List of America's most unhealthy fast food items is out, and you might want to ditch that cheeseburger and fries
fast food
chain. But, on a scale of 1 to 50, how unhealthy do you think that juicy (and greasy) burger is? No, it's not 8, and certainly not 49, it's beyond that. As US President Donald Trump and the HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are working on 'Making America Healthy Again', the list of 'The most unhealthy menu items at America's fast-food chains' is out, and it's shocking, to say the least.
A new study conducted by online healthcare platform PlushCare in 2024 has made the list of the most unhealthy fast food items in America, based on Department of Health's nutrient profiling method, comparing the calories (kj), sugar (g), saturated fat (g), and sodium (mg) values of products at 24 leading US fast-food chains.
And guess what's in the top one position as the most unhealthy food? It's not what you expect.
Cheeseburger! Yeah, that's right. This might finally be the right time to quit eating cheeseburgers from fast food chains.
Five Guys cheeseburger
tops the list by being the unhealthiest cheeseburger, with a 50-point unhealthiness score. The least healthy on the chain's menu is fries, which are too at 28 points. 'According to our calculations, the Five Guys cheeseburger is the most unhealthy in its class, primarily because it has 73% more saturated fat than any other fast-food cheeseburger,' the study said.
(Pic courtesy: PlushCare)
Many Americans believe that burgers are healthy. It can be, if cooked traditionally, with slow-cooked lean meat, and a healthy bun. It can provide protein, iron, and vitamin B12. However, that's not what you get from fast food chains. The World Health Organization (WHO) has found that red meat and ultra-processed foods are carcinogenic, which is basically what you're getting with a fast-food cheeseburger.
Interestingly, Burger King and McDonald's
cheeseburgers
are tied on relatively low unhealthiness scores (18 points). Compared to Five Guys, they each have less than a quarter of the saturated fat and less than half that of a Wendy's cheeseburger. Saturated fats are linked with increased risk of heart disease and obesity.
Well, that doesn't mean Burger King or McDonald's are any better. McDonald's McChicken is still on the list, but is the least unhealthy fast-food chicken
burger
. "While the McChicken is significantly less unhealthy than other fast-food chicken burgers, it is still high in sodium, fat, and calories. Because it is made of ground chicken patty, the nutrients it does contain are not high-quality," the study said.
Popeye's chicken nuggets are at the top of the least healthy (30 points) chicken nuggets.
(Pic courtesy: PlushCare)
When it comes to fries, Five Guys Regular Five Guys style fries are in the top spot, being the unhelathiest fries with a score of 28. KFC's secret recipe fries have 17 points on the unhealthiest score. Burger King and McDonald's fries are also on the list.
(Pic courtesy: PlushCare)
Next in the list is for most unhealthy Vanilla Shakes. Fatburger's vanilla shake is the least healthy, with 63 points and 890 calories. Five Guys, DQ, Steak 'n Shake, Burger King, Smash Burger, and McDonald's are on the list.
(Pic courtesy: PlushCare)
Trump Demands This From China Amid Tariff War... | 'U.S. No Longer Lose On Trade'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
The 3 worst things you can say after a pet dies, and what to say instead
By Brian N. Chin I saw it firsthand after my cat Murphy died earlier this year. She'd been diagnosed with cancer just weeks before. She was a small gray tabby with delicate paws who, even during chemotherapy, climbed her favourite dresser perch – Mount Murphy – with steady determination. The day after she died, a colleague said with a shrug: 'It's just part of life.' That phrase stayed with me – not because it was wrong, but because of how quickly it dismissed something real. Murphy wasn't just a cat. She was my eldest daughter – by bond, if not by blood. My shadow. More than two-thirds of US households include pets. Americans tend to treat them like family with birthday cakes, shared beds and names on holiday cards. But when someone grieves them like family, the cultural script flips. Grief gets minimised. Support gets awkward. And when no one acknowledges your loss, it starts to feel like you weren't even supposed to love them that much in the first place. I've seen this kind of grief up close – in my research and in my own life. I am a psychologist who studies attachment, loss and the human-animal bond. And I've seen firsthand how often grief following pet loss gets brushed aside – treated as less valid, less serious or less worthy of support than human loss. After a pet dies, people often say the wrong thing – usually trying to help, but often doing the opposite. Psychologists describe this kind of unacknowledged loss as disenfranchised grief: a form of mourning that isn't fully recognised by social norms or institutions. It happens after miscarriages, breakups, job loss – and especially after the death of a beloved animal companion. The pain is real for the person grieving, but what's missing is the social support to mourn that loss. Even well-meaning people struggle to respond in ways that feel supportive. And when grief gets dismissed, it doesn't just hurt – it makes us question whether we're even allowed to feel it. Here are three of the most common responses – and what to do instead: This is one of the most reflexive responses after a loss like this. It sounds harmless. But under the surface is a cultural belief that grieving an animal is excessive – even unprofessional. That belief shows up in everything from workplace leave policies to everyday conversations. Even from people trying to be kind. But pet grief isn't about the species, it's about the bond. And for many, that bond is irreplaceable. Pets often become attachment figures; they're woven into our routines, our emotional lives and our identities. Recent research shows that the quality of the human-pet bond matters deeply – not just for well-being, but for how we grieve when that connection ends. What's lost isn't 'just an animal.' It's the steady presence who greeted you every morning. The one who sat beside you through deadlines, small triumphs and quiet nights. A companion who made the world feel a little less lonely. But when the world treats that love like it doesn't count, the loss can cut even deeper. It may not come with formal recognition or time off, but it still matters. And love isn't less real just because it came with fur. If someone you care about loses a pet, acknowledge the bond. Even a simple 'I'm so sorry' can offer real comfort. 