North Dakota considers 2 proposed natural gas pipelines that would stretch across the state
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A state official briefed regulators Thursday on two separate underground pipelines that companies plan to build across hundreds of miles of North Dakota, bringing natural gas from the oil fields in the west to mostly industrial users in the more populated east.
Both pipelines — one by Intensity Infrastructure Partners and Rainbow Energy Center, the other by WBI Energy — would span about 350 miles (563 kilometers) roughly from the Watford City to Fargo areas. Segments would come into service in 2029 and 2030. The companies didn't disclose the projects' costs.
The presentation to a state industrial panel of elected officials was among the first steps in a process for the state to sign on with a 10-year, $50 million-per-year line of credit. That is essentially a backstop so projects can proceed with the intent that the state back out one day when other users join. Companies won't build a pipeline without firm commitments from users.
North Dakota has a critical need for more natural gas transportation as oil wells age and produce more natural gas relative to oil, North Dakota Pipeline Authority Director Justin Kringstad said.
Republican Gov. Kelly Armstrong welcomed the projects for helping oil production, which is a huge driver of the state budget.
'If you can't move your gas and you have a finite amount of capital to invest in drilling, you're going to drill where you can market your gas, or you're going to do it in a different manner," the governor said. 'So being able to move gas out of the Bakken (oil region) will help produce more oil.'
North Dakota is producing a near-record 3.5 billion cubic feet (99.1 million cubic liters) per day of natural gas.
The state has long wanted such pipelines, but efforts never succeeded in the past because of developments that hurt demand, such as oil price declines and the COVID-19 pandemic, Kringstad said.
'Today we're seeing a much stronger pull on the demand side than we've ever seen in these efforts," Kringstad said. 'We've always seen the push and the need in the west, but today the appetite across the state for natural gas and for energy is at the highest that I've ever seen.'
The gas will mostly be used for industrial purposes but also growing residential needs, he said. The pipelines could carry as much as 1 million dekatherms per day, a volume he said would be 'extremely meaningful in addressing the challenges that North Dakota is facing."
Capturing and moving the gas out of the oil field has been an issue over the years as officials and industry have sought to boost infrastructure and reduce flaring, or the burning of natural gas into the air. Although the state captured about 96% of the gas in April, critics have long raised environmental and health concerns about flaring.
The Trump administration has pushed for increased domestic energy production, largely from fossil fuel sources. Doug Burgum, a former North Dakota governor and now the U.S. Interior secretary, has long called for raising energy extraction efforts.
Other pipeline projects in North Dakota have drawn enormous pushback in recent years, including huge protests of the Dakota Access oil pipeline and landowner resistance around the Midwest to Summit Carbon Solutions' proposed carbon dioxide network.
Armstrong said some degree of pushback is likely, 'but the reality is pipelines are the easiest way to move things.'
It's unclear whether eminent domain, or the taking of private property with just compensation, will come into play for the pipelines. A Rainbow Enegry Center leader said Intensity Infrastructure Partners has never utilized eminent domain in more than 2,000 miles (3,200 kilometers) of pipeline it has built in North Dakota. A WBI Energy spokesperson said he couldn't answer.
Iowa-based Summit Carbon Solutions has faced intense opposition over eminent domain for its proposed five-state carbon dioxide pipeline. Some landowners have opposed eminent domain as the company seeks to build the pipeline, and South Dakota's governor earlier this year signed a ban on eminent domain for carbon dioxide pipelines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
40 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk calls Trump's spending bill 'utterly insane' as Senate gears up for a vote
Elon Musk is most definitely over. The Tesla CEO, who until recently was the face of the White House DOGE Office and Trump's efforts to cut government spending, had some more choice words for the president's signature spending bill on Saturday. "The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country! Utterly insane and destructive," Musk said on X. "It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." Senate Republicans managed to push the bill past a key procedural hurdle over the weekend, allowing debate to begin. A final vote could come as early as Monday. Republicans have hoped to get a version of the bill to Trump's desk by the president's requested July 4 deadline. Some lawmakers, however, remain opposed to the bill. Democrats, meanwhile, have remained united in their opposition, and have found a surprise ally in Musk. In his criticisms on Sunday, Musk focused on provisions in the bill that would terminate Biden-era tax credits for renewable energy, such as solar, wind, and battery manufacturing. Tesla, Musk's automotive company, has an energy generation and storage business that earned $2.7 billion in revenue during Q1 2025. The company also uses batteries and solar cells in many of its products. In response to an X post from Michael Thomas — the founder of Cleanview, a company that tracks clean energy development — who said the bill would likely decrease energy capacity in the country, Musk said the bill would be "incredibly destructive" for the United States. In another post, Musk shared a poll about the bill and said it would be "political suicide" for the Republican Party. He also reposted several posts criticizing the bill, including one by Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican. "'BBB' = our credit rating if this bill becomes law," Massie wrote on X. Trump's mega bill will impact nearly every aspect of American life, including healthcare, student loans, taxes, Social Security, Medicaid, clean energy, defense, immigration, tipping, AI regulation, and more. Musk's X posts echo remarks he made earlier this month when his feud with Trump took a public turn. Musk called the bill a "disgusting abomination" on X before laying into Trump's personal life. At the time, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Business Insider said the situation was "an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." The tech billionaire later apologized to Trump on X, saying he regretted "some" of his posts and that they "went too far."
