LGBTQ+ advocates condemn Ohio budget plan to defund youth shelters, restrict books
The Ohio Senate Education Committee welcomed school district leaders, librarians, parents, students and other residents on May 14 for a wide-ranging hearing on the education funding within House Bill 96, legislation meant to outline Ohio's budget for the next two years. Watch a previous NBC4 report on the budget proposal in the video player above.
The more than 5,000-page bill covers a myriad of topics, and includes the following amendments that leading advocacy organizations said would harm the state's LGBTQ+ community:
Codify state policy recognizing two sexes, male and female, and that 'these sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.'
Require public libraries to place material 'related to sexual orientation or gender identity or expression in a portion of the public library that is not primarily open to the view of the persons under the age of 18.'
Bar funding to youth homeless shelters 'that promote or affirm social gender transition.'
Ohio congressman introduces bill to study 'Trump Derangement Syndrome'
'These amendments are not only discriminatory, but they are also detrimental to the welfare of thousands of LGBTQ+ Ohioans, and legislates harm against some of the most vulnerable members of our society,' said Dwayne Steward, executive director of Equality Ohio.
Steward condemned the provision to defund certain homeless shelters as 'a direct assault on the safety and well-being of Ohio's youth,' citing a 16-year-old student who was recently kicked out of their home in Troy for being transgender. It was only when the student found refuge in a Dayton youth shelter that offered LGBTQ+ services that they began to feel safe, Steward said.
'Stripping away funding from such shelter would leave countless young people without the support they desperately need,' the executive director argued, noting that a report from the Williams Institute at UCLA found 40% of homeless youth identify as LGBTQ+.
Dara Adkison, executive director of TransOhio, denounced the measure 'to recognize two sexes,' claiming the language is factually incorrect, contradicts medical, psychological, and legal understanding of sex and gender, and denies the reality of trans, nonbinary and intersex Ohioans.
'The language of this proposed budget rejects their lived experiences and reality. For many trans and intersex Ohioans, legal and medical transition is life-saving,' said Adkison. 'Attempts to erase or deny these rights through budgetary language would almost certainly invite legal challenge, costing Ohio taxpayers both financially and morally.'
Ohio bill would cap 'junk fees' on tickets for concerts, sporting events
Adkison cited the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Endocrine Society, which recognize that sex and gender exist on a spectrum. The executive director also noted Bostock v. Clayton County, a 2020 Supreme Court case that said sex discrimination includes LGBTQ+ people.
Ohio House legislators have long argued the sex provision is need given 'it's accepted science that there are two genders.' In April, Speaker Matt Huffman (R-Lima) said, 'This simply ends the discussion in the state of Ohio which I think most voters, most citizens of Ohio agree with, and it also prevents us from having months and months and weeks of arguments.'
Cookie Dixon, a trans Ohioan, testified against requiring public libraries to limit access to LGBTQ+ materials, and said such books were a pivotal part of their self discovery.
'Restricting these resources hurts queer children who were in the same place I was; I had no sense of self and was ready to completely give up before I began exploring my gender identity,' said Dixon. 'This also continues to perpetuate the harmful idea that queer people are obscene, something to be hidden from the eyes of children, a thinly veiled attempt at pushing us back out of the sight of the public as our mere existence continues to be illegalized.'
How Ohio lawmakers want to make schools safer
Sharon Hawkes, a former librarian and head of Right to Read Ohio, submitted testimony that the mandate would force libraries to remove any mention of LGBTQ+ people, and many child and teen biographies, literary fiction, romance, history, and age-appropriate sex education. Hawkes said a similar Idaho law forced at least one library to close to children because it didn't have the resources and space to isolate adult materials away from the children's section.
'This mandate would be very costly, forcing librarians to sift through their collections to find these books and perhaps remove taxpayer-funded books,' said Hawkes. 'It is also hurtful, telling certain minority communities that they should not be read about.'