'I know how you feel' sounds empathetic, but it quietly shifts the focus from the griever to the speaker. It rushes in with your story before theirs has even had a chance to land. That instinct comes from a good place. We want to relate, to reassure, to let someone know they're not alone. But when it comes to grief, that impulse often backfires. Grief doesn't need to be matched. It needs to be honoured and given time, care and space to unfold, whether the loss is of a person or a pet. Instead of responding with your own story, try simpler, grounding words: 1) 'That sounds really hard.' 2) 'I'm so sorry.' 3) 'I'm here if you want to talk.' You don't need to understand someone's grief to make space for it. What helps isn't comparison – it's presence. Let them name the loss. Let them remember. Let them say what hurts. Sometimes, simply staying present – without rushing, problem-solving or shifting the focus away – is the most meaningful thing you can do. 'You can always get another one' is the kind of thing people offer reflexively when they don't know what else to say – a clumsy attempt at reassurance. Underneath is a desire to soothe, to fix, to make the sadness go away. But that instinct can miss the point: The loss isn't practical – it's personal. And grief isn't a problem to be solved. This type of comment often lands more like customer service than comfort. It treats the relationship as replaceable, as if love were something you can swap out like a broken phone. But every pet is one of a kind – not just in how they look or sound, but in how they move through your life. The way they wait for you at the door and watch you as you leave. The small rituals that you didn't know were rituals until they stopped. You build a life around them without realising it, until they're no longer in it. You wouldn't tell someone to 'just have another child' or 'just find a new partner.' And yet, people say the equivalent all the time after pet loss. Rushing to replace the relationship instead of honouring what was lost overlooks what made that bond irreplaceable. Love isn't interchangeable – and neither are the ones we lose. So offer care that endures. Grief doesn't follow a timeline. A check-in weeks or months later, whether it's a heart emoji, a shared memory or a gentle reminder that they're not alone, can remind someone that their grief is seen and their love still matters. People often don't know what to say after a pet dies, so they say nothing. But silence doesn't just bury grief, it isolates it. It tells the griever that their love was excessive, their sadness inconvenient, their loss unworthy of acknowledgment. And grief that feels invisible can be the hardest kind to carry. So if someone you love loses a pet, don't change the subject. Don't rush them out of their sadness. Don't offer solutions. Instead, here are a few other ways to offer support gently and meaningfully: 1) Say their pet's name. 2) Ask what they miss most. 3) Tell them you're sorry. 4) Let them cry. 5) Let them not cry. 6) Let them remember. Because when someone loses a pet, they're not 'just' mourning an animal. They're grieving for a relationship, a rhythm and a presence that made the world feel kinder. What they need most is someone willing to treat that loss like it matters.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Venus Williams' health insurance comments: What athletes need to know
Venus Williams' recent singles win at the DC Open showcased her longevity and brought attention to health coverage for aging athletes following a joking comment she made in an on-court interview. "I had to come back for the insurance," the five-time Wimbledon champion said after Tuesday's match, her first in 16 months. "They informed me this year that I'm on COBRA, so it's like, I got to get my benefits on." The 45-year-old Williams, who has won seven major singles titles in her career, became the second-oldest woman to win a tour-level singles match in professional tennis with Tuesday's victory. After losing on Thursday, she acknowledged that her comment on health insurance was a "fun and funny moment." The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, more commonly referred to as COBRA, allows Americans to stay on their employer's insurance plan for a limited amount of time after leaving their job. It comes with high costs. Williams' comment led to questions about health insurance in the sports world. For most active professional athletes, partially or fully subsidised health insurance is provided by their league or governing body and guaranteed in their collective bargaining agreement. A CBA is an agreement reached between a league and its players that guarantees certain levels of player compensation and benefits, and can be renegotiated every few years. So when athletes are playing, they're usually covered. But Williams, coming back to the sport after a 16-month hiatus, brought to light how long that insurance lasts or doesn't last for athletes when they're not playing. Women's Tennis In the WTA, the governing body of the women's tour, players are eligible to enroll in the health insurance plan if they are ranked in the top 500 in singles or top 175 in doubles and have played a minimum of three WTA 250 level or above tournaments that year. If players are in the top 150 in singles or top 50 in doubles, the WTA will pay a portion of the premiums. If a player