Former teacher says phone ban will not be easy
A former teacher and union rep has said a decision to ban mobile phones in Jersey schools and colleges "may encourage children to actually talk to each other".The Government of Jersey said the ban would include break and lunch times and apply to all students up the end of Key Stage 4.Ms Mauger from the NASUWT teacher union welcomed the change and said she spent much time in her teaching days telling students to put their phones away or down, and believed children would adapt.She said: "I don't think it will be easy.
'Easy to enforce'
"I think initially while children are getting used to this ban, they will try every manoeuvre they can to retain and use their phone in school."If a school has a good behaviour policy, which all Jersey schools do have, then it should be easy for teachers to enforce."Outside of school, she believes it is the responsibility of parents to monitor how their children are using their phones, including social media.The ban is set to come in from September, and she thinks it will help reduce the amount of "horrible things" seen by children online.
Local play champion and smartphone free childhood campaigner Emily Jennings said the parent community was heartened to see the guidance and recommendations for mobile-free schools.Ms Jennings believes the next steps for the government was to work with mobile phone manufactures to create more non-smart mobile phones for children."Currently if you walk into a mobile phone shop on the high street, there are very few," she said."Most of them are designed for old people with big buttons which are not cool for kids."
She said the announcement by the Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning Deputy Rob Ward promoting non-smart phone ownership for children was a first for the UK."They may not bring the phone to school, and they may have the smartphone that their parents may have given them before, but the education minister has recommended that parents don't buy their children a smart phone," said Ms Jennings."There are safer phones for children that do not have internet on them."
'Win for childhood'
Ms Jennings said the ban of the devices at school was a "real win for childhood". "Children are free to play with each other in real life without distraction from dopamine devices is just extraordinary," added Ms Jennings."This is a radical step and a real win for childhood."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
State pension plan £580 a week and retirement age 60 in 'living wage' campaign
A petition to Parliament is demanding the state pension increase to the equivalent of 48 hours a week at the National Living Wage, which pays £12.21 an hour for workers Campaigners are rallying for a dramatic increase in the state pension to over £30,000 a year and a reduction in the age of eligibility to 60. A petition to Parliament is demanding that the state pension be equivalent to 48 hours a week at the National Living Wage, which currently stands at £12.21 an hour for workers aged over 21. The campaign also advocates for a significant reduction in the retirement age to 60 - the current state pension age is 66 for both men and women, and is set to rise to 67 between 2026 and 2028. The petition implores: "We want the Government to make the state pension available from the age of 60 & increase this to equal 48hrs a week at the National Living Wage." Hence from April 2025 a universal state pension should be £586.08 per week or about £30,476.16 per year as a right to all including expatriates, age 60 and above. "Such a hike would more than double the full new state pension rate, which currently stands at £230.25 a week, or £11,973 a year. The campaigners have also voiced concerns that the government intends to make the state pension system less petition states: "We think that government policy seems intent on the state pension being a benefit not paid to all, while ever increasing the age of entitlement. "We want reforms to the state pension, so that it is available to all including expatriates, from age 60, and linked to the National Living Wage, for security." If the petition garners 10,000 signatures, the government will be obliged to respond. If it reaches a whopping 100,000 supporters, the issue could be up for debate in Parliament, reports the Express. To qualify for the full new state pension, you generally need a record of 35 years of National Insurance contributions. The full basic state pension currently stands at £176.45 a week, and typically requires 30 years of contributions. Individuals can check their projected state pension using the state pension forecast tool on the government website. State pension payments see an annual increase each April, thanks to the triple lock policy, which determines the percentage increase for payment rates. The triple lock ensures a pay rise in line with the highest of either inflation, average earnings growth, or 2.5 per cent. Based on recent figures, the earnings metric looks set to be the key determinant for next April's increase, standing at 5.3 per cent in the latest data. Inflation was recorded at 3.4 per cent for the year to May, a slight decrease from 3.5 per cent for the year to April.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Lord Hermer's denial of two-tier justice is a disgrace
