No 10 accused of ‘control freakery' over ban on civil servants speaking at events
The guidance, sent out from No 10 several weeks ago, was issued to ensure that ministers, rather than senior civil servants, should be the spokespeople for the government and at the forefront of communications with the public.
Senior officials may be allowed to speak at public events on a case by case basis if they have gone through rigorous clearance requirements and inform No 10 so that it can be scheduled or 'gridded'.
However, there is a presumption against them speaking where media are present or where they might have to take part in a question and answer session. Civil servants were told any such event 'should not go ahead'.
It had previously been reported by the Times that military chiefs had been restricted from making speeches where media were present – but the guidance has been sent out more widely and applies to all civil servants.
A senior government source defended the changes, saying: 'I don't think it should be controversial that government policy is announced and explained by ministers.'
But several senior civil servants said that the guidance had already had a chilling effect on engagement with the world outside Whitehall, with one blaming 'control freakery from the centre'.
It is understood some Treasury officials took a decision to pull out of an Institute for Government (IfG) event this week as a result of the advice, leading to it being cancelled.
The IfG criticised the guidance, with programme director Alex Thomas and director-general Hannah White, saying: 'This is an overreach and will damage the quality of government and public discourse.'
They said the clearance requirements were 'defensible but heavy-handed' but added: 'The No10 communications team has banned any official from speaking at events that include question and answer sessions, or where the media are expected to be in attendance, seemingly so that ministers are the only, rather than the primary, people able to represent the government in public.
'The strict nature of the guidance implies a very narrow view of what it is that officials do when they engage in public, and a failure to appreciate what the consequences might be of such restrictions.'
They also highlighted that Cabinet Office minister Georgia Gould had called for 'a civil service that is connected to the British people', saying that 'closing discussion down like this sends the opposite signal'.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
There was previously a furore in 2015 when Tory cabinet minister Francis Maude changed the rules to say that government employees are only allowed to speak to the media with prior permission from a minister.
Government sources said the guidance around speaking in front of media had long been in place and insisted it did not amount to a ban.
They also pointed to recent instances where military chiefs and Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer, had recently spoken in public.
A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: 'The principle of civil servants rules around media engagement are well longstanding and established, having been clearly outlined in the civil servant management code 2016 and the civil service code.
'It has always been the case, and a constitutional principle, that ministers are ultimately accountable for decisions making to parliament and the public – so it is right they are routinely scrutinised by the media and MPs.'
Earlier this month, No 10 was criticised for setting terms that prevented media from reporting speeches made by military chiefs at a Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) conference. Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton, the chief of the air staff, and Gen Sir Jim Hockenhull, the head of strategic command, were among those whose speeches were not allowed to be made public because they were made 'off the record' and on 'not for reporting' terms – in contrast to speeches given at the event by leaders from foreign militaries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rayner dismisses suggestions she could take Starmer's place
Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, says she would never want to be prime minister, joking that it would age her by 10 years within six months. She dismissed suggestions of replacing Sir Keir Starmer, despite a recent rebellion over his welfare reforms and growing criticism of his leadership. Ms Rayner defended Sir Keir, asserting he is doing the job for Britain by repairing international relationships and securing trade deals. Her comments follow polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice 's assessment that Sir Keir's first year in office has been the worst start for any newly elected prime minister. Ms Rayner expressed passion for issues like workers' rights and council housing, emphasising her commitment to serving the country in her current role.
