3 GPUs you should avoid buying right now
Shopping for one of the best graphics cards is a minefield right now. It's not that the latest generation is bad (that's a different subject entirely), it's that the prices still haven't gone back to normal, despite it being a few months since these GPUs first surfaced.
If you have an unlimited budget, then of course, you can buy any GPU — even the mighty powerful RTX 5090. But if you're trying to squeeze out the most performance-per-dollar, there are some GPUs I'd recommend avoiding right now.
Recommended Videos
AMD RX 9070 XT
Adding the excellent RX 9070 XT to this list is something I'm doing with a heavy heart. The GPU received stellar reviews from just about every publication that got to try it, and those who ended up buying it largely seem happy with it, too. I have no complaints about the performance of this graphics card; if anything, it surpassed the expectations that I had for it going into the launch of RDNA 4.
Capable of rivaling the RTX 5070 Ti, the RX 9070 XT arrived with a $599 price tag, and at first, it was glorious. Gamers flocked to various retailers, with AMD's Frank Azor sharing a photo of a long line of shoppers waiting outside a Microcenter. The consumer market welcomed the RX 9070 XT with open arms.
Perhaps the welcome was overly enthusiastic, though.
Demand today for our new @amdradeon cards has been phenomenal. We are working with our AIBs to replenish stock at our partners ASAP in the coming days and weeks. MSRP pricing (excluding region specific tariffs and/or taxes) will continue to be encouraged beyond today so don't… pic.twitter.com/8VxGioMkev — Frank Azor (@AzorFrank) March 6, 2025
Let me reiterate: The problem with the RX 9070 XT is not its performance. I don't think anyone can find any major fault in it … at its intended $600 price point. But unfortunately, the recommended list price (MSRP) didn't last all too long.
Once the initial batch of RX 9070 XTs (and non-XTs) sold out, which didn't take long, the prices started rising. Upon launch, there were many models above MSRP, but not wildly so — and some cards were indeed sold for $599. These days, outside of rare stock drops, good luck finding an RX 9070 XT at MSRP.
The cheapest option I was able to find on Amazon costs $848, meaning nearly $250 above the MSRP. At that price point, the RX 9070 XT loses some of its charm; the RTX 5070 Ti costs $900, and with comparable performance but better ray tracing and DLSS 4, many GPU shoppers will choose it over the AMD card.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
This was always bound to happen. Nvidia's RTX 5060 Ti launched in two flavors: One with 8GB VRAM, and one with 16GB. The 8GB model starts at $379, followed by $429 for the 16GB version. At such a small price gap, it was almost a given that most gamers would favor the version with more VRAM, even though they both share the same 128-bit interface (which affects their bandwidth, and that also means their overall performance). The frame rate gap between the two versions of the RTX 5060 Ti might not be as large as it seems, but still, the 8GB version is a GPU you should avoid right now.
Unsurprisingly, the RTX 5060 Ti with just 8GB of VRAM sells at MSRP on Amazon. There are models that sell for more, but in general, you can grab it at $379. But, while it can match the RTX 5060 Ti with 16 gigs of memory at 1080p, it's always better to have more VRAM if possible, and the 5060 Ti 16GB wins most benchmarks at 1440p.
If you're set on buying the RTX 5060 Ti, you might as well spend $100 more and get the (currently overpriced) 16GB version. But if you want my advice, I'd say wait it out and hunt for a 16GB model at MSRP — they do pop up occasionally.
Intel Arc B580
This is another GPU that I am sad to have to mention on this list. The Arc B580 surprised everyone when it launched. Our reviewer called it the '$249 Nvidia killer,' and who would've expected this kind of results from an Intel Arc GPU?
Knowing the rocky start that the Arc Alchemist generation had to go through, many were wary of Battlemage, but Intel surprised us in the best way possible. The GPU offered fantastic performance for the inexpensive $250 price point — something which is rare right now, at a time when most GPUs cost well above $350.
Unfortunately (for the buyers, at least), the Arc B580 wasn't able to stay at MSRP for too long. The GPU now sells for $359 to $409 on Amazon, and at that price, you're better off getting the new RTX 5060.
If there's one thing these GPUs have in common, it's that they're all selling far above the price point they were made for. Solid in their own right, they fail to impress when they're suddenly placed one or two pricing brackets above the one they belong in. But if sold at MSRP? All three are worthwhile picks.
If you're currently buying a GPU, my advice is to keep an eye out for models selling at MSRP, and then be quick, because they continue to sell out fast.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
39 minutes ago
- CBS News
This Sacramento County school district revives career training programs for students
More than 400,000 California students graduate from high school each year, and 62% will go on to college. Over the decades, many schools have phased out classes like auto shop and home economics in favor of college prep courses. But one local district is bringing back career training classes so students can get jobs without getting a four-year degree. Today's high school students in the Folsom Cordova Unified School District are learning a lot more than just the 3Rs. "The idea is that our students are not only ready for college, they're ready for careers," said Shanan Spears with the district. They're learning everything from hospitality positions like catering and being a chef to construction and manufacturing jobs like metal welding and woodworking. "It's going to help me in the long run, with not only securing a job, but if I'm at home and something breaks, I'm going to have the technical know-how to fix it," said Folsom High senior Dustin Davis. Software design, health care, and sales are some of the other career training that is offered. The district says these types of classes and internships give students skills that can lead to high-paying careers without the time commitment and cost of having to attend a four-year college. "They go to college because they think they're supposed to go to college, and they come out with a degree and they don't know what to do with it," Spears said. "They don't know where to go." School officials say there's a huge need for workers with these types of skills. "We almost don't even have enough students," Spears said. "There is a high demand, and we hope we're filling that gap just a little bit." Whether they go on to college, trade school, or get a job right after graduation, these students are getting professional experience before they even get a diploma. "I know each student has learned so much, including myself, and I'm so grateful to have this opportunity," said Varshini Nagam, a senior at Vista Del Lago High School. Around 26% of students in the Folsom Cordova district participate in these career classes, and the district says much of the funding for this training comes from state grants.