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Republican Jack Ciattarelli can win NJ gov's race by opposing transgenderism: new poll
Republican Jack Ciattarelli can win the New Jersey governor's race this fall by campaigning against transgenderism, a new poll suggests. The survey, conducted for the conservative American Principles Project, found that 68% of Garden State voters oppose allowing biological boys who identify as transgender to compete against girls in sports, while just 22% support transgender participation. More than 70% of New Jersey residents also oppose taxpayer funding for gender transition or sex reassignment surgery for minors, while just 20% expressed support. Advertisement 3 New Jersey Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli can win the general election by campaigning against transgenderism, according to a new poll. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post In addition, 60% of voters oppose public elementary schools teaching about sexual orientation and transgender ideology, while 31% back such instruction, according to the survey of 500 likely voters by Cygnal. Ciattarelli is facing off against the Democratic nominee for governor, Rep. Mikie Sherrill, who is on record supporting transgender rights. They are vying to replace Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, who is term-limited and can't run again. Advertisement In the poll's initial surveying of voters, Sherrill leads Ciattarelli 50% to 43%, with the remaining 7% undecided. Voters are then told of Sherrill's position on transgender rights and other issues. 'Anti-Women's Sports: In Congress, Mikie Sherrill voted to let boys who identify as girls compete in girls' sports,' one statement said. 3 Ciattarelli will face Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill in the November election. Stephen Lovekin/Shutterstock Advertisement Sherrill also backed legislation that would 'open women's restrooms, locker rooms, and private spaces' to biological men or transgender individuals, 'advancing a radical agenda at the expense of safety for girls and women,' another statement read to voters said. Respondents were told that Sherrill wants to ban therapists from talking to children about their biological sex, instead 'forcing radical gender ideology on young kids over their parents' objections.' The race then turns into a dead heat — 46% for Sherill to 45% for Ciattarelli — after voters are informed of Sherrill's positions on transgender issues. 'The polling is clear, New Jersey families are fed up with the far-left's woke, anti-family agenda,' said American Principles Project president Terry Schilling in a statement. 'Now is the time for us to work together and flip New Jersey red so common sense can return to their state. Advertisement 3 Sherrill is leading Ciattarelli 50% to 43%, according to a recent poll. Christopher Sadowski 'The path to victory in New Jersey for Ciattarelli is messaging on the Culture War. This polling is proof that people in purple and blue states care deeply about protecting their families and will vote accordingly.' The APP said, 'Transgender and parental rights issues should drive the narrative of the race' because the issues cut across across party lines. The poll also found that 53% of Jersey voters say the state is on the wrong track, while just 35% said it's heading in the right direction. A majority of voters — 53% — also said pocketbook concerns including inflation/cost of living and taxes and government spending are the most pressing problem. Another 11% of voters cited illegal immigration and border security as most important. The survey was conducted for APP by pollster Cygnal with 500 likely general election voters on June 19-20. It has a margin of error of ±4.36% points. Voters were interviewed through an online panel or mobile phone text.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
One NY Republican has a massive edge in possible primary to face Gov. Kathy Hochul: poll