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Politics latest: Rachel Reeves has Starmer's ‘full backing', No 10 says after chancellor cries in PMQs
Downing Street has insisted Rachel Reeves has Sir Keir Starmer 's full backing after she was seen in tears during PMQs. Ms Reeves wiped away tears as Kemi Badenoch told the Commons she looked 'absolutely miserable'. Labour minister Ellie Reeves then appeared to be holding her sister's hand as she left the chamber on Wednesday. It has been claimed by ministerial sources that the tears were a result of an argument with Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle prior to PMQs for which they said he has since apologised. The Speaker's office has declined to comment. But her tears came as the prime minister came under attack in a fiery PMQs over his failure to deliver £5bn of welfare cuts which were a crucial part of the spending review. He had refused to guarantee Ms Reeves' future as chancellor when pressed by Ms Badenoch amid growing speculation over a reshuffle to regain his authority. In the grilling at PMQs, Sir Keir insisted his benefits bill will be 'better for the economy' despite a £5bn hole now left in the government 's spending plans. And he refused to rule out tax rises. No 10 says Starmer backs Reeves after Chancellor's tears in Commons Rachel Reeves is 'going nowhere' and will remain as Chancellor, Downing Street said, despite Sir Keir Starmer declining to give her a public show of support. The Chancellor was visibly tearful in the Commons, as her position came under intense scrutiny after the welfare U-turn which put an almost £5 billion black hole in her plans. But allies said she was dealing with a 'personal matter' and No 10 said she had Sir Keir's 'full backing'. Jabed Ahmed2 July 2025 13:54 Labour MP who led welfare revolt calls for wealth tax to meet £5bn cost of U-turn The leader of the rebel Labour MPs who forced Sir Keir Starmer to abandon his welfare reforms has called for a wealth tax to meet the £5bn cost of the U turn. On Tuesday, the prime minister suffered the biggest blow to his leadership since coming into power a year ago after he was forced to shelve a key plank of his controversial benefit cuts in order to get them through parliament. While his welfare reform bill passed its second reading by 335 votes to 260 – a majority of 75 – the prime minister still suffered the largest rebellion of his premiership so far, with 42 Labour MPs voting to reject the legislation. The Independent's political correspondents Millie Cooke and Archie Mitchell report: Labour MP who led welfare revolt calls for 'wealth tax' to meet £5bn cost of U-turn Rachael Maskell blamed the chancellor for the scale of rebellion, saying the Treasury had chosen to 'find savings on the backs of disabled people' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:45 Tories demand to 'know what's going on' with Reeves after tears in Commons The Tories have said 'we need to know what's going on' with Rachel Reeves after the Chancellor was seen visibly upset during Prime Minister's Questions, which a spokesman has since said related to a personal matter. Kemi Badenoch's spokesman said 'personal matter doesn't really clear it up' and 'you normally tell people what the personal matter is'. Asked whether politicians should disclose all personal matters in their lives regardless of what they are, he said: 'That's an absurd question.' He added: 'I'm not going to speculate… I think we should find out what's going on.' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:40 Welfare revolt will not be 'defining story of this government', Cabinet minister says Welfare revolt will not 'be the defining story of this government', a Cabinet minister has said. Pat McFadden compared Tuesday night's backbench revolt to one under Sir Tony Blair in the 1990s, and told Times Radio: 'I have been around for a long time, and I have to reflect that it's not the first time this has happened with Labour on welfare. 'When we first came into government in 1997 we had a very similar size of rebellion on a similar issue: we had 47 Labour MPs voting against a welfare reform measure, we had 100 abstentions. 'The headline was, Blair suffers in benefits revolt and that government went on not only to reform welfare more, but to reduce child poverty, to turn around the NHS and to do a lot of other good things. So I don't deny that this has been a difficult process over welfare reform, but it's not the first time it's happened, and it is not going to be the defining story of this government.' The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster also defended Sir Keir Starmer, telling the same station he is the person who has 'set the direction' for the Government. Asked whether there are issues of policy or leadership, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster said: 'Keir Starmer is the leader who took the Labour Party for only the fourth time in its history from opposition to a majority Labour government.' