Shopping centre machete attack victim relives the harrowing moment his arm was allegedly almost HACKED off in unprovoked eshay ambush: 'Don't know how I'll survive'
Saurabh Anand, 33, was allegedly set upon by five teenagers in the unprovoked attack in Altona Meadows, in Melbourne 's west ten days ago.
As well as almost losing his hand and arm, Mr Anand was allegedly slashed and stabbed in the shoulder and back, and suffered a fractured spine, broken bones in his arm, and head injuries.
Doctors initially thought they would have to amputate his left hand, but surgeons were able to reattach it by inserting screws into his wrist and hand during five hours of emergency surgery.
'I am completely broken, mentally, physically and emotionally,' he said on Monday.
'I don't know how I'll survive. I am in constant pain. It is the toughest time in my life - I wouldn't have wished this on my worst enemy.'
Mr Anand was at Central Square Shopping Centre to pick up medication and was talking on the phone when the gang of youths allegedly pounced around 7.30pm.
He said he had spotted five teenagers sitting on a bench near a cafe outside the shopping centre, but was quickly surrounded as he came out of the pharmacy.
One teenager allegedly demanded his phone before another allegedly punched him repeatedly in the head until he fell, breaking his back as he hit the ground
The gang then allegedly began punching and kicking him as he lay on the ground before a third teen then allegedly pulled out a machete and held it to his throat.
'He [allegedly] went for my neck, my throat,' he told The Australia Today Facebook page on Monday following his release from hospital after eight days.
'To save myself, I raised my hand up to protect my throat and my arm [allegedly] got completely sliced off - the machete cut all of the muscle, the tendons, the nerves.
'But if the machete had gone through my neck I would not be here today.'
Mr Anand said he feared he would die in the alleged attack.
He said the first cut allegedly sliced through his hand near his thumb before another almost hacked off his hand at the wrist.
'It wasn't just once, they [allegedly] did it repeatedly,' he said. 'They [allegedly] tried to kill me three or four times.
'My hand was literally hanging off. There was so much blood and so much pain. And he [allegedly] did not stop. He [allegedly] cut through both the bones in my arm.
'The bones were sticking out of my skin.'
He said that as he lay on the ground in a pool of his own blood, his attackers then stood on his back and allegedly struck him again on his shoulders.
'I was just trying to survive,' he said. 'I was just tumbling around, half-concussed, half-conscious.'
He said he lay there for around half an hour before emergency services arrived to help him.
'For 30 minutes, I kept rolling there, stumbling, trying to save myself, holding my hand and falling down,' he said. 'It was very scary.'
He said he begged for help from bystanders but was ignored until one good samaritan finally stepped in to call police before he was rushed to hospital.
Several teenagers have now been arrested in connection with the incident.
A 14-year-old appeared at a Children's Court this week charged with a spate of offences including intentionally causing serious injury, recklessly causing injury, robbery and unlawful assault.
He was remanded in custody until August 15.
Two 15-year-olds were also charged with intentionally causing serious injury, robbery and unlawful assault.
Police said the two were bailed and will face a Children's Court on August 11.
Mr Anand says doctors still don't know how much movement he will have in his hand and arm once his wounds heal.
'There is no certainty about that at all,' he said.
He says he now faces financial ruin as he tries to recover, with no income and no support despite having lived in Australia for seven years.
'I have invested in this country, paid my taxes, paid my bills - supported this country in every way, economically or supported the community,' he added.
'But today I am in such a situation as to have nothing to show that anyone or the government will help me.
'I need support and I hope the government will help me. Someone needs to hear the victims.
'It is very easy to defend [alleged] offenders, saying that someone is underage, someone has mental health issues.
'But what about my mental health right now? Who will take care of me at my home?
'I would really like to urge the government of Victoria and the government of Australia to please provide me with physical health support, a physical carer or a mental health support worker.
'I'm really scared to get out of my home. I have nowhere to go. I am completely injured, distorted, disoriented in my head and a completely broken man.'
A GoFundMe fundraiser set up to help pay Mr Anand's medical bills has already raised more than $11,000 of a $26,000 target.
The fundraiser contains images of Mr Anand in his hospital bed, with his arm in a sling.
His friend Kanika, who organised the fundraiser, called on the community to rally behind Mr Anand.
'He's still struggling to come to terms with what a bad ordeal he had to go through,' she said in the appeal.
'In this time, I would urge the community to bring in generous support for him as this would help him to support his medical expenses, while covering for the loss of income from work and recover from his physical injuries and mental distress through rehabilitation.
