Village where vampire panic began revives old story claiming truth about world's first vampire
Origins of the Vampire Myth in Kisiljevo
As per archival records dating back to July 21, 1725, villagers exhumed Blagojevic's body after a series of sudden and
unexplained deaths
. The event, documented in the Wienerisches Diarium, noted that the deceased appeared unnaturally preserved. Accounts claimed that blood was seen oozing from his mouth and ears, which, combined with local suspicions, led to the belief that he had returned from the dead to prey on villagers.
To end what they believed was a string of supernatural killings, residents reportedly drove a hawthorn stake through his chest, burned the body, and scattered the ashes in a nearby lake.
AFP reported Mirko Bogicevic, a former mayor and self-declared chronicler of the village's history, explained that the story has been passed down for generations, further embedding Blagojevic into local folklore. While he acknowledged Blagojevic might have been a regular man, he emphasized that the records clearly tie him to Kisiljevo and date back to around 1700.
Academic Views and Medical Theories
The vampire myth may have stemmed from a simple misunderstanding, says Clemens Ruthner of Trinity College Dublin. He attributes the story's origins to a miscommunication between villagers and Austrian officials sent to investigate the deaths. Ruthner noted that a mistranslation of the Bulgarian word 'upior,' meaning "evil person," might have led to it being interpreted as 'vampire.'
He suggested the real cause of the deaths might have been anthrax, a serious infection known to cause symptoms like suffocation and fever. Such outbreaks, he explained, were often attributed to supernatural forces in pre-modern societies lacking medical knowledge.
From Myth to Tourism Opportunity
Despite doubts from the academic community, local historian Nenad Mihajlovic insists on the authenticity of the written accounts and believes the grave's discovery adds weight to Kisiljevo's claim as the birthplace of the vampire legend. He described the dowsing rods dramatically plunging into the earth during their search — an event he and others found unusually compelling.
The region is now hoping to capitalise on the tale to attract visitors. Dajana Stojanovic, who heads the local tourism board, sees potential in blending myth with cultural heritage. She pointed to other local traditions, including folklore involving Vlach magic and ancient customs, as valuable elements to promote.
Vampire Lore Through the Ages
The Kisiljevo case predates Bram Stoker's Dracula by over 150 years and is considered by some to be the earliest documented case of vampirism. While vampire fiction has romanticised the undead, early legends were rooted in fear and efforts to explain unknown illnesses. In Slavic regions especially, vampire stories evolved as communities grappled with disease and death without scientific explanations.
Historically, conditions such as tuberculosis and porphyria were misunderstood and contributed to vampire myths. In later centuries, similar panics occurred in New England, where families performed rituals on the dead to halt disease, a phenomenon now linked to tuberculosis outbreaks.
Today, Kisiljevo is a quiet farming village surrounded by cornfields and lakes, but its link to one of the earliest vampire stories is gaining renewed attention. Some households even continue to keep bottles of garlic-and-chilli-infused rakija — just in case the legends have any truth.
