logo
Wimbledon says a call on a shot that landed out was missed because the electronic system was off

Wimbledon says a call on a shot that landed out was missed because the electronic system was off

The Hindu10 hours ago
A ball that clearly landed long in a match at Centre Court wasn't called out Sunday (July 6, 2025) because the electronic system that replaced line judges at Wimbledon this year accidentally was shut off for three points.
And, because the replay review procedure that used to be in place also has been scrapped, the chair umpire called for a do-over on the point at 4-all in the first set — much to the dismay of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, the player who would have won the game if the proper call had been made originally.
Pavlyuchenkova wound up getting broken there to trail Sonay Kartal of Britain, but she eventually did manage to come back to win the match 7-6 (3), 6-4 and reach the quarterfinals at the All England Club for the first time since 2016.
'You took the game away from me,' 2021 French Open runner-up Pavlyuchenkova told chair umpire Nico Helwerth at the changeover after the game ended.
Pavlyuchenkova, who is Russian, also said in the moment that the decision-making there went in Kartal's favor because she is a local player.
Next for Pavlyuchenkova is a match against No. 13 Amanda Anisimova of the United States, a 6-2, 5-7, 6-4 winner against No. 30 Linda Noskova on Sunday night. Anisimova also was a Wimbledon quarterfinalist in 2022; her best Slam showing was making the 2019 French Open semifinals at age 17.
At her news conference, Pavlyuchenkova said Helwerth told her following the match that he did think Kartal's shot landed out.
'I think he felt bad, a little bit,' Pavlyuchenkova said. 'He probably felt like he should have taken the initiative and called it out.'
Pavlyuchenkova also said Helwerth 'probably was scared to take such a big decision.'
Pavlyuchenkova was serving and had a game point when Kartal hit a backhand that landed beyond the opposite baseline, TV replays showed. But there was no sound of one of the recorded voices being used for the first time at Wimbledon to reflect when the technology being used in place of human officials determines that a ball landed out.
At least Pavlyuchenkova could joke about the whole episode later. Asked how she'd feel about it had she lost the match, Pavlyuchenkova responded with a laugh: 'I would just say that I hate Wimbledon and never come back.'
She also cracked that chair umpires are 'very good at giving fines and code violations' and never miss those, but perhaps it would be beneficial if they did a better job of noticing mistaken calls.
Kartal said she couldn't see where her shot went.
'That situation is a rarity. I don't think it's really ever happened — if it has. It's tough. What can you do? The umpire's trying his best in that situation, and he handled it fine,' Kartal said. 'I think the system just malfunctioned a little bit, and the fairest way was what he did: replay the point.'
Helwerth delayed play while he made a phone call from his stand. Eventually, play resumed, Pavlyuchenkova missed a forehand on the replay, then lost the game a few points later.
The tournament looked into it afterward and blamed 'human error,' saying that the line-calling setup 'was deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game by those operating the system,' according to an All England Club spokesperson, who added: 'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball-tracking technology.'
The spokesperson also said Pavlyuchenkova and Kartal received apologies from the club.
The French Open is now the only Grand Slam tournament that still uses line judges instead of electronic calls.
From 2007 through last year, players were allowed to challenge in-or-out calls at Wimbledon; a video review was employed to decide whether a line judge's — or chair umpire's — ruling was correct. That challenge system was removed for the current tournament, but there immediately were demands on social media from some tennis fans or observers to bring that back to aid chair umpires.
Pavlyuchenkova agreed, saying: 'We should probably look into something else to have better decisions.'
Taylor Fritz, who reached the quarterfinals with a win at a different court Sunday, didn't see what happened. But when it was explained by a reporter, his biggest question was why the chair umpire didn't just make the call himself if it was so clear what actually happened on Kartal's shot.
'The chair umpire has to make the call,' 2024 U.S. Open finalist Fritz said. 'Why is he there if he's not going to call the ball?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wimbledon 2025: Teenager Andreeva marches into Wimbledon last 16
Wimbledon 2025: Teenager Andreeva marches into Wimbledon last 16

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Wimbledon 2025: Teenager Andreeva marches into Wimbledon last 16

Seventh seed Mirra Andreeva outclassed American Hailey Baptiste 6-1 6-3 under the Court One roof to equal her best Wimbledon run by reaching the last 16 on Saturday. In a first week littered with fallen seeds, 18-year-old Andreeva has made reaching the business end of the tournament look like a breeze and is yet to drop a set. She has reached the third round of the doubles too with partner Diana Shnaider, also without losing a set. The Russian's clean hitting proved too much for 55th-ranked Baptiste who has enjoyed an impressive Wimbledon main draw debut, having reached the fourth round at Roland Garros. 'Honestly, today I was so focused today,' Andreeva, who is coached by former champion Conchita Martinez, said. 'I watched her first round and I knew it would be tough because she creates a lot of different stuff on the court and has a rocket of a forehand. 'With every match I play I feel my level is rising.' Three service breaks delivered a one-sided first set in 31 minutes but Baptiste loosened up in the second and produced eye-catching tennis of her own, especially off the forehand which often had Andreeva at full stretch. Had she taken any of the five break points she had when trailing 4-2 things could have got interesting but Andreeva held on, letting out a yell that echoed around the arena. Andreeva, the highest seed left in the bottom half of the draw, wrapped up victory two games later and will next meet either defending champion Barbora Krejcikova or American 10th seed Emma Navarro.

