B.C. judge reserves decision on the fate of homeless encampment in Prince George
The city's lawyer, Jeffrey Locke, argued that supportive housing in Prince George now exceeds the requirements set out in a previous court decision that saw the encampment gain legal protection.
The encampment on Lower Patricia Boulevard, known as Moccasin Flats, was first established in the spring of 2021 on city-owned land, on an empty dirt lot between an industrial yard and a steep hill leading to a residential neighbourhood.
In August of that year, the city asked for an injunction to remove over 50 campers there, citing public safety risk and the need to enforce city bylaws on overnight camping. But in October 2021, the B.C. Supreme Court issued an order stating that residents could stay "absent other suitable housing and daytime facilities."
That ruling was upheld in a 2022 decision, after the encampment survived a partial demolition in November 2021, which the city subsequently apologized for.
Locke says, in 2023, the city changed its course of action and began working with the province and B.C. Housing to set up a 42-unit temporary transitional housing facility in Atco trailers on Third Avenue near the encampment.
"The city, province, and B.C. Housing really doubled down on creating new supportive housing in Prince George," he said .
Locke says the Third Avenue site serves as a safe, comfortable place to provide unhoused people with 24-hour access to secure private rooms and supportive services while they await long-term housing solutions.
The city says the remaining long-term occupant of the encampment is Belvery Edward Johnny, who was identified in the city's notice of civil claim, and has been living at Moccasin Flats since it was established.
"The encampment, since the dismantling of Nov. 2021, has continued to be occupied by a transient population with the exception of Mr. Johnny, who has been there the whole time," said Locke.
He says the city knows of 11 people still sheltering at Moccasin Flats and said eight rooms are being held at the Third Avenue Site for encampment residents in "various states of readiness".
Locke said that as the number of encampment occupants and rooms available is constantly in flux, the city would not require the residents of the encampment to decamp until seven days after they had an offer of housing.
"Now we have a seamless transition from homelessness until they have a home."
Lawyers representing the residents of Moccasin Flats, however, argued that the city is premature in coming to the court seeking an order to close the encampment without housing readily available for everyone.
Lawyer Claire Kanigan and co-counsel Casey St. Germain said they found there to be at least 18 residents remaining at the encampment and said there are only three rooms currently ready to be occupied at the Third Avenue site.
Kanigan said there's no timeline as to when more beds will be made available and that the city should be able to prove they have enough beds before they're given permission to close the site.
"The basic calculation of number of beds to number of people is foundational," she said. "It is not an overly onerous burden to meet."
Kanigan said that because the city is also seeking the right to refuse anyone the ability to encamp on city-owned property if they refuse to apply to B.C. Housing or decline an offer from B.C. Housing, it would leave vulnerable people with complex needs with nowhere to go.
The matter is further complicated by the city's Parks and Open Space bylaw, which was amended in 2023 to designate an area of Moccasin Flats as the only allowable place for temporary overnight shelter between 7 p.m. and 9 a.m.
"This would be highly problematic," she said. "My ultimate submission is that the level of evidence the city has brought to this court has continuously narrowed."
St. Germain also argued that the housing offered may be suitable for some but is not suitable for all, especially individuals who are suffering from complex mental health issues and may not be able to follow the rules of the Third Avenue site.
Locke said the Third Avenue site is intended to be broadly accessible but "cannot be everything, to everyone, all at once."
