Faces of Trump's deportation push: The people falling victim to the immigration crackdown
In his first 100 days in office, he has bent every part of the government toward that goal, cracking down on non-citizen activists, invoking emergency wartime authorities, skirting court orders to stop deportation flights, pulling humanitarian protections from hundreds of thousands, and attempting to ignore the Constitution and end birthright citizenship.
In a White House defined by chaos, immigration may be the only place where the Trump administration is consistent.
For the millions of immigrants across the U.S., this has meant consistent anxiety. Will they be detained and deported without warning? Do they still have rights to protest? Will the courts check Trump, and will Trump obey the courts?
Four different immigrants and their families told The Independent about what it's like living through this age of uncertainty.
The first sign that something was wrong came when Wendy Brito, an asylum-seeker from El Salvador, attended one of her regular check-ins with immigration officials in Louisiana last month. She called her fiancé, Kremly Marrero, and said she heard the sound of handcuffs nearby.
'I said, 'Don't worry, you're not doing anything wrong. You got permission to stay here,'' Marrero told The Independent. ''You applied for asylum. You should be alright, don't worry about it.''
Brito hasn't been home since. She was arrested and sent to an Immigration and Customs detention center in the city of Basile, Louisiana, nearly 200 miles away from where the couple live with their three children, just outside of New Orleans.
'My kids are not sleeping. My kids are constantly depressed,' Marrero, a U.S. citizen from Puerto Rico, said. 'They break down at school crying…They're constantly asking why their mother is in jail if she's not a bad person.'
And he's not sure what to tell them. He said he still doesn't know why Brito, who first applied for asylum in 2009, was suddenly arrested after nearly two decades. Marrero said he suspects it may have had something to do with a long-ago incident in which a neighbor called the police on Marrero and Brito during a domestic dispute in which neither sought charges.
Brito fled El Salvador after a gang killed her brother in the midst of an extortion attempt on the family, and her life has been turned upside-down once again.
The immigration officer who arrested Brito said it had something to do with the new administration, Marrero's lawyer told him, but that's about all he knows.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement acknowledged a request for comment about the case from The Independent but did not respond to questions.
'She went in for a routine check-in with ICE and never made it home,' Congressman Troy Carter, Democrat of Louisiana, said on April 22, after a delegation of representatives visited Brito and others held at facilities in Louisiana's 'deportation alley.' 'That's a tragedy. Due process was clearly denied…This is America. This is not some third-world country.'
In between four-hour nights of sleep, caring for the kids, and working in facilities at a local hospital, Marrero speaks with Brito on a prison video tablet. He said his partner has become unwell behind bars.
'I'm looking at her. I know you're not eating,' he said. 'She says, 'I don't want to. I just want to go home.' That breaks you. I don't care how strong of a man you are. You see your wife there and you can't do anything. I feel hopeless.'
While Brito has been in detention, a new crisis has hit the family. Marrero just found out he has liver cancer. He's still working to understand the severity of the diagnosis, but so far he has ignored his doctors' pleas to stay in the hospital, he told The Independent.
'I didn't have anyone to take care of the kids, so I had to leave. We're waiting for her to come home so I can get treated,' he said. 'It's been very tough.'
There has been one bright spot though. Marrero said Brito's bond has been approved, and the father is hoping to raise some of the $5,000 payment on GoFundMe so Brito can return home ahead of a May asylum hearing.
Ahwar Sultan, 25, a graduate student at Ohio State University, was sitting in an architecture lecture on April 3 when he got a notice that his record within the SEVIS government exchange student database had been terminated, jeopardizing his ability to study and work inside the U.S.
The government said vaguely that Sultan may have lost his visa or that his name may have appeared in a criminal records check, while the university said it hadn't gotten any notice from the government about the change.
The timing was hard to miss, though. The Trump administration had vowed to deport all non-citizen students who joined in widespread campus pro-Palestine demonstrations. It also said it would investigate universities for alleged antisemitism, including Ohio State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed in late March the State Department had begun pulling hundreds of visas.
Sultan had been a part of campus Palestine activism since 2023. The 25-year-old, who studies right-wing politics in India, felt compelled to join the movement out of a mixture of his academic background and a sense of solidarity with Palestinian scholars, who watched as Israel destroyed or damaged every university in Gaza.
Sultan may have come on the radar of authorities for an April 2024 incident where he was arrested as he attempted to protect a group of Muslim protesters at a divestment protest conducting evening prayers from advancing police. The resulting charges were later dismissed and expunged.