H.B. 96 will continue to be debated in Ohio Senate hearings open for public testimony.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
95,000 D.C. residents at risk of losing Medicaid due to Trump bill
About 95,000 D.C. residents are at risk of losing health care coverage through Medicaid due to the Republican spending bill recently approved in Congress, the District estimates. Why it matters: President Trump's so-called " big, beautiful bill" impacts about 32% of D.C.'s Medicaid recipients, the District says, while also posing funding threats to hospitals and clinics across the region. The big picture: There are about 300,000 D.C. residents on Medicaid. To comply with the new law, D.C. (and other states) will need to build an employment verification system, so that residents 19-64 years old can document they completed 80 hours of work or service a month to be Medicaid eligible. "That is the biggest concern that I have," Wayne Turnage, D.C.'s deputy mayor for health and human services, told NBC4 in an interview. "It will bring some cost to implement." The work requirement takes effect on Dec. 31, 2026. Between the lines: The new federal rule comes as the D.C. Council is poised to pass the mayor's budget that takes 25,000 residents off Medicaid. More than 20,000 of those people will automatically be moved into a federal program called the Basic Health Plan, per NBC4. Zoom out: In Maryland, 175,000 people are projected to lose Medicaid coverage, according to the state Department of Health's new analysis. "Passage of this bill means families will lose access to essential health care, and hospitals and clinics will face funding shortfalls," David McAllister, a spokesperson for Maryland's Health Department, told the Washington Post. A congressional analysis estimated about 166,000 people in Virginia will lose Medicaid, in addition to 136,500 people losing Affordable Care Act coverage. What we're watching: Virginia hospitals are bracing for cuts to Medicaid payments that they rely on for funding. That's expected to begin in 2028, Axios Richmond reports.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Protesting in Ohio and Kentucky? Here's what you can, can't do under the law
Protests across Ohio on July 17 included an ICE protest on the Roebling Bridge in Greater Cincinnati that led to multiple arrests after a tense exchange between protesters and law enforcement officers. The rallies were organized in response to the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration, among other policies. Those arrested face charges such as rioting, unlawful assembly, failure to disperse, obstructing a highway, obstructing emergency responders, criminal mischief, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest, The Enquirer reports. What are your protest rights in Ohio and Kentucky? Can you wear a mask when protesting? Do you need a permit to organize a rally? Peaceful protests and assembly are protected under the First Amendment, but local or statewide restrictions still apply. Here's what protest attendees should know about their rights during demonstrations. Your rights when protesting: What Ohioans can and can't do during protests The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, assembly, and petition. Typically, demonstrations can happen in public places like streets, sidewalks, and parks. However, your freedom of expression could have limitations if it incites riots or violence. While not an exhaustive list, here are a few rules Ohio protestors must follow, according to the ACLU of Ohio and the Legal Aid Society of Cleveland. You can't protest on private property without permission from the owner. You cannot stop others from using a public space, such as by blocking traffic or pedestrian walkways. No fighting, rioting, or 'disorderly conduct' under Ohio law. Law enforcement can implement "time, place, and manner' restrictions like enforcing noise levels or permits. You may need a permit for events that block traffic or close down streets, or if you use amplifiers, such as bullhorns. Demonstrators are allowed to wear a mask as part of their protest, but they may be required to provide information if suspected of a crime. It is a federal crime to threaten to harm the president, the vice president, or a major candidate. Do not physically or verbally antagonize the police or law enforcement. Avoid carrying any drugs or weapons to protests. If arrested, you could face additional charges for possession. Refusing to provide information or providing false information when stopped is illegal. If you are arrested, the ACLU of Ohio provides additional guidance on what to do, such as not resisting arrest and your right to hire an attorney. What are Kentuckians' rights during protests? Similarly, the ACLU of Kentucky lists a few legal rules and tips for attending protests, among other suggestions, the Louisville Courier Journal reports: Your right to free speech is strongest in public spaces, such as streets, sidewalks and parks. Speech can be restricted on private property. In the event of a counter-protest, police can separate the two groups — as long as the groups can still see and hear each