When is the price of stamps going up? What to know about USPS cost spike
The United States Postal Service appears to be on track to raise the first-class Forever Stamp price as well as for other products in just over two weeks, a spokesperson for the federal agency confirmed to USA TODAY on June 26.
The move still under consideration this week by the agency's oversight board, who ultimately makes the decision. The stamp price is slated to rise July 13, USPS Senior Public Relationship Representative Marti Johnson told USA TODAY.
The Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC), the federal agency that oversees the postal service, has been weighing approving a 5-cent spike on the stamp, according to a news release last month.
"The Postal Service continues to take a rational and realistic approach to pricing that includes prudent implementation of new and existing pricing authorities, with letter prices still significantly lower than other comparable foreign posts," Johnson said.
The postal service did not say what date the PRC's deadline is to make its decision.
USA TODAY has reached out to the PRC for comment.
National Park mass expansion: Big Bend may soon add 6,000 more acres
The USPS said in an April news release that the upcoming slated price adjustments "are needed to achieve the financial stability sought by the organization's Delivering for America 10-year plan," adding its prices "remain among the most affordable in the world."
Changes would increase mailing service product prices by 7.4%, the USPS wrote in the release.
The USPS stamp price is slated to increase on July 13, 2025.
Forever Stamp price could rise from 73 cents to 78 cents, the USPS reported.
Over 70,000 BMW vehicles recalled: See impacted models
In addition to the Forever Stamp price jump, other USPS products proposed price increases include:
Domestic postcards: 56 cents to 62 cents
Letters: 69 cents to 74 cents
Letters (1 ounce): 73 cents to 78 cents
Additional-ounce price for single letters: 28 cents to 29 cents;
International postcards: $1.65 to $1.70;
International letter (1 ounce) – $1.65 to $1.70
Contributing: USA TODAY's Saleen Martin
Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@usatoday.com and follow her on X @nataliealund.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: When will cost of USPS stamps increase?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Club World Cup 2025 prize money: How much will Chelsea earn if they win the tournament?
The 2025 Club World Cup's revamped format will see a vast pot of prize money divvied out among its competitors, with it still possible that Chelsea will bring home the lion's share. The new 32-team summer tournament, the brainchild of Fifa president Gianni Infantino, has been taking place in the United States over the last four weeks, featuring clubs all over the globe. Advertisement Watch every Fifa Club World Cup game free on DAZN. Sign up here now . A competition that included the likes of Manchester City, Bayern Munich and Real Madrid has now been whittled down to the final two, with Premier League outfit Chelsea taking on European champions PSG in a hotly-anticipated final. Whoever does lift the trophy will scoop up to £70m, via a combination of participation payments and performance bonuses. Here is how the Club World Cup prize money breaks down: 🏆 Total prize pool £790m 💸 Participation payments (guaranteed) Continent Europe £10.12m–£30.17m South America £12.02m North/Central America £7.55m Asia £7.55m Africa £7.55m Oceania £2.83m 💰 Performance bonuses (added to participation) Group win £1.58m Advertisement Group draw £0.79m Round of 16 exit £5.93m Quarter-finalists £10.37m Semi-finalists £16.59m Runners-up £23.7m Champions £31.6m 🏅 Maximum potential earnings Performance-only total £69.22m Total including top Euro participation £98.75m
Washington Post
32 minutes ago
- Washington Post
What does Trump's tax law mean for your health insurance?
RFK Jr. has big plans for your food. Here are the facts. May 2, 2025
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: How the Trump tax cut law will hurt the working class
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said it was 'agonizing' to vote for the tax cut bill President Trump signed on July 4. As details of the legislation come into focus, it's obvious why it might cause heartburn even for Republicans who passed it, with no Democratic votes. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, as the law is clumsily known, will literally make the rich better off and the poor worse off. Some conservatives who want to pare the 'welfare state' may not care. But imposing austerity on millions of working-class voters is a stunning political risk for a party that is supposedly following President Trump's populist instincts. The law has two main elements. The first is a sweeping series of tax cuts and tax cut extensions that will generally benefit everybody but add trillions of dollars to the national debt. The second is a set of benefit cuts that are meant to reduce the overall cost of the bill. Those will hit working-class Americans and make the net effect of the bill punishing to them. The biggest part of the OBBBA is an extension of the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017. Those were due to expire at the end of this year. The OBBBA makes the current individual income tax rates permanent. Those are not 'tax cuts' per se, since tax rates will be the same in future years as they are in 2025. But the law does prevent what would have been a de facto tax hike if the 2017 rates expired and the higher 2016 rates went back into effect. The law also includes some new tax breaks, such as the elimination of tax on income from tips and overtime pay, up to certain limits. There's also a new tax break for some seniors and a much higher cap for deducting state and local taxes, which will mostly benefit wealthy homeowners who itemize deductions on their tax returns. The tax provisions generally benefit everybody, but the wealthy will gain the most. The average savings for all taxpayers will be about $2,900, compared with what the tax bill would have been if current rates expired, according to the Tax Policy Center. Those with incomes above $1 million would save nearly $60,000 on average. But the savings for workers with incomes below $30,000 would be less than $200 per year. Those provisions, at least, do no harm to most taxpayers. But the harm arrives when factoring in cuts to Medicaid, subsidies for people to buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act, and food aid known as SNAP. The healthcare cutbacks will leave an additional 16 million people without coverage by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Cutbacks to the SNAP program could reduce or eliminate food aid going to 22 million families, according to the Urban Institute. Those changes will leave millions of Americans worse off. When accounting for the tax changes and benefit cuts combined, people in the lowest income quintile, with incomes below $13,500, will lose an average of $600 per year, according to the Yale Budget Lab. The next quintile will lose $65 per year. The healthcare and food aid cuts will have little impact on top earners, for obvious reasons. The top quintile will gain $6,500 in after-tax savings from all of the law's provisions, while the top 1% will net more than $30,000. This is what economists call a 'regressive' policy change because the economic burden falls more heavily on those with lower incomes. 'The bill has four overriding characteristics,' Howard Gleckman of the Tax Policy Center wrote recently. 'It is regressive, expensive, complicated, and it treats people who make roughly the same amount of money in very different ways.'Tax cut defenders often point out that the wealthy typically get the biggest tax cuts because they pay the most taxes in the first place. That's generally true. But the wealthy are a distinct minority, which means a regressive law such as the OBBBA dis-serves millions of voters, and possibly a majority of them. The bottom two income quintiles, for instance, include roughly 92 million taxpaying units, whether singles, married couples, or other designations. There are only 26 million taxpaying units in the top quintile. Maybe that's what Murkowski found so agonizing. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told a reporter on July 2. 'I know in many parts of the country there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill.' Trump can point to working-class provisions such as the elimination of taxes on tip income and overtime pay, with limitations based on the type of work and the amount of income. Some workers will in fact benefit from those carve-outs. But tax analysts argue that favoring certain types of work in that manner violates the principle of 'horizontal equity,' the idea that similar incomes should be taxed in similar ways. To use the example of a restaurant, a waiter earning tip income would get a tax break that a cook paid hourly would not. That distorts the tax code, creates incentives to cheat, and generates legitimate grievances among the unlucky workers not gifted a tax break. The OBBBA is already unpopular, with 64% of Americans disapproving and just 35% approving, in one poll. The real vote will come in the 2026 midterm elections, when Americans will express whether they feel better off or worse off under unified Republican control of government. Getting Americans to like this law might be a more agonizing ideal than passing it. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.
