logo
Shashi Tharoor Defends Nation-First Approach Despite Party Loyalty Concerns

Shashi Tharoor Defends Nation-First Approach Despite Party Loyalty Concerns

Hans India5 days ago
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has reinforced his commitment to placing national interests above party considerations, acknowledging that this stance sometimes creates friction with party leadership who may perceive such positions as disloyal.
Addressing an audience in Kochi at a discussion on "Peace, Harmony and National Development" on Saturday, the Thiruvananthapuram representative articulated his philosophy that political parties should serve as instruments for national betterment rather than ends in themselves. He emphasized that regardless of party affiliation, the ultimate goal should be creating a stronger India, even if different parties disagree on methodology.
Tharoor directly confronted recent criticism he has received for backing the Modi government's handling of Operation Sindoor and other defense-related initiatives. He defended his position by stating that supporting the nation's armed forces and government during critical security matters represents the correct course of action, regardless of political consequences.
When questioned by a student about his relationship with Congress leadership, Tharoor explained the delicate balance he maintains between party loyalty and national duty. He noted that while he respects his party and shares its fundamental values, he believes cooperation with other parties becomes necessary when national security is at stake, though such collaboration sometimes appears disloyal to party colleagues.
The veteran politician acknowledged that democratic politics inherently involves competition between parties, but argued that this competitive spirit should not prevent collaborative efforts during crucial moments. He described inclusive development as his consistent theme throughout his sixteen-year political career, alongside commitments to national security and broader national interests.
Speaking to reporters later, Tharoor reiterated that his "nation first" philosophy has guided his entire political journey since returning to India specifically to serve the country in various capacities. He emphasized that his service extends beyond conventional political boundaries.
The Congress leader also addressed growing speculation about internal party tensions, particularly following his appointment to head an all-party delegation regarding Operation Sindoor. While typically avoiding public discussion of such political matters, he felt obligated to respond to the student's inquiry and subsequently shared the interaction on social media platform X.
Tharoor invoked former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru's famous question "Who lives if India dies?" to underscore his belief that political actors must set aside partisan differences when national interests are threatened. This perspective has become increasingly relevant as he faces scrutiny for positions that some within his party view as overly accommodating toward the current government.
Recent controversy surrounding Tharoor intensified after he published an article praising Prime Minister Modi's international diplomatic approach, specifically commending his "energy" and "dynamism" in global affairs. The Prime Minister's Office's decision to share this article further fueled speculation about Tharoor's standing within the Congress hierarchy and his relationship with party leadership.
Throughout his remarks, Tharoor maintained that political parties across the spectrum should demonstrate willingness to collaborate during moments of national significance, suggesting that such cooperation represents true patriotism rather than political betrayal. His comments reflect ongoing tensions within opposition ranks about how to balance criticism of the ruling party with support for national initiatives, particularly those involving security and defense matters.
The controversy highlights broader questions about the role of individual conscience versus party discipline in contemporary Indian politics, with Tharoor positioning himself as someone willing to face internal criticism for what he perceives as principled stances on national issues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What do the Epstein files reveal about Donald Trump? Here's the latest
What do the Epstein files reveal about Donald Trump? Here's the latest

The Hindu

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

What do the Epstein files reveal about Donald Trump? Here's the latest

In Washington, U.S. lawmakers have escalated pressure on the Justice Department over the Jeffrey Epstein files following multiple emerging developments: Attorney General Pam Bondi reportedly informed Donald Trump in May that his name appears in internal Epstein records; Republicans ended a House session early amid internal conflict over a vote on pressing DOJ disclosures; and Justice Department officials met with imprisoned Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell to explore possible leads. Against this backdrop, bipartisan calls have intensified for Bondi to testify before Congress Also Read: Republican rumblings: on Trump and the Epstein files What is the background of the Jeffrey Epstein case? Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender, died by suicide in a federal jail in August 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. He was previously convicted in 2008 in Florida for soliciting a minor, serving a controversial sentence that allowed him work release. Epstein's re-arrest in 2019 reignited public scrutiny over how he operated an alleged trafficking ring for years, often involving underage girls, with little accountability. Since his death, questions have remained about the extent of his connections, including to prominent global figures, and whether U.S. authorities have withheld critical information. In February 2025, the DOJ released an initial batch of declassified documents, including redacted flight logs and Epstein's contact book. However, many of these materials were already public. What are the latest developments in the Epstein files investigation? Congressional subpoena: On July 23, the House Oversight Subcommittee formally subpoenaed the DOJ, demanding the release of all Epstein-related records, including sealed files, internal DOJ communications, and evidence not yet made public. Maxwell to testify: Ghislaine Maxwell, the imprisoned former girlfriend of Epstein, is expected to testify before Congress on August 11. A closed-door interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has already taken place. Trump's name in files: U.S. President Donald Trump was told in May 2025 that his name appears 'multiple times' in the Epstein files. The White House has acknowledged the inclusion but emphasised that it is based on unverified references. Court rejects file unsealing: A Florida judge has blocked the DOJ's request to unseal grand jury records, citing legal protections. A similar petition remains under review in New York. $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions: Senator Ron Wyden has alleged that Treasury Department documents indicate over $1.5 billion in wire transfers tied to Epstein's network. He claims the DOJ has withheld these suspicious activity reports (SARs) from Congress. What do the Jeffrey Epstein files contain? According to the DOJ, the Epstein files include over 300 gigabytes of digital content and tens of thousands of images and videos, many involving minors and explicit content. The seized physical materials include flight manifests, photo albums, architectural plans of Epstein's residences, cash bundles, and contact directories. Authorities say that most of these materials remain sealed due to their illicit nature and the need to protect the victims' identities. What happens next in the Epstein investigation? The US House Oversight Subcommittee's subpoena may require the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release more documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, unless blocked by the courts. Ghislaine Maxwell is expected to testify before Congress in August. Her closed-door meeting with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in Florida was part of the DOJ's ongoing efforts to respond to calls for transparency. Mr Blanche said on social media that President Donald Trump had asked officials to 'release all credible evidence'. He added that the FBI and DOJ would review any information Maxwell provides on crimes involving victims. Also Read: Pam Bondi | Bonding for cover Meanwhile, lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna have introduced the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act'. If supported by 218 members of the House of Representatives, it would direct the Attorney General to release all unclassified DOJ records related to Epstein. The outcome will influence how much more information becomes public in the coming months.