Still, the notice from the feds put him in a legal 'gray zone,' he said. He temporarily stopped attending class in person or conducting his duties as a teaching assistant. If he loses his ability to work for the university, he's not sure he'll be able to cover his bills, let alone stay in America.
'I don't feel safe being out and about, especially getting the news from everywhere around the country,' he told The Independent after his status was pulled.
On April 15, Sultan and a campus Palestine group sued the Trump administration, arguing its efforts to surveil and deport immigrants over their alleged views violated the First Amendment, and, in Sultan's case, due process and federal law as well.
Federal officials argued in court documents that Sultan's lawsuit was wrongly conflating canceling his status in the database with revoking his immigration status overall or beginning to deport him from the country, decisions he could contest in immigration court while being afforded full due process.
On April 24, Washington federal judge Tanya Chutkan ordered Sultan's status in the SEVIS database be temporarily reinstated, arguing the administration could 'point to no legal authority' for canceling it in the first place, while voicing doubt over the administration's larger treatment of the student.
'At this juncture, more than two weeks have elapsed since Sultan filed his Complaint and the court is highly skeptical of counsel's representations that Defendants are still waiting for ICE to confirm whether Sultan's presence in the United States is unlawful,' she wrote.
Despite the temporary win, Sultan isn't feeling very reassured. He got a letter from the U.S. Consul General General in Mumbai, informing him his F-1 visa had been revoked, meaning he may not be able to re-enter the country if he leaves it.
The grad student, who decided to pursue his studies in America to avoid the potential of government interference, now feels the U.S. is following Israel down what he sees as a path of lawlessness. Even if he gets some measure of reprieve in court, he feels the paradigm has shifted, noting that even his friends and colleagues without visa issues fear leaving the country.
'A pure sense of normalcy is not going to return. All bets are off,' he said. 'There might be ways to mitigate the uncertainty and try to push back against it. I don't really see how, with an administration that is turbocharging ICE and attacks on immigrants, any real sense of safety will return for most people.'
Ohio State declined to comment, citing the ongoing lawsuit.
Billy Elve, 32, is also waiting on the courts.
The Orlando, Florida, resident is originally from Haiti, and arrived in the U.S. in February 2024, granted temporary protected status and humanitarian parole under a Biden administration initiative.
He fled Haiti as gangs increasingly took control of the country and threatened his neighborhood.
'They forced their way into his house, tied up the husband, and went away with his wife,' Elve told The Independent of one neighbor. 'At that time my wife was pregnant, so we had to move.'
Elve managed to get approval to come to the U.S., but his wife Nehemie and daughter Villyncia's attempts were still pending as Trump took office.
The translator has felt a variety of emotions since — worry for his family, alarm at the Trump campaign's racist conspiracies about Haitians eating cats, and uncertainty after the administration sought to end the CHNV parole program in March, which covers some 500,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
A federal judge blocked the move in mid-April, prompting the Trump administration to appeal, and Elve doesn't know what will happen next. If he returns to Haiti he'll be marked as a target, an expat returning home from the wealthier United States, while if he stays in the U.S., there's still no guarantee his family can escape.
'It's very difficult to know what can be done next,' he said. 'There's a big question mark behind that.'
On Monday, he learned from immigration officials his wife and daughter definitely won't be able to get in on the same parole program as he did, which Homeland Security has taken to calling 'an unlawful scheme' from the previous administration.
Now he's considering joining his parents in Canada and seeking asylum, or pursuing a change of status in the U.S. to be a student or on a company-sponsored visa, whatever gets his family out of harm's way fastest.
'It was already a pain and now it's just adding oil to the fire,' he told The Independent.
Momodou Taal, a UK-Gambian grad student at Cornell and campus pro-Palestine leader, felt he couldn't wait on the U.S. courts for protection.
Taal sued the Trump administration last month with a group of fellow academics, alleging a pair of January executive orders had effectively made it illegal for non-citizens to protest the administration and its allies like Israel.
As the constitutional lawsuit proceeded, immigration officials told Taal to surrender immediately and officers circled near his residence.
Court documents later revealed that ICE was notified on March 14, a day before the suit was filed, that the State Department pulled Taal's visa, with officials claiming his protest actions had created a hostile environment for Jewish students. The threat raised the prospect he might be deported before a court could rule on his challenge.
Taal grew up in a political milieu, where family members served in The Gambia's post-colonial government, and told The Independent he saw his own Palestine activism as a way to continue their legacy of fighting colonialism. He said he has never supported antisemitism of any kind, pointing to a letter of support from Jewish Cornellians, and only advocates the right to resist what he sees as an illegal occupation of Palestine under international law.
