
Trump is getting his military parade in Washington. On his birthday.
The Army estimates the cost at $25 million to $45 million. But it could be higher because the Army has promised to fix any city streets that the parade damages, plus the cost of cleanup and police are not yet part of the estimate. While $45 million is a tiny fraction of Trump's proposed Pentagon budget of $1.01 trillion for fiscal year 2026, it comes as the administration seeks to slash funding for education, health and public assistance.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'It's a lot of money,' the Army spokesperson Steve Warren acknowledged. 'But I think that amount of money is dwarfed by 250 years of service and sacrifice by America's Army.'
Advertisement
The parade will include tanks, other vehicles, and helicopters.
Eric Gay/Associated Press
The Army is not calling the event a birthday parade for Trump. It is the Army's birthday parade. The Continental Army was officially formed on June 14, 1775, so June 14 will mark 250 years.
Advertisement
That also happens to be Trump's birthday.
Related
:
There was no big parade in Washington back when the Army turned 200 in 1975, when Vietnam War scars were still raw. While smaller commemorations were held at Army bases around the country, complete with dinner dances, barbershop quartets and cake cutting, few people were looking to glorify the military so soon after the Kent State shootings. Besides, the country was gearing up for big bicentennial celebrations the next year.
If things were going to be similarly low-key this time around, Fort Myer, across the Potomac in Arlington, Virginia, might be an ideal location, 'where the Old Guard could march with some veterans,' said Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the leading Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, in a reference to the 3rd Infantry Regiment, the Army's oldest active duty infantry unit.
'But this is Trump,' Reed added, speaking to reporters last week at the Defense Writers Group. 'It's consistent with so much of what he's doing.'
President Trump attended an Independence Day celebration in front of the Lincoln Memorial, July 4, 2019, that featured a flyover by the US Navy Blue Angels.
Alex Brandon/Associated Press
Army officials say the parade will cross in front of Trump's viewing stand on Constitution Avenue, near the White House, on the evening of Saturday, June 14, part of a big bash on the National Mall.
There will be marching troops who will be housed in two government buildings, officials say. They will sleep on military cots and bring their own sleeping bags, a topic of much merriment on late-night television.
There will be Paladins, the huge self-propelled howitzers, and nods to vintage style. Army officials want to outfit some troops in uniforms from the wars of long ago, like the one in 1812 or the Spanish-American War.
For more than two years, the Army has been planning national, global and even interstellar aspects of the celebration -- an Army astronaut on the International Space Station will be phoning in, Warren said.
Advertisement
But those planned celebrations focused on festivals, a postal stamp, various fun runs, military bands and the like. At some point this year, Army officials said, a military parade in Washington appeared in the plans.
Related
:
Still, officials say there are no plans at the moment to sing 'Happy Birthday' to Trump, or to the Army, during the parade. One plan does, however, call for paratroopers from the Golden Knights, the Army parachute team, to land amid the festivities and hand Trump a flag.
In 2017 during his first term, Trump watched the Bastille Day parade in Paris with President Emmanuel Macron of France and returned home wanting his own. But the Trump 1.0 Pentagon shut him down. Jim Mattis, the defense secretary at the time, said he would 'rather swallow acid,' according to 'Holding the Line,' a book by Guy Snodgrass, Mattis' former speechwriter.
'We're all aware in this country of the president's affection and respect for the military,' Mattis said tersely when reporters asked about Trump's wishes. 'We have been putting together some options. We will send them up to the White House for decision.'
President Trump, pictured with French President Emmanuel Macron, watched the Bastille Day parade on the Champs Elysees avenue in Paris, on July 14, 2017.
Carolyn Kaster/Associated Press
Gen. Paul J. Selva, then the vice chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Trump during a meeting at the Pentagon that military parades were 'what dictators do,' according to 'The Divider,' by Peter Baker, a New York Times reporter, and Susan Glasser.
When Mattis was gone, Trump brought up the idea again. Mattis' successor, Mark T. Esper, responded with an 'air parade' as part of July 4 celebrations in 2020, Pentagon officials said. An array of fighter jets and other warplanes flew down the East Coast over cities that played roles in the American Revolution, including Boston, New York and Philadelphia.
Advertisement
Officials in Trump's first Defense Department resisted his parade suggestion -- it was never a direct order -- because they viewed it as putting the military in the middle of politics, something the Pentagon historically has been loath to do.
But now Trump has Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and military leaders who have been more willing to put his musings into action.
This 'raises the question, 'Is the U.S. military celebrating Trump?'' said Risa Brooks, an associate professor of political science at Marquette University.
'Having tanks rolling down streets of the capital doesn't look like something consistent with the tradition of a professional, highly capable military,' Brooks said in an interview. 'It looks instead like a military that is politicized and turning inwardly, focusing on domestic oriented adversaries instead of external ones.'