For Mihajlovic and others, it's not just about folklore or tourism. It's about preserving a documented chapter of their village's past — one that, centuries later, still stirs curiosity and wonder.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
AI robots fill in for weed killers and farm hands
Oblivious to the punishing midday heat, a wheeled robot powered by the sun and infused with artificial intelligence carefully combs a cotton field in California, plucking out farms across the United States face a shortage of labourers and weeds grow resistant to herbicides, startup Aigen says its robotic solution -- named Element -- can save farmers money, help the environment and keep harmful chemicals out of food."I really believe this is the biggest thing we can do to improve human health," cofounder and chief technology officer Richard Wurden told AFP, as robots made their way through crops at Bowles Farm in the town of Los Banos."Everybody's eating food sprayed with chemicals."Wurden, a mechanical engineer who spent five years at Tesla, went to work on the robot after relatives who farm in Minnesota told him weeding was a costly are becoming immune to herbicides, but a shortage of laborers often leaves chemicals as the only viable option, according to Wurden."No farmer that we've ever talked to said 'I'm in love with chemicals'," added Aigen co-founder and chief executive Kenny Lee, whose background is in software."They use it because it's a tool -- we're trying to create an alternative."Element the robot resembles a large table on wheels, solar panels on top. Metal arms equipped with small blades reach down to hoe between crop plants."It actually mimics how humans work," Lee said as the temperature hit 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32 degrees Celsius) under a cloudless sky."When the sun goes down, it just powers down and goes to sleep; then in the morning it comes back up and starts going again."The robot's AI system takes in data from on-board cameras, allowing it to follow crop rows and identify weeds."If you think this is a job that we want humans doing, just spend two hours in the field weeding," Wurden vision is for workers who once toiled in the heat to be "upskilled" to monitor and troubleshoot with the on-board AI, robots communicate wirelessly with small control centres, notifying handlers of has robots running in tomato, cotton, and sugar beet fields, and touts the technology's ability to weed without damaging the estimated that it takes about five robots to weed 160 acres (65 hectares) of robots made by the 25-person startup -- based in the city of Redmond, outside Seattle -- are priced at $50, company is focused on winning over politically conservative farmers with a climate friendly option that relies on the sun instead of costly diesel fuel that powers heavy machinery."Climate, the word, has become politicized but when you get really down to brass tacks farmers care about their land," Lee technology caught the attention of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the ecommerce giant's cloud computing was chosen for AWS's "Compute for Climate" fellowship program that provides AI tools, data center power, and technical help for startups tackling environmental woes."Aigen is going to be one of the industry giants in the future," said AWS head of climate tech startups business development Lisbeth Kaufman."I think about Ford and the Model T, or Edison and the light bulb -- that's Kenny and Rich and Aigen."
Mint
7 hours ago
- Mint
AI robots fill in for weed killers and farm hands
Oblivious to the punishing midday heat, a wheeled robot powered by the sun and infused with artificial intelligence carefully combs a cotton field in California, plucking out weeds. As farms across the United States face a shortage of laborers and weeds grow resistant to herbicides, startup Aigen says its robotic solution -- named Element -- can save farmers money, help the environment and keep harmful chemicals out of food. "I really believe this is the biggest thing we can do to improve human health," co-founder and chief technology officer Richard Wurden told AFP, as robots made their way through crops at Bowles Farm in the town of Los Banos. "Everybody's eating food sprayed with chemicals." Wurden, a mechanical engineer who spent five years at Tesla, went to work on the robot after relatives who farm in Minnesota told him weeding was a costly bane. Weeds are becoming immune to herbicides, but a shortage of laborers often leaves chemicals as the only viable option, according to Wurden. "No farmer that we've ever talked to said 'I'm in love with chemicals'," added Aigen co-founder and chief executive Kenny Lee, whose background is in software. "They use it because it's a tool -- we're trying to create an alternative." Element the robot resembles a large table on wheels, solar panels on top. Metal arms equipped with small blades reach down to hoe between crop plants. "It actually mimics how humans work," Lee said as the temperature hit 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32 degrees Celsius) under a cloudless sky. "When the sun goes down, it just powers down and goes to sleep; then in the morning it comes back up and starts going again." The robot's AI system takes in data from on-board cameras, allowing it to follow crop rows and identify weeds. "If you think this is a job that we want humans doing, just spend two hours in the field weeding," Wurden said. Aigen's vision is for workers who once toiled in the heat to be "upskilled" to monitor and troubleshoot robots. Along with the on-board AI, robots communicate wirelessly with small control centers, notifying handlers of mishaps. Aigen has robots running in tomato, cotton, and sugar beet fields, and touts the technology's ability to weed without damaging the crops. Lee estimated that it takes about five robots to weed 160 acres (65 hectares) of farm. The robots made by the 25-person startup -- based in the city of Redmond, outside Seattle -- are priced at $50,000. The company is focused on winning over politically conservative farmers with a climate friendly option that relies on the sun instead of costly diesel fuel that powers heavy machinery. "Climate, the word, has become politicized but when you get really down to brass tacks farmers care about their land," Lee said. The technology caught the attention of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the e-commerce giant's cloud computing unit. Aigen was chosen for AWS's "Compute for Climate" fellowship program that provides AI tools, data center power, and technical help for startups tackling environmental woes. "Aigen is going to be one of the industry giants in the future," said AWS head of climate tech startups business development Lisbeth Kaufman.
