‘A stunning win for the defense': Experts react to Karen Read verdict
Read was acquitted of the three most serious charges she faced: second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence and leaving the scene of an accident causing injury or death. The seven women and five men picked as deliberating jurors convicted Read only of operating under the influence, a misdemeanor for which she will serve one year of probation.
Jack Lu, a retired Superior Court judge who followed the trial, said the verdict was a 'rejection of the quality of the investigation of homicide cases by the Massachusetts State Police.'
'It's a stunning win for the defense,' he said.
Dan Conley, a former Suffolk County district attorney and now a partner at Mintz, echoed Lu.
It's 'very clear that today was a very clear and decisive victory for the defense,' he said Wednesday evening.
While it's impossible to know what was going through jurors' minds, Conley speculated that prosecutors simply failed to meet the high burden of proving their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
He said the prosecution had a 'tough case,' noting the lack of eyewitnesses. Conley praised the performance of Hank Brennan, the special prosecutor hired by the Norfolk district attorney's office for the retrial, and Read's defense team.
'Both sides tried it well,' he said.
Read more: 'This is the best day ever': Karen Read supporters erupt in sobs and confetti
George Price, a partner at Casner and Edwards, who worked as a special prosecutor for the Middlesex district attorney's office, said the verdict returned by the jury was the right one based on the evidence.
'It was the prosecution's job to explain to the jury what caused John's ... death, and they failed miserably," he said.
Payal Salsburg, a partner at the firm Laredo & Smith, called the retrial 'the most expensive, longest battled jury trial on an OUI case.'
Indeed, Brennan, the special prosecutor, earned more than $220,000 to prosecute Read as of Jan. 25, 2025, alone, according to the most recent bills provided by the district attorney's office in response to a MassLive public records request. Significant funds were devoted to security, as well, with Massachusetts State Police troopers and Dedham Police officers patrolling the streets surrounding the Dedham courthouse.
Read sank millions into her defense, and faces an ongoing legal fight in a civil wrongful death suit filed by the O'Keefe family. Still, she is free from the looming specter of a potential life sentence.
'I'm still in a dream,' she told reporters from the SUV whisking her away from the courthouse on Wednesday.
Karen Read verdict: How the day played out before acquittal
Canton was 'deeply affected' by Karen Read murder trial, official says
'This is the best day ever': Karen Read supporters erupt in sobs and confetti
After acquittal, what comes next for Karen Read?
Alberts, McCabes say trial was 'infected by lies' after Karen Read's acquittals
Read the original article on MassLive.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
36 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump's MAGA allies zero in on Ghislaine Maxwell as Epstein furor persists
As President Donald Trump has struggled to contain the stubborn fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, several of his staunchest supporters and conservative media allies think they have finally found the key to exposing a secret cabal of rich and powerful pedophiles. Some of MAGA's most prominent voices say without evidence that Ghislaine Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years for sex trafficking girls for Epstein, has inside knowledge that would help law enforcement bring untold elites to justice.