At the conclusion of the hearing, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Bruce Elwood said he had a lot to consider and that he hopes to complete his written decision before mid-August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EXCLUSIVE: Leaked audio of CBC disciplinary meeting with former TV host Travis Dhanraj
A leaked audio recording of an internal CBC disciplinary meeting for a national news anchor reveals the public broadcaster's tension over its policies on journalistic standards and freedom clashing with protecting its corporate image. Travis Dhanraj, once the host of a CBC television news show called Canada Tonight with Travis Dhanraj, resigned earlier this month with fiery letters accusing the CBC of 'tokenism masquerading as diversity, problematic political coverage protocols, and the erosion of editorial independence.' His letters, one to CBC leadership and another to CBC colleagues, were made public and created controversy, including over perceived political imbalance in news coverage at the publicly funded broadcaster. Last week, Conservative Members of Parliament called for a public hearing into Dhanraj's 'damning allegations' on workplace culture and biased reporting. CBC has denied Dhanraj's criticisms made in his letters. More than a year before his still reverberating resignation, however, a disciplinary meeting for Dhanraj was convened by CBC shortly after he made a social media post on April 19, 2024. His post on X said: 'At a time when the public broadcaster is under increasing scrutiny and when transparency is needed.' CBC's president Catherine Tait had been asked to appear on his show. 'We wanted to discuss new budget funding, what it means for jobs & the corporation's strategic priorities ahead. Our request was declined. This is unfortunate.' The disciplinary meeting preceded his removal from on-air duties for the CBC News Network show that bore his name. Dhanraj declined to comment on the recording or the meeting, referring questions to his lawyer, Kathryn Marshall. Marshall confirmed the recording National Post has is an authentic portion of a longer disciplinary meeting between Dhanraj and CBC officials. CBC did not dispute the disciplinary meeting or recording. The CBC manager speaking in the recording is identified as Andree Lau, senior director of digital publishing and streaming. Lau's LinkedIn page describes her job as overseeing the strategic and editorial direction of CBC News Network as well as other CBC news properties. In the recording she appears to equate a CBC journalist reporting something critical about the CBC with a potential breach of journalistic conflict of interest ethics, on the grounds that a CBC journalist has a personal stake in the broadcaster's success. The recording excerpt begins with Dhanraj explaining the circumstances of his post about Tait. 'The new budget funding was publicly put out in the budget on Tuesday. It was widely reported on, by not only CBC but other broadcasters. There is nothing in the tweet that is insider information,' Dhanraj says. Lau replies: 'With exception of a unionized employee criticizing their employer; that is an employee who has a personal stake in the matter whose job is part of it…. The issue is, you know, does this post meet the standards of integrity, does it meet the conflict of interest under code of conduct.' Dhanraj says: 'I firmly stand by the fact that it does.' Asks Lau: 'Do you understand the concern with this post as it relates to the principle of integrity?' Dhanraj: 'No, I really don't. I don't, and again, Andree, I find it problematic that we are in a meeting where we are discussing something that is in the interests of the corporation. So, I, I'm not seeing the separation right now between the journalism and the interest of the corporation. I see how it would be in the interest of the corporation for this tweet not to be out, but I don't see how, journalistically, it's not sound…' An unidentified union representative then asks for context on how the appearance request to Tait came about. 'I didn't watch the show that night,' he says. 'We had an editorial discussion,' Dhanraj says, 'as to whether or not now was the correct time, since there was a development, a significant development with the release of the federal budget and the new money, to put a request in for Catherine Tait. We had been discussing putting a request in for some time and we thought there was a news hook to it because of the new development….' I find it problematic that we are in a meeting where we are discussing something that is in the interests of the corporation Lau: '… What is your understanding of the protocol and considerations when CBC journalists are covering the CBC?' 'It, it's the J.S.P. statement again,' Dhanraj says, likely referencing CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices. 