This week, Lord Hermer was asked by the BBC about two-tier justice, the idea that the British state treats ethnic minorities more favourably than the white working class. This perception, so corrosive to faith in the rule of law, has become widespread since the crackdown on the Southport unrest last summer. Never one to read the public or political mood, Starmer's lawyer ally simply issued a blunt and contemptuous denial. Such claims are 'frankly disgusting', he said, and indeed 'offensive' to police, prosecutors and courts. He added that instead of criticising the British justice system, politicians 'need to get behind it, not seek to undermine it'. (Perhaps he should have a word with the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, who earlier this year had to intervene to block sentencing guidelines which she herself labelled 'two-tier'.) It's a woefully tone-deaf performance, suggesting that Hermer doesn't even understand why the Government's response to the Southport unrest gave rise to charges of unfairness. He argued that people were wrong to compare the policing of London Gaza marches, often awash with anti-Semitism but 'not producing violence', with the Southport unrest, since this saw attacks against police officers. No one would say violent rioters shouldn't be treated robustly. But what Hermer ignores is the way the state dealt fiercely with white, working-class Southport rioters in a way it never does with more favoured groups. Just weeks before, when rioters in ultra-diverse Harehills, Leeds, overturned a police car and set a bus on fire, the police reportedly ran away. Meanwhile, days into the Southport unrest, when armed Muslim mobs formed supposedly in order to protect their local communities, the police let them have free rein. In Birmingham on August 5, the result was a pub being attacked, with a man outside it suffering a lacerated liver, amid other disorder. Even more than this double-standard though, it is the punitive crackdown on online speech that has caused there were many who found themselves charged and remanded in custody for social media posts, the most high-profile is Lucy Connolly, imprisoned for 31 months for a single nasty tweet (which she later deleted) on the night of the Southport murders. As the Telegraph disclosed earlier this month, Lord Hermer personally approved the prosecution of Mrs Connolly for stirring up racial hatred, despite having the constitutional power not to. Hermer has also declined to seek to review lenient sentences for gang grooming offenders – but in his political judgement, it was in the public interest for Connolly to face up to seven years in prison over one nasty tweet. Former Attorney General Suella Braverman says she would not have consented to the charge. 'We don't have a two-tiered justice system', insists Hermer. We have an 'independent justice system'. But can anyone really look at the state response to Southport and claim it 'independent' from politics? Sir Keir Starmer politicised the justice system the moment he claimed all of those involved were 'far-Right thugs', who had come from out of town to cause chaos. In reality, subsequent analysis of the arrest data along with a recent report by the police inspectorate have poured cold water on those claims. Politicians were also swiftly claiming that online speech was a principal cause, with Hermer himself crowing that 'you cannot hide behind your keyboard'. This narrative was no less dubious – no one needed to be told by social media to be angry about the horrific murders of three children. Yet both became reasons for the police, the CPS and the courts to throw the book at people like Connolly over tweets. '[T]heir intention was always to hammer me', as Lucy told the Telegraph earlier this year. Lucy's two-tier treatment continues to this day. First, she was denied release on temporary license to care for her daughter and sick husband. This is a privilege which even murderers are sometimes granted, and which has been granted to others at Lucy's prison. Now she says she's being cruelly mistreated in prison. Does Hermer seriously think it's 'disgusting' to see this as unfair? Hermer can deny two-tier justice all he likes, but the more the public hears about cases like Connolly, the more the charge rings true. A recent YouGov poll found public confidence in the judicial system at an all-time low, with the proportion expressing 'no confidence at all' rising four per cent since last June. Berating people who feel these concerns will not make them go away.
North Wales Live
an hour ago
- North Wales Live
Prime Minister meets trainee pilots and sees a flight simulator at RAF Valley
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer met trainee pilots and their families and was shown a flight simulator on a visit to RAF Valley on Anglesey. The No 10. leader made the visit yesterday to help mark Armed Forces Day today as he prepared to attend the Welsh Labour Party conference in Llandudno. Armed Forces Day takes place on the last Saturday of June. It is a chance to show support for the men and women who make up the UK's military units. The PM was joined at RAF Valley by Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan MS and Welsh Secretary Jo Stevens MP. Today on Armed Forces Day there will be events to support serving personnel, service families, veterans and cadets. They will take place across the country with a national event in Cleethorpes, North East Lincolnshire. Get the best island stories from our Anglesey newsletter - sent every Friday It comes as the Government confirms plans for the first time that all government departments will have to legally consider the needs of the Armed Forces community when making new policy. More details of the legal duty will be set out in due course but could include initiatives such as extending travel benefits to the families of veterans and the bereaved, or flexible working for partners of serving personnel who are required to move as part for their role in the Armed Forces. The Government says this delivers on a manifesto promise and is part of the Government's commitment to renew the nation's contract with those who serve and following the Strategic Defence Review, which underscored the role the Armed Forces play in protecting our national security, which it says is the foundation of the Government's Plan for Change. The Government says it is committed to renewing its contract with the Armed Forces community, delivering two above inflation pay awards for service personnel and an extra £1.5bn investment this parliament to improve forces' family housing through the Strategic Defence Review. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: 'Across the country and around the world, our service personnel and their families make the ultimate sacrifice to keep us safe and protect our freedom and our way of life. 'When I became Prime Minister, I made a promise to serve those who have served us. Through the new Armed Forces Covenant, we are delivering on that promise - ensuring our service personnel, veterans and their families are treated with the respect they deserve - that is our duty."
