Delays on train orders putting factory jobs at risk, MPs told
Thousands of rail manufacturing jobs will be put at risk if the Government fails to sign off on a backlog of orders for new trains, bosses have warned.
Executives from manufacturers Alstom and Siemens told MPs that long gaps between contracts for new trains on Britain's rail network would jeopardise production and threaten jobs.
Only three tenders for new trains are in the offing, with both companies warning that they face a cliff edge in the rate they can build trains if they fail to win at least one of them.
The businesses support thousands of jobs across the country, with Alstom's Derby factory dating back 140 years and Siemens having opened its first British plant in Goole, East Yorkshire, in October.
Sambit Banerjee, Siemens Mobility's UK chief executive, urged the Government to establish a five-year, fully-funded pipeline of orders to safeguard jobs.
'We see an immediate necessity to push ahead with procurement. A lot of stock is very, very old and to upgrade it is much more expensive than bringing new trains in,' he told the Commons transport select committee.
'What the industry wants is certainty of the pipeline and certainty of the projects coming on time. We want to win competitively, but we are not getting that opportunity.'
Since taking power last year, the Labour Government has pledged to establish an industrial strategy for rolling-stock and end what it called the boom-and-bust cycle of train orders by ensuring a strong pipeline of work.
However, Mr Banerjee warned that Britain risks missing out on future spending if there are no orders to chase following investment such as the £340m that Siemens devoted to the Goole plant.
He said: 'When I go to Munich I'm fighting with emerging economies and with the US, who are also asking for research and development money.
'If our shareholders give us £340m there has to then be projects coming to fruition.'
Mr Banerjee added that while refurbishment work can help bridge the gap between new orders, this often represents poor value for money, pointing to upgrades to the 52-year-old Bakerloo Line trains for Transport for London (TfL).
Siemens will also complete a contract for 94 Piccadilly Line trains in two years, Mr Banerjee said, after which the Goole site, which employs 700 people, faces 'a stiff drop' in production unless it wins work on trains for the Southeastern, TransPennine or Northern networks.
A four-year funding settlement for TfL announced on Wednesday by Rachel Reeves in the Chancellor's spending review should also fund a shorter term order for new Bakerloo Line trains.
Bidding for tenders has not been helped by changes to specifications and the number of trains needed, making it 'extraordinarily difficult for us as manufacturers to plan,' he said.
Alstom, whose Derby Litchurch Lane site is Britain's biggest train factory with 1,500 workers, is also concerned.
Peter Broadley, the company's commercial director, told the committee: 'There has been barely any rolling-stock procurement since the pandemic. If we were to win none of the three coming up it would be a tough environment.'
Alstom was last year awarded a top-up order for 90 Elizabeth Line carriages that saved the Derby site from potential closure ahead of fitting out work on trains for High Speed 2.
The companies face competition for contracts from Hitachi, which employs 700 people in Newton Aycliffe, Co Durham, and CAF of Spain, which operates a smaller plant in Newport, Wales.
Hitachi was itself handed a lifeline in December with a £500m, 14-train deal from FirstGroup's Lumo brand, which will compete with the nationalised Great British Railways.
Labour said last year that the rolling-stock sector would not be taken under state control, given costs estimated to be £10bn.
