logo
America's public data needs rescuing from Trump

America's public data needs rescuing from Trump

The Hill2 days ago
America's public data is part of our country's critical infrastructure, every bit as important as our highways, bridges, railways, and dams. Roughly 300,000 public federal datasets, including GPS, weather, Census, and economic data, are an essential resource for policymakers, companies, state and local governments, and ordinary Americans.
Now the Trump administration is disrupting our data infrastructure in unprecedented ways.
Data experts across the country are alarmed by these changes, but they're also seeing the opportunity for positive change. The months ahead will determine whether we end up with an unreliable, inaccurate and deeply flawed data ecosystem, or a new infrastructure that is better and stronger than what we had before.
The administration began making changes to America's data systems within a month of the inauguration. It began by deleting government websites and datasets, which an ad hoc army of 'data rescuers' scrambled to save.
In the last five months, the changes to data infrastructure have gone deeper.
The administration has cut staffing and funding for data-providing agencies, altered or dropped specific surveys and data collections, disbanded advisory committees for the Census Bureau and other agencies that collect data, laid the groundwork for major changes to long-established data programs and removed data relating to sexual orientation and gender identity.
On July 3, The Lancet published research finding that 114 of 232 federal public health datasets studied, or 49 percent, 'were substantially altered,' primarily in how they referred to gender and sex.
My nonprofit organization has just published a white paper on the current challenges and opportunities for America's data infrastructure. Drawing on more than 200 sources and numerous discussions with data experts, we found a growing movement to reinvent America's data infrastructure, not just preserve it.
Advocates are simultaneously trying to rescue datasets and data programs while also envisioning something greater: a national data ecosystem that is more accessible, accurate, complete and secure.
Here are some of the best emerging opportunities to shape America's data future.
Working with Congress. The Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act (the Evidence Act), which President Trump signed into law in 2019, embodied a strong bipartisan commitment to public data for public use. In May, Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.) introduced a bipartisan resolution to convene a new Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking like the one that shaped the Evidence Act. There is an opportunity to build on the Evidence Act by strengthening the processes required to alter major data collections, writing more precise specifications for the most high-value data programs, creating clear guidelines for making government data AI-ready and more.
Reinventing federal data governance. The president's budget for 2026 recommends consolidating three statistical agencies: Census, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Many statisticians support this proposal and see it as an opportunity to make further, long-needed changes. The American Statistical Association has launched a project on Modernizing the Federal Statistical System with recommendations to come by the end of the year. Other expert groups could explore additional opportunities for structural reform.
Working with the states. States already collect data for national statistics on health, education and more, but variations in methods and data quality can make that data hard to use. Ongoing efforts to standardize state data could make it more reliable and leave the country less dependent on federal data collections.
Forming new collaborations. People and organizations that care about America's data are working together in new ways. For example, the Population Reference Bureau has launched a Federal Data Forum to promote information sharing and collaboration. Several foundation collaboratives are supporting projects to improve national data sources, both across the board and in sectors including science and health. We have launched a U.S. Data Action Hub, with about 70 resources so far, to track the growing number of organizations and initiatives working to protect America's data.
Reinventing data advocacy. Advocates are realizing that they have to make a stronger case for public support to preserve, fund and improve vital data sources. America's Essential Data is compiling examples of data used by police officers, students, ranchers and business owners, among others. The Census Project has stepped up its advocacy for the American Community Survey, an indispensable resource for businesses and entrepreneurs as well as state, local and tribal governments. Other groups are advocating for funding to support labor statistics and health statistics. Efforts like these are creating new coalitions that can protect our current data infrastructure, push for future improvements and provide evidence for lawsuits to protect essential data, like the recently successful lawsuits brought by physicians and organic farmers.
Developing new data sources. Data scientists are exploring alternatives to the federal data that's now at risk. They're looking for new ways to analyze national and state administrative data, which tracks government transactions and records, to gain new insights into the population. Crowdsourcing and citizen science projects can engage the public in creating new data sources. And AI has opened new opportunities to create structured, usable data based on internet searches, mobile applications and social media.
America's data systems are facing a crisis, but like any crisis, this one can open up new possibilities. Federal data serves a huge constituency that ultimately includes every American.
By thinking creatively and working together, we can preserve the country's most important data resources, improve what needs to be made better and ultimately create the robust, reliable data ecosystem America deserves.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dimon's delusional Powell support and more: Letters to the Editor — July 20, 2025
Dimon's delusional Powell support and more: Letters to the Editor — July 20, 2025