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Can we hack our way through the sizzle?: Mridula Ramesh writes on heat
Summer is over and floods are in the air. But still, let's talk about heat. Paris is on red alert, with the top of the Eiffel Tower shut to visitors this week, amid a heat wave that has seen temperatures reach 41 degrees haze, incidentally, is from light reflecting off clouds of dust carried by strong winds. (AFP) Why? Because while India's summer heatwaves may be over, the planet's heat continues to speak through many tongues. Let's start at the source. The Sun is made up largely of hydrogen, and a little helium. Deep in its core, where temperatures reach 15 million degrees Celsius and pressures are immense, hydrogen nuclei fuse into helium. This helium nucleus has slightly less mass than the four hydrogen nuclei that formed it, and the difference in mass is released as energy. In just one second, the sun releases enough energy to meet humanity's needs for 612,900 years. Only a fraction of that energy reaches the top of the atmosphere above Earth. Then, nearly a third of this energy is either absorbed by the ozone layer or reflected, by the clouds, by aerosols and by shiny surfaces (think deserts and ice sheets). A sliver (with enough energy to last us 4,400 years) reaches the planet's surface, which the planet, in turn, releases as heat. Some of this heat radiates back into space, but a lot of it is trapped by greenhouse gases and clouds. Importantly, the outgoing heat does not quite balance out the incoming solar energy, resulting in a planetary energy imbalance. The gold standard data for checking energy flows at the top of our atmosphere comes from CERES (Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System; a project by the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration or NASA). Their instruments tell us that the energy imbalance has doubled, from 0.5 watt per square metre in the first decade of this millennium to 1.0 watt per square metre in 2013-22. And it's showing: 2024 was the hottest year on record, per NASA, beating 2023, which held the record before it. The planet is currently absorbing as much extra energy as if eight Hiroshima bombs were detonating on its surface every second. That's 'a lot. A lot, a lot', as Rosamund Pike's character puts it, in the 2014 movie Gone Girl. This is not a one-time thing, like the actual Hiroshima bomb was. No, we've been absorbing energy for decades, slowly, invisibly, day and night, everywhere. We are literally sitting in an oven, and ratcheting up the thermostat. Crowds throng a beach in Sale, Morocco, during a heatwave. (AFP) Eight Hiroshima bombs a second. Every second. For the past decade. Let that thought sink in on this pleasant Sunday morning. *** Perhaps we don't register this heating because the oceans have been shielding us by taking up about 90% of it. The rest goes into warming land and air, and melting ice. Periodically, during an El Nino, the ocean belches some of that heat, making the planet hotter, as in 2023. Meanwhile, data from disparate realms — ocean temperatures, ice extent, global air temperatures — all point to the same thing: rising invisible heat. The impacts run deeper than heat exhaustion for humans and rising wet-bulb temperatures. Crops wilt. Wheat, grown today in parts of India it was never suited to, suffers when March feels like May; the grains do not fill out, and shrivel instead. Other botanical immigrants from cooler climes, such as tomatoes, suffer. Monsoons grow fiercer, as warmer air holds more moisture, fuelling intense downpours. Hotter seas supercharge cyclones, battering coastal cities. Human productivity drops. India suffers. The planet suffers. *** This has been going on for a while. Between 1750 and 2019, global surface air temperatures rose by about 1.29 degrees Celsius. According to the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, heat trapped by carbon-dioxide (CO2) has driven about 1 degree Celsius of that warming, while other greenhouse gases have added 0.58 degrees Celsius. Offsetting this, the effect of land-use changes and aerosols — think pollution and their effect on clouds — have lowered temperatures by roughly 0.30 degrees Celsius. Given this breakdown, the overarching theme in climate action has been reducing CO2 levels by reducing fossil-fuel use. We have not done too well on that front. *** A rare "roll cloud", a huge horizontal bank, advances from the horizon towards the beaches of the Atlantic Ocean during a heatwave in southwestern Portugal, in June. (AFP) Meanwhile… Over the past decade, CERES data shows that incoming solar energy has not changed, the outgoing heat from Earth has risen a bit, but a lot more of the incoming solar radiation is being absorbed. Why? Simply put, the planet appears to be becoming less shiny. While there is a lot of uncertainty over what is causing this change, an early hypothesis