'Clear editorial separation,' Lau says. Dhanraj: 'So those who have the interest of the corporation should not be influencing reporters.' Lau: 'Yes.' Dhanraj: 'And if that is happening, well, that kind of goes against some core fundamentals of the public broadcaster.' Lau then says there are other aspects of the JSP involved. In a sentence in which some words are unclear on the recording, she says 'the principle of integrity and the perception of who has a stake in the matter,' finishing with 'perceived impartiality because, as I mentioned, you are an employee, and you are criticizing your employer.' The Post does not have a recording of the entire meeting. Chuck Thompson, CBC's head of public affairs, said the meeting was about more than just Dhanraj's social media post, for which Dhanraj was 'never formally disciplined for.' 'The discussions in April with Mr. Dhanraj were about a range of issues outside the tweet; there was a particular emphasis on CBC News policies about conflicts of interest, violations of journalistic standards and protocols on how we report on ourselves. 'Mr. Dhanraj violated these policies and was asked about them by his manager with his union representative present. He also secretly recorded the meeting after agreeing not to,' Thompson said. Lau could not be reached for comment prior to publication. An email sent to her on Friday was returned with an automated out of office message; a detailed message to her cell phone was not responded to. A CBC official had said they would alert Lau to the Post's request. Marshall, Dhanraj's lawyer, said what is heard in the recording is 'disturbing.' 'It shows that Travis was intimidated for simply doing his job as a journalist. He was hauled into a meeting with human resources, his boss, and the union. The purpose of the meeting, I think, was to intimidate him, scare him and pressure him, making it clear to him that he's not to do that, that he is not to post anything or say anything as a journalist that could be embarrassing to the public broadcaster,' Marshall said. 'This is deeply concerning. I think it demonstrates that CBC, in that moment, was far more interested in preserving its own reputation than allowing their journalists to do their jobs.' 'It shows that the CBC corporation has a disturbing level of control over their journalists and is involved in the types of stories that the journalists are covering or not covering. I think that speaks to significant concerns of bias and a lack of objectivity within the corporation.' Thompson said late Friday that Dhanraj is still a CBC employee although currently on leave. Marshall said CBC has still not accepted Dhanraj's resignation despite him voicing his clear intent and, in fact, are still paying him. 'I want to be very clear: The CBC doesn't get to hold him hostage. This is a free country. He's allowed to resign.' Marshall said Dhanraj is pressing a human rights lawsuit against CBC over his departure. • Email: ahumphreys@ | X: AD_Humphreys CBC host resigns, saying he could not continue at public broadcaster 'with integrity' Conservatives call for investigation into CBC after journalist resigns over 'performative diversity, tokenism' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
News24
42 minutes ago
- News24
Wildfire risks grow, but SA can lead region's response
Africa accounts for nearly 67% of the world's annually burned surface area; tackling wildfires requires a collaborative effort which SA can help lead, writes Trevor Abrahams. In June, President Cyril Ramaphosa attended the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, at the invitation of Prime Minister Mark Carney. South Africa was one of five non-G7 countries invited to the summit's outreach sessions, and the only African nation present. During the meeting, Ramaphosa formally endorsed the Kananaskis Wildfire Charter, an international agreement that recognises wildfire as a systemic, year-round climate threat that requires urgent global cooperation. Disaster wildland fires have captured the news as in the recent devastation in Los Angeles, the Jasper Park fire in Canada, the Park fire in California, the Lahaina fire in Hawaii, the fires in Greece, Algeria, Portugal, Brazil and Knysna in South Africa, which have claimed countless lives, destroyed livelihoods, infrastructure and ecosystems. In 2024, some 34 people lost their lives in wildland fires in South Africa, 18 of whom were engaged in fighting these fires. The G7 Kananaskis Wildfire Charter, also endorsed by South Africa, Australia, India, South Korea, Mexico, is more than a diplomatic gesture. It builds on a long-standing working relationship between South Africa and Canada. Since 2015, South African firefighting teams have deployed six times to support Canadian efforts during record-breaking fire seasons. The endorsement acknowledges that wildfire is no longer just a forestry issue. It is a climate, development and public safety challenge that demands integrated and long-term planning. The Charter calls for a shift from reactive suppression to integrated fire management. It emphasises early warning systems, ecological restoration, community resilience and the inclusion of Indigenous and local knowledge. READ | 'We served city with everything…' – Cape Town firefighters say they weren't paid for June These are not new ideas for South Africa. Through the Working on Fire programme, funded by the South African government and implemented by