New York Post

time26 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Dimon's delusional Powell support and more: Letters to the Editor — July 20, 2025

Dimon's downer Gee, what a surprise: A big-time banking CEO like Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan is supporting the under-siege Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell in keeping interest rates high for Americans ('Dimon: Get off Fed boss' back,' July 16). The American people just came off four torturous years of an administration that made every decision against our best interests. The only way we survived this was with the hope of President Trump getting back in the White House to restore peace and prosperity. But Dimon says: Hold your horses, people. Despite surviving the worst administration of all time, you still can't get prosperous terms because it would hurt my bottom line. How does he sleep at night? Dimon clearly benefits from Americans continuing to suffer from high interest rates, claiming, 'Playing around with the Fed can often have adverse consequences.' Eugene Dunn, Medford PBS' public good PBS and NPR are not about politics or handouts ('Big Bird's Big Bucks,' Rich Lowry, July 15). They are trusted public services that reach millions of Americans with high-quality educational programming, fact-based journalism and cultural content. In rural areas, including much of upstate New York, local public media stations are often the only consistent sources of news and learning. That is not a luxury — it's a civic need. Lowry's article claims public media should survive like any other private business. But PBS and NPR are not built to maximize profit — they are designed to serve the public interest. Federal support — though modest, with around 15% for PBS and 1% for NPR — is essential for keeping these services accessible. Ask any parent or teacher what PBS means to childhood education; ask any listener in a news desert what NPR means to staying informed. Bo Hershey, Watertown A dud of a ruling I cannot understand how a judge could overturn Michael Bossett's conviction for throwing a grenade at the police officers who were arresting him for his role in the murder of Gabriel Vitale ('Judge's helping 'hand' to killer,' July 14). The most ironic thing about this affair is that Bossett's lawyer, Ron Kuby, called the conviction 'wrongful.' However, Bossett really did throw a grenade at the officers. When the grenade fortunately did not go off, he later pretended that he thought it was a 'dud.' There is nothing false about that. John Francis Fox, Sunnyside Halt bird-hawking A new local bill would ban pet stores from hawking birds ('NYC pet shops squawk,' July 15). Thank you to Voters for Animal Rights and Councilwoman Diana Ayala for attempting to right society's wrongs. Over 200 years ago, William Blake nailed it when he wrote, 'A robin redbreast in a cage puts all heaven in a rage.' For far too long, humanity has ignored that wisdom. Karen Dawn, Santa Barbara Calif. Defend ICE agents Left-wing radicals claim they are protesting ICE raids, but throwing rocks at agents is anarchy — not protest ('Begging for Civil War,' Editorial, July 14). These acts endanger officers' lives and can cause death. The head of ICE should issue a shoot-to-kill order when attacked by radicals whose acts constitute deadly physical force against law officers in the lawful performance of their duties. The rights of these people end when public safety is endangered. Gary Acerra, Staten Island Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

Ukraine Gets Major Abrams Tank Boost
Ukraine Gets Major Abrams Tank Boost

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Ukraine Gets Major Abrams Tank Boost