Upstate Rep. Elise Stefanik has a massive edge over other Republicans in a hypothetical party primary to take on Gov. Kathy Hochul next year, a new poll found. Some 64% of Republicans would support Stefanik — while only 8% would back Hudson Valley Rep. Michael Lawler, the survey of 1,108 likely Republican voters conducted by the firm co/efficient found. Another 6% polled said they'd support Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman in a hypothetical matchup, while 22% are undecided or back another candidate ahead of the 2026 gubernatorial race. Advertisement 4 A new poll found that 64% of Republican voters in New York state would back Rep. Elise Stefanik in the Republican primary for governor. AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana 'Among the most likely contenders Congresswoman Elise Stefanik is widely known AND widely loved,' co/efficient pollster Ryan Munce said. 'Over the last several years, Stefanik has become a fixture in both statewide and nationwide politics and is the face of change for New York State.' Still, Munce was surprised that Stefanik amassed a 56- percentage point lead over Lawler, a popular lawmaker and also a rising star in the GOP. Advertisement 'If I had my chips on the table, I thought Lawler would be in the mid-20s percent,' Munce told The Post. 'Typically, this early in an election cycle, a significant percentage of voters are still undecided and waiting to see who else may join the race,' the pollster added. 'Today in New York, that is not the case. Minds are made up and Elise Stefanik looks all but guaranteed to be the Republicans' choice to become the next Governor of New York.' Stefanik, Lawler and Blakeman are eyeing a run for governor against the Democratic incumbent but no formal campaigns have kicked off — yet. 4 Rep. Mike Lawler finished a distance second in the poll. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz Advertisement Stefanik, first elected to the House in 2014, has more widespread name recognition and popularity among Republican voters than Lawler or Blakeman, according to the poll. For example, 64% of Republicans had a favorable view of Stefanik, 11% an unfavorable view and 24% had no opinion or did not know her. By comparison, 25% of Republicans had a favorable view of Lawler, 9% an unfavorable view but a whopping 66% were unsure or never heard of him, the poll showed. Blakeman was viewed favorably by 17% of Republicans, unfavorably by 11% and 72% were unsure or never heard of him, according to the survey. Advertisement 4 Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman recieved 6% in the gubernatorial poll. Heather Khalifa for the NY Post Munce attributed some of Stefanik's edge to the fact she is chairwoman of the House Republican Leadership and has a higher national profile because she has served in GOP House leadership for a number of years. She was also nominated to be President Trump's US Ambassador to the United Nations — but the president withdrew the selection earlier this year over concerns he needed her vote in Congress as the GOP holds only a razor-thin majority in the House. Stefanik also had a prominent role grilling Ivy League college presidents over anti-Israel campus protests and antisemitism. 4 Another recent poll found that Lawler had a better chance at beating Gov. Hochul in the general election. Aidin Bharti/Office of Governor Trump suggested he was leaning toward giving Stefanik his blessing last month when he posted to TruthSocial an unsolicited endorsement of Lawler's re-election campaign for Congress — even though the lawmaker hasn't announced his intentions for 2026. Lawler took a jaunt upstate two weeks ago, making stops in six counties and meeting with over a dozen county GOP committee chairs, as well as elected officials and other party faithful. Advertisement Several of the local Republican leaders who met with Lawler said they would be happy to back him should he choose to go up against Hochul next year. One survey by Harper Polling claimed that Lawler — who represents the battleground 17th House District that takes in Rockland, Putnam and and portions of Westchester and Dutchess counties — would have a better shot at defeating Hochul than Stefanik, whose 21st District in the North Country borders both Vermont and Canada. Lawler's camp, when informed of the GOP primary poll, said Sunday the congressman is the stronger candidate in the general election. 'The real race is against Kathy Hochul and the data universally shows that Mike Lawler is the only Republican who can defeat her and actually get elected governor,' Lawler campaign spokesman Chris Russell said. Advertisement Lawler, first elected to Congress in 2022, has been a vocal critic of the controversial congestion pricing toll to enter Manhattan and has fought to increase the state and local tax deduction on federal returns for New Yorkers that was capped during Trump's first term as president. Munce anticipates that Stefanik, Lawler or a generic Republican would poll well against Kathy Hochul, given the governor's underwhelming public approval ratings in surveys. The co/efficient survey was conducted from June 18-20 via mobile texts and landline interviews and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.76% points.
