Labour MP Willie Jackson accuses government of rigging next election
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Labour MP Willie Jackson has accused the government of trying to rig next year's election through its move to block people from being able
to enrol for 12 days before voting day
.
The claim - made during Parliament's general debate on Wednesday - goes further than
Labour's official position
which has been that electoral changes would make it harder to vote.
Jackson also used his speech to criticise Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour as the "biggest dropkick of all" following Seymour's use of the term to disparage late enrollers.
"I don't know what's more offensive," Jackson told MPs. "The gerrymandering of our voting rules to rig the election, or the deputy prime minister referring to 600,000 people as dropkicks."
Seymour last week told reporters he was "sick of dropkicks that can't get themselves organised to follow the law". More than 600,000 people enrolled or updated their enrolment details after writ day in 2023, including 110,000 on election day itself.
In a fiery speech on Wednesday, Jackson poured contempt on the "disgraceful, rotten, useless government", accusing it of actively suppressing the vote and "vandalising democratic participation".
He pointed to official advice which noted that young people, Māori, Pasifika and Asian communities would be disproportionately affected by the changes.
"It's racist disenfranchisement," Jackson said. "It's a breach of democracy... this government risks being accused of rigging the next election."
Jackson commended Attorney-General
Judith Collins
as "one of the most principled National Party members" for standing up to her "weak and useless leader" by warning that the voting changes breached human rights.
"She's had the courage to call these voter suppression powers what they are: discriminatory."
Jackson concluded his speech by taking at aim at Seymour, calling on him to apologise for his "disgraceful" description of some voters as dropkicks.
"He's the most dangerous politician of the last generation... not only a disgrace as the deputy prime minister, but surely the biggest dropkick of all."
Speaking to RNZ, Seymour laughed off Jackson's description of him as a dropkick: "To be honest, I was always an open side flanker. Didn't really do a big drop kick, although, on a good day, I could nail one from just outside the 22."
Seymour said Jackson's claims were "wrong and insane" but he could not help but like the man because "you know he doesn't mean it".
"He's more a figure of fun for me," Seymour said. "Although I do worry a little bit about - you know - a man of his age - the old ticker can give out if he hyperventilates too much at work in the House."
In a statement to RNZ, a spokesperson for Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said Jackson was prone to "hyperbole and mangling of the facts".
"People are not being disenfranchised, they are merely being required to enrol," the spokesperson said.
The government's legislation banning same-day voter enrolment
passed its first reading
in Parliament on Tuesday and will now be considered by select committee.
During the debate, Goldsmith told MPs the change was required because the increasing number of special votes was delaying the final vote count.
"The final vote count used to take two weeks. Last election, it took three," Goldsmith said. "The advice I received is that if we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections."
Goldsmith flatly rejected the claim that people were being disenfranchised, saying the 110,000 people who updated their details on election day in 2023 only did so because they had been told they could.
"The message will be different this election. People will be told they need to be enrolled well before voting starts. It's not that hard, and people are capable of doing these things."
Justice officials, however, recommended against the move and warned it could result in
lower turnout
and reduce confidence in the electoral system.
"Its impact on reducing special votes is uncertain, while its impact on democratic participation could be significant," officials said.
The
move has also been criticised
by the Chief Human Rights Commissioner and electoral law experts Andrew Geddis and Graeme Edgeler.
