Actors paid ₹300 crore while technicians earn less than ₹3,000, FEFSI tells Madras High Court
Appearing before Justice K. Kumaresh Babu, advocate G. Mohanakrishnan, representing FEFSI, said, members of TFPC were also trying to 'snatch the livelihood' of technicians in Tamil Nadu by attempting to employ people from other States to complete ongoing projects.
On the other hand, advocate Krishna Ravindran, representing TFPC, stated that a majority of the members of the council were small-budget moviemakers and not corporate filmmakers who make big-budget movies. He said, TFPC was equally concerned about the technicians.
The counsel said, TFPC had been following the practice of entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) once in three years with FEFSI with respect to the fixation of wages for technicians and also other service conditions. The last MoU, signed in 2022, ended on March 9, 2025.
In the meantime, FEFSI suspected TFPC of having promoted a rival association of technicians named Tamil Nadu Thiraipada Thozhilalargal Sammelanam, and issued a communication to all its 23 affiliated associations on April 2, 2025, asking them not to cooperate with the members of TFPC.
Asserting that TFPC had nothing to do with the rival association of technicians, Mr. Ravindran said, ever since FEFSI issued the non-cooperation communication to its affiliated associations, the technicians were refusing to work for the ongoing film projects, thereby causing great monetary loss to the producers.
Minister to hold talks
He also said FEFSI had now begun to work with another body titled Tamil Film Active Producers Association (TFAPA), and that the issue had become so serious that Minister for Information and Publicity M.P. Saminathan had decided to intervene and hold talks between the parties to resolve the impasse.
After hearing both sides, Justice Babu made it clear that he could not compel the members of FEFSI to work with TFPC since the MoU had expired on March 9, 2025. At the same time, he warned that TFPC members could always initiate legal action against individual members of FEFSI for violation of work agreements.
Therefore, he suggested it would be in the interest of both parties to resolve their differences across the table. The judge asked Mr. Mohanakrishnan and Mr. Ravindran to submit by Wednesday (July 2) a couple of names of retired judges of the High Court who could be appointed as a mediator.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
8 hours ago
- Indian Express
Standoff in Tamil cinema disrupts several productions, High Court calls for mediation
A long-simmering conflict in the Tamil film industry, between producers and technicians, reached a crucial moment on Monday as the Madras High Court declined to issue interim relief against a non-cooperation protest launched by the technicians. In the conflict between the Tamil Film Producers Council (TFPC) and the Film Employees Federation of South India (FEFSI), Justice K Kumaresh Babu, hearing a civil suit filed by TFPC against FEFSI, suggested that both parties recommend names of retired High Court judges who could be appointed as neutral mediators. The court has given until Wednesday for both sides to submit names. The producers had sought a stay on the FEFSI's protest, which has disrupted multiple ongoing film productions in the state. The FEFSI, an umbrella body representing 24 technicians' and film workers' unions, has been at loggerheads with the TFPC since the expiry of a three-year MoU on March 9. The MoU governed wages, working conditions, and cooperative norms between producers and technicians. In court, FEFSI's legal counsel, advocate G Mohanakrishnan, painted a stark picture of inequality in the Tamil film industry. 'Top actors are paid Rs 300 crore per movie, while technicians struggle to get even Rs 3,000 a day,' he argued, calling the situation untenable and exploitative. He further alleged that TFPC was attempting to undermine the livelihoods of Tamil Nadu-based technicians by importing workers from other states to continue film shoots stalled by the impasse. The producers' side, represented by advocate Krishna Ravindran, countered that TFPC comprises mainly small-budget filmmakers — not the few mega-budget producers driving exorbitant salaries for actors. He emphasised that TFPC had followed a consistent practice of signing MoUs with FEFSI every three years and was willing to renew the agreement, but was met with hostility and allegations instead. Central to the producers' grievance is the charge that FEFSI's protest has brought the industry to a standstill. 'Ongoing production works have been stalled, resulting in major financial losses,' said Ravindran. 'Technicians affiliated with FEFSI are refusing to cooperate, jeopardising the livelihood of hundreds of others involved in film projects,' he alleged. In April, the federation issued a circular to all its 23 affiliated unions, asking them not to cooperate with TFPC members. The move came after FEFSI accused TFPC of secretly backing a rival technicians' association — Tamil Nadu Thiraipada Thozhilalargal Sammelanam — in what it believes is an effort to splinter the organised workforce. The producers deny any link to the new association. 