Still, despite his faith in his convictions, he felt his leverage in the U.S. slipping away as he hid out in a friend's apartment in Ithaca, barely eating and avoiding communicating with family for fear of being tracked.
'Given that I dared to challenge Trump and challenge his executive orders, I felt they would make an example of me,' Taal told The Independent from an undisclosed location, as he prepares to return to the UK.
The Trump administration has defended its handling of the Taal case.
'It is a privilege to be granted a visa to live and study in the United States of America,' the Department of Homeland Security said after he fled the country. 'When you advocate for violence and terrorism, that privilege should be revoked.'
It wasn't an idle fear that something exceptional might happen in or outside of court. The same day as Taal filed his suit, the government invoked the wartime Alien Enemies Act to summarily deport alleged gang members, many of whom say they have no ties to criminal groups, and wrongly deported a man to El Salvador, despite a court order specifically barring his removal to the country.
And Taal had watched for months as Trump spoke more and more specifically about the mass deportation of non-citizen Palestine activists.
'I felt like it was only a matter of time until something happens to me, unless I triumphed in court,' he said. 'I didn't think it would be so quick.'
Now, as Taal works to finish his degree remotely, he said he gets messages from other activists asking when he knew it was time to leave America.
Every person has a different threshold, but it's clear that for the millions of immigrants in the United States something fundamental about the country has already changed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
15 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ahead of shutdown deadline, Democrats face a dilemma on spending
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republicans pushed through legislation this month Advertisement 'It is no secret the path to advancing more of our bills is going to be harder because of the unprecedented, partisan rescissions bill that Republicans just passed,' said Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. 'It is extremely frustrating to see so many of the colleagues that have worked with us to pass funding bills turn around and vote to rip away the funding that we all agreed on.' Advertisement Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, told reporters recently that the appropriations process 'has to be less bipartisan,' infuriating Democrats who said the comment poisoned the well as they worked with Republicans to put together spending bills. Because those bills must pass to keep the government running, spending deals have historically been bipartisan products that can draw enough support to clear a Senate filibuster, forcing lawmakers in both parties to set aside their most incendiary proposals and broker a compromise. In a blowout 90-8 vote this week, most Senate Democrats voted to open floor debate on the chamber's first spending bill of the year, a typically less contentious measure covering military construction projects and veterans programs. Some other less divisive bills could potentially be added to the package. But Democrats are keeping a close eye on Republicans and the White House. In a sign of their wariness about the coming funding fight, House and Senate Democratic leaders and senior Democratic members of the Appropriations Committee from both chambers met privately in Schumer's office this week to plot and make sure they were on the same page. For now, Democrats appear ready to let the process play out. Murray called some of the initial spending bills advancing through the Senate 'solid, compromise bills that reject the truly draconian cuts proposed by President Trump and House Republicans.' 'No one wants a shutdown, and the way we avoid that shutdown is by working together,' she said. Advertisement A major priority for Democrats is winning assurances from Senate Republicans that they will not again agree to allow the Trump administration to cancel spending after Congress approves the bills. Without some commitment in place, Democrats say it is uncertain whether they can back the spending measures. 'It is not clear to me there is a way to get over that hurdle,' said Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., a member of the Appropriations Committee. At the same time, House Republicans are advancing funding bills setting drastically lower spending levels than their counterparts in the Senate. Republicans on the Appropriations Committee in that chamber this week approved a spending bill that would slash the budget for foreign aid and the State Department by 22%. Still, some conservatives in the House have complained the spending bills they are advancing do not do enough to cut spending. The foreign aid bill provided billions more for some international programs than the president had requested, and rejected his calls to gut global broadcasting initiatives. 'I like the president's budget; I think he did a good job with it,' said Rep. Andrew Clyde of Georgia, a Republican on the appropriations panel. 'I think we should hold to those levels.' House Republicans on the committee also voted to strip out a provision they had included in the measure that would have made it more difficult for the White House to cancel spending in the future. With a potential funding impasse coming this fall, Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., the majority leader, has already begun the political effort to pin the blame on Democrats if the government shuts down. Thune, who has pledged to bring spending bills to the floor after Democrats refused to do so in recent years, shrugged off Democratic worries over the administration cuts. Advertisement 'The Democrats have indicated, because they're so upset over the rescissions bill last week -- which, by the way, cut one-tenth of 1% of all federal spending -- that somehow they can use that as an excuse to shut down the appropriations process and therefore shut down the government,' he said. 'We think that would be a big mistake, and hopefully they will think better of it and work with us.' This article originally appeared in .