Since 2019, voters have been able to turn up to the booth at any time during the advance voting period and enrol at the same time, as well as on election day, with their vote being counted as a special vote.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Luxon to tell National faithful country is 'turning the corner'
Luxon to tell National faithful "we're turning the corner" National leader Christopher Luxon. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro National Party members are gathering in Christchurch to cap off a week in which MPs attempted to steer public minds back towards the government's cost of living policies. Members will also farewell a party stalwart, with former president Peter Goodfellow retiring from National's board of directors. While leader Christopher Luxon will be speaking to the converted, he will be acutely aware the cost of living has become front of mind . Earlier this week, he was asked what his message to the party faithful would be. "Look, they know it's been a tough time, they know that we're turning the corner," Luxon said. "But really ... this country's got great potential and a great future ahead of it, and we've just got to keep working at it." National's deputy leader, Nicola Willis, said the conference would be focused on the steps the government was taking to make the country "an easier, better place to do business, to hire people, to create well paying jobs". "It is our job as a government not to moan about the things we can't control, but to focus on how we can make things better here in New Zealand, and we're very proud of the efforts we're making," she said. It is a stark contrast to this time last year, where Luxon's message ahead of the first conference since National returned to government was its focus on action and delivery . It shows just how much the cost of living crisis is lingering, and National has spent the week attempting to convince the public it has got it under control. With no announcement to make at this week's post-Cabinet press conference (bar the card surcharge ban, which had already been announced), Luxon and Willis gave a more than 10-minute address about the economy and cost of living, and actions the government had taken. "The most important thing we can do to make you better off is to double-down on our long-term economic plan," Luxon said. Willis used her speech to remind people of National's tax changes, FamilyBoost policy and a falling Official Cash Rate. It prompted Labour to accuse the government of "more spin than a front-load washing machine" . The latest Ipsos Issues Monitor has Labour in front of National as the party New Zealanders consider most able to handle the cost of living, despite releasing no substantive policy since the election. In 2023, National won 38.06 percent of the party vote, but since then has failed to poll above that. Recent polls have had National in the low thirties, with some showing the left bloc would have enough numbers to form a government. Other polls give the coalition the numbers to form a government, but only just. National party ministers will hold panels on health, education, law and order, agriculture, and the economy and cost of living. Members will also elect board positions. Long-serving board member and former party president Peter Goodfellow will be retiring from the board. Goodfellow was president from 2009 to 2022 before stepping down but remaining on the board. ANZCO Foods founder Sir Graeme Harrison, who joined the National board in 2021, has also decided to retire. Current board member Rachel Bird is up for re-election. Under National's constitution and rules, board members serve three years and then retire. They can then be eligible for re-election. Craig Carr, Andrew von Dadelszen and Edgar Wilson have also put their names forward for the vacancies. Party president Sylvia Wood and board members Jannita Pilisi, Stefan Sunde and David Ryan are not up for re-election, and so will remain on the board. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
3 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Jevon McSkimming resignation: Winners and losers as police top brass jockey for position
However, unlike de Wattignar who had previously been promoted internally, McSkimming and Kura were exempt from the restructure because they were statutory appointments made by the previous Labour government, and independent from the Commissioner. Restructures of the workforce are stressful, lower morale and create instability. Under normal circumstances, to then lose a pair of senior staff members - especially in the circumstances of McSkimming - so soon after a tumultuous time of change could be damaging for an organisation. But for Chambers, the departures of Kura and McSkimming solves a different problem. Whether they be chief executives of businesses, or heads of government departments, newly appointed leaders naturally want to surround themselves with people they can trust to deliver their vision. It's particularly important when there's a drastic change of vision, such as has taken place in the New Zealand Police since the National-led government appointed Chambers in November. Previous police commissioners certainly haven't hesitated to promote their favourites into positions of influence, even if that meant creating new roles that didn't exist. But Chambers' ability to refresh his leadership team has been somewhat hamstrung because of his decision to restructure the top hierarchy of Police National Headquarters, which resulted in a net loss of 19 roles (and an estimated annual saving of $2 million). There are now literally fewer jobs to fill, and those hoping for promotion under Chambers have realised they might have to bide their time for a bit longer. With McSkimming and Kura now leaving the New Zealand Police edition of musical chairs, there are now empty seats at the top table that need to be filled. Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura, left, has announced she will retire from the police this year. Jill Rogers, right, is highly rated by Police Commissioner Richard Chambers and is a leading candidate to replace Kura on a permanent basis. Photo / Mark Mitchell As previously reported by the Herald, Jill Rogers and Mike Pannett were the obvious candidates to replace McSkimming after his resignation. Both have been seen flanking Chambers at important meetings around Wellington this year, and each have acted in the deputy role on a temporary basis during McSkimming's absence. Rogers is currently relieving as deputy commissioner responsible for the northern police districts, while Pannett is the Assistant Commissioner in charge of national security and international partnerships. There had been rumours that, if Pannett was overlooked for the deputy job in favour of Rogers, he could be tempted to join former police commissioner Mike Bush in Melbourne. Bush has recently been appointed as the new Police Commissioner for the state of Victoria and there was speculation that Pannett, who recently spent three years on secondment to the Australian Federal Police, would be shoulder-tapped as a valuable ally. But with Kura's retirement now opening up a second vacancy, it's possible both Rogers and Pannett could be appointed as deputies to Chambers. There will be other contenders. Tusha Penny, Bruce O'Brien and Mike Johnson, all currently Assistant Commissioners, have all been mentioned in police circles as possible candidates to put themselves forward. It's also not unheard of for the officers in charge of the 12 police districts to make the jump straight into a deputy commissioner role. Superintendent Tim Anderson, the Bay of Plenty district commander, is respected by staff for his operational nous and support for the frontline, and also has a working relationship with Chambers dating back to when they were young detectives in Auckland. Superintendent Tim Anderson, left, at a press conference in October announcing a drug bust on the Mongrel Mob in Opotiki. Photo / Mike Scott Whoever puts themselves forward for consideration can expect the vetting process to be rigorous, given the revelations which led to McSkimming's resignation. The statutory role is important within the constitution framework of the police and carries a safeguard of independence from the Police Commissioner. If Chambers was to be incapacitated, for example, the senior deputy (which until recently would have been McSkimming) would assume office until a new commissioner was appointed. In announcing Kura's retirement last week, Police Minister Mark Mitchell said the Public Service Commission had started the recruitment process to replace her and McSkimming. A PSC spokesperson said the job description and timing for when the position is advertised are yet to be finalised, in consultation with Mitchell and the Prime Minister Chris Luxon. He said the average recruitment process takes four to six months. Once the PSC provides advice on the candidates - including whether nominees meet the 'fit and proper' criteria - Luxon recommends the preferred candidate to the Governor-General who officially makes the appointment. Jared Savage covers crime and justice issues, with a particular interest in organised crime. He joined the Herald in 2006 and has won a dozen journalism awards in that time, including twice being named Reporter of the Year. He is also the author of Gangland, Gangster's Paradise and Underworld.
NZ Herald
3 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
The Government says it's fixing the cost of living, so what happens if voters don't believe it?
It was clearly designed to assuage fears, fanned by the Opposition, that the Government had put the entire Crown infrastructure build on ice, leading to the mass exodus of construction labour to Australia. The tactic isn't an unfair one. All Governments indulge in the vice of reannouncing things to focus attention on them. A billion or so dollars spent on a road earns the Government a few hundred bites of the PR cherry, or so the political arithmetic goes. So no, the tactic wasn't unfair or even ridiculous - but nor was Labour's criticism that a fair whack of the projects were funded by the last Government. (Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop's riposte that Labour might have funded some of the projects, but it certainly didn't do a good job of delivering them, was equally true.) This early success evaporated on Monday, when Luxon held one of the most bizarre press conferences since taking office. Alongside Finance Minister Nicola Willis, he spoke for more than 10 minutes to mark the first anniversary of the Government's tax package coming into effect. He listed every other cost-of-living policy the Government had implemented since taking office. Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Trade Minister Todd McClay spoke about US tariffs yesterday. Photo / Mark Mitchell Again, there's nothing inherently wrong with reannouncing something old. Former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern liked to mark anniversaries too. Some years, she'd put out a press release celebrating the fact that superannuation payments were increasing in line with wages - despite the fact that this annual increase is written into primary legislation. But Monday's announcement, coming as voters' economic sentiment bounces along the bottom and the country seems on the verge of rioting over the butter price, seemed vacuous. There was something ever so faintly Soviet about a Government thinking that, simply by telling voters it had a policy to fix their problems, they'd believe those problems were being fixed. There are two obvious pathways for how the next few months might pan out. The Government is clinging to several good forward economic indicators: business confidence surveys report okay-ish vibes from firms and suggest