logo
Zandile Gumede's R320 million fraud case adjourned as State seeks audit reports

Zandile Gumede's R320 million fraud case adjourned as State seeks audit reports

IOL News11-06-2025
Former eThekwini mayor Zandile Gumede in the Durban High Court.
Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers
The Durban High Court said it was left with no choice but to postpone the R320 million Durban Solid Waste (DSW) tender fraud case involving Zandile Gumede on Wednesday morning, due to the State not being able to access audit reports from the eThekwini Municipality.
Gumede, the former mayor of eThekwini, is on trial with 21 others for numerous charges, including money laundering, racketeering, fraud, corruption, and contravention of the Municipal Finance Management Act and the Municipal Systems Act, relating to the R320 million DSW tender.
The State, which is currently leading evidence from a new witness, was on Tuesday ordered to obtain the audit report regarding the household numbers that needed to be serviced in the 2016/17 financial year.
This came after Gumede's counsel, advocate Jay Naidoo SC, objected while the witness, who cannot be named, was leading evidence.
Naidoo stated they would like to access the reports to ensure they were consistent with the witness's oral evidence.
The witness told the court earlier this week that in a report submitted to the Bid Adjudication Committee (BAC) on December 19, 2017, the number of formal and informal households that needed to be serviced was doubled, while some had been tripled.
The Solid Waste Unit went to the BAC on December 14, 2017, to seek authority to invite quotations from experienced service providers for waste collection and illegal dumping services in the city.
In a report, the unit had also included that this was an emergency, as there would be no one to collect waste in January 2018. On December 19, the BAC approved those quotations.
The fourth accused, Robert Allan Abbu, served as the deputy head of the unit at the time.
The witness, who said she was on leave during this time, said she sent an email to Abbu in February 2018.
She stated that she would not be able to defend the number of households that went to the BAC, to the auditors.
'The contract value is misaligned, I am afraid I won't be able to defend this with auditors,' she read her email to the court.
On Wednesday, counsel appointed by the National Prosecuting Authority, advocate Viwe Notshe SC, told the court that they had made enquiries with the municipality on Tuesday, and the box with the audit report was found.
'We are unable to get them today to be able to proceed,' he said.
Notshe asked for the matter to be remanded until Thursday.
'It seems there is no choice; we have to adjourn till tomorrow (Thursday),' said Judge Sharmaine Balton.
On Tuesday, the matter was also adjourned early to allow the State to obtain the audit reports.
[email protected]
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Electric fault hits bail ruling for Tiffany Meek, mother of murdered Jayden-Lee Meek
Electric fault hits bail ruling for Tiffany Meek, mother of murdered Jayden-Lee Meek

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Electric fault hits bail ruling for Tiffany Meek, mother of murdered Jayden-Lee Meek

Tiffany Meek, 31, appearing before the Roodepoort Regional Court, accused of killing her 11-year-old son Jayden-Lee. Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers Tiffany's defence lawyer, Noven Naidoo, has argued strongly for the release of his client on bail, insisting that she is not a flight risk. On the other hand, community members have been protesting outside the court, demanding that her bail bid be denied. Tiffany has previously requested that she be granted R5,000 bail as she believes she is innocent and is being framed for the gruesome May 13 murder. Her lawyer has argued that no evidence has been presented to the court suggesting that his client could be a flight risk. Tiffany is facing multiple charges, including murder, crimen injuria, defeating the ends of justice, and attempting to obstruct justice. Jayden-Lee's body was found on May 14 on the staircase of their flat at the Swazi's Place complex in Fleurhof, southwest Johannesburg, after the Grade 6 learner was reported missing the day before. On Monday, Naidoo argued that her client is innocent, and everybody wants justice for Jayden-Lee. Jayden-Lee Meek was found murdered just metres from his home in the Swazi Place complex in Fleurhof. Image: Supplied "The learned magistrate, in her wisdom, should realise that with all the public outcry, there is no evidence that Mr Mnisi was harmed by the public. While the public is indeed angry with the applicant, why would they resort to murder? Kill the applicant and risk being also charged with murder. Everybody wants justice for Jayden-Lee, but that can only be achieved through a proper investigation and with the trial court making a determination on the matter. "In conclusion, there is no evidence before this court to even suggest that the applicant is a flight risk. In the absence of such evidence, it is submitted that the accused be released on bail as the accused has discharged the onus as a suitable candidate for bail," Naidoo stated. On Monday, the State prosecutor argued that Meek does not have a reliable address as she intends to relocate to another province, which will make things difficult for the State to take control of the case. "If the applicant is released and goes to stay with her father, she will not have a stable address. Two, your worship, it is evident that the accused will continue to be employed, and she is not required to be in the office. She can work remotely. That means she can work from anywhere, and she will continue to have financial resources. "What I mean is that the applicant could be a flight risk. She is in another province. So we are asking someone somewhere in another police station who has no interest in this matter to keep tabs on her," the State prosecutor told the court. [email protected] IOL News

