
HUD field office, staff reductions could impact Ohio locations
The Trump administration has plans to cut the Federal Housing Administration staff significantly and close all HUD field offices in Ohio and more than 30 other states, according to a Bloomberg report.
No decisions have been made about field office locations as of this week, a HUD spokesperson said. Ohio is home to field offices in Columbus and Cleveland — these two offices carry out multiple tasks related to housing, including processing mortgage insurance applications, underwriting mortgage loans, addressing fair housing claims and distributing federal funds.
Coalition on Housing and Homelessness in Ohio communications and development director Marcus Roth said the move to reduce housing staff and consolidate field offices seems "wrong-headed" during a housing crisis.
"When you don't have enough people on the ground to actually implement the laws that Congress has passed, they become essentially broken promises," Roth said. "We're not saying that HUD does everything perfectly, but recklessly gutting the agency is really going to harm a lot of Ohioans who are struggling to keep a roof over their heads."
In a letter to HUD Sec. Scott Turner, Ohio congressional Democrats recently said that closing or downsizing HUD field offices in Ohio would "harm vulnerable populations."
U.S. representatives included in the letter are former Daytonian Rep. Joyce Beatty, of Columbus; and Rep. Greg Landsman, of Cincinnati, whose district includes Warren County.
According to a press release from Beatty's office, more than 422,000 Ohioans — 71% of whom are seniors, children, or people with disabilities — rely on federal rental assistance to afford housing.
"At a time when the cost of housing continues to rise, homelessness has reached historic levels, and communities face increasing economic uncertainty, HUD must remain a fully staffed and functioning agency," the letter says.
According to the letter, HUD's Columbus field office — which serves the Dayton area — had lost a dozen of its staff members in March, with another five employees announcing their retirement.
"The Administration's staffing reductions and office closures not only undermine HUD's ability to enforce fair housing policies, respond to local housing crises, and administer critical programs, but also place undue strain on the remaining workforce," the letter says.
National reports say the only six field offices that would be left open are those in Anchorage, Alaska; Greensboro, North Carolina; Honolulu; Jacksonville, Florida; Los Angeles; and San Juan, Puerto Rico.
But under federal law, there are requirements for at least one field office existing in each state. Ohio representatives included in the letter called on HUD to follow statutory rules for the agency.
The National Low Income Housing Coalition reports that Ohio faces a shortage of more than 264,000 rental homes that are affordable and available to extremely low-income families.
According to the Coalition on Housing and Homelessness in Ohio, average rent increased by 20% across the state in 2021 and 2022, the early pandemic years. Homelessness overall has increased in Ohio by 10% since January 2020, according to the organization.
Roth said the cost of rent in Ohio has slowed down in the past couple years, but Ohio's rent decreases have come much more slowly than other Midwestern states.
"The last you want to do when you have increasing homelessness and rising rents is take your foot off the gas of the programs that actually help to try to close the gap for people," Roth said. "We should be beefing up these programs, increasing the amount of resources that can be used to develop affordable housing."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
17 minutes ago
- CBS News
Democratic states sue Trump administration over $6 billion in frozen education funds
Democratic officials from 24 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration on Monday seeking to restore access to billions of dollars in frozen education funding. The states lost out on funding for after-school and summer programs, teacher training, English language learners and support for the children of migrant farmworkers, among and other initiatives, as part of the June 30 freeze on more than $6 billion that the states say was allocated by Congress. In a complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, lawyers for the states said the decision to freeze the funds had caused "chaos." The suit named as defendants Education Secretary Linda McMahon, President Trump and Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget. "States already have planned for the upcoming academic year — which is set to start in weeks in many areas — in reliance on the billions of dollars that are now frozen," they wrote. "The budgets for many local educational agencies (LEAs) have already been approved and staffing plans have been developed so that LEAs can perform their responsibilities for the impacted programs." California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a press release that the funding freeze was done "with no rhyme or reason." His office said the freeze is blocking $939 million in funding for California alone. "Taken together with his other attacks on education, President Trump seems comfortable risking the academic success of a generation to further his own misguided political agenda," Bonta said. "But as with so many of his other actions, this funding freeze is blatantly illegal, and we're confident the court will agree." The latest legal fight between Democratic state officials and the federal government comes as Mr. Trump has promised to dismantle the federal Department of Education, an ambition supported by McMahon. A federal judge in Massachusetts blocked an executive order to unwind the department in May. The Education Department did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the lawsuit. The states joining Monday's legal action are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin. Many of the states are also parties to litigation filed earlier this year contesting layoffs at the federal agency and the White House's efforts to rollback diversity programming.


CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
Blue states sue Trump administration in bid to undo freeze on billions in public education funds
A slew of Democratic-led states asked a federal court on Monday to lift the Trump administration's freeze on nearly $7 billion in public education money, accusing the Department of Education of unlawfully locking up critical funds Congress set aside to help low-income and immigrant students, among others. The new suit represents the latest clash between states and the federal government over the Trump administration's decision to pause or claw back federal aid. In other cases dating back to the opening weeks of President Donald Trump's second term, federal courts have at times sided against the administration's efforts to freeze federal funds, though the administration scored a key win at the Supreme Court in April. In the case at hand, more than 20 Democratic state attorneys general and two Democratic governors are challenging the administration's decision late last month to pause disbursement of education funds for six programs pending a review of how consistent the programs are with Trump's own priorities. Among the targeted initiatives are ones that help immigrant students attain English proficiency, fund after-school and summer programs, and support the hiring and retention of teachers in low-income areas. The administration's withholding of the funds, the states say in the suit, runs afoul of Congress' decision over the years to provide the federal aid and the government's requirement to spend the money. Historically, the money has been made available to states starting around July 1. 'Defendants' actions now jeopardize these critical programs – the loss of which has irreparably harmed and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff States, their schools, and the students and families they serve,' the suit states. The states and attorneys general are asking a federal court in Rhode Island to rule that the funding freeze is unconstitutional and order the administration to stop implementing its plans. CNN has reached out to the Department of Education for comment on the lawsuit.


Buzz Feed
18 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Why Trump Is Panicking Now, According To Ex-Aide
A former White House insider said President Donald Trump 's lengthy rant on Truth Social urging supporters to forget all about late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein says a lot about his state of mind at the moment. 'He has to be panicking right now,' Sarah Matthews, who served as a press aide during the first Trump administration, said on MSNBC on Sunday. Trump's message on Truth Social was a sign of that panic as the president fired back at supporters who are angry after the Justice Department said last week that a long-rumored list of Epstein clients doesn't exist. 'Let's keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about,' Trump wrote. Kypros But Matthews doesn't think that post will help. 'The thing is, is that he campaigned on this,' she said. 'He said that he was going to release the list and now his supporters are asking him to follow up and follow through.' Trump, Vice President JD Vance and many within Trump's orbit made the release of the list a central talking point. Earlier this year, Attorney General Pam Bondi said the list was on her desk for review as part of a 'directive by President Trump.' Pam Bondi in February: The Epstein client list is sitting on my desk right now to review. Pam Bondi today: There is no Epstein client list and no "further disclosure" of Epstein-related material "would be appropriate or warranted." — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) July 7, 2025 Twitter: @MeidasTouch But now, Bondi says there is no list ― and even many hardcore MAGA supporters don't believe it. Former Trump ally Elon Musk said last month the reason Trump won't release the Epstein files is because Trump himself is in them. With the story not going away, Matthews said Trump will likely turn to his favorite tactic: distraction. 'If I had to make a prediction, I think that he is going to try to shift the news cycle this week by either saying something very controversial or doing something controversial,' she said. 'Because he does not want us to be talking about Jeffrey Epstein.'