There have been big American military parades in the past, but the last one was almost 35 years ago, to commemorate the end of the first Gulf War. Military parades in the United States have traditionally followed the end of major conflicts, such as the Civil War and the two World Wars. There were also military parades during three presidential inaugurations during the Cold War. And small-town festivities also sometimes commemorate the military with a few armored vehicles and troops.
'I don't actually see the problem with a military parade,' said Kori Schake, a former defense official in the George W. Bush administration who directs foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. Schake said more Americans need to see the troops who serve the country.
Advertisement
'If seeing our fellow Americans in uniform encourages public knowledge and connection, or inspires volunteering, it would be beneficial,' she said.
At the end of the day, 'the military won't die on this hill even if they do not like it,' said Peter Feaver, a political-science professor at Duke University who has studied the military for decades. 'Trump's 2.0 team is better at giving the president what he wants whether or not it is best in the long run.'
This article originally appeared in
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces 'massive' Japan trade deal
Donald Trump announced Tuesday a "massive" trade deal with Japan, marking a key breakthrough for major US trade partners as they scramble to strike agreements before the end of the month. In an attempt to slash his country's colossal trade deficit, the US president has vowed to hit dozens of countries with punitive "reciprocal" tariffs if they do not hammer out a pact with Washington by August 1. The breakthrough makes Japan one of five countries to have signed an agreement -- along with Britain, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines -- after Trump promised in April he would get "90 deals in 90 days". "We just completed a massive Deal with Japan, perhaps the largest Deal ever made," he wrote on his Truth Social platform. He said that under the deal, "Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 Billion Dollars into the United States, which will receive 90% of the Profits". He did not provide further details on the unusual investment plan, but said it "will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs". Japanese exports to the United States were already subject to a 10 percent tariff, which would have risen to 25 percent on August 1 without a deal. Duties of 25 percent on Japanese autos -- an industry accounting for eight percent of Japanese jobs -- were also already in place, plus 50 percent on steel and aluminium. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said that the autos levy had now been cut to 15 percent, sending Japanese car stocks soaring, with Toyota and Mitsubishi up around 14 percent each. "We are the first (country) in the world to reduce tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, with no limits on volume," he told reporters. "By protecting what needs to be protected, we continued the negotiations with an aim to reach an agreement that meets the national interest of both Japan and the United States," Ishiba added. "In this agreement with President Trump, I think we were able to realise such an agreement." - Rice imports - However, Japan's trade envoy Ryosei Akazawa, who secured the deal on his eighth visit to Washington, said the 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminium would remain. Akazawa also said that increased defence spending by Japan -- something Trump has pressed for -- was not part of the agreement. Trump said Tuesday that Japan has also agreed to "open their Country to Trade including Cars and Trucks, Rice and certain other Agricultural Products, and other things". Rice imports are a sensitive issue in Japan, and Ishiba's government -- which lost its upper house majority in elections on Sunday -- had previously ruled out any concessions. Japan currently imports 770,000 tonnes of rice tariff-free under its World Trade Organization commitments, and Ishiba said it would import more US grain within this. Ishiba said Wednesday that the deal does not "sacrifice" Japan's agricultural sector. Tatsuo Yasunaga, the chair of Japan Foreign Trade Council welcomed the trade deal announcement but said the business community needed to see details to assess its impact. "I highly commend the fact that this major milestone has been achieved and dispelled the uncertainty that private companies had been concerned about," Yasunaga said. Naomi Omura, an 80-year-old voter, said it was "disappointing that Japan cannot act more strongly" towards the United States. Tetsuo Momiyama, 81, said that Ishiba "is finished... It's good timing for him to go." Reports claimed Wednesday that he aims to step down soon following the election debacle. - China talks - Trump has been under pressure to wrap up trade pacts after promising a flurry of deals ahead of his deadline. The White House on Tuesday also laid out details of a deal with Indonesia, which would see it ease critical mineral export restrictions and also face a 19 percent tariff, down from a threatened 32 percent. Trump also said that levies on the Philippines, another close strategic US ally, would be cut by one percentage point to 19 percent after hosting President Ferdinand Marcos. But negotiations are still ongoing with much larger US trading partners China, Canada, Mexico and the European Union. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday that he would meet his Chinese counterparts in Stockholm next week. Leaders of the world's two biggest economies imposed escalating, tit-for-tat levies on each other's exports earlier this year, reaching triple-digit levels. But in talks in Geneva in May they agreed to lower them temporarily until August 12. bur-stu/dan Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Fox News
16 minutes ago
- Fox News
Obama's Henchman Fire Back At The Bidens
The Democrat machine strikes back at the Bidens, as the party's cold war hits a dangerous inflection point. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jerome Powell should resign, top economist Mohamed El-Erian says, citing a scandal Trump hasn't even mentioned