'Your contribution would help him to recover better without him having to worry about his next dollar as the journey is going to be long to bring it back to normal considering the expenses required for ongoing therapy, counselling , medication and rental expenses are not easy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Sall Grover begins federal court appeal against Roxanne Tickle's gender discrimination case win
Giggle for Girls and Sall Grover have begun their appeal to overturn a landmark court decision that found the women-only social media app and its CEO had unlawfully discriminated against Roxanne Tickle, a transgender woman. On Monday, the full court of the federal court heard that Grover's team believes the app – designed as a 'women-only safe space' – constituted a 'special measure' under the Sex Discrimination Act (SDA), which allows discrimination with the aim of redressing historical disadvantage between men and women. In an unexpected move, an application for a new amended notice of appeal with an entirely new ground of appeal was lodged by Giggle and Grover's team on Monday morning with only one hour's notice for Tickle's legal team. The application was refused. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Grover is challenging justice Robert Bromwich's milestone August decision in the first gender identity discrimination case to reach the federal court. Tickle, from regional New South Wales, sued the women-only social media app for gender discrimination, claiming she was unlawfully barred from using Giggle for Girls in September 2021 after the firm and Grover said she was a man. Tickle was initially allowed to join the app, which shut down in 2022, but was then later removed from the platform. She contacted Grover on multiple occasions seeking readmission. Tickle was awarded $10,000 plus costs after Bromwich found she had been indirectly discriminated against, in the decision that tested the meaning and scope of the SDA. The appeal is being heard over four days by justice Melissa Perry, justice Geoffrey Kennett and justice Wendy Abraham in Sydney. Giggle and Grover's legal team is being led by Noel Hutley SC. The team has dropped its constitutional challenge argument and is appealing against paying $10,000 damages, claiming Tickle was not discriminated against indirectly, on the basis Grover did not know Tickle was transgender when she barred her from the app. Grover previously said that the ruling erred in its interpretation of sex under the SDA, had not considered critical evidence and did not recognise that the app was a 'special measure' fostering substantive equality between women and men. Grover has persistently referred to Tickle as male and during last year's hearing, said she would not address her as 'Ms' Tickle. On Monday, Hutley said a woman was a 'natal' woman – or assigned female at birth. He told the court the SDA was a 'compromise' and that its special measures were 'ephemeral', claiming that 'just about any special measures targeted at a group' would, through the act's other legal carve-outs, probably involve discrimination of another group. He said special measures should be protective and enabling, not restrictive. Tickle's legal team is expected to argue that every special measure needs to work for all groups protected by the act simultaneously. Tickle's barrister, Georgina Costello KC told the court 'a real review of the evidence leads to the easily drawn conclusion that, for the purposes of the Sex Discrimination Act, Ms Tickle is a woman and she was a woman when the appellants excluded her from the Giggle app.' Costello said: 'She presented her gender identity to the world and to the Giggle app as a woman. Her identity is as a woman and as a transgender woman.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion She said Bromwich had made the correct conclusion 'that Ms Tickle was a woman' and that her sex as a woman was 'legally unimpeachable'. Tickle's team is expected to argue also that the judge did not fully consider all of the evidence and that Tickle's barring from the app and failure in her appeals to Grover to rejoin the app both amounted to direct, not indirect, discrimination. Tickle is seeking a total of $40,000: $30,000 in general damages, and $10,000 in aggravated damages. Her team will argue previously awarded damages of $10,000 are inappropriate and did not take into account Grover's conduct around the proceedings. During the three-day trial in April 2024, the court heard Tickle had lived as a woman since 2017, has a birth certificate stating her gender is female, had gender affirmation surgery and 'feels in her mind that psychologically she is a woman'. The respondents claimed that biological sex was immutable and that the app had been intended as an online refuge for women. The court has granted leave to the sex discrimination commissioner, Equality Australia and the Lesbian Action Group – which unsuccessfully attempted to exclude transgender and bisexual women from its public events – to intervene, or participate, in the appeal. Changes to the SDA in 2013 made it unlawful under federal law to discriminate against a person on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status. In April 2025, the UK supreme court issued a historic and definitive ruling that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the UK's Equality Act refer only to a biological woman and to biological sex.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
High-profile Channel Nine reporter Ben McCormack is slapped with more than 60 child abuse material offences
A former Channel Nine reporter has been charged with more than 60 offences related to child abuse material. Ben McCormack, who worked for A Current Affair, was charged on Saturday with 64 counts of using a carriage service to transmit child abuse material and one count of using a carriage service to transmit child abuse material to self. McCormack has also been charged with three counts of failing to comply with reporting obligations and one count of giving false or misleading information. He is accused of committing the offences on 65 occasions from his address in Oxley, Brisbane, on various dates last year. The 51-year-old had his case briefly mentioned in Brisbane Magistrates Court on Monday. He was not required to appear in person. No application for bail was made and his Legal Aid duty lawyer Zane Playle asked for the matter to be adjourned to September 5.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Footage of Erin Patterson dumping food dehydrator released weeks after guilty murder verdicts
Footage of Erin Patterson dumping a food dehydrator at a local tip and handing a mobile phone to police has been released by the Victorian supreme court, almost a month after she was found guilty of murdering and attempting to murder her estranged husband's family. Both sets of footage were tendered as exhibits during Patterson's trial, but only were released to the media on Monday. The footage was taken from the Koonwarra Transfer Station CCTV and from a police officer filming the execution of a search warrant at Patterson's Leongatha home. Both events happened in August 2023, the week immediately after Patterson served a lunch of beef wellington laced with death cap mushrooms that fatally poisoned Don and Gail Patterson, the parents of her estranged husband Simon, and Heather Wilkinson, Gail's sister. Ian Wilkinson, Gail's husband, survived. Patterson can be seen on the footage taking the Sunbeam food dehydrator, which is in its box, and placing it in an area for electronic waste disposal. The dehydrator – described during the trial as 'the murder weapon' – was later recovered by police, and found to contain traces of death cap mushrooms, and Patterson's fingerprints. The footage taken from inside her home shows Patterson sitting at her dining room table and handing over a mobile phone to a detective at the conclusion of an almost four-hour search of the property. It was later alleged that Patterson did not hand police her main mobile phone at this time, but another device which she had recently factory reset, and would reset again over the following hours. It was alleged her main phone was never recovered by police.