New York Times
36 minutes ago
- New York Times
How Hulk Hogan Leg-Dropped the Digital Media Industry
Among the 99.99 percent of Americans who are not journalists, Hulk Hogan's name most likely summons a charming and patriotic cloud of associations: vitamins, 'real American,' ripped shirts, leg drops, mustache, pectorals, 'brother.' But among our diminishing tribe, Hogan's wrestling persona falls away, and the man, Terry Bollea, looms larger. Because he — not Hogan — was the plaintiff in an invasion of privacy lawsuit, Bollea v. Gawker, that reshaped the whole landscape of the media business. The tawdry story begins at some point in or around 2006. Bollea was having trouble in his marriage and was, by his own account, severely depressed. One day, he visited the home of his friend, a Tampa shock jock named Bubba the Love Sponge Clem. Clem invited Bollea to have sex with his wife, Heather. The two apparently had an arrangement. But Clem also had a hidden camera in his bedroom — and what he probably didn't mention that day was that he was going to burn the footage onto a DVD, label it 'HOGAN' with a Sharpie, and leave it in an unlocked drawer. It took that tape somewhere around six years to reach the Manhattan offices of Gawker Media, in 2012. At the time, Gawker was no longer a gossipy blog for the media elite and those just outside the walls. It was that, plus a news aggregator, plus a tabloid, plus an occasional source of literary essays. It was, without question, the most interesting and unpredictable of the rising class of digital media properties. According to a later report by BuzzFeed News, Gawker's editor in chief, A.J. Daulerio, used a somewhat circular logic to determine the video had news value: A Hulk Hogan sex tape was fair game because there had previously been reported rumors about a Hulk Hogan sex tape. Consequentially, Daulerio made the decision not just to confirm the tape's existence and summarize its lurid contents but also to publish a roughly two-minute excerpt from it. Bollea's lawyers tried to have Gawker take the video down, but the site refused. In 2013, Bollea sued Gawker — as well as Daulerio and Gawker's founder, Nick Denton — for invasion of privacy, seeking damages of $100 million. Then, rather than settle the suit, as Gawker seemed to expect he would, Bollea spent years pursuing justice through the courts before finally winning at trial in 2016. In the end, the court ordered Gawker to pay $140 million in damages, forcing the company into bankruptcy. Its flagship site was eventually revived under different ownership, then shuttered again in 2023. (Daulerio's inciting post no longer exists, not even in the Internet Archive; the one apparently faithful copy I could find had been pasted contemporaneously on a message board connected to a boating lifestyle brand in Lake Havasu City, Ariz.) As Ben Smith recounts in 'Traffic,' his recent history of the rise of digital media, Daulerio was a creature of the earlier, meaner Gawker days. As editor of another Gawker property, Deadspin, he published questionably obtained pictures of athletes' penises, posted a link to peeping Tom footage of the ESPN reporter Erin Andrews changing in a hotel room, and published a video of a visibly drunk female college student having sex in a bar bathroom. According to a 2011 profile in GQ, Daulerio heard directly from a woman he took to be the person in the video, begging him to take it down; he initially refused, but relented the next day, admitting to the magazine that what the video depicted 'was possibly rape.' The Gawker that published the Hogan tape wasn't yet the website that it would become in the public imagination; digital media hadn't yet taken the crusading and moralizing form it would later that decade. In 2012, the site — and maybe the whole country — was on the other side of a fulcrum that was hard to see at the time. Just one year later, another Gawker site, Valleywag, would post the news that a completely unknown communications professional, Justine Sacco, had made a racially insensitive joke on Twitter, which led to her firing — and inaugurated a tumultuous new era in American life. The signals from the commingling worlds of digital and social media were clear: Not even a non-wrestling civilian could be totally sure that the beam would never be turned on them. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
36 minutes ago
- New York Times
Competing Conspiracy Theories Consume Trump's Washington
OK, so President Trump's name is in the Jeffrey Epstein files. But who put it there? Could it possibly have been Barack Obama from his prison cell? Or a tranquilized Hillary Clinton? Oh wait, maybe it was etched onto the documents by Joe Biden's magical autopen. Or wait, is that mixing up different scandals? It's so hard to keep up with the latest wild notions circulating in the capital and beyond. Washington is awash in conspiracy theories these days, a cascade of suspicion and intrigue promoted or denied in the Oval Office, ricocheting around Capitol Hill and cable news and propelled at warp speed across social media. No commander in chief in his lifetime has been as consumed by conspiracy theories as President Trump and now they seem to be consuming him. They have been the rocket fuel for his political career since the days when he spread the lie that Mr. Obama was secretly born overseas and therefore not eligible to be president. More than a decade later, Mr. Trump is coming full circle by trying to divert attention from the Epstein conspiracy theory with a new-and-improved one about Mr. Obama supposedly committing treason. The harmonic convergence of competing conspiracies has overshadowed critical policy issues facing America's leaders at the moment, whether it's new tariffs that could dramatically reshape the global economy or the collapse of cease-fire talks meant to end the war in Gaza. The Epstein matter so spooked Speaker Mike Johnson that he abruptly recessed the House for the summer rather than confront it. The allegations lodged against Mr. Obama so outraged the former president that he emerged from political hibernation to express his indignation at even having to address them. The whispers and questions — 'this nonsense,' as Mr. Trump put it — followed the president all the way to Scotland, where he landed Friday for a visit to his golf club. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