In a surprising turn, top economist Mohamed El-Erian has broken with convention among financial leaders by publicly calling for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to resign. El-Erian's comments, issued via social media and elaborated in press interviews, are remarkable not only for their candor, but for their counterintuitive reasoning: El-Erian believes Powell should step aside to protect the institution's independence in the face of multiplying political attacks. Most financial leaders who are insisting that Powell resist the pressure he's facing from Trump are the exact opposite, citing central bank independence as the reason Powell must stay. As the White House has ratcheted up its criticism of Powell, speculation has grown about potential leadership changes at the Federal Reserve. Donald Trump has been outspoken in his demands that Powell cut interest rates, a concern that El-Erian shares. But the scandal advanced by the Trump administration over Powell's oversight of a $2.5 billion office renovation is not part of El-Erian's critique. El-Erian, who has been an inflation hawk for nearly all of the 2020s, largely agrees with the White House on inflation, even if they may be coming at it from different angles. Trump likely wants rate cuts as a way to spur the economy ahead of the 2026 elections, although Trump demanded rate cuts in similar fashion in the last decade, when both he and Powell were in their first terms. The cuts that eventually resulted surprised economists as inflation stayed under control for a time—but the surge in 2021 was the biggest since the early 1980s. El-Erian was on the record then and now about saying that Powell undermined the Fed's credibility on inflation throughout this episode. On Tuesday, he stated that if Powell were a CEO in the corporate world, he would have already been forced out over the central bank's recent stumbles. Among the missteps: the Fed's much-derided assertion in 2021–2022 that inflation was 'transitory,' which delayed rate hikes and contributed to price spikes; the 2022 'insider trading' scandal involving several senior Fed officials; and the 2023 banking crisis around the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, which prompted what El-Erian termed a 'damning' internal report. In the first regard, El-Erian was often critical of Powell's reference to 'transitory' inflation, calling it a 'protracted gross mischaracterisation' in a December 2022 op-ed for the Financial Times. At that time, Powell was awaiting an Inspector General report on stock trading during the pandemic by two central bank governors. They were ultimately cleared, but the watchdog chastised both of them—and indirectly Powell—for undermining public confidence in the central bank, the same topic with whic El-Erian is still concerned. Although Powell was never accused of wrongdoing regarding the trading controversy, the episode led to stricter rules for central bank leaders and further eroded public confidence. Finally, the collapse in Silicon Valley Bank was unrelated, but chief regulator Michael Barr criticized lax oversight in an April 2023 report, arguing that it was partially responsible for one of the biggest banking failures in American history. El-Erian, former CEO of PIMCO and current president of Queen's College, Cambridge, told Axios and other outlets that Powell should bow out to defend the credibility and autonomy of the central bank. 'If your objective is to protect the independence of the central bank,' he told Axios, 'then it's better that he step down than he stays and the attacks multiply.' El-Erian warned that further assaults could undermine trust in the Fed with serious economic consequences. A 'lame duck' chair, and more attacks to come Powell, whose term expires in May 2026, is in a weakened position, El-Erian argued. The announcement of his replacement is expected by year end, and with a limited ability to steer policy, he is essentially a 'lame duck.' El-Erian argued that continuing attacks—regardless of their origin—will escalate so long as Powell remains in the role, increasing the risk of lasting reputational harm to the Fed. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's comments on Monday, calling for an examination 'of the entire Federal Reserve institution,' only heightened El-Erian's concerns. 'That is a red flag,' he said, suggesting the administration is widening its criticism beyond Powell to target the Fed itself. El-Erian predicted that if these political threats to central bank independence persist, markets could see a weaker dollar, higher interest rates, and a more volatile yield curve—destabilizing the economy further. Independence versus political pressure Trump's criticism of Powell has also expanded to the cost and management of the Fed's $2.5 billion renovation of its historic Washington, D.C. headquarters. Trump and his administration have accused Powell of mismanaging the project and potentially violating oversight rules, describing the renovations as 'ostentatious' and possibly 'fraudulent.' Specific complaints have included claims about luxury features such as rooftop gardens, private dining rooms, and executive elevators—many of which Powell refuted as either standard building updates or mischaracterizations by the administration. Trump has suggested that Powell's handling of the office renovation could be sufficient grounds for removal, although no evidence of fraud has been presented. In contrast, economist El-Erian's opinion of the real scandal is based on institutional credibility and internal scandals. El-Erian points to a series of reputational crises under Powell's leadership, with special emphasis on a high-profile insider trading scandal involving several senior Fed officials. In 2021 and 2022, some key regional Fed presidents were revealed to have been trading securities during periods when they had privileged policy information. Although Powell himself was cleared of wrongdoing by an independent watchdog, El-Erian argues that these scandals have eroded public confidence and harmed the Fed's credibility. The economist emphasized that the best outcome would be for the attacks to cease and for Powell to serve out his term in peace—though he considers that highly unlikely. El-Erian said the best-case scenario is for Powell to stay and attacks on the Fed to end, but he doesn't see that happening, making clear his conviction that a voluntary departure by Powell could help stem the tide and limit further damage. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data