I Know You Don't Want to Hear This, but It's Time to Start Your Holiday Savings. I'll Make It Easy for You
Can you believe we have only six months until Christmas?
That can feel like plenty of time, especially when we haven't even started back-to-school shopping yet. But with stores starting holiday sales earlier and earlier, I want to be prepared. And with tariff uncertainty already raising prices, I want to be prepared so I don't overspend or turn to credit cards during the holiday season.
So yes, I'm saving for "the most wonderful time of the year" now, and you should, too. Here's my holiday savings plan and where I'm stashing the money until I need it.
How I'm saving for the holidays now
Starting this week, I have an automatic transfer set to move $50 from my checking account to my high-yield savings account every time I get paid. Since I'm paid twice a month, that will add up to $550 by Dec. 1.
By starting now, I'll also have a good amount saved if any deals or sales pop up sooner, like on Black Friday. If I buy a gift before I hit my $550 goal, I'll deduct it from my budget to avoid overspending.
If you also want to plan ahead, figure out how much you can comfortably afford to move into a savings account each pay period. Even if you can afford only $25 a month, you'll still have $150 saved before the end of December.
How a high-yield savings account makes it easy
I'm keeping my holiday fund in my high-yield savings account. I use Ally Bank, which offers a 3.60% annual percentage yield, but any bank offering you over 3.5% APY will do. I won't earn much in six months by only depositing a couple of hundred dollars, but it's better than what I'd earn by letting it sit in a checking account or traditional savings account earning 0.02% APY at best.
Ally's high-yield savings account also comes with two unique features that I love. First, it offers goal-tracking so I can see how close I am to reaching my holiday fund goal. And Ally's savings buckets help me keep my holiday fund separate from my emergency fund without opening a separate account.
Interest and savings features aside, keeping this money in an account separate from my checking and everyday spending prevents me from accidentally dipping into it. If you struggle with impulse buying, keeping money that's earmarked for other goals separate can help eliminate this temptation.
If you don't already have a high-yield savings account, check out CNET's recommendations. Look for an account with a competitive APY, no monthly fees and easy access so you can quickly transfer your funds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The McDonald's Boycott Every Investor Needs to Know About
President Donald Trump rode various waves of sentiment to return him to the Oval Office. One of the key areas of contention that got him re-elected was his attack on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Soon after his return, Trump swiftly acted to undo many DEI programs in federal agencies. Many companies followed suit, rolling back or eliminating their respective programs. Discover More: Read Next: Consumer sentiment has been balanced, but those upset by actions taken by corporate America have made themselves heard by imposing economic blackouts on firms. McDonald's is the latest company drawing the ire of upset Americans and their stock prices are reflecting that. Here's what investors should know. McDonald's was one of the first companies to roll back its DEI initiatives. 'We are retiring setting aspirational representation goals and instead keeping our focus on continuing to embed inclusion practices that grow our business into our everyday process and operations,' said McDonald's in a letter to its restaurant owners and operators in early January. The company announced numerous other changes to its DEI programs in the letter. Those moves didn't go unnoticed by The People's Union, a grassroots group that supports DEI and corporate responsibility. The group called for a boycott of McDonald's from June 24 to 30. Besides pausing DEI initiatives, the boycott of McDonald's was due to its perceived price gouging, use of tax loopholes, exploitation of workers, corporate greed and political corruption, according to a recent Instagram post. It's arguable whether or not economic blackouts work. However, the boycott of McDonald's couldn't come at a worse time for the company. The fast food chain saw U.S. sales decrease by 3.6% in the first quarter of 2025, making it the worst quarter since the second quarter of 2020. McDonald's serves 26 million customers in the United States daily. That's enough volume to withstand some slumps but given that it has seen same-store sales fall for two consecutive quarters, following it up with another quarter of losses won't look good. McDonald's isn't the only corporation to face economic blackouts. Firms that have faced similar backlashes include Amazon, Target and Walmart. Some faced a one-day boycott on February 28, whereas others faced extended boycotts. Amazon, for one, actually saw an increase in sales on its one-day boycott, according to Newsweek. Similarly, Costco experienced an impressive 22% increase in web traffic on February 28, thanks to its commitment to keeping DEI initiatives. Walmart saw a slight decrease, but Target fared significantly worse. The company faced a 40-day boycott due to rolling back DEI initiatives, and the retailer conceded sales were impacted by the action, according to CNN. Net sales decreased by 2.8% in the first quarter of 2025 versus the same period in 2024. It's debatable whether boycotts work, but the repercussions can vary widely. It won't be clear how McDonald's boycott led by The People's Union will impact sales until it reports its next earnings. Given how the restaurant has fared in recent quarters, investors may need to brace for further lagging sales. More From GOBankingRates 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on The McDonald's Boycott Every Investor Needs to Know About
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Microsoft Exchange 2016 and 2019 sunset, how can privacy-conscious organisations future-proof their email?
With Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 and 2019 reaching end-of-support in October, IT teams must make an urgent, strategic decision of either migrating to cloud-based services or staying on-premises. As major productivity solution providers continue to adjust their plan offerings, many organisations are grappling with sudden shrinking plan options, rising costs, and the phase-out of long-standing services. With Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 and 2019 reaching end-of-support in October 2025, IT teams must consider more than just a routine upgrade. This is a strategic crossroads, a decision that impacts how businesses manage communication, compliance, and data sovereignty, with significant implications for cost and control. Continuing on unsupported Exchange versions would expose businesses to serious risks, including the loss of security updates, vendor support, and compatibility with other Microsoft applications. Therefore, this shift marks more than just the end of a product lifecycle. It forces IT teams to make an urgent, strategic decision of either migrating to cloud-based services like Exchange Online or Microsoft 365, or staying on-prem with the upcoming Exchange Server Subscription Edition. Time is running out to evaluate the next move before the sunset. With mounting pressure to act, IT teams are left with a narrow window to weigh their options. The new Exchange subscription model introduces added complexity, requiring Software Assurance on top of server licences and client access licences, which can create significant management challenges for growing teams and small to mid-sized organisations. Similarly, cloud adoption offers agility and scalability, but organisations are increasingly weighing the trade-offs in compliance, cost control, and vendor dependency. Software-as-a-service (SaaS) expenditures have grown 27% in two years, averaging US$7,900 ($10,049) per user annually, according to spend optimisation platform Vertice. For heavily regulated sectors or cost-conscious public institutions, this trend raises sustainability concerns. In this landscape, finding a stable on-premise solution that guarantees robust security, privacy and price reliability becomes all the more crucial. Hosting email on-premises allows organisations to retain full ownership over their infrastructure and data, reducing reliance on external vendors and ensuring compliance with local or sector-specific standards such as European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, US's Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or ISO 27001. This can be particularly beneficial for teams in education, government, legal, or healthcare environments, where trust and traceability matter. On-premises solutions can also offer key advantages in data governance. With everything hosted within the organisation's own network — from mail services and user permissions to backup and access logs — administrators maintain full visibility into how data is handled and by whom. This level of control is increasingly critical in an era where organisations face tightening compliance regulations and heightened data privacy expectations. Some modern solutions now integrate email, storage, security, and auditing into a single appliance, enabling IT teams to simplify administration while strengthening governance and oversight. In terms of budget, modern self-hosted platforms can also break from the pricing complexity of legacy email systems. For IT teams managing large-scale infrastructure, minimising unpredictable licensing costs and integrating with existing systems is critical. A solution like Synology MailPlus, which runs natively on network attached storage (NAS) devices and follows a lifetime licence model, addresses both these issues. Ultimately, organisations today are not just choosing where to host email. They are choosing how to control and protect one of their most sensitive communications systems. Whether responding to evolving compliance demands or planning for long-term IT resilience, on-prem email remains a smart and strategic option for organisations that want simplicity, ownership, and security on their own terms. Learn more about how Synology MailPlus supports email privacy, data governance, and cost reliability here: See Also: Click here to stay updated with the Latest Business & Investment News in Singapore New AWS innovation hub in Singapore to support the training of 2,000 professionals annually M1 targets Asean growth with a heavier focus on enterprise tech consulting Singapore taps on AI to detect fractures, tuberculosis and streamline public healthcare delivery Read more stories about where the money flows, and analysis of the biggest market stories from Singapore and around the World Get in-depth insights from our expert contributors, and dive into financial and economic trends Follow the market issue situation with our daily updates Or want more Lifestyle and Passion stories? Click hereError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Harvard Business Review
27 minutes ago
- Harvard Business Review
Research: Marketing Tech Is Broken. Here's How to Fix It.
