
SA algae crisis ‘incredibly disturbing' but federal government won't declare natural disaster, Watt says
The environment minister, Murray Watt, announced the federal assistance package on Monday while visiting South Australia to see the impacts of a toxic algal bloom that for months has caused mass deaths of marine life across the state's beaches.
Watt said the bloom and its impacts were 'incredibly disturbing'. But he stopped short of declaring the event a natural disaster, saying the catastrophe did not meet the relevant definitions under the federal natural disaster framework.
Hanson-Young said the criteria used to declare such events should be examined.
As parliament returns, the South Australia-based senator also said she would push for an inquiry into the disaster to examine issues including the federal and state government responses to the event.
'South Australians have been crying out for weeks and months for federal action on this, so I'm glad to see the federal environment minister finally get to South Australia,' Hanson-Young told the ABC's Afternoon Briefing on Monday: '$14 million is good but nowhere near what will be needed.'
Get Guardian Australia environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as an email
Asked if the bloom was a national disaster, the Nationals leader, David Littleproud, said, 'obviously it's one of significance'.
'I think we need to broaden those definitions, and as a parliament we should do that,' he told Sky News on Monday. He also urged Labor to pursue other measures that would provide financial support to agricultural workers affected.
On Monday night, Anthony Albanese said federal funding had been timed 'appropriately' given the event was unfolding 'primarily in state waters'.
'Events do occur in our environment,' the prime minister told ABC's 7.30. 'What is important is that there be a response. We're responding, giving support to the South Australian government.'
The bloom of the microalgae species karenia mikimotoi was identified off South Australia's Fleurieu Peninsula in March, and grew to more than 4400 sq km, close to the size of Kangaroo Island.
It has been breaking up in recent weeks, spreading north into Spencer Gulf, south into the Coorong wetlands and along Adelaide's beaches in Gulf St Vincent into the Port River, killing tens of thousands of marine animals.
The money is likely to be used to pay for the clean-up of dead marine life from SA's beaches, support impacted businesses, bolster community awareness about the bloom and invest in science and research to better understand the incident.
'There's no doubting whatsoever that this is a very serious environmental event facing South Australia,' Watt told reporters on Monday.
'We are in uncharted waters here.'
Asked if the bloom and its impact should be declared a natural disaster, Watt said it was not possible under the existing definition despite calls from scientists, the Greens and SA's Labor premier.
A natural disaster declaration would trigger special federal assistance measures to support individuals, businesses and communities in their recovery.
'We have managed outside the usual natural disaster framework to marshal the type of resources that South Australia has asked for,' Watt said.
'One of the difficulties has been understanding exactly what its impacts are and what sort of response is required.
'We won't solve this overnight and we are, to some extent, relying on weather conditions to help disperse the algal bloom.'
Darcie Carruthers, the South Australia-based nature campaigner for the Australian Conservation Foundation, welcomed Watt's funding announcement but said it was overdue and more needed to be done.
'The federal government needs to focus on the causes of this economic and environmental disaster to prevent it from happening again,' Carruthers said.
'A marine heatwave and the water from the disastrous 2023 Murray Darling floods are both factors that have allowed the algae to take hold and both warming waters and floods are supercharged by burning fossil fuels.'
Paul Gamblin, the chief executive of the Australian Marine Conservation Society, said the devastating bloom shows
'nowhere is immune from the accelerating impacts of climate change', and called for
' major coordinated response that matches the scale of this emergency'.
'This unnatural, shocking event needs all hands on deck,' Gamblin said.
The algal bloom is naturally occurring, but the state's environment department has listed potential contributing factors including a marine heatwave that started in 2024, when sea temperatures were about 2.5C warmer than usual, combined with calm conditions.
Another was the 2022/23 River Murray flood that washed extra nutrients into the sea followed by an unprecedented cold-water upwelling in the summer of 2023/24 that brought nutrient-rich water to the surface.
Marine ecologist Dominic McAfee said the mortality in most heavily impacted areas was 'extremely confronting'.
'It seems like almost everything has died,' Dr McAfee, from the University of Adelaide's Environment Institute, told AAP.
'The impacts we're seeing now could just be the start of something more prolonged.'
Dr McAfee said it had been hoped winter winds and swells would 'disperse and nullify' the algae bloom, but this had not happened.