Karnataka BJP slams Rahul Gandhi, says refusal to accept electoral defeat leads to baseless theories
Karnataka BJP slams Rahul Gandhi, says refusal to accept electoral defeat leads to baseless theories

Hans India

time26 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Karnataka BJP slams Rahul Gandhi, says refusal to accept electoral defeat leads to baseless theories

Bengaluru: Responding to Rahul Gandhi's allegations against the Election Commission of India (ECI) and claims of having concrete proof of cheating in a constituency in Karnataka, the state BJP has said the Congress leader's refusal to accept electoral defeat has now descended into baseless conspiracy theories. The Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Karnataka Assembly, R. Ashoka, said on Friday, "The Lok Sabha results in Karnataka are a decisive mandate in favour of NDA and a resounding rejection of the Congress-led Karnataka government's failures. But instead of introspecting, Rahul Gandhi is now blaming the Election Commission for covering up his party's collapse, and CM Siddaramaiah is endorsing it, not to save democracy but to shield himself from brewing internal backlash and save his chair." The inclusion and deletion of voter names is a transparent process conducted in the presence of representatives from all political parties, Ashoka noted. If there were any legitimate concerns, they should have been raised with evidence before the Election Commission or courts, not turned into political drama after losing, Ashoka pointed out. BJP's victory is a result of people's trust in Prime Minister Narendra Modi, not some imaginary 'vote theft' narrative peddled by Congress, he said. 'If Rahul Gandhi claims to have proof, what is stopping him from initiating legal action? Why the delay?' Ashoka challenged. "This is nothing but a textbook example of Congress' political bankruptcy, blaming everyone but themselves for their failures," he underlined. "Karnataka BJP unit strongly condemns this attempt to undermine public faith in democratic institutions just because the outcome didn't favour them," Ashoka charged. Rahul Gandhi had stated, "The Election Commission is not functioning as the Election Commission of India. The fact of the matter is, the Election Commission is not doing its job. Now, we have concrete, hundred per cent proof of the Election Commission allowing cheating in a seat in Karnataka." Responding to allegations by the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, against the ECI and his claims of having concrete proof that the ECI allowed cheating for a seat in Karnataka, the Chief Electoral Officer of Karnataka has refuted the charges, stating that the electoral rolls were prepared transparently and copies were shared with recognised political parties. The statement further stated, "As informed by the Election Commission of India already, Electoral Rolls are shared with all recognised political parties. During Special Summary Revision-2024, which was taken up before the General Elections to Lok Sabha-2024, the copies of draft and final electoral rolls of all 224 Assembly constituencies were provided to representatives of all registered and recognised political parties, including the Indian National Congress (INC)." Supporting the statement of Rahul Gandhi, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Thursday stated that the Congress party's setback in the parliamentary elections was due to the BJP's misuse of the Election Commission. CM Siddaramaiah, in his press statement, said, "The outcome of the recent Lok Sabha elections in Karnataka not only surprised us but also gave rise to several doubts. It is now becoming evident that the main reason behind the Congress party's setback in that election was the BJP's misuse of the Election Commission to carry out irregularities."

Rahul Gandhi spreading hatred through pre-planned actions, UP govt tells Supreme Court in Savarkar defamation case
Rahul Gandhi spreading hatred through pre-planned actions, UP govt tells Supreme Court in Savarkar defamation case

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Rahul Gandhi spreading hatred through pre-planned actions, UP govt tells Supreme Court in Savarkar defamation case

NEW DELHI: The Uttar Pradesh government has told the Supreme Court that Congress leader Rahul Gandhi is deliberately spreading hatred through pre-planned actions, referring to his alleged remarks against freedom fighter Veer Savarkar during the Bharat Jodo Yatra in 2022. The government made this claim in an affidavit filed in response to Gandhi's Special Leave Petition (SLP), which seeks to quash a summons issued by a Lucknow lower court based on a criminal complaint by lawyer Nripendra Pandey. A two-judge bench of the top court, comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Manmohan, is scheduled to hear the matter. In its previous hearing on 25 April, the Supreme Court had stayed the Allahabad High Court's order refusing to quash the summons and had directed the UP government to file a response. The Yogi Adityanath-led government, in its affidavit, defended the summons and urged the court to dismiss Gandhi's appeal, stating, "All the allegations are supported by the investigation, which indicates deliberate spreading of hatred through pre-planned actions." The affidavit claimed that the magistrate had thoroughly reviewed the case file, statements, and investigation report before issuing the summoning order under Sections 153A (promoting enmity between groups) and 505 (statements conducive to public mischief) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store