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:30 Starmer will 'plough on' with 'busy agenda' following welfare vote, Downing St says Downing Street said Sir Keir Starmer would 'plough on' with his 'very busy agenda' when asked if the Prime Minister was planning for a course correction following the welfare vote. Asked whether Sir Keir would be changing anything about the way he operates after the fallout, a Number 10 spokesman said: 'The Prime Minister is fully focused on the job at hand. 'You've heard… the number of achievements this Government has secured in its first year in office. You can expect him to plough on with the very busy agenda.' 2 July 2025 13:28 Recap: The moment Starmer was challenged over Reeves' future as chancellor Kemi Badenoch accused Keir Starmer of forgetting that 'his welfare bill was there to plug a black hole created by the chancellor'. She accused them of instead 'creating new ones'. The Conservative leader went on to described Ms Reeves as looking 'absolutely miserable'. The chancellor was visibly tearful as the exchanges unfolded. Ms Badenoch continued: 'Labour MPs are going on the record saying that the chancellor is toast, and the reality is that she is a human shield for his incompetence. In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?' Sir Keir replied: '[Mrs Badenoch] certainly won't. I have to say, I'm always cheered up when she asks me questions or responds to a statement because she always makes a complete mess of it and shows just how unserious and irrelevant they are. She talks about the black hole, they left a £22 billion black hole in our economy and we're clearing it up, and I'm really proud that in the first year of a Labour Government, we got free school meals, breakfast clubs, childcare, got £15 billion invested in transport in the North and the Midlands. We're cutting regulation, planning and infrastructure is pounding forward, building 1.5 million homes, the biggest investment in social and affordable housing, and of course the three trade deals.' Mrs Badenoch replied: 'How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place.' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:18 With a £5bn hole to fill, the true battle on Keir Starmer's hands is only just beginning Sir Keir Starmer forced the tattered remnants of his welfare reforms through the Commons on Tuesday night, staving off what would have been an embarrassing defeat. The unedifying spectacle of a leader with a huge majority after just a year in Downing Street chopping and changing one of his flagship bills to buy off backbench rebels has badly damaged his authority. The Independent's political correspondent Archie Mitchell reports: The true battle on Keir Starmer's hands may only be beginning Sir Keir Starmer's capitulation on welfare cuts has dented his authority and raised questions about his judgment Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:15 Reeves crying in Commons over 'personal matter', spokesperson for chancellor says Rachel Reeves was crying in the Commons over a 'personal matter', a spokesperson for the chancellor has said. Asked about Ms Reeves' tears, the spokesperson said: 'It's a personal matter, which, as you would expect, we are not going to get into. 'The chancellor will be working out of Downing Street this afternoon.' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:11 Reeves 'is going nowhere' as chancellor and retains PM's 'full backing', Starmer's press secretary says Rachel Reeves "is going nowhere'' as chancellor and retains the prime minister's "full backing'', Sir Keir Starmer's press secretary has said. 2 July 2025 13:09 Starmer fails to say whether he has 'changed his mind' over Pip reform plans Sir Keir Starmer failed to say whether he has 'changed his mind' on the government's plans for reform of Personal Independence Payments (Pip) after a question from Liberal Democrat Sir Ed Davey. Sir Ed said in Prime Minister's Questions: 'Yesterday, the Government was asking this House to vote for a law that would mean someone with a condition like Parkinson's or multiple sclerosis would qualify for a personal independence payment (Pip) today, but someone diagnosed with the same condition with very same symptoms in a few months time would not. 'We all know that the cost of welfare needs to come down, but that was not a fair way to do it. Until he lost control yesterday, the Prime Minister was arguing for that approach. Has he changed his mind on this or not?' Responding, Sir Keir Starmer said: 'The Stephen Timms review will take place, a very important review to look into this issue. 'But what we did do last night was end mandatory reassessments for those with severe disabilities. I thought that he and his party cared about things like that. It's the right thing to do, and they voted against it. 'We rebalanced Universal Credit, long overdue. I think he believes that, but what did he do last night? He voted against it. We set out a pathway to reform, something he argues for every week, but what did he do when he had the chance? He voted against it.'
