Italy changes law on right to claim citizenship through great-grandparents
The law, which was introduced in March by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's right-wing government and came into force on Tuesday, now restricts the right to citizenship under jus sanguinis, or descendent bloodline, to people whose parents or grandparents were Italian.
According to the country's Interior Ministry, 80 million people worldwide are of Italian descent. And for those whose great-grandparents were Italian and who have spent time and money collecting documents and getting them translated and notarized in order to claim citizenship, the change is bad news.
They will now only be able to become Italian by moving to Italy and applying based on residency — which has already become more difficult under Meloni's government due to tighter visa rules for non-European Union citizens.
To complicate matters further, on June 8 and 9, Italians will vote in a referendum on a proposal to change Italy's rules on citizenship by residency. At present, non-EU citizens can apply for citizenship after 10 years of legal residency.
The referendum, which is predicted to fail and which the government does not support, would halve that requirement to five years. But if it does not pass, it could be followed by another referendum, which, if passed, would increase the requirement to 12 years of legal residency.
As it stands, those applying for Italian citizenship by residency need to provide proof of taxable income for all years of residency, and must have a minimum annual income of 8,263.31 euros (around $9,360) for those without children and 11,362.05 euros ($12,870) plus an additional 516 euros ($585) per child for those with children.
Applicants must also pass an Italian language exam and prove they have no criminal convictions in every country they've lived in. People applying for citizenship through ancestry, on the other hand, currently do not need to pass a language exam or prove income.
For many of those who had hoped to gain citizenship through their great-grandparents, moving to Italy for 10 years (or five if the referendum passes) is not an option. Gina Pace Trucil, an American who has been working on getting citizenship, expressed her frustration on a Facebook group for people with Italian ancestors working through the new laws.
'I submitted all my documents based on my great-grandfather,' she wrote. 'I wait the 3 years for my appointment, spent thousands of dollars and now they tell me I am not eligible.'
Samantha Wilson, who runs Smart Move Italy, a firm that helps people through the immigration process, called the law change terrible news.
'It is actually worse than we expected,' she told CNN. 'For many of our clients, this change has shattered their immediate plans of moving to Italy, as well as their long-term aspirations.
'It's also concerning for Italy itself, as the country is already facing a decreasing population. Many of these applicants were not only looking to connect with their heritage but were also planning to invest in property, start businesses, and contribute to the Italian economy. Now, that's no longer possible without a visa.'
Wilson recommends that people who want to make the move explore Italy's Digital Nomad Visa program or other visa options, according to their individual circumstances. Certain visas also mean the legal residency requirement is reduced.
For those who were in the process of applying based on their great-grandparent but are now disqualified, she suggests they challenge the law in Italy's constitutional court.
'Of course, only a judge can file a case to the constitutional court, but we need enough cases to be brought forward for a potential ruling,' Wilson added.
'This process will likely take over a year and comes with significant legal costs. If clients have already paid for the citizenship process, we suggest they continue moving forward and defend their rights.
'Overall, it's a very sad situation for many, and while we hope that the constitutional court will eventually rule on the matter, it's going to take time.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Alberta Forever Canada' petition sees potential hurdles according to Alberta political scientist
The countdown has officially started, and Thomas Lukaszuk has less than 88 days to garner over 290,000 signatures for his Alberta Forever Canada citizen initiative. Alberta's Chief Electoral Officer Gordon McClure issued the petition on Wednesday for a potential referendum that asks whether or not Alberta should remain in Canada. The petition was approved under older guidelines that the province had in place. In total, the petition needs to garner 293,976 signatures by Oct. 28. 'It definitely appears that a referendum on separation in this province was inevitable,' said petition originator and former progressive Conservative deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk. 'Our premier has done everything she could to make it as easy and convenient for the separatists to strike a referendum by lowering the number of required signatures, extending the time of petitioning, and really relaxing fundraising rules.' Lukaszuk ultimately decided to start a new conversation to contrast the voices promoting separatism in Alberta. 'That's why I chose to do it,' he said. 'I was fortunate enough to file my petition first; my petition meets all the federal Supreme Court of Canada and provincial legislative requirements.' They will officially be launching the campaign in Edmonton Saturday at the Strathcona Farmers Market at 9 a.m., alongside soliciting signatures from Albertans at public events, festivals, and knocking door-to-door. Numerous canvassers from Calgary have also signed up, but are currently in the process of being registered with Elections Alberta. 'They will probably be out in the next four or five days, because Elections Alberta is in the process of accrediting them and that's sort of a bureaucratic process that they have to go through, but there's no other way around that,' Lukaszuk said. Lukaszuk is confident they will hit their mark. 'It looks like there is a lot of appetite for it because there is no shortage of Albertans who want to sign the petition,' he said. ' We're inundated with questions of 'where can we sign,' so now the only challenge we have is getting (where they) can sign.' Hurdles and pitfalls Jared Wesley, University of Alberta political scientist and lead on the Common Ground Project, said the big question is where this initiative leads the province in the discussion around Alberta's future within Canada. 'I would think that this has got to be one of largest petition campaigns, not just in Alberta, but in Canadian history,' Wesley said. 'I can't recall a petition in Canada that would have had north of 250,000 signatures.' If they are able to garner that number of signatures in the dead-heat of summer, Wesley said it would be a great political feat. It's a high-risk, high-reward venture that will ultimately see where Alberta stands on the topic. 'If they get enough signatures, it does definitely support their claim that Albertans want nothing to do with separatism,' he said. 'If they don't, it has the potential to put wind in the sails of the separatist movement, who can claim their numbers are bigger than what the polls are showing.' Wesley hopes the petition isn't motivated by wedge politics. He views petitions and referendums as majoritarian instruments that are often used on complex issues that require discussion and negotiation. 