Bloomberg
39 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
'Taking From The Poor Giving to the Rich:' Sarin on Tax Bill
Natasha Sarin, President & Co-Founder of the Budget Lab at Yale University, talks about how the current Tax Bill will benefit the wealthy, add to the US deficit, and states that over the long run the tax cuts from this legislation will slow the economy. Sarin speaks with Kailey Leinz on the late edition of Bloomberg's 'Balance of Power.' (Source: Bloomberg)
Bloomberg
39 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
KIC's Park Says Treasuries Remain Core Portfolio
CC-Transcript 00:00One of the big questions that's come up this year was, you know, the role of US treasuries and whether or not, you know, people have overinvested or overallocated into Treasuries as the sovereign wealth fund. I know you guys have exposure to U.S. Treasuries. How are you looking at your holdings right now? And are you happy with your exposure to U.S. Treasuries? In the country, though, we are happy to invest, with an investment in the U.S. Treasury in a sense that the U.S. Treasury bond keeps are very strong, that liquidity and stable returns. And also, regardless of any sort of market volatilities, we are expecting a stable and the solid returns in the short term. So for the time being, we maintain our portfolio, the Treasury bond, as are our two core portfolios. But in the longer term we are mindful of any risks from the supply, supply change from the investors and also to the... Some are on policy uncertainties long term. Do you need to be rethinking that? How are you looking at your exposure to U.S. Treasuries longer term and how are you looking at potential alternatives to U.S. treasuries? Are there alternatives? We are now reconsidering our asset allocation. We understand that our long term returns are largely depend on our asset allocation. So among the total fixed income investments, we are also interested in investing to the credit and credit bond and other other to the structural bonds, along with the U.S. Treasury. And also more fundamentally, we are now considering to our asset allocation between the fixed income to the global equity. Do you see alternatives to public fixed income and would you be increasing you're looking to increase your weighting into things like private credit, for example, in private private lending? And is that what role do you see that part playing in your portfolio? That's a little bit. I'll start with the... The investment in fixed income. Now the we diversify our portfolio to alternative investments, including, as you said, private equity, the private credit and the infrastructure. So the more we believe the alternative investment, it will be our core assets in our portfolio in the longer term. So we are we plan to invest continuously, fairly and steadily pace the philosophy behind alternatives or going into, say, private credit, for example, is that is that because of returns or is that because of predictability and stability? What role why are you doing that? Well, always to the edge to support investment. Our key objective is the diversification of the asset. So the higher return is also very the is our top priority. But at the same time, the stability is is our one of the key objective is to manage our portfolio. So we understand alternative investment is very goal upon a long term investment. So we expect more reasonable risk return profile compared to the traditional investment, public investment. So among the alternative assets or we are trying to diversify our portfolios, as you mentioned, the private credit is is to the growing industry and also to we we are interested in investment in infrastructure where you already have a New York office, just a cloud that's been in for 15 years. But you have plans to is it to branch out a specific part of the fund that looks at us out of New York? What's what are you looking to do specifically there and why? Strengthening the function and the role of the overseas offices is these are all key objectives. Do you have a timeline of when you plan to do that? And do you have an initial. Amount in mind that you're looking to invest specifically there in in alternatives? The U.S. is already our largest the place for our alternative investment. And later this year, we are trying to establish a new dedicated pond which will the how big is it fund is we we are starting from the very small side and at the same time it's relative for us sovereign wealth fund if you can give guidance but but what's smallest. Yeah. Is is a smaller size it's it's compared to our to the typical investment in our country, investment to the size is very small but we want identify the very good investment opportunities in all states. So that's why we establish that this dedicate pond in New York and then we are doubling the performance of this operation, and then we can expand both inside and also in other details such where is it? Is it accurate to say that see is going overweight on the US as far as private markets go? And if that is accurate, tell us tell us why and how and do you do you have any concerns about your exposure to the US dollar, for example? Our exposure to U.S. is a heavy, but compared to other investors, I think our exposure to U.S. is at the reasonable level at this moment and also to hedge our longer term is investor rather than responding to just short term the volatility. We are trying to focus on that more long term growth potential and the structural trend that says we expect U.S. market trends continue, especially in tech sector. So hopefully we can see more opportunities. You mentioned China and some of the I guess some of the opportunities that you are looking at there. I know you have some exposure there as well. Could you elaborate more on that? Like what what future opportunities do you see in in China, whether it is public or private markets? And what would it take for you to then, I guess, establish an office to your point, by to then increase your on the ground capabilities? Yeah. In terms of Chinese market, it's a little bit tricky and it's complicated to invest in Chinese market. Is that an economic consideration and a geopolitical comparison force? And the Chinese tech sector is very promising. At the same time, Chinese private property market and macro condition is a little bit unclear. Also, I just say that in the political point of view, no, we see the the rivalry and the tension between the U.S. and China. So we have to concede at this point and we expect this trend to will be continuing for the time being. So now we are also seeing some fundamental change over world economic order. So now from the globalization tool, where we have more protectionism and supply chain disruption. So every countries are trying to protect their industries. Key industries, including air and high tech, is one of them.