other. But they must treat protesters and counter-protesters equally. Memorize an emergency contact's phone number or write it on your arm in case you lose your phone or other belongings. If you are stopped by the police while protesting The ACLU suggests the following if you've been stopped by the police during a protest: Stay calm with your hands visible. Don't argue, resist, or obstruct the police, even if you believe they are violating your rights. Ask if you are free to leave. If you are under arrest, ask why and request a lawyer. You do not have to answer any questions. You can make a local phone call, and if you're calling your lawyer, the police are not allowed to listen. You do not have to consent to a search of yourself or your belongings. Police may "pat down" your clothing if they suspect you have a weapon. If you refuse a search, that may not stop them from searching you against your will, but objecting before it happens or during the search can be helpful in legal proceedings. Police officers may not confiscate or demand to view your photographs or video without a warrant, nor may they delete any data. If you believe your rights have been violated, the ACLU recommends writing down everything you can remember (including the officers' badge and patrol car numbers), contact information for witnesses, and pictures of injuries to file a written complaint. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Ohio protests lead to arrests: See protest rights, laws in Ohio, Kentucky Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Despite lawsuit, unclaimed funds for Browns stadium moves forward
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Part of the Ohio budget signed last week is already being challenged in court. As it stands, $1 billion will be taken from Ohio's unclaimed funds program. That money could be an uncashed check or a forgotten bank account that the state holds onto for its citizens until it is claimed. How Ohio's recently passed budget will expand driver's education requirements Lawmakers now want to use some of that money to build new sports stadiums while Ohio resident Felicia Snell said the move is misguided. 'A stadium is not going to feed a child; a stadium is not going to put someone in an apartment,' she said. 'It doesn't make sense to me.' Right now, that fund houses $3.7 billion. Lawmakers want to capitalize on what they call idle money and use it for a new 'Ohio Cultural and Sports Facility' fund. The $1 billion that is used will be money that has been in the fund for more than 10 years; $600 million of it will go to the Cleveland Browns for a new stadium. Snell did not know that the state plans to give $600 million to the Cleveland Browns or use the other billions of dollars in the fund for sports stadiums in the future. She said she is shocked the state hasn't notified residents. 840-acre Knox County solar farm approved; opponents promise to continue fight 'Since I'm not that important, I mean, I guess why not take it,' she said. 'They're snatching funds and not focusing on children who are with crime, people that are homeless, people in addiction.' So, what is the class action lawsuit? It argues that using unclaimed funds unconstitutionally seizes Ohioans' private property without due process. 'I'm confident we're on good constitutional grounds and I'm also confident that they're not going to be able to prove damages by anybody,' Ohio Senate President Rob McColley (R-Napoleon) said. 'Everybody who has money in the fund still has ten years to come get the money and so there is no harm, there are no damages for those individuals, so I think it's going to be a tough case to prove all the way up.' McColley said he does not think the lawsuit stands a chance, in the higher courts, at least. 'They may win it at the local trial court level but that's something that we're confident as it advances through the stages that we'll be successful,' he said. Ohio equal rights amendment would outlaw discrimination, void same-sex marriage ban Senate Finance Committee Chairman Jerry Cirino (R-Kirtland) said that unclaimed funds have been used before, like in emergencies. 'This is not the first time, and we didn't recall any challenges to those occasions when that money was used,' he said. The lawsuit was filed by Marc Dann, a former Ohio attorney general who also sued the state — and won — over $900 million in COVID-era unemployment funds for Ohioans. 'The way they've decided to do it, by taking people's money that doesn't belong to the state, is uncosted and it's unconstitutional for several reasons,' Dann said. 'One is the government can't take your money or your property without compensating you for that. Secondly, they can't take your money at all, for a, for something that's not a public purpose and I think there's a pretty good argument that a, a football stadium for, for, that will benefit only the Cleveland Browns and Jimmy Haslam is, is is, is not a public purpose. The third reason is that, that there's not good due process.' Unless the courts say otherwise, the money will be taken from the fund on Jan. 1, 2026. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