'In a way, taking this to the streets and having these conversations in public removes it from the elite-style accommodation that makes federalism work in Canada,' Wesley said. 'Will this drive a wedge within the United Conservative Party? I'm not sure they need any more. 'They've got the federal byelection campaign that's drawn the leader of the federal party into discussions around this; the UCP has their AGM in the fall where this will be at the top of their agenda; and if anything, this petition adds one more potential area for division among the UCP caucus and cabinet.' With additional external pressures, Wesley said the petition will become another front where the UCP will need to pay attention. 'And that position is very unclear,' he said. In terms of the petition itself, Wesley said one challenge it may face can draw similarities from what federalists ran into during the Quebec 1995 referendum campaign. 'Albertans, like Quebecers, are not happy with the status quo, so selling them on the notion of remaining… (it doesn't) really capture the mood of Albertans, most of whom are not actually happy with the way things are going within confederation,' he said. One of the challenges he sees is avoiding the sell of 'what Canada is right now.' 'That's what the federalists did in Quebec in 1995,' Wesley said. 'Jean Chretien famously said that when somebody asks him how easy it is to campaign he'd say, 'It's easy, I have the best product in the world: I've got Canada.' 'And if that's the tactic that the Lukaszuk group is going to employ, I think they're going to find some resistance on the doorstep.' Another potential pitfall is making people choose between Canada and Alberta. 'The vast majority of Albertans strongly identify with their province and country, and more than that, they hate being asked to pick between the two,' Wesley said. 'If the Forever Canada campaign is only selling Canada and not talking about what it means to be Albertan and how being Albertan is also being Canadian, I think it's going to be a branding misfire.' If there's one thing Wesley would like someone to ask, it would be regarding laws surrounding the Alberta Prosperity Project (APP) petition and Lukaszuk's petition. 'Under law, you can't have two petition on the same issue,' he said. 'So, why is the chief clection officer asking the court to rule on the APP petition when he's already endorsed the Lukaszuk petition? 'Is he considering both of them? Or maybe he's getting ahead of it, like if the Lukaszuk petition fails I want an answer right away so the APP can get started with signatures. It's just odd to me.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Bill limiting use of sales tax passes
GUILFORD COUNTY — Voters will be asked again to approve a sales tax increase of 0.25% of a penny for every $1 of sales, but this time legislation dictates how the revenue must be spent if the increase is approved. House Bill 305 was amended by Sen. Phil Berger Sr., R-Rockingham and Senate president pro tem, to set parameters on how the revenue, estimated at $28.7 million a year, would be allocated, with most of it going for teacher pay. The bill passed the General Assembly this week. The Guilford County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously in mid-June to place the sales tax referendum issue on the November 2026 general election ballot. A little more than a week after the commissioners' action, Berger amended House Bill 305 to address the sales tax proposal. Berger, whose legislative district includes Guilford County and some precincts in High Point, has said he placed directives on allocating the tax revenue to assure Guilford County voters on how the money would be spent. Although the county commissioners have pledged that all revenue raised by the proposed sales tax increase would go to teacher pay, there was no provision in state law preventing the money from being directed to other purposes. 'House Bill 305 now provides them with information so they can make an educated decision,' Berger previously said. If the proposed tax increase is approved by voters and raises $28.7 million, this is how the money would have to be allocated, according to the new legislation: • Teacher pay supplements in Guilford County Schools, $19.2 million. • Guilford County Fire and Rescue Council for equipment purposes and capital expenditures, $5.5 million. • Guilford Technical Community College capital projects, $2.7 million. • Allocations for Whitsett, Summerfield, Stokesdale, Pleasant Garden and Oak Ridge, $1.3 million. Berger's allocation approach apparently was the first time that has been applied in North Carolina to a sales tax referendum. Whether it will change how Guilford County voters view the proposal is uncertain. Voters have rejected the same proposed sales tax increase six times in the past 20 years, most recently in the November 2024 general election. Solve the daily Crossword
Associated Press
2 days ago
- Associated Press
Turkish, Italian, Libyan leaders meet to address migration and Libya's stability
ISTANBUL (AP) — Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan hosted Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Libyan Prime Minister Abdul-Hamid Dbeibah in Istanbul on Friday for a summit centered on addressing migration, enhancing cooperation, and supporting Libya's political stability. A statement issued by Meloni's office following the closed-door session said the three discussed strengthening cooperation in the Mediterranean region, starting with the management of migration flows. Meloni praised the 'excellent results achieved' through collaboration with Turkey on migration control, saying that the lessons learned from working with Ankara should be used to support the Libyan Government of National Unity's efforts on migration, according to a statement by her office. Erdogan stated that 'long-term and sustainable' solutions were needed to eliminate the root cause of migration, according to a statement from his office. Libya is a dominant transit point for migrants fleeing war and poverty in Africa and the Middle East. Drowning incidents near the country's coast have been common. In December, at least 61 migrants, including women and children, drowned off the town of Zuwara on Libya's western coast. The Italian prime minister also reaffirmed Italy's commitment 'to Libya's stability, unity, and independence,' and its support for a Libyan-led, United Nations-facilitated political process leading to elections. The Turkish presidential statement said the three leaders would reconvene to evaluate decisions taken, following lower-level technical meetings. Oil-rich Libya plunged into chaos after a NATO-backed uprising toppled and killed longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi in 2011. In the disarray that followed, the country split into rival administrations in the east and west, each backed by rogue militias and foreign governments. Turkey has been allied with the Tripoli-based government in the west, but has recently taken steps to improve ties with the eastern-based government as well. In 2019, Turkey reached an agreement with the Tripoli-based government which delineated maritime boundaries between Libya and Turkey, angering Greece and Cyprus which say the agreement infringes on their rights.