Although companies invest considerably in marketing technology (martech), it is often under-utilized, and its impact is modest. As part of our research compiling The CMO Survey, we (a team of two academics, two consultants, and a CMO) asked 292 senior marketers how they use the technology and why they may not be getting the best results. Marketing leaders told us that they intend to spend 24% of their budgets on martech this year. Nearly a third (31%) of survey respondents noted that marketing spend on martech five years from now will increase by 55%. Few companies are unaffected by martech, and these budgetary trends suggest that its influence is accelerating. In response to the question, 'How much impact are your current martech tools having on your company's performance?' the marketers reported an impact-score of 4.7 on a 7-point scale (1 = not at all and 7 = a great deal). A concerning 49% told us that their expected outcomes aren't matching the technology's real-world impact. They also told us that 44% of purchased martech tools remain unused. The stark contrast between the large and growing investments in martech and its uneven performance raises two questions: 1) What factors underpin this gap, and 2) How should companies systematically manage their martech activities? Our findings suggest that the investment-performance disconnect arises from an overemphasis on martech's operational aspects when compared to its organizational ones. The Martech Organization Report Card To help redress this concern, we offer the Martech Organization Report Card. It summarizes the organizational 'best practices' for driving martech usage and effectiveness. It offers a systematic approach to identifying and remediating specific impediments to martech's integration into the company based on self-reported measures. Companies can benchmark their martech integration strategy on these ten best practices to help improve organizational elements. 1. Refocus attention—look past budget. The CMO survey indicates that martech spend and performance are not related—more spend does not lead to more performance. This means that leaders should look past spending and think more about how they can better leverage these systems. 2. Pursue the right goals. Leaders adopt martech for many reasons, including some problematic motivations like imitating a competitor or a fascination with shiny new marketing technologies. Our survey contrasted these motivations against those with stronger strategic intent, such as alignment with company objectives and strategy and enhancing customer value. Results reveal that when organizations implement martech for strategic reasons they experience 20% higher usage rates and substantially greater impact. This premium likely emerges because strategically-sound motivations can position martech as a valuable decision-making resource rather than another marketing toy. A strategic focus is often more easily embraced. 3. Increase the reach of martech across the company. Martech can be siloed into marketing. But marketing is typically more effective when tightly woven into the operations of the broader organization. To test this idea, we measured how well martech tools enhance the performance of each part of a company's strategy across six strategy areas: marketing, CRM, sales, CX, customer insights, and operations. In some companies, only marketing and CRM benefited, while in others, the average performance benefits were more evenly spread across the six areas. Results show that when martech's benefits are deployed company-wide, its overall organizational impact increases from 4.2 (narrower focus) to 5.4 (broader deployments) on the 7-point impact scale. To achieve cross-functional use, you should involve managers from across the company in martech adoption and goal setting. You should also increase training on the use of martech in each functional area. 4. Get the right people involved. Survey data indicates that companies are not prioritizing martech talent. When asked to 'Rate the event to which you focus on the following activities when managing your martech strategy,' the lowest performing area is 'Hiring or retaining talent for managing/implementing martech strategy. Respondents rated retention 4.1 on the 7-point scale. By contrast, 'Optimizing or streamlining existing tools' commands far greater attention. Marketers rated it 5.3. This imbalance needs addressing. Martech's objective value may weaken and its perceived credibility may be undermined if you haven't assembled the right team. Getting the most out of new martech solutions requires leaders to cultivate an always on-culture for learning and development. They should also establish dedicated programs for onboarding and productively using these solutions. 