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Australia has sent Ukraine the first batch of dozens of U.S.-built M1A1 Abrams tanks that it had promised Kyiv for its fight against Russian aggression, according to the Defense Ministry in Canberra. Ukraine's ally in the South Pacific announced that Kyiv had received the majority of the 49 decommissioned tanks it had pledged, with the rest scheduled to arrive later this year. The delivery follows reported delays due to initial resistance from the U.S. about the American vehicles. An Australian army M1A2 Abrams tank is loaded onto U.S Army Vessel Paulus Hook in Townsville, Australia, on July 19. An Australian army M1A2 Abrams tank is loaded onto U.S Army Vessel Paulus Hook in Townsville, Australia, on July It Matters Australia is one of Ukraine's largest non-NATO partners and has been supplying Kyiv with assistance, ammunition and defense equipment since the beginning of the war. The delivery of main battle tanks could be a battlefield boost for Ukraine as it awaits further pledges of military support from U.S. President Donald Trump. What To Know Australia is providing 49 Abrams tanks to Ukraine to help its fight against Russia as part of a pledge it made in October. The delivery was delayed because of objections from the U.S., the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported, citing unnamed defense officials. Washington had warned Canberra against sending the tanks, and Trump's decision to pause military aid earlier this year may also have added to complications, according to the Australian outlet. Experts have voiced concerns about their battlefield effectiveness due to the vulnerabilities of the tank's roof to drones. However, the Australian Defense Ministry said on Friday that most of the tanks had been shipped to Ukraine, adding to the mobility and firepower of Kyiv's forces. The rest are set to arrive in the coming months. Ukraine also awaits additional military aid pledged by Trump on July 7, when he unveiled a plan to funnel weapons to Ukraine via a NATO- and EU-backed program. Retired U.S. Vice Admiral Robert Murrett told Newsweek that Washington's decision to provide more arms to Ukraine mostly through European allies was a good step, although the Kremlin is still convinced that conditions on the ground are working in its favor. Despite high Russian losses, Moscow is not interested in a ceasefire, in spite of Kyiv's willingness to accept such a move, added Murrett, the deputy director at Syracuse University's Institute for Security Policy and Law. He continued, "Both sides are likely to sustain the fight, and keep a close eye on arms, prospective additional sanctions and military activity in the skies and front lines in Ukraine." What People Are Saying Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said: "The M1A1 Abrams tanks will make a significant contribution to Ukraine's ongoing fight against Russia's illegal and immoral invasion." Australian Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy said: "These modified M1A1 Abrams tanks will deliver more firepower and more mobility to the Ukrainian Armed Forces." What Happens Next Australia said it would ship the rest of the Abrams tanks to Ukraine later this year. Kyiv also awaits other U.S. weapons. The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that its next Patriot air defense system, promised by Trump, would be sent to Germany rather than Switzerland to speed up its transfer to Ukraine.

Aspen forum attendees admit there's no return to a pre-Trump world order
Aspen forum attendees admit there's no return to a pre-Trump world order

Politico

time27 minutes ago

  • Politico

Aspen forum attendees admit there's no return to a pre-Trump world order

'I have a president and team that backs it up,' Boehler said of his efforts to free Americans. 'It gives me strength. When we decided to make a move, and the president decided to move on Iran for me, getting Americans out — that's going to get Americans out.' Given the administration's limited presence, attendees were forced to wrestle with how to address the president's many changes to foreign policy amongst themselves. The main approach at the conference seemed to be to at least avoid antagonizing team Trump. Much praise was offered for Trump's recent expressions of support for Ukraine and the success of U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in deteriorating Tehran's nuclear capabilities. And Trump's overhaul of federal agencies and departments was met with resignation and even some optimism. In informal conversations, there was recognition from some attendees that the State Department was overdue for reform to cut through decades of bureaucracy. The main protest was about the manner in which the cuts were being made. 'They all need reform,' said a former U.S. diplomat who attended the forum of USAID and State. 'There are a lot of challenges with how the bureaucracy is set up, and part of it is because of congressional demands. But this isn't reform. This is just dismantling and shutting down government bodies … and poor treatment of federal workers.' The former diplomat, like others cited, was granted anonymity to speak freely about the conference. Panelists and attendees also embraced the need to rethink the way that the U.S. offers foreign assistance. In one session discussing the future of foreign aid, panelists agreed that the Trump administration's pursuit of access to critical minerals in Africa's Great Lakes region represents an opportunity for alliances with countries that China has looked to court in recent years. 'There are a number of questions that rightfully should be asked, but I wouldn't condemn it outrightly. I think there is an opportunity to be had going down the line,' Comfort Ero, who leads the International Crisis Group think tank, told the audience. Especially on economic questions, attendees and panelists were quick to note that the protectionist tendencies Trump embraces are gaining adherents across the U.S. ideological spectrum. 'It's a big deal that you've now had two presidents of two different parties take a protectionist line,' former U.S. Trade Representative and World Bank Group President Robert Zoellick, said on one panel. 'That is a very big switch in the nature of trade politics.' Some attendees expressed frustration at what they saw as pandering to Trump, saying there was a missing opportunity to have more discussion on the main stage about the potential impacts of Trump's policies and governing style on U.S. democratic institutions and institutions around the world.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store