each year, with most of them in Gulf Coast states, according to CDC data. USA TODAY has reached out to health departments in other coastal states regarding possible cases. What is Vibrio vulnificus? Vibrio vulnificus is a bacterium that causes a serious infection called vibriosis. Different types of Vibrio bacteria cause different infections, with Vibrio vulnificus causing the "most serious forms of vibriosis," according to the Cleveland Clinic. The potentially fatal infection can quickly result in tissue damage and spreading blisters, low blood pressure, fever, organ damage, sepsis and death. Vibrio vulnificus is often referred to as "flesh-eating" because it can also cause necrotizing fasciitis, a bacterial infection that destroys muscle and skin tissue, causing flesh around wounds to die, according to the CDC. While it is possible, Vibrio vulnificus is not considered to be the most common cause of necrotizing fasciitis in the U.S. The bacteria and resulting infections are rare but can be life-threatening. Without treatment, death can occur in just a few days. How does 'flesh-eating' bacteria enter the body? Vibrio vulnificus requires salt water for survival and thrives in warm, brackish water where a stream or river meets seawater, according to the CDC. Most infections occur when contaminated water is swallowed or gets into an open wound, such as a cut or scrape. It can enter through broken skin but cannot penetrate unharmed skin. Vibrio vulnificus can also enter your body when you eat uncooked or undercooked shellfish, especially oysters. In fact, raw oysters and other seafood, along with seawater exposure, are the most common sources of Vibrio outbreaks tracked by the CDC. Once inside the body, it can spread quickly to the blood and organs, usually within a matter of hours. Symptoms of Vibrio vulnificus infection Symptoms of a Vibrio vulnificus infection begin suddenly and quickly, usually less than 24 hours after exposure, according to the CDC and Cleveland Clinic. Common symptoms include: How to protect yourself against Vibrio vulnificus When consuming seafood, advises the CDC, you should: When swimming, you should: Contributing: Janet Loehrke, USA TODAY