'TFPC has no involvement in setting up any rival union,' said Ravindran. But he did acknowledge that the deadlock had pushed some producers to explore working with a separate body, the Tamil Film Active Producers Association (TFAPA), as a workaround to continue stalled projects. As the impasse deepens, the Tamil Nadu government has taken note. Minister for Information and Publicity, M P Saminathan, is expected to step in to mediate talks, underlining the growing public and political pressure to resolve the conflict. In court, Justice Babu was firm in his observation that he could not compel FEFSI to resume work with TFPC, given that the binding MoU had lapsed. However, he did note that individual producers could pursue legal action if existing work agreements had been violated. He also expressed concern that both sides risk further erosion of goodwill and financial damage if the matter is not resolved swiftly. With both FEFSI and TFPC expected to submit their recommended names for a retired High Court judge to mediate, the coming week will be critical for whether this is going to be a step toward reconciliation or a deeper institutional rupture in Tamil cinema's labour landscape.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Cinema technicians, producers clash; HC suggests mediation
Chennai: The Film Employees Federation of South India (FEFSI) has moved the Madras high court against the Tamil Nadu Film Producers Council (TFPC), seeking to stop the engagement of technicians from other states, which affects the livelihood of its members. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Admitting the plea on Monday, Justice K Kumaresh Babu suggested that the association recommend a retired judge of the court to mediate the issue. Representing FEFSI, advocate G Mohanakrishnan submitted that TFPC is trying to snatch the livelihood of Tamil Nadu technicians by engaging people from other states. Appearing for TFPC, advocate Krishna Ravindran contended that the association followed the practice of entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) once every three years with FEFSI regarding the fixation of wages. The last MoU, signed in 2022, ended on March 9, 2025. FEFSI alleged that TFPC promoted a rival association of technicians, the Tamil Nadu Thiraipada Thozhilalargal Sammelanam. Recording the submissions, the court observed that it could not direct the members of FEFSI to work with TFPC since the MoU expired on March 9. The court then suggested that both parties resolve their differences across the table by recommending names of two retired judges of the high court who could be appointed as mediators to resolve the issue. TFPC is allegedly taking steps to establish a new labour union as an alternative to FEFSI. This move comes after years of tension between the producers and FEFSI, which represents various film industry workers, including technicians, crew members, and other essential staff. As the existing agreement between the two parties was officially cancelled, producers have invited interested film workers to join the upcoming labour union.
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
South Indian Film Employees' Federation moves Madras HC over underpayment to technicians
Chennai: The simmering dispute over wages for film technicians in Tamil Nadu reached the Madras High Court on Monday, with the Film Employees Federation of South India (FEFSI) alleging that technicians are being pushed to the margins even as leading actors earn up to Rs 300 crore per film. Appearing before Justice K. Kumaresh Babu, FEFSI counsel G. Mohanakrishnan accused members of the Tamil Film Producers Council (TFPC) of trying to 'snatch the livelihood' of local technicians by recruiting crews from other States to finish ongoing productions. He said technicians in the State often earn less than Rs 3,000 a day despite the industry's soaring top-line salaries. TFPC's counsel Krishna Ravindran countered that most of the council's members are small-budget film-makers, not corporate studios, and insisted the producers are 'equally concerned' about worker welfare. He pointed out that TFPC and FEFSI have traditionally signed a wage-fixing Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) every three years, the last of which, inked in 2022, expired on March 9 this year. According to Ravindran, relations deteriorated when FEFSI, suspecting TFPC of backing a breakaway technicians' body called the Tamil Nadu Thiraipada Thozhilalargal Sammelanam, issued a non-cooperation directive on April 2 to all 23 of its affiliated craft unions. The order, he said, triggered walk-outs on sets and 'significant monetary losses' to producers as projects stalled. Ravindran added that FEFSI has since begun collaborating with a separate producers' faction, the Tamil Film Active Producers Association (TFAPA), prompting the State's Information and Publicity Minister M. P. Saminathan to step in and convene talks. Justice Babu observed that, with the MoU no longer in force, the court could not compel FEFSI members to work on TFPC-backed films. At the same time, he noted that individual producers remained free to sue crew members for breach of existing work contracts, if any. Stressing the need for an amicable settlement, the judge urged both sides to nominate, by Wednesday (July 2), two retired High Court judges who could act as mediators. 'Given the tight production schedules and the livelihoods at stake, it is in everyone's interest to resolve this across the table,' Justice Babu said before adjourning the matter.