is no longer eligible under those requirements, they can enrol in COBRA for up to 18 months, which is likely the situation that Williams was referencing. That is also the WTA's only option for retiring players. "Nobody wants to be on COBRA, right? Williams said after her second-round loss on Thursday night. That remains an issue in my life Obviously (the interview was) a fun and funny moment, but it's an issue that people are dealing with, so it is serious." Men's Tennis The ATP provides health insurance to men's tennis players who rank in the top 250 in singles or top 50 in doubles. All other players with a ranking point are given the opportunity to purchase health insurance through the ATP's provider. For retired players, the only option is COBRA for up to three years. Golf As an individual sport without a CBA, golf tours vary. They do have a group insurance plan that is available to active members of the PGA Tour, the PGA Tour Champions (the tour for golfers over 50) and the Korn Ferry Tour (the feeder circuit for the PGA). For players who meet certain "performance criteria," including how many tournaments they played and how often they won, the PGA will partially subsidise the plan. In retirement, players are responsible for their own insurance. Some players join the PGA Tour Champions after the PGA Tour and play into their mid-60s, during which they maintain coverage. Top players can receive a subsidy from the PGA in retirement. The LPGA Tour, the women's professional golf tour, started offering its players fully funded health insurance for the first time this year. Before this year, players were given a $4,000 stipend. NBA NBA players have access to one of the most inclusive insurance plans in retirement. If they played at least three years in the league, retired NBA players are eligible for fully-funded health insurance in retirement, and if they played at least 10 years, they will have healthcare covered for their entire family. WNBA WNBA players are fighting for retirement healthcare as part of their new CBA, which they are currently negotiating with the league. Those negotiations have been heated, and the most recent meeting between the two sides last weekend did not result in an agreement. One unique facet of the W's healthcare is that athletes who have spent more than eight years in the league can be reimbursed up to USD 20,000 a year for costs related to adoption, surrogacy, egg freezing or additional fertility treatments. NFL The NFL has less long-term coverage for retirees than most other team sport leagues athletes who played in the league for at least three years can remain on the NFL health insurance plan, but only for five years into retirement. NHL NHL players who have played more than 160 games with the league, which is about two seasons, are eligible to buy NHL health insurance for their retirement. The retirement insurance plan is eligible for partial subsidization from the league. MLB Baseball players who spent at least four years in the league have the option to pay premiums to stay on the MLB's healthcare plan indefinitely. Minor League Baseball has its own separate CBA, which also guarantees health insurance for active players. In the minors, however, players who get cut or leave the league lose coverage at the end of that month. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Investigate the health' of Donald Trump, ex-navy veteran urges Congress not to ignore POTUS' red flags
Donald Trump is facing new pressure for a full mental health check after a series of strange public appearances left even some of his supporters confused, according to Mirror report. Dr. Bandy Lee, a former Yale psychiatry professor, said she first saw signs of cognitive decline in Donald Trump back in 2017.(REUTERS) At the same time, some Republicans are still going after the former President Biden's health records from when he was in office. But one retired Navy commander says they're going after the wrong person. Paul Mazich: 'Investigate the health of our current president' Paul Mazich, a former Navy commander, called out Congress for focusing on Biden instead of Trump. He wrote in a column, 'Does it really matter whether Congress investigates former President Joe Biden's health in office? He's retired. Leave him alone. Here's a better idea: Investigate the health of our current president.' Trump, who returned to the presidency earlier this year, has made headlines with some odd speeches. In one, he claimed his late uncle taught the Unabomber, even though the dates don't sit align. That comment is just one of several that experts have called out as troubling. Mazich said, 'Clues to Trump's mental state have been plainly observable for many years. During his first term, dozens of psychiatrists and mental health professionals tried to warn the public.' Also Read: 'Trump: Convicted Felon' headline goes viral | A look at his indictments Trump suffers from a health issue He urged Congress to act quickly, 'If they determine that Trump suffers from a health issue that makes him unfit for office, they must act for the nation's good and not for political advantage." Trump has waved off concerns, saying he 'aced' a memory test and 'got every answer right.' Dr. Bandy Lee, a former Yale psychiatry professor, said she first saw signs of cognitive decline in Trump back in 2017. She now heads the World Mental Health Coalition. Also Read: In US, Pakistan's foreign minister backs Donald Trump's 'ceasefire' claim as he meets Marco Rubio 'Trump's bizarre speech and political decisions…' Last year, that group released a warning signed by more than 50 top psychiatrists, neurologists, and dementia experts. It said, 'What's alarming is how the rate of Trump's bizarre speech and political decisions have been increasing. He gave an answer about childcare to the Economic Club of New York so incoherent that even his supporters were concerned.' The group also pointed to signs like how Trump walks, problems speaking clearly, and dropping vocabulary and thought complexity, all common symptoms of dementia.