5. Bring genAI to the martech table. Companies told us they use genAI in 15% of marketing activities, on average. Above-average users use genAI in 32.1% of marketing activities, while below average users leverage it only 4.3% of the time. Above-average users also experience a significantly higher (10-20%) martech impact score. For this reason, genAI and martech appear to be complementary assets. They make each other stronger and are often part of the same systems. Sadly, we heard of a marketer who builds a 27-step process to publish a single blog. That is totally unsustainable and unnecessary with genAI. 6. Empower marketing leadership. A striking difference emerges in martech effectiveness based on leadership. In organizations where marketing leads martech initiatives (66% of companies surveyed), the impact is 25% higher than in those where other functions lead, including IT. This disparity highlights the value of a marketing-centric approach. Marketers' customer-focused perspective can foster more effective identification and deployment of technologies to address specific customer pain points and opportunities. 7. Include metrics for long-term impact. Companies use a range of martech metrics. Some are short-term, such as lead generation, lead conversion, and content engagement. These are used by 60% or more of the companies surveyed. Some are long-term, such as customer satisfaction, loyalty, and lifetime value. These are used by half as many companies. Companies who focus on longer-term metrics realize a greater lift in the impact of martech relative to the lift from short-term metrics, which makes the emphasis on short-term metrics surprising. If 'what gets measured gets managed' holds, the longer-term focus on customer relationships over transactions should equate to managers focusing on generating repeat business and loyalty for the company. In addition, measures convey value. If martech focuses on tactical or short-term activities, it could be viewed as less valuable inside the company. Over time, this will likely undermine martech's credibility as a powerful strategic platform. 8. Infuse creativity to bolster martech impact. Companies increase martech's effectiveness when they infuse it with creativity. To test this idea, we assessed leaders' responses to the question 'My organization's long-term success depends upon its ability to foster creative ideas that can transform the business' (where 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree) and examined how they influenced the performance impact of martech. Results show that martech impact improves as creativity ratings increase. This is most likely to occur when the focus is on elements of the brand, social, and/or CRM strategy. 9. Keep a customer focus. Tech systems can assume a life and entitlement of their own. One can become distracted from the key purpose of generating more revenue and lowering costs. To test this idea, we asked corporate leaders questions regarding their customer focus, such as the degree to which their company 'has clarity around identifying who your most engaged customers are,' 'can harness data focused on your most engaged customers,' and 'effectively use insights to manage your most engaged customers' (where 1=not at all to 7=very well). In all cases, companies that score higher on these customer-focused strategy tasks report higher martech performance. 10. Audit martech systems regularly. Martech acquisition requires considerable effort and expense, and it's not uncommon for companies to have large teams or groups evaluating potential technologies for adoption. Once purchased, however, companies less commonly attend to the technology. While 'set it and forget' is easy, it commonly fails owing to non-use or gaps in the tech stack and rapidly shifting innovations in the space. When asked, 'How regularly are your company's martech tools audited and evaluated, only 30.9% of respondents perform audits at a cadence of six months or less. Yet we find that martech impact drops significantly when companies wait more than a half year to evaluate. The inquiry, data, and discussions that surround evaluation are as important as the audit. The discussion coordinates martech's goals and reminds participants about its proper use. Done well, performance evaluations can remediate martech deficiencies and aid in the decision to cut underperforming components. Importantly, the audit can benefit from use cases and in-motion martech initiatives. . . . Companies are increasing their martech spend because it has the potential to increase customer demand and lower costs. Our evidence suggests that the realization of these benefits is, in part, due to whether martech is integrated into the fabric of the organization. Our Martech Organization Report Card offers leaders across the company a framework to take stock of their investments to optimize their impact.