State to oppose bail for alleged cop killer
State to oppose bail for alleged cop killer

IOL News

time4 hours ago

  • IOL News

State to oppose bail for alleged cop killer

The family of slain traffic officer Walton van Rooyen has pleaded with the court not to grant his alleged killer bail. Van Rooyen was shot and killed inside his patrol vehicle on 17 March 2020. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers THE State has changed its tune and indicated it will now oppose bail for alleged traffic cop killer Craig 'Krake' de Lilly. Traffic officers and family members packed the Cape Town Magistrate's Court to witness the bail proceedings of De Lilly. The 41-year-old is accused of murdering traffic officer Walton van Rooyen in March 2020, and also faces charges of illegal possession of a 9mm pistol and 14 cartridges. Van Rooyen was shot and killed inside his patrol vehicle. Craig 'Krake' De Lilly, 36, appeared in Cape Town Magistrates Court Image: Supplied De Lilly, his taxi guard and two other men were arrested shortly after the shooting in Acre Road, Kensington, but the case was provisionally withdrawn just a month later. De Lilly's recent re-arrest follows the emergence of new information in the case. The court previously heard that the State wasn't planning to oppose De Lilly's release, despite him facing a Schedule 6 charge, drawing criticism from mayco member for safety and security, JP Smith. Walton van Rooyen's mother, Johana Van Rooyen, cries outside of court as the slain officer's son, Conrad Van Rooyen, embraces her. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers De Lilly's lawyer told the court that they only found out about the State's decision after hearing Smith on the radio last week calling for the state to oppose bail. However, things took a turn on Monday when the court heard that the State will in fact oppose bail, a move that shocked De Lilly's family. His lawyer told the court he has witnesses lined up to testify at the next appearance, and the matter was postponed to August 11. Smith said the City welcomed the decision by the State to oppose bail. 'Just over a week ago we were informed that the suspect was re-arrested and many of us felt relieved. It has been a five-year wait for justice. 'We believe that the state would not have recharged the suspect haphazardly and we have faith that they have applied their minds when assessing the docket.' Smith said over the weekend the directorate held the annual Remembrance Day event where they honour the brave men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty for their families and the residents of Cape Town. 'At the time of his death Walton was a father for two sons and the sole breadwinner for his elderly mother. Today we are here to not only show our support for the family but to show the courts that as a society we cannot just sit and watch as murder cases fall through the cracks. An attack on any officer tasked with upholding the law, should be regarded as an attack on the state.' 'I visited Walton's family at the time of his death and I can recall the heartache in the eyes of his relatives and friends. His death had a profound impact on the entire directorate.' Cape Times

Tiffany Meek's bail judgment is expected today
Tiffany Meek's bail judgment is expected today

IOL News

time6 hours ago

  • IOL News

Tiffany Meek's bail judgment is expected today

The 31-year-old, Tiffany Meek, mother of the 11-year-old Jayden-Lee Meek, is accused of murdering her son. Image: Timothy Bernard / IOL Graphics The much-anticipated bail judgment for Tiffany Meek is expected to be heard in the Roodepoort Magistrate's Court on Tuesday. Meek, 31, from Fleurhof, is charged with the murder of her 11-year-old son Jayden-Lee Meek. She also faces charges of crimen injuria, attempting to defeat or obstruct the course of justice, and defeating or obstructing the administration of justice. Closing arguments were delivered by legal counsel on Monday after five gruelling days of the bail application. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The defence lawyer for Meek, Noven Naidoo, has urged the court to grant his client bail. Meek asked the court to grant her R5,000 as it is what she can afford. She further gave her biological father's address in Verulam in Durban, stating she would be willing to abide by any conditions set by the court. Meek has maintained her innocence throughout the proceedings and remains adamant that she is being framed. She has even requested that the investigation be moved to another arm within the South African law enforcement sphere, the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (known as Hawks). The State has opposed Meek's release. The State has called out Meek for deliberately shifting the focus of the investigation and the court's opinion with her defence tactics. The State alleges that Meek killed her son, went back to her apartment between 4am and 5am on May 14, 2025, to remove his body and place it anywhere else. It was also submitted that she tried to incriminate the school transport driver. The court further heard that the investigation was directed by the evidence, and the evidence eliminated many but led to one person, Meek. The State urged the court to take note of how the evidence was challenged. 'She's throwing around wild speculative suggestions. The applicant pre-empted the discovery of the school bag, which is why she put it in her affidavit. It is clear she was given this information. But, she omitted her return to Swazi Place. 'She was not aware of the evidence the investigating officer had. She was blindsided by that and by the detail that was recorded that night. She forgot she had already made a statement to the investigating officer. She forgot what she said,' he submitted. The State submitted that Meek was trying to create distance between her presence and the discovery. IOL

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store