the Kishugu Group, the country operates the continent's only nationally deployed wildland firefighting workforce. Each year, more than 5 000 young South Africans, many from rural areas, are trained to monitor fire danger, reduce fuel loads and carry out prescribed burns and combat unwanted wildfires. This is not just about extinguishing fires. It is about embedding climate resilience, protecting biodiversity and creating jobs in places that need them most. Kishugu has spent two decades building an integrated fire management system. This includes aviation, logistics, fleet management, environmental services and a dedicated training academy. Its teams have worked in Chile, Indonesia and Canada, and supported disaster operations in Malawi. The Kishugu Training Academy, already recognised through the Japanese International Cooperation Agency-funded SADC initiative, has the capacity to serve as a regional hub for training in wildfire preparedness. Despite this experience, sub-Saharan Africa remains underprepared. Africa accounts for nearly 67% of the world's annually burned surface area, yet lacks a shared response architecture. Unlike Europe or the Americas, it has no standard framework for incident management, resource interoperability or joint training. These gaps were clear at the 2025 United Nations FAO Global Fire Management Hub plenary in Rome, where Africa's structural disadvantage was evident. South Africa is in a position to help close that gap. The Wildfire Applied Research Network (WARN), established by the Working on Fire-Kishugu Joint Venture in 2024, aims to connect scientists with frontline fire managers and decision-makers. It promotes applied fire research to inform real-time strategy. But what is needed now is something broader — a dedicated sub-Saharan platform for wildfire cooperation, which could harmonise operational standards, scale up early warning systems and facilitate cross-border resource sharing. Such a platform would also enable a truly collaborative approach. Community education, indigenous knowledge and public participation must be central to how fire governance is shaped on the continent. As climate change accelerates, risk will no longer be isolated. Fire, drought, floods, and food insecurity will overlap and intensify. These are not separate emergencies. They are connected. The only credible response is anticipatory, integrated, and collaborative. Wildfire must be placed at the heart of national disaster strategies. Fire crews should be recognised not only as emergency responders, but as essential climate mitigation personnel. Their work reduces emissions, safeguards ecosystems and builds resilience where it matters most. South Africa has already put the Kananaskis Wildfire Charter into practice. The region should not wait for the next fire season to follow its lead. Trevor Abrahams, managing director, Working on Fire – Kishugu JV News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inquest begins into 2022 fatal police shooting of La Loche, Sask., man in Saskatoon
Saskatoon police knew all about Ronnie Glen Herman when they began chasing him through yards in the city's Mayfair neighbourhood late on a Thursday afternoon in October 2022. Nine months earlier, police shot the 36-year-old from La Loche, Sask., in the arm, when he rushed police outside a house on Avenue L South in Saskatoon armed with a machete and replica handgun. Two years earlier, in 2021, Herman was the subject of an RCMP alert in La Loche, just over 500 kilometres northwest of Saskatoon, wanted for assault, assault with a weapon, forcible confinement and failure to comply with probation. And, in 2009, when he was 22, Herman pleaded guilty to manslaughter for his role in the beating death of a teen in a parking lot in La Loche. On Monday, a coroner's inquest at Court of King's Bench will begin deconstructing the sequence of events that led to Herman's fatal shooting by Saskatoon police. "The guns and gangs unit became aware that a 36-year-old male, who was wanted by La Loche RCMP, was in the 1300 block of Avenue E North and was armed with a gun," police Chief Troy Cooper wrote in a statement the following day. "The male was in breach of release conditions and had removed his electronic monitoring device." People living in the houses near where Herman died say dozens of plainclothes and uniformed police with guns drawn converged on a two-storey house across from the Mayfair elementary school around 5:45 p.m. on Oct. 27, 2022. Witnesses say police ran through yards and jumped fences and decks, squaring off with Herman both inside and outside the corner house. The neighbours heard shouting and the sound of multiple gunshots. Police said in a news release that they confronted a suspect in the home before police fatally shot him. No police or bystanders were hurt. The established neighbourhood was busy at the time of the shooting — parent-teacher interviews had just started at the school and kids were out in the playground. The inquest will feature 18 witnesses, including a paramedic, a registered nurse, a pathologist, two civilians and 14 police. Timothy Hawryluk will be the presiding coroner.