is that shifts in cloud patterns could be at play. Clouds act as both umbrellas, by reflecting sunlight and cooling the planet, and as coats, by absorbing heat and warming the surface. The loss of low-level clouds above the ocean, the umbrellas, could have many causes, ranging from warmer oceans and higher greenhouse-gas levels to less sulphur in ship's exhausts and changes in ocean circulation. If cloud patterns are changing in response to warmer oceans, we can expect the heating to intensify. So, what can we do about it? We circle back to reduced carbon emissions. This is already happening in many places. My own textile factory, for instance, now runs largely on renewable energy, made possible by innovation and policies that have driven costs down. In homes, the LED revolution means we enjoy the same brightness at a fraction of the carbon footprint. Developed country emissions are falling, and India, which is still building much of its infrastructure, is seeing the carbon intensity of its economy falling too. But some, ignoring their own historical emissions, ask: 'When China and India are emitting so much, why should we tighten our belts?' India is not China, whose 2023 emissions were nearly four times that of India. But that nuance is missed by many reeling under the heat – temperatures in Spain touched 47 degrees Celsius last week — and clamouring for change. As a result, an idea once considered taboo in climate circles is gaining traction. A decade ago, a start-up purporting to sell cooling credits by injecting sulphur-dioxide particles into the atmosphere over Mexico would have been unthinkable. While the start-up did draw widespread criticism, within a year, the UK government set up its Advanced Research and Innovation Agency (ARIA), which this year began funnelling nearly £60 million into several real-world geoengineering experiments. Proponents of geoengineering support real-world trials because they say data from these are needed to shape global governance. But, going by recent events, 'global governance' may be an oxymoron. Sometimes I wonder what lies beneath the hubris of geoengineers. It's not as though the last human-wrought geoengineering experiments — largescale deforestation and rising greenhouse-gas emissions — have gone so well. And yet, they persist. One experiment involves brightening the clouds over the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Coral reefs, reeling under the combined onslaught of marine heatwaves and acidifying oceans, are the proverbial canary in the coal mine. So, some are trying to cool the reef by brightening clouds above it. But data from small-scale experiments can miss the bigger picture. For one thing, the mechanism of brightening clouds has some cooling and some warming effects, and the net effect is far from certain, as even proponents admit. Second, meaningful cooling may occur only when such efforts are scaled up, and there we run into a problem. Studies suggest that large-scale marine cloud-brightening efforts may impact ozone levels. Talk about borrowing from Peter to pay Paul. Another form of geoengineering involves mimicking volcanic eruptions. It is well-known that global temperatures fall after a giant volcano eruption. Indeed, Indonesia's great Mount Tambora explosion in 1815 saw temperatures dip below 0 degrees Celsius in Chennai. But such cooling has collateral damage, the most important, from India's point of view, being its effect on the monsoon. A recent study of 145 years of data found that medium and large tropical volcanic eruptions were followed by two years of poor monsoons, especially in El Nino periods. That is very bad news. The second casualty, multiple studies suggest, is the ozone layer. Now for the third casualty of such action. Innovation and policy that spur carbon action are possible only because there is a strong, consistent signal across governments and corporate leaders that such action is crucial to planet safety. If this signal is short-circuited or diluted, by geoengineering for example, innovation and entire industries will be cut down. Since these often do good things for the environment and human health, those will suffer as well. Indeed, there are already whispers that the climate-tech industry in the US is feeling the pinch. My sense is that some form of geoengineering will be pushed through. Given that the monsoon may be affected, India should get real about its water. There are thousands of waterbodies scattered across the length and breadth of Indian cities (hundreds in Delhi alone; have you visited the Anang Tal Baoli in Mehrauli?). Many are not in great shape. Rejuvenating them and greening the spaces around them would be highly effective in countering heat and making our cities climate-resilient. Whether or not we whiten the skies. (Mridula Ramesh is a climate-tech investor and author of The Climate Solution and Watershed. She can be reached on tradeoffs@
