
HC orders Punjab to free 412 prison inmates, says they ‘can't be expected to live at whims and fancies of state'
In an interim order this week, in the case of Malkit Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab, Justice Harpreet Singh Brar directed that all eligible prisoners be granted interim bail within two weeks. 'The incarcerated cannot be expected to live at the whims and fancies of the State, and neither does their incarceration entitle the administration to jeopardise their fundamental rights,' the judge observed, pulling up the state for its apathy.
The case has its roots in a surprise judicial visit to Ludhiana's jails in 2019, during which inmates flagged delays in the processing of their release. A fresh affidavit submitted on December 10, 2024, revealed that 412 such cases remain unresolved, prompting the court to act.
Justice Brar cited the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Sunil Batra vs. Delhi Administration, reaffirming that 'all prisoners shall be entitled to all the rights bestowed upon the citizens by the Constitution of India'. The judgment reiterates that incarceration does not strip individuals of their right to dignity, liberty, and due process.
The court directed chief judicial magistrates across Punjab to oversee the release process and required the state to submit detailed reports on all pending premature release cases from the last two years. The registry has been asked to forward the list of 412 inmates to the respective magistrates to ensure compliance.
Additionally, the states of Haryana and Chandigarh have been ordered to file affidavits with a month-wise breakdown of similar pending cases. The matter will next be heard on August 6.
Justice Brar's ruling also referenced the Supreme Court's recent guidance in the 2025 In Re: Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail case, which obligates states to consider eligible convicts for release even without formal applications. Quoting Nelson Mandela—'To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity'—Justice Brar underscored the need to shift from punitive incarceration to a reformative model of justice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
The KYC menace: Aadhaar-linked chaos frustrates daily transactions
The Supreme Court's instruction last week to include Aadhaar is supposed to ease this situation somewhat Listen to This Article The Election Commission's special intensive revision of electoral rolls presently underway in Bihar has come in for much criticism for its rigid approach, which is being deemed respondent-unfriendly, and with possible political consequences. The Supreme Court's instruction last week to include Aadhaar is supposed to ease this situation somewhat. However, in Aadhaar, and now its latest insistence on biometrics, we may have created another monster, which, in the name of adding to the ease of countless transactions, we need to undertake online almost daily, and which actually results in hindering many, making most people tear their hair. Another part is


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Our courts confirm we're like this only
It is what it is. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court confirmed that India is not a liberal democratic society that puts the right of freedom and speech on par with - never mind above - the right to dignity . In other words, being offended gets a free hand to take punitive action against the person offending. The 2-member bench was hearing pleas against five standup comedians making 'insensitive jokes' - as opposed to 'sensitive' ones - about persons with disabilities. Where criticism would have been an earlier standard response against offensive remarks (that lie outside the ambit of fomenting enmity between communities), Article 21 of the Constitution, providing right to dignity, as part of right to life and liberty, has been stated to legally 'trump' Article 19, the right to freedom and expression. This observation mirrors the reality of how Indian society weighs freedom of expression Hearing a separate case on the same day, another Supreme Court bench granted cartoonist Hemant Malviya interim protection from arrest. He has been booked over a January 2021 cartoon mocking the PM and RSS over Covid vaccination. Such protection can be considered the limit of Indian liberalism's approach to satire, coming as it does a day after the court criticised Malviya for his 'immature' cartoon that portrayed its subjects in an 'undignified' manner after the accused apologised and deleted the cartoon from social does not share the kind of liberal leeway that countries allowing lampoons of PMs, presidents and monarchs still do. Perhaps, in this regard, it is ahead of the curve in a world growing increasingly truculent against sarcasm and jibes that were once frowned upon by hypersensitive parties, but legally tolerated.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
SC asks Delhi govt to issue order declaring Lodhi-era 'Gumti of Shaikh Ali' protected monument
In a significant step, the Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Delhi government to issue a fresh notification to declare the historic, Lodhi-era monument "Gumti of Shaikh Ali" as a protected monument under the law. The two-judge bench of the top court, headed by Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, passed the direction to the Delhi govt after hearing an appeal filed by Defence Colony resident Rajeev Suri, who sought a direction to declare the Gumti as a protected monument under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 (AMASR Act). Suri had knocked the doors of the apex court after his plea was earlier dismissed by the Delhi High Court. During the course of the hearing on Wednesday, the top court went through some report filed by the Delhi government, including a notification and clarified that it was not 'happily (properly) worded'. 'Let the notification (to declare the monument as a protected one under the law) be re-issued by the Delhi government,' the bench told the Delhi govt. Making it clear that there should not be any illegal structures or encroachments near the area, the court asked the authorities to demolish the illegal structures, if any, inside the monument site. It directed the court commissioner to visit and inspect the concerned area and apprise the bench about the work undertaken in pursuance of the directions issued.