'And there's a chance that it will continue for many more months.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Albanese government plotted to maintain native forest logging in NSW if court battle was lost, documents show
The Albanese government was so worried a court case could halt native forest logging in northern New South Wales that it drew up plans to essentially sidestep federal environment laws in the event of a loss, documents released under freedom of information laws (FoI) reveal. The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, played a key role as the commonwealth and NSW governments worked to ensure some logging could continue in the face of any 'adverse decision' and to manage a potentially volatile situation between loggers and environmentalists. In the end, the planning wasn't needed, because the government won the case. Justice Melissa Perry ruled in the federal court in 2024 that the north-east regional forest agreement (RFA) was legitimate, despite the fact it was amended in 2018 without fresh scientific studies regarding the impact on threatened species. The initial 20-year RFA between the commonwealth and the state of NSW commenced in 2000. Shortly before it was due to expire, it was varied and extended for at least a further 20 years. The North East Forest Alliance conservation group challenged the 2018 north-east RFA on the grounds it was not a 'regional forest agreement' within the meaning of the RFA Act and therefore neither the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act nor the RFA Act applied 'to exempt forestry operations … from the approval processes'. The alliance argued the new agreement didn't properly assess 'environmental values' including old growth, wilderness, endangered species and world heritage values, along with 'principles of ecologically sustainable management'. If the federal and state governments had lost the court case, there could have been an immediate halt to logging in northern NSW forests and lengthy processes to assess areas one by one under the commonwealth's environment laws. The Albanese government was concerned such a decision could lead to environmentalists demanding an end to logging. The prime minister wrote to his environment and agriculture ministers in 2023 seeking updates on how to deal with any forestry shutdown, the FoI documents show. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter Forestry Corp of NSW and other private forest owners would have been forced to put in approximately 1,700 applications to show their activities were consistent with federal environment laws. That process would have taken months. In July 2023, the then environment minister, Tanya Plibersek, and then agriculture minister, Murray Watt, wrote to Albanese stating: 'Thank you for your correspondence dated 23 May 2023, regarding forest management and seeking advice on strategy and preparedness to manage the impacts on communities if the federal court finds … that the north-east regional forest agreement as varied in 2018 is not a regional forest agreement for the purposes of the … Act.' The ministers, in their letter, said: 'While we await judgment, our departments have been working closely with the NSW government to consider implications for forestry operations in north-east NSW and options for government to prepare for and manage potential impacts of an adverse decision.' A separate ministerial briefing note to Plibersek in November 2023 states: 'This area is highly biologically diverse, supporting approximately 300 threatened species and approximately 22 endangered or critically endangered ecological communities listed as matters of national environmental significance under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Listed threatened species in the region include species that attract public attention and focus such as the Greater Glider, Swift Parrot and Koala.' The federal department of environment warned that the number of assessments needed if they lost the court case would be 'extremely high' and officers would need to be transferred from other sections to handle the workload. There would also be political and economic fallout for the government, the department warned in the briefing. 'Given the time required to complete environmental approval processes, we expect there will be sustained pressure over many months after the judgment to provide support to both the larger public and smaller private operators.' The environment law requirements would be seen as a barrier to the resumption of logging operations and could lead to calls for an industry transition package, the department said. Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion One memo noted that the Victorian government had paid out $875m in industry support to close down its native timber industry. Bureaucrats also advised that 60% of NSW's high-grade sawlogs were coming from north-east forests and that this could leave NSW with a timber shortage. Another memo, also dated November 2023, explored several alternatives to keep the industry operating and effectively sidestep federal environment laws. The details were heavily redacted but included giving the state power to authorise logging under a special bilateral agreement between the federal government and NSW. A national interest exemption under the federal environment laws was also considered. This would have involved Forestry Corp applying to the federal environment minister and was seen as a possible short-term solution. Fast-track assessments were considered for Forestry Corp. This would still have taken six to nine months and there were concerns Forestry Corp lacked the scientific information about threatened species needed to quickly apply. There was also a suggestion Forestry Corp could 'self-assess' to determine any impacts of national environmental significance. The department was warned, however, that it could expect to receive complaints from environmentalists that Forestry Corp's activities were already breaching federal law. The Australian Conservation Foundation said the FoI documents showed that if the carve-out for native forest logging from federal environmental laws was to end, the environment department was prepared. 'For the sake of Australia's much-loved wildlife, we need to move to a post-RFA world,' the foundation's national biodiversity policy officer, Brendan Sydes, said. 'The environment minister, Murray Watt, should bring native forest logging under the national nature law as part of the reforms of the EPBC Act he's promised to introduce into parliament early next year. 'Failing to close the native forest logging loophole will mean threatened species like koalas and greater gliders continue to get pushed closer to extinction.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Labor lifts ban on US beef, saying new measures ‘effectively' manage biosecurity risks