Newsweek
17 minutes ago
- Newsweek
JD Vance Chances of Beating Leading Democratic Candidates in 2028—Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Vice President JD Vance held a narrow lead over three potential Democratic presidential candidates who have led recent surveys of the 2028 primary, according to a new Emerson College poll released Friday. Newsweek reached out to Vance's office and each of the candidates for comment via email. Why It Matters Vance, President Donald Trump's second-in-command, is viewed as a potential Republican front-runner in the 2028 election, when Democrats will aim to win back control of the White House. Although the Democratic primary is still years away, prospective candidates are already making early moves, such as fundraising, building national name recognition, and traveling to key primary states to meet with voters. Early polling can provide insights into how Americans view potential candidates ahead of the election, although surveys aren't always predictive this far in advance. What To Know The Emerson College poll found that Vance held a single-digit lead over three potential candidates: former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The poll surveyed 1,400 U.S. voters from July 21 to July 22, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points. Of those three, Buttigieg was held to the tightest margin, with 44 percent backing Vance for president and 43 percent supporting Buttigieg. Buttigieg fueled speculation that he could run for president earlier this year when he announced he would opt out of running statewide in Michigan, where he has lived since his time in President Joe Biden's administration. Newsom, who traveled to early-voting primary state South Carolina this summer, received 42 percent support against Vance's 45 percent, according to the poll. Vice President JD Vance participates in a debate in New York City on October 1, 2024. Vice President JD Vance participates in a debate in New York City on October 1, Ocasio-Cortez, who is a favorite of many progressives, received 41 percent to Vance's 44 percent. Ocasio-Cortez hasn't signaled she plans to run for president, and is also speculated to be a potential Senate candidate against incumbent New York Democrat Chuck Schumer. It notably did not ask about former Vice President Kamala Harris, who has not said whether she plans to run again. She is also reportedly considering a bid for California governor. The poll also found that 47 percent of respondents disapproved of Trump's job performance, while 46 percent approve of him so far. An Overton Insights poll released last month showed that Harris would have a slight lead over Vance, with 45 percent of respondents backing her and 42 percent supporting Vance. That poll surveyed 1,200 registered voters from June 23 to June 26, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.77 percentage points. What People Are Saying Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling, wrote in the polling memo: "A key takeaway from the ballot tests is that about 13% of the electorate remains persuadable, while the other 87% have already settled on a party preference." Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in May: "Democrats do not have the best brand around here or in a lot of places. There's a lot of reasons for that. Some fair, and some not fair." California Governor Gavin Newsom told The Wall Street Journal in June: "I'm not thinking about running, but it's a path that I could see unfold." What Happens Next The 2028 presidential race will continue to unfold over the coming years. Typically, candidates do not announce plans to run until after the midterms, which will be held next November. But speculation about who may be gearing up for a presidential run is sure to continue.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Independent Michigan gubernatorial candidate Mike Duggan raises $3.2M in six months
Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan said on Friday that his independent Michigan gubernatorial campaign brought in more than $3.2 million over the past six months and has over $2.3 million cash on hand. According to the Duggan campaign, more than 93 percent of its donations came from Michigan. Duggan's campaign manager Ed Duggan also noted that the campaign has raised nearly $1.4 million over the past 30 days alone. 'As an Independent campaign, we can't rely on party infrastructure for our fundraising. We had to build everything from the ground up,' Ed Duggan said in a statement. 'Our numbers are a sign of the incredible grassroots energy we're feeling on the campaign trail. We couldn't be more grateful for all our supporters who made this possible.' Mike Duggan, who was elected mayor as a Democrat, launched his Independent bid for governor in December. The mayor's latest fundraising numbers come a day after Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D), the frontrunner in the Democratic primary, announced her campaign raised more than $3.5 million since its launch in January and has over $2.4 million in the bank. Benson and Duggan's hauls are both more than the $1.5 million Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D), who is term-limited, raised at this point in 2017 after announcing her first gubernatorial bid in January of that year. In this year's Democratic primary, Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist II's campaign said he raised more than $750,000, while former Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson said his campaign has raised more than $1 million. Gilchrist jumped into the primary in March, and Swanson announced his bid in February. On the Republican side, former state Attorney General Mike Cox (R), who jumped into the race in April, said his campaign has raised $2.4 million and has $1.9 million in the bank. Rep. John James (R-Mich.), state Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt (R), and former state House Speaker Tom Leonard (R) are also running in the GOP primary.