logo
More than 2,000 pubs have closed in Ireland in past 20 years, report says

More than 2,000 pubs have closed in Ireland in past 20 years, report says

The traditional Irish pub could become a thing of the past for many rural communities after a new report revealed that well over 2,000 bars have closed in the last two decades.
And it could get a lot worse as the same study has predicted that up to a 1,000 more pubs could close in the years ahead if action is not taken now.
Pub closures were on average running at around 112 a year but between 2019 and 2024 this rate increased to 128 annually.
Overall in the years from 2005 and 2024 the number of publican licenses declined from 8,617 to 6,498, a drop of 24.6%, the report commissioned by the Drinks Industry Group of Ireland (DIGI) found.
The rate of closure is highest in rural counties, with Limerick, Offaly, Roscommon, Tipperary, Laois, Longford and Mayo recording closure rates of over 30% between 2005 and 2024.
The report, compiled by Dublin City University economics professor Anthony Foley warns that more closures are imminent, especially in rural areas. He said: 'This report reveals a pattern of pub closures across Ireland, particularly in rural Ireland in recent years.
'The addition of profound economic uncertainty through US trade tariffs and reduced levels of inbound tourism further threaten the financial foundations of family-owned pubs across the country.
'In the absence of government intervention, we are likely to see a further 600 to 1,000 pubs close over the coming decade.'
The study found that all 26 counties experienced declines in pub numbers in the two decades to up until last year.
The highest decrease was in Limerick (-37.2%), followed by Offaly (-34.1%) Cork (-32.7%), Roscommon (-32.3%), Tipperary (-32.0%), Laois (-30.6%), Longford (-30.1%) and Westmeath (-30.0%).
The lowest decrease was in Dublin with a drop of -1.7%, followed by Meath with a decrease of -9.5%.
Wicklow had a decrease of 10.8% and all other counties saw a 13% or greater decrease.
One of the reasons for the dramatic rise in pub closures in recent years could be down to Covid-19 when the hospitality sector was devastated.
This led to an increased number of publicans calling time on their business with some selling their licences for up to €50,000.
The deregulation of pub licences over two decades ago opened up the market as licences could then be transferred for use anywhere in the state.
Some of these were snapped up by supermarket multiples eager to sell alcohol and were willing to pay over the odds for them. Other licences were sold to individuals and businesses intending to open an off-licence but the downside of these sales was that many small villages were left without a pub.
DIGI also claims the high cost of doing business is a major contributory factor to the rising rate of closures recorded by the report.
The organisation said that without immediate action by the Government many villages and small towns will soon lose their last remaining pub which would deal a devastating blow to the economic and social fabric of that community.
The Drinks Industry Group is now calling on the Government to use the upcoming Budget to introduce a 10% cut in excise, which they say is the second highest in the European Union.
'More than 100 pubs are closing every year in Ireland, due in large part to the high costs imposed by the State. Without immediate intervention, up to 1,000 more pubs will close for the last time, leaving their communities without a vital community and tourism hub. Once closed, such pubs rarely re-open.
DIGI secretary, Donall O'Keeffe, said: 'The Government could improve commercial viability overnight by cutting excise by 10%.
'With Irish consumption of alcohol having fallen to average EU levels, and likely to continue dropping, it is no longer justifiable that pubs should be faced with the second-highest excise rates in Europe.
'This is on top of a hefty 23% VAT rate. The time for the Government to act is now before it is too late.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spending slash planned for Budget 2026 over looming 30% US tariffs threat amid ‘significant job losses in Ireland' fears
Spending slash planned for Budget 2026 over looming 30% US tariffs threat amid ‘significant job losses in Ireland' fears

The Irish Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Irish Sun

Spending slash planned for Budget 2026 over looming 30% US tariffs threat amid ‘significant job losses in Ireland' fears

THE Government will cut spending in Budget 2026 due to the 'significant risk' of job losses caused by Donald Trump's tariffs. The Advertisement 2 The Government will cut spending in Budget 2026 due to Trump's tariffs Credit: Getty Images - Getty But on Saturday, Trump Tanaiste The EU plans retaliatory tariffs that will be imposed on American goods if the taxes do go ahead. An all-out EU-US trade war Advertisement Read more in News And the Public Expenditure Minister, Jack Chambers, warned a 30 per cent tariff could result in significant He said the Government will have to cut back on spending in the The "It would have a severe impact on growth, it could result in significant job losses and would really disrupt the international trading environment upon which the Irish economy is built. Advertisement Most read in Irish News 'That is a significant risk in the context of budgetary planning, and that's why fiscal restraint will be really important, particularly as we plan for Budget 2026. 'Within that, we need to see a moderation of current expenditure and also, we need to significantly address the infrastructure deficit.' President Trump previously claimed there is a major trade imbalance between the States and the EU and he wants more 'Trump's new tariffs are outrageous', slams EU lawmaker after Don slaps 30% on Brussels & it readies to fight back In a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Trump warned Europe not to respond with tariffs of their own or he would hit back once again by jacking up his taxes. Advertisement He said: 'The European Union will allow complete, open market access to the United States, with no tariffs being charged to us, in an attempt to reduce the large trade deficit. 'If for any reason you decide to raise your tariffs and retaliate, then, whatever the number you chose to raise them by, will be added onto the 30 per cent that we charge." PREFERENCE IS CLEAR Taoiseach He said last week: 'While it has been clear that all options remain on the table, the EU has also been clear that our preference is for a negotiated solution that avoids escalation. That remains the case. Advertisement 'I hope that negotiations will continue in the weeks ahead and that they will be successful. 'The EU and the US should be partners, not rivals. In a true partnership, everyone wins. 'The EU negotiators continue to have my full support in this important work." 2 Jack Chambers warned a 30 per cent tariff could result in significant job losses Credit: Brian Lawless/PA Wire Advertisement