Labor will lift restrictions on imports of US beef, easing tensions with the Trump administration as the federal government seeks relief from punishing US tariffs on steel and aluminium. The government confirmed on Thursday morning that the Department of Agriculture would allow the imports into Australia, saying the US now 'effectively' manages biosecurity risks in beef production. A ban on beef from cows raised and slaughtered in the US was lifted in 2019 but restrictions remained on beef from cattle raised in Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US. Changes to make protections more robust introduced in late 2024 and early 2025 allow for meat from those countries to be traced through supply chains to their source farm. The concession is expected to help pave the way for the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, to argue the case to Donald Trump that Australia should be given exemptions from the US's 50% tariff on steel and aluminium, and a looming 200% tariff planned for pharmaceuticals. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The US president specifically cited Australia's restrictions on beef imports when he announced his 'Liberation Day' tariff regime. Australia faces a 10% baseline tariff on all products exported to the US. During the federal election campaign, Albanese said Australia would not change or compromise any biosecurity rules, 'full stop, exclamation mark'. Despite the comments, a concession on beef had been expected from Australia. The agriculture, fisheries and forestry minister, Julie Collins, said the government wanted fair and open trade, which significantly benefited the cattle industry. 'The US beef imports review has undergone a rigorous science and risk-based assessment over the past decade,' she said. 'The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks. 'Australia stands for open and fair trade – our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this.' The new arrangements are due to come into place from 28 July, with Australian importers able to apply for permits to handle fresh beef products from the US, the largest buyer of Australian beef, ahead of China, in a $14bn market. The shadow finance minister, James Paterson, called for Albanese to explain the new arrangements. He said farmers needed reassurance there would be no risk to their businesses. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The prime minister himself has said that we couldn't relax the restrictions on the importation of US beef because of serious biosecurity concerns,' Paterson told Sky News. 'So if the government has found some way of dealing with that issue, protecting our domestic agricultural industry from the introduction of foreign diseases and pests, then they should say so.' The Nationals frontbencher Bridget McKenzie warned against sacrificing farmers for 'deficiencies' in the government's handling of the US alliance. 'We need a biosecurity arrangement that's based on science,' she told Channel Nine. 'We would be concerned around, particularly the protocols on the slaughtering of beef out of Canada and Mexico, because we do not want to bring those diseases into our country and our farmers and our industry shouldn't be sacrificed because the PM can't get his act together on this relationship.' McKenzie said Nationals MPs 'will be very concerned if our $11bn beef export industry is sacrificed to actually make up for the deficiencies in the Anthony Albanese-United States diplomatic relationship.'


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Australia lifts biosecurity curbs on US beef amid tariff talks
SYDNEY, July 24 (Reuters) - Australia lifted on Thursday strict biosecurity restrictions on beef imports from the U.S. after an extensive scientific and risk review, likely removing a key concern for U.S. President Donald Trump's administration over bilateral trade. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said Australia was satisfied with the measures put in place by the United States to effectively manage biosecurity risks. "The U.S. Beef Imports Review has undergone a rigorous science and risk-based assessment over the past decade," Collins said in a statement. "The ... government will never compromise on biosecurity." News of Australia lifting the curbs was first reported by the Australian Financial Review. The report said Australia will use the easing of rules to argue its case for the United States to wind back 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium and Trump's threat to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. Trump in April singled out the beef trade disparity after Australia's beef exports to the United States surged last year, reaching A$4 billion ($2.64 billion) amid a slump in U.S. beef production. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in April had ruled out relaxing Australia's strict biosecurity rules during tariff talks with the United States. Since 2003, Australia has curbed entry of U.S. beef after detecting bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease. It lifted some restrictions in 2019. Australia allows entry if the cattle were born, raised, and slaughtered in the United States, though few shippers can prove these requirements, as cattle frequently move between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The United States has introduced more tracking methods since last year to identify and trace all cattle from Mexico and Canada to the farm and through the supply chain. Australia views its strict biosecurity rules as safeguarding its disease-free cattle, helping it preserve access to lucrative markets such as Japan and South Korea, while Australian beef is prized by U.S. fast-food chains for its lower fat content and competitive prices. ($1 = 1.5152 Australian dollars)