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Starmer's approach to welfare reform 'appalling'
First Minister John Swinney has accused the UK government of taking an "absolutely appalling" approach to welfare reform. MPs have backed changes to the social security system, but only after Labour ministers made major concessions to rebels that removed the bulk of the proposals for reforming disability benefits. Swinney said his own administration had taken "hard decisions", including tax rises, to fund a more generous system north of the border. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the bill still made the welfare system "better for individuals, better for the taxpayer and better for the economy". The Labour government's original reforms included changes to Universal Credit and tightened rules for those applying for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip).But ministers were forced to strip their bill of most of its significant measures under the threat of a backbench rebellion, despite having already watered down the changes to Pip would not have directly applied in Scotland, where the benefit is being phased out for a devolved alternative. Swinney described the handling of the reforms as "shocking".He told BBC Scotland News the proposals had "essentially preyed on some of those vulnerable within our society". The first minister said the UK government had now "essentially deserted their proposals".He said: "But what we've got to recognise in Scotland is that we must take our decisions and act in a completely different fashion to the process being taken by Westminster."The Scottish government has used its devolved powers over social security to set up a more generous system than in the rest of the UK - but that comes at a cost. According to the Scottish Fiscal Commission, social security spending reached £6.1bn in 2024-25. It is forecast to rise to £7.7bn next year and to more than £9bn by on social security in Scotland is already £1.2bn higher than the block grant funding it receives from the Treasury. The gap is forecast to grow to £2bn by the end of the decade. 'Hard decisions' To continue to fund the more generous system, Holyrood ministers will have to find £2bn from elsewhere in the budget, or from an increase in taxation. Scotland already has different income tax rates than in the rest of the UK. Those earning less than £30,300 pay slightly less in income tax than they would south of the border, while higher earners pay said: "That's the hard decisions we've taken on tax as a government to ask those who earn higher levels of salary within Scotland, to contribute more to our public finances, to make sure that we can run a fair social security system within Scotland."He accused the UK government of "ducking" the issue of income said there were a "range" of options the UK government could use to better "protect the vulnerable", citing taxation or a change to the Treasury's self-imposed fiscal UK government's original welfare bill was expected to save £5bn a year by 2030. The last-minute concessions to Labour rebels are expected to have significantly reduced any savings. Cabinet minister Pat McFadden told the BBC that his government would stick to Labour's pre-election pledge that it would not raise income tax. Pressed at Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir declined to repeat that guarantee. The prime minister said the bill would end mandatory reassessment of those with severe disabilities, "re-balance" Universal Credit and set out "a pathway to reform" of added: "It's consistent with the principles I set out throughout. If you can work, you should work. If you need help into work, the state should provide the help."The UK government had initially planned to limit eligibility for Pip, the main disability benefit in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and freeze the health-related element of Universal is being replaced by a devolved benefit, the Adult Disability Payment, in Scotland. However, any cuts to funding for Pip would have had a knock-on effect to the Scottish government's Credit is paid to Scottish claimants by the UK government, meaning any reforms would directly affect people north of the to the Labour administration's own impact assessment, the reforms would have pushed an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty by 2030. But ministers said that figure did not take into account a £1bn package of support to help disabled people and those with long-term conditions into work. The UK government argued Treasury spending on working-age benefits, forecast to rise by £27bn to £75.7bn by 2030, was unsustainable. But ministers were forced to water down the plans after more than 120 Labour rebels threatened to vote down the bill, with Scottish Labour MP Brian Leishman calling the reforms "horrific" for disabled the government's revised proposals, an estimated 150,000 people would have been pushed into poverty by 2030. Almost a third of Scottish Labour's cohort at Westminster joined the initial rebellion against the proposed welfare changes. However, most voted in favour of the bill on Tuesday after the government, in effect, removed some of the most significant reforms at the last minute to stave off Scottish Labour MPs – Leishman (Alloa and Grangemouth), Irene Campbell (North Ayrshire and Arran), Tracey Gilbert (Edinburgh North and Leith) and Euan Stainbank (Falkirk) – voted against the bill. The government has now promised that it will not change Pip rules until after a review of the benefit. Labour rebels have warned that if the government does not follow through on its pledge, the bill could still be defeated when it returns to the Commons next week.