Butler brothers secure stay on order restricting them from acting as company directors
Butler brothers secure stay on order restricting them from acting as company directors

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Butler brothers secure stay on order restricting them from acting as company directors

Two brothers behind a number of high-profile Irish franchises — including several Starbucks cafes, TGI Fridays, Mao and Hard Rock Cafe — have secured a stay on a court order restricting them from acting as directors. In a judgment published last month, Ms Justice Nessa Cahill found Colum and Ciaran Butler failed to prove they acted responsibly in the operation of one of their companies, Downtul Ltd, which leased a premises at St Stephen's Green, Dublin, that operated as a Starbucks. Downtul was placed in voluntary liquidation in November 2022. The judge granted a declaration sought by Downtul liquidator Patrick O'Connell restricting the brothers from acting as company directors or secretaries for five years unless the company meets certain requirements set out in the Companies Act 2014. Such an order means that, for the Butler brothers to act as directors of a company during that five-year period, that company must have share capital of at least €100,000 paid up by shareholders — or €500,000 in the case of a public limited company. The judge had found the brothers did discharge the burden of showing they acted honestly in the operation of Downtul. Lawyers for the Butlers on Tuesday successfully applied for a stay on the order, after submitting their clients would require time to get their affairs in order. Brian McGuckian told the court his instructions were to seek a stay on the order for six months, for two reasons. He said he was firstly seeking the stay to allow the Butlers time to organise their affairs, noting Ciaran is the director of 134 companies, while Colum is the director of more than 170 companies. Mr McGuckian said there was a general practice of the court affording directors time to organise their affairs in the context of an order of this kind. He said he was also seeking a stay pending a possible appeal being brought against the High Court decision. Padraic Lyons SC, for the receiver, said there was an obvious distinction between the granting of a stay pending an appeal, and a stay to allow the directors to get their affairs in order. His side had received no correspondence on a potential appeal, and there were no draft grounds of appeal before the court. It was a matter for the directors to put before the court arguable grounds for appeal, he said. Mr Lyons agreed there should be a stay granted to allow the directors to organise their affairs, but submitted that six months was an excessive amount of time. Ms Justice Nessa Cahill said she would grant a stay of four months to allow the Butlers to organise their affairs. She said she was not granting the stay pending a possible appeal, but noted the granted stay will be the same terms had she acceded to the application for a stay pending appeal. It was a matter for the respondents if they wished to bring an applicant to appeal, she said.

New labels on alcohol about health risks to be pushed back until 2029
New labels on alcohol about health risks to be pushed back until 2029

Irish Independent

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

New labels on alcohol about health risks to be pushed back until 2029

Ibec said the labels should be paused as they are hiking labelling costs by 30pc of alcoholic products. The lobby group previously accused the Department of Health of 'railroading' the law underpinning the new alcohol labels and said the Government is going on a 'solo run' by bringing the labels in. The Government previously signalled it would pause the labels due to the extra costs facing businesses already in light of new US tariffs. Plans to postpone the requirement for the new labels were indicated in a letter sent to members of the Government's trade forum by Tánaiste Simon Harris. Senior ministers Peter Burke and Martin Heydon asked their Fine Gael Cabinet colleague Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill to push back the roll out of the labels. Minister Carroll MacNeill will be the Minister tasked with signing the statutory instrument which will give impact to the new laws. But it is now expected they will not kick in until 2029. Under the new laws, labels on alcohol products will warn about the risk of liver disease and fatal cancers from alcohol consumption. The labels were supposed to roll out next May and will make Ireland the first country to have mandatory health warning labels on all alcoholic beverages. In his push for the labels to be delayed, Minister Heydon said he had concerns about the impact on 'jobs and investment'. ADVERTISEMENT 'The concerns I brought to the discussion were the economic issues which had been conveyed to us at an international level, especially from the US,' he said in a statement previously. 'This included the impact on jobs and investment. We have strong exports of Irish whiskey especially to the US. The Tánaiste previously told the Dáil the Government needs to 'consider' the timeline due to a 'very new trade environment'. Alcohol Action said it is "bizarre" the Government would delay rollout of the labels and warned on the impact this will have on the health of the public. 'No decision has been made yet on labelling and this is clearly yet another instance of the alcohol industry and their friends in government putting more pressure on the Taoiseach and Health Minister to turn their backs on public health," said the organisation's CEO Dr Sheila Gilheany. 'It is bizarre that the government should even contemplate delaying this measure which has been in planning for years. 'Any decision to delay the regulations has consequences, not least the 4,000 people who will receive a cancer diagnosis caused by alcohol and the multiple thousands of babies who will be born with FASD in the four years that a delay has been mooted for," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store