something of a recovery next year; the primary sector, far from being the villain of the butter crisis, is driving an export-led recovery in the regions; the Reserve Bank is likely to continue cutting interest rates, spurring investment and growth in 2026, giving Luxon an economic tailwind of good vibes and rising house prices in election year. The snow will soon melt, the ground will thaw, and New Zealanders may spend their summer holidays contemplating having endured the worst of it. Luxon and his colleagues may return to work in January, set the election date and wonder what on earth they were so worried about in winter. That's one scenario, sure. There's another. For every positive data point, there is an equally negative one. The Reserve Bank's GDP tracker suggests what every New Zealander feels in their bones: the economy has been shrinking, and could shrink further. A small recession, measured by the glib but powerful two-negative-quarters definition, could be on the cards. The most recent ANZ business confidence survey showed residential construction intentions tanking, to use the words of the bank's economists. If things continue to follow that negative trajectory, another scenario opens up: one of panic, as the once-distant prospect of a first-term defeat becomes more plausible. If the economy continues to worsen, and National's polling materialises into gloomy party vote numbers, don't entirely rule out a leadership change. A change is not 'on' - you'd be a fool to put money on it — but you'd also be a fool to bet against it. There's no real affection for Luxon in the caucus room, and National has little patience for underperformance, particularly from its leaders. Luxon's intense self-belief could count against him. He does not seem to observe that, of all his frontbenchers, he is the one who is struggling the most. Despite the whole Cabinet fighting fires on every front, National's ministers do a decent job of rebuffing their Labour opposite numbers during Question Time. Health Minister Simeon Brown has come under the most pressure, but has so far survived in the House. Chris Bishop seems unbothered by Kieran McAnulty and seemed to be enjoying himself on Thursday when he answered finance questions on behalf of Willis, who was away (the caucus enjoyed it too). Willis herself never breaks a sweat debating her opposite number, Barbara Edmonds. FBI director Kash Patel visited Wellington to open a new office. Photo / Ola Thorsen Luxon is the most challenged of the lot and was devoured, degustation-style, by Chris Hipkins in the debating chamber this week. Hipkins, who can excel in the House when he wants to, wasn't even trying a particularly sophisticated line of questioning. He resorted to a past Luxon tactic of using each supplementary question to list another case of something going terribly wrong in the economy - migration to Australia, construction jobs, board director remuneration - and then asking the Prime Minister what he thinks about it. Luxon should be able to answer questions like that easily, but could not. His belief in the power of political marketing is so fundamental that he undervalues the importance of backing up that marketing with substance; even more than most prime ministers, he's too quick to answer every question with a canned line and not quick enough to respond by substantively dismantling the question and defending himself. He seems to think this doesn't matter. He's disdainful of Question Time, or of anything that happens in Wellington. But it does matter - and you could tell from the ashen faces behind Luxon as he answered Hipkins' questions that the backbench is worried. If the economy doesn't turn around meaningfully, there's a chance the Government could be in serious trouble, however scary they think a Labour-Green-Te Pāti Māori Government might be. Slumps such as this one are difficult for centre-right governments. They're instinctively anti-intervention. When the public demands 'something must be done', centre-left governments have no shortage of ideas for that 'something'. The National benches regularly look despondent during Question Time - as pictured here in March. Photo / Mark Mitchell For the right, recovery comes from automatic stabilisers like benefits doing their job, before the fiscal part of the Government gets out of the way of the monetary side, allowing the reduction of interest rates to encourage firms to borrow and invest. It's a less politically attractive recovery because it involves substantially less ribbon-cutting, but that doesn't make it any less sensible a strategy. Ultimately, however much a government tries to pump-prime an economy back to life with fiscal policy, eventually private firms will need to pick up some slack too - and that means low interest rates. Luxon, to his credit, has been explicitly articulating this as his vision for the economic recovery. Last month, he successfully rebuffed one of Hipkins' questions, noting that the construction sector was 'hit hard because of high interest rates. High interest rates happened because Government spending was out of control, and you let inflation get out of control'. Not bad. Grim economic times will always be tough for a government, but they needn't be as tough as these. Back in 2012, net migration to Australia was even higher than it is now and the unemployment rate, in September of that year, was higher than at any point in the past 25 years. Yet that economic malaise failed to find its way into politics. National's party vote polling peaked at 48.8% in October 2012, rising - strangely - in tandem with the unemployment rate. Prime Minister John Key's popularity was unassailable. A government can be popular when an economy is under strain. But that appears to require the public to have faith that the government has a plan to make things better. Voters don't have that faith currently and, after this week, who could blame them?
