NST Leader: Travel ban? Yes and no!
But according to the Immigration Department, the answer was, at least on June 6 as Fahmi found out at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport as he was about to board a flight to Singapore, yes and no depending on whether it is the department's English or Bahasa website.
Being bilingual, Fahmi read both only to get different responses. How could one department have one system but two different responses, albeit in two languages? The English version said there was no travel ban, but the Bahasa copy asked him to contact the Immigration Department, suggesting there was a restriction of some sort.
Mind bending. The department did try to explain the puzzle through a statement, but it appears to blame the system. Little wonder, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has directed the department to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter.
Looks like nothing gets done without the intervention of the prime minister. Or in extreme cases, unless a royal decree is issued. We cannot take the nation to a good place if the public service only springs into action when intervention is from the top.
But that is the developing pattern we detect, when a blunder like this or road tragedies happen. We have a question for the Immigration Department's top management: Why didn't they spring into action the moment they detected the mess up?
Frankly, the Immigration Department has a lot more to explain on Fahmi's overseas travel ban controversy than merely issuing a statement that appears to point the finger at the system.
Now it has become a national issue, with the conversation being joined by non-governmental organisations and even former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission chief commissioner Tan Sri Dzulkifli Ahmad.
As an aside, there was irony at work in the case of Dzulkifli. It was MACC that requested the travel ban. All are agreed on one point: no agency should have unchecked power to restrict a person's freedom of movement. Or to put it differently, every agency that is given the power to do so — we can't deny our laws do empower agencies to do so — must direct itself properly in law.
This is an old public law principle expounded in the seminal English case of Wednesbury, which is part of our common law. Lord Greene there was speaking of the exercise of discretion, but if it applies to good judgment it must apply more so to the exercise of power.
Make no mistake. We are not saying freedom of movement or speech is absolute. There isn't a country in the world where either is absolute. But what is called for is transparent due process.
Our government agencies could do better when it comes to due process. The people, including Fahmi, must understand that there isn't absolute freedom.
Similarly, our agencies must know that there isn't such a thing as unchecked power. Power granted by the law must be exercised properly in law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
9 minutes ago
- Focus Malaysia
Zaid wants PMX, Tengku Zafrul to step down for bowing to US in lopsided tariff negotiation
PRIME Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul should resign for their complete surrender to US president Donald Trump who is a renowned tough negotiator. This is because if Malaysia had not agreed to buy US$240 bil worth of American goods, the tariff on Malaysian exports might probably stay at 25%. 'But instead of negotiating from a position of strength, they capitulated – and settled for a 6% reduction which brought the tariff down to 19%,' berated former de facto law minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim in a social media post. Both PMX and Tengku Zafrul should resign for their complete surrender to Trump. If we had not agreed to buy US $240 billion worth of American goods, the tariff on our exports might have been 25%. But instead of negotiating from a position of strength, they capitulated—and… — Zaid Ibrahim (@zaidibrahim) August 4, 2025 'What did we get in return? A saving of US$2.6 bil/year (RM10.4 bil/year) over the next four years based on Malaysia's current export value of US$43 bil/year. 'In contrast, we committed to buying US$240 bil (RM1.02 tril) in American goods, effectively trading RM24 to save RM1. How is that sound economic policy?' For context, Tengku Zafrul told the Dewan Rakyat yesterday (Aug 4) that Malaysia has agreed to buy and invest o ver US$240 bil with the US to reduce or bridge the trade gap between both countries, eventually securing the 19% tariff rate. The key deals include: US$150 bil in purchases by multinationals in Malaysia's semiconductor, aerospace and data centre sectors over five years; US$70 bil in Malaysian investments in the US over 10 years; US$19 bil Boeing aircraft order by Malaysia Aviation Group (MAG) for fleet renewal; US$3.4 bil/year in LNG (liquefied natural gas) purchases by PETRONAS; US$42.6 mill/year in coal purchases by Tenaga Nasional Bhd; and US$119 mil in telecom product purchases by Telekom Malaysia Bhd. Can the Opposition fare better? Zaid further questioned why had the Madani government bowed down so easily to Washington's demand given that 'Trump has less than four years left in office'. 'His protectionist lunacy, like all things Trump, is likely to end in chaos – either at the ballot box or in the courts,' argued the opposition-slant UMNO member. Datuk Zaid Ibrahim 'Why then are we so gullible? Why did our leaders panic at the first sign of pressure from a volatile foreign president?' Added Zaid who once served momentarily as the defence counsel of now incarcerated former premier Datuk Seri Najib Razak: 'This is not diplomacy. This is economic appeasement which comes at the expense of Malaysia's sovereignty and long-term interests. 'If this is what the 'Madani economics' look like, we are in deeper trouble than we thought.' While sone commenters concurred that both PMX and Tengku Zafrul 'could have 'screwed up the negotiations', realistically, it would be impossible 'to negotiate from a 'position of strength' when you have no strength'. Interestingly, few commenters wondered if ever the table is turned with Zaid himself in PMX's or Tengku Zafrul's shoes, would the politician with turncoat tendency have fared better? – Aug 5, 2025
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Cambodia-Thailand conflict negotiation, govt debt in focus at Dewan Rakyat today
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia's role in facilitating peace talks and a ceasefire in the Thailand-Cambodia conflict is among the issues in focus at the Dewan Rakyat sitting on Tuesday (Aug 5). Based on the Order Paper on Parliament's portal, Rodiyah Sapiee (GPS-Batang Sadong) will raise the issue with the Prime Minister during Minister's Question Time. In the same session, Datuk Iskandar Dzulkarnain Abdul Khalid (PN-Kuala Kangsar) will seek clarification from the Prime Minister on whether the Madani government managed the national debt responsibly. Meanwhile, in the question and answer session, Isnaraissah Munirah Majilis (Warisan-Kota Belud) will ask the Foreign Minister about the proposed Joint Development with Indonesia in the ND6 and ND7 Ambalat blocks. She will also inquire whether the same method would be used through the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Authority (MTJDA) or another method, ensuring the rights of Sabah and Sarawak are protected under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). Datuk Che Mohamad Zulkifly Jusoh (PN-Besut) will ask the Prime Minister to state the government's decision following a holistic engagement session with stakeholders regarding the status of the establishment of the Malaysian Ombudsman, as well as the next steps to expedite its establishment. Additionally, Jimmy Puah Wee Tse (PH-Tebrau) will ask the Defence Minister if the ministry planned to integrate the use of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology in the country's air defence systems. The Dewan Rakyat sitting resumed with the debate session on the 13th Malaysia Plan (RMK13) motion tabled by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim last Thursday (July 31). This Dewan Rakyat session will last for 24 days until August 28. – Bernama
Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Ginormous RM1t bill for small tariff cut
COMMENT | And so the cost of that reduction in tariff to 19 percent from 25 for Malaysian goods to the US is revealed as over US$240 billion - more than RM1 trillion - that's paying way too much for very little, leaving us gaping at the gigantic sacrifice made. Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz enumerated the concessions: US$150 billion in purchases by multinational companies in Malaysia's semiconductor, aerospace, and data centre sectors over five years;