The Department for Transport was contacted for comment.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PwC UK to reduce 175 audit roles amid market challenges
PwC is set to lay off approximately 175 junior auditors in the UK, due to market challenges, reported the Financial Times (FT). The decision to initiate compulsory redundancies marks a departure from the firm's usual practice of voluntary severance, particularly within the audit division. The final number of job cuts could vary, but the move is scheduled to take effect in August 2025. The junior auditors affected by the redundancies were informed during a webcast that lasted about ten minutes. PwC said: "We always keep the shape of our business under review to respond to changing client demands, attrition rates and new opportunities.' 'From time to time, we may need to reduce roles as a consequence — such decisions are never taken lightly. We continue to invest heavily in our people, including pay, promotions, bonuses and training." As per several sources cited by the publication, non-British nationals on firm-sponsored visas are among those facing redundancy, as they incur higher retention costs than UK nationals. PwC has not commented on this aspect. In addition, the firm's 25,000 UK employees have been told to expect a 2.5% salary increase starting in July, a decrease from the 3% raise given last year. Historically, audit roles at Big Four firms have been somewhat shielded from economic downturns due to the recurring nature of audit work. However, consulting divisions have experienced a decline in demand post-pandemic, highlighted FT. Additionally, the professional services sector is currently experiencing poor demand in some areas, with a fall in voluntary staff departures, further outlined the publication. Other firms, including McKinsey and Deloitte, have also reduced their workforce. PwC has maintained a pandemic-era benefit allowing staff to take half-days on Fridays during the summer, now termed "Summer Empowerment." Earlier in June 2025, a report from The Wall Street Journal revealed that PwC is restructuring its US advisory division to enhance industry-specific services. Moreover, the firm is also dealing with issues in Hong Kong related to the audit of China Evergrande Group. "PwC UK to reduce 175 audit roles amid market challenges" was originally created and published by International Accounting Bulletin, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morning Bid: The euro's big beautiful moment
By Mike Dolan LONDON (Reuters) -What matters in U.S. and global markets today Investors are keeping a wary eye on the progress of President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful" U.S. tax-cutting and spending bill that is slowly making its way through the Senate, with signs it may not make it by Trump's preferred July 4 deadline. Meanwhile, over on Wall Street, futures on the S&P 500 suggest another record high might be in the offing later on. Mike Dolan is enjoying some well-deserved time off over the next two weeks, but the Reuters markets team is here to provide you with all the information you need to start your day. Today's Market Minute * Canada scrapped its digital services tax targeting U.S. technology firms late on Sunday, just hours before it was due to take effect, in a bid to advance stalled trade negotiations with the United States. * The trade deal signed between U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer lowering some tariffs on imports from Britain has come into effect, the British government said on Monday. * A million-dollar question will hang over the world's top central bankers when they meet in Sintra, Portugal, from Monday evening: Is the monetary system centred on the U.S. currency beginning to unravel? * The war between Israel and Iran offered a real-time look at some new global cross-asset dynamics that can help investors understand the state of play in the first half of 2025 and what they can expect in the next six months. TPW Advisory founder Jay Pelosky details three key takeaways from the conflict. * Plus, ROI energy columnist Ron Bousso explains why Egypt was one of the biggest economic losers of the Middle East's 12-day war. The euro's big beautiful moment The euro is heading for a ninth straight day of gains versus the dollar, something it has only achieved three times since its inception in 1999. Another daily rise and we're in record territory. In 2025's "everyone hates the dollar" trading environment, the euro, and European assets in general, have to be real magnets for investor cash. The euro itself has gained nearly 14% against the dollar so far this year, while its performance against other currencies has been far less eye-popping. It has risen around 3.5% against both the pound and the Japanese yen and has barely broken even against the Swiss franc and Norwegian crown. Confidence in the United States as an investment destination - not just in markets, but for businesses too - has not vanished, but has taken a serious knock from the erratic and unpredictable policies of the Trump administration. This would not be obvious when looking through the lens of the stock market, given the S&P 500 is at record highs, in dollar terms at least. When priced in other currencies, it is a long way off. Europe's STOXX 600 has risen 7% so far this year, compared with the S&P's 5% rise. On an equal-weighted basis, the divergence is even more marked. Wall Street's Magnificent 7 are back in vogue, but not quite riding to the rescue. The equal-weighted S&P is up 3.3% versus a near-10% gain in the STOXX equivalent. That said, in spite of the chaos from Trump's on-again off-again tariffs, the heightened uncertainty stemming from the Middle East and the deficit-busting "One Big Beautiful