Wimbledon error call sparks controversy as electronic line system was off
Wimbledon error call sparks controversy as electronic line system was off

Business Standard

time3 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Wimbledon error call sparks controversy as electronic line system was off

A ball that clearly landed long in a match at Centre Court wasn't called out Sunday because the electronic system that replaced line judges at Wimbledon this year was shut off. And, because the replay review procedure that used to be in place also has been scrapped, the chair umpire called for a do-over on the point at 4-all in the first set much to the dismay of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, the player who would have won the game if the proper call had been made originally. Pavlyuchenkova wound up getting broken there to trail Sonay Kartal of Britain, but she eventually did manage to come back to win the match 7-6 (3), 6-4 and reach the quarterfinals at the All England Club for the first time since 2016. You took the game away from me, 2021 French Open runner-up Pavlyuchenkova told chair umpire Nico Helwerth at the changeover after the game ended. Pavlyuchenkova, who is Russian, also said in the moment that the decision-making there went in Kartal's favor because she is a local player. At her news conference, Pavlyuchenkova said Helwerth told her following the match that he did think Kartal's shot landed out. I think he felt bad, a little bit, Pavlyuchenkova said. He probably felt like he should have taken the initiative and called it out. She also said Helwerth probably was scared to take such a big decision. Pavlyuchenkova was serving and had a game point when Kartal hit a backhand that landed beyond the opposite baseline, TV replays showed. But there was no sound of one of the recorded voices being used for the first time at Wimbledon to reflect when the technology being used in place of human officials determines that a ball landed out. At least Pavlyuchenkova could joke about the whole episode later. Asked how she'd feel about it had she lost the match, Pavlyuchenkova responded with a laugh: I would just say that I hate Wimbledon and never come back. She also cracked that chair umpires are very good at giving fines and code violations and never miss those, but perhaps it would be beneficial if they did a better job of noticing mistaken calls. Kartal said she couldn't see where her shot went. That situation is a rarity. I don't think it's really ever happened if it has. It's tough. What can you do? The umpire's trying his best in that situation, and he handled it fine, Kartal said. I think the system just malfunctioned a little bit, and the fairest way was what he did: replay the point. Helwerth delayed play while he made a phone call from his stand. Eventually, play resumed, Pavlyuchenkova missed a forehand on the replay, then lost the game a few points later. The explanation offered by an All England Club spokesman: Due to operator error, the system was deactivated on the point in question. The chair umpire followed the established process. The French Open is now the only Grand Slam tournament that still uses line judges instead of electronic calls. From 2007 through last year, players were allowed to challenge in-or-out calls at Wimbledon; a video review was employed to decide whether a line judge's or chair umpire's ruling was correct. That challenge system was removed for the current tournament, but there immediately were demands on social media from some tennis fans or observers to bring that back to aid chair umpires. Pavlyuchenkova agreed, saying: We should probably look into something else to have better decisions. Taylor Fritz, who reached the quarterfinals with a win at a different court Sunday, didn't see what happened. But when it was explained by a reporter, his biggest question was why the chair umpire didn't just make the call himself if it was so clear what actually happened on Kartal's shot. The chair umpire has to make the call, 2024 U.S. Open finalist Fritz said.

Wimbledon organisers left embarrassed after electronic line-calling system fails
Wimbledon organisers left embarrassed after electronic line-calling system fails

First Post

time3 hours ago

  • First Post

Wimbledon organisers left embarrassed after electronic line-calling system fails

Another controversy hit Wimbledon 2025 as the new electronic line-calling system failed during Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's match against Sonay Kartal. This has sparked concerns over the technology's reliability. read more Another controversy erupted at Wimbledon after the new electronic line-calling system failed during a fourth-round match on Centre Court on Sunday. The system was accidentally turned off and missed three calls during the game between Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova of Russia and Britain's Sonay Kartal. Pavlyuchenkova was left upset after a backhand from Kartal clearly missed the baseline, and she was not given the point. The Russian stopped playing, thinking the point was hers. However, there was no 'out' call from the system, and the chair umpire Nico Helwerth had to stop the match. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We're just going to check if the system was up and running, because there was no audio call,' the umpire told the crowd. After making a phone call, he announced that the system had failed to track the ball and said the point would be replayed. Kartal won the replayed point and ended up breaking Pavlyuchenkova's serve to take a 5-4 lead in the first set. Even though Pavlyuchenkova went on to win the match, she was still angry about the incident. 'You took the game away from me… they stole the game from me,' she told the umpire during a break. After the match, she said the chair umpire had admitted he also thought the ball was out but didn't make the call. 'That's why he's there. I thought he would do that, but he didn't. Instead, they just said replay,' she said. Pavlyuchenkova also suggested the umpire might have been hesitant because Kartal is a local player. 'He probably was scared to take such a big decision,' she added. Wimbledon organisers apologise Wimbledon organisers later apologised for the error, but the incident has raised big questions about the technology's reliability. 'It is now clear that the live ELC system, which was working optimally, was deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game by those operating the system. In that time, there were three calls not picked up by live ELC on the affected part of the court. Two of these were called by the chair umpire, who was not made aware that the system had been deactivated,' a Wimbledon spokesperson said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Following the third, the chair umpire stopped the match and consulted with the review official. It was determined that the point should be replayed. The chair umpire followed the established process. We have apologised to the players involved,' the statement added. This year is the first time Wimbledon is using fully automated line-calling. However, not everyone is happy with the new tech. British stars Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu have also complained about the system. After losing to Aryna Sabalenka, Raducanu said, 'It's kind of disappointing… the calls can be so wrong.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store