Bill" that is up for debate in the Senate right now, investors aren't exactly ditching U.S. assets en masse. "Anywhere But The USA" may sound catchy as an investment theme, but it has taken more than that to lure capital into Europe. European governments, spearheaded by Germany, have pledged to unleash a one trillion euro ($1.17 trillion) spending bazooka, much of which will be concentrated on defence and infrastructure, as they attempt to address years of riding on the coattails of Washington for security, and of shortfalls in spending on basics at home. The July 9 deadline for a trade deal is less than two weeks away - and with Trump saying he will impose 50% tariffs on all EU goods without a deal - investors are moving their money. Data from LSEG's Lipper Funds show that more than $100 billion has flowed into European equity funds so far this year - up threefold from the same period last year - while outflows from the U.S. more than doubled to nearly $87 billion. "All that is an indication that at least market forces, investors, those who move real money around, actually see value and have confidence in Europe," European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said earlier this month. She said now is the time for Europe to take its destiny into its own hands, and that this is the euro's "moment". Chart of the day With the U.S. Independence Day holiday on Friday, the June employment report lands on Thursday. A Reuters poll shows economists expect to see a rise of 129,000, slightly below May's 139,000 increase. Evidence of the impact on the economy from Trump's tariffs and their potentially inflationary effect, along with the mass layoffs among government employees and the likelihood of big cuts to a raft of welfare benefits is starting to materialise in other data points. So far, the monthly non-farm payrolls report has not been one of them. May's number marked the fifth upside surprise in the past 12 months, and the ninth reading below the 200,000 mark over the past year. Layoffs are historically low, but hiring is not exactly booming. The most recent weekly jobless claims numbers showed the number of Americans filing new applications for jobless benefits fell, but work opportunities are becoming scarce as businesses are reluctant to hire while things such as import tariffs are in flux. Today's events to watch * Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell speaks at the European Central Bank Forum on Central Banking 2025 in Sintra, Portugal * Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta President Raphael Bostic speaks on the economic outlook and monetary policy in London * Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Austan Goolsbee speaks at the Aspen Ideas Festival 2025 * June Chicago PMI * Three- and six-month Treasury bill auctions Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. Want to receive the Morning Bid in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for the newsletter here. ($1 = 0.8533 euros) (By Amanda Cooper; Editing by Anna Szymanski)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump tried to fire them. But these Democratic appointees are still on the job.
President Donald Trump has fired a host of Democratic appointees at independent boards and commissions across the government. There's just one catch: Some of them are still working. More than a dozen leaders of independent federal agencies received terse emails from the White House purporting to fire or demote them shortly after Trump's inauguration, despite the fact that their roles are governed by laws that bar termination without cause. Many of them decried Trump's summary termination notices as illegal and made various attempts to remain in their posts, including suing. Their efforts have proven largely futile against the administration's brute force strategy: The overwhelming majority have in fact left, accepted new jobs, dropped their lawsuits, or been otherwise forced out — quite literally locked out of their former agency offices in some cases. The Supreme Court, meanwhile, has signaled that it will continue to expand the president's power to fire board members who run regulatory agencies. Yet a handful of officials have successfully resisted, either because they were reinstated — at least temporarily — by lower-court judges, or because they have simply managed to maneuver around the White House's orders and directives. Those officials' resistance could end up shaping how courts view crucial, pending questions about the hiring-and-firing powers of the presidency, and whether Congress can create federal agencies with some degree of independence from the chief executive. Trump fired three members of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which oversees PBS and NPR, in April. But those members participated in two CPB board of directors meetings this month. Diane Kaplan, Tom Rothman and Laura Gore Ross made motions and voted on issues before the board on June 10 and 11. Former President Joe Biden appointed Rothman and Kaplan to the CPB. Trump appointed Ross during his first term, and Biden reappointed her in 2021. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said Trump 'exercised his lawful authority' to remove the members because the CPB 'is creating media to support a particular political party on the taxpayers' dime.' Similarly, Rochelle Garza, the Biden-appointed chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights whom Trump purportedly demoted in March, has maintained her role without interruption. The civil rights board investigates discrimination and guides the development of civil rights laws. Garza presided over multiple commission business meetings since March, including a meeting last Friday, where she voted on several motions. The CPB members and Garza have hung on to their roles by simply resisting the White House's directives — and with the support of some colleagues. The CPB quickly changed its bylaws after being targeted by Trump, adding a provision that bars removing directors without two-thirds approval from their colleagues. Garza said in April that she invited a vote on her purported demotion, but her colleagues on the bipartisan commission have not taken up the matter. Other officials have scored temporary wins in ongoing court battles. Three members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission who were fired in May are back in their roles after a federal judge reinstated them, said Nicolas Sansone, a staff attorney at the advocacy group Public Citizen, which represents the officials. Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. have conducted substantive business at the agency since they were reinstated on June 13, including convening meetings and voting on matters. The same goes for two Democrats on the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board whom Trump claimed to fire in January. Ed Felten and Travis LeBlanc have remained in their roles by virtue of a federal court ruling in May. U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton held that the board's mission — to monitor whether government surveillance efforts infringe on civil liberties — 'is incompatible with at-will removal by the President' because that would make it 'beholden to the very authority it is supposed to oversee.' Attorneys for the members told the court last month that they have been 'back at work' since May. The White House didn't respond to follow-up questions about the broader group of commissioners and board members who remain in their roles despite a purported firing or demotion. Don Kettl, former dean of the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, said fundamental questions about the president's authority over independent regulatory bodies remain unresolved, even as some courts have recognized that the president has wide removal powers over the executive branch more broadly. Trump administration officials have urged the Supreme Court to overturn a 1935 precedent that upheld Congress' power to limit the president from firing leaders of some executive branch agencies. And the justices indicated in a preliminary order in May that they will likely curtail that precedent. For now, though, the issue remains in flux. 'I think some commissioners, as a matter of principle, are hanging on by their fingernails waiting for courts to decide, but also as a way of creating a series of legal challenges that forces them to frame the questions' differently, Kettl said. 'It's a shadow-boxing match at this point,' Kettl added. 'All sides are feeling each other out and trying to find a way to frame the ultimate legal questions in a way that's more likely to produce the results they want.' The officials who have maintained their jobs are exceptions in Trump's firing spree. The president fired more than a dozen inspectors general at major federal agencies during the first week of his second term, bulldozing through legal requirements to provide 30-days notice to Congress and explain the terminations. And the White House has terminated or demoted numerous political appointees — almost all Democrats — across the government since then, often bypassing term limits and other job protections. Indeed, the administration has been remarkably successful in its broad campaign to consolidate Trump's power over the executive branch. Ellen Weintraub, a former Federal Election Commission member Trump attempted to fire in February, said at the time she would remain in her role, calling the move illegal. By May, Weintraub said she was officially leaving. This month, she announced that she was taking on a new role at a campaign finance reform group. Perhaps the most illustrative case involves former Federal Trade Commissioners Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Slaughter. Slaughter and Bedoya sued the president after receiving termination notices in March. They also fought to continue exercising their authority as commissioners — but they struggled against the practical powers of the White House. The administration revoked their access to agency offices, emails and resources. And officials reassigned or placed much of their staff on leave. Bedoya and Slaughter continued trying to decide cases and weigh in on matters — but they were limited to doing so via social media and the FTC's public comments portal. They also made public appearances as commissioners, but the agency has indicated that their 'time in office' ended in March. Earlier this month, Bedoya told the judge he was formally resigning, adding that he has a family to support, and that the government has stopped paying his salary. 'As a result of these actions, I have been unable to fulfill my duties … with over a year remaining in my term of service,' Bedoya said. For the time being, the handful of targeted appointees whose resistance has been more successful remain defiant. 'Our bylaws prohibit any person, including the President of the United States, from removing a director without a two-thirds vote of the other directors,' CPB chair Ruby Calvert said in the latest board meeting this month. 'We will continue our mission, because the importance of a vibrant, independent public media system … is needed more now than ever.' Ultimately, the White House appears poised to win the fight — judging by the experiences of the broader group of appointees Trump has already removed, and the early signs from the Supreme Court. Still, the resistance by the handful of 'fired' appointees who remain in their seats could end up shaping the courts' views on the issue.
