Bills look to expand North Dakota student opportunities through savings accounts
North Dakota lawmakers are weighing several proposals to establish Education Savings Accounts, but the eligibility, method of payment and amount students may receive differs.
Supporters say they want to give families more options but opponents object to using public dollars to pay for private school tuition.
Legislators have already demonstrated support for school choice, approving a bill in 2023 that would have provided $10 million in state funding to offset the cost of private school tuition for students who met income requirements.
The bill was vetoed by then-Gov. Doug Burgum, who at the time said he supported the concept but didn't think the bill went far enough to promote competition or expand options in rural areas. He also called for more transparency and accountability.
'I can say confidently today that he (Burgum) was most definitely correct,' said Sen. Michelle Axtman, R-Bismarck, during a hearing last week.
Axtman is the prime sponsor of Senate Bill 2400, which would provide a $1,000 Educational Savings Account for every student, whether they attend public or private school or are homeschooled.
Students attending private schools could qualify for $2,500 or $4,000 per year if their households meet certain income thresholds.
'This bill isn't about one educational option over another,' Axtman said. 'This bill is about increasing educational opportunities for each and every North Dakota student.'
The savings accounts can cover tuition, fees, textbooks, school meals, educational therapy and tutoring, among other educational items and services. Axtman added North Dakota would be the first state to cover student mental health services through the accounts.
Participating private schools would have to meet accountability requirements. For example, students who pay for school with a voucher would need to participate in statewide tests, with school results presented to a legislative committee. The state superintendent of public instruction would administer and audit the program.
A fiscal note estimating the cost of the program had not been prepared as of last week.
Charter school bill narrowly fails in North Dakota House; Senate considers similar bill
'Unless this is going to happen for free, the money is going to have to come from somewhere, and those are public dollars,' said Nick Archuleta, president of North Dakota United, a union representing teachers and public sector employees.
Rick Diegel, superintendent of Kidder County Public Schools, used basic math during his testimony in opposition to Axtman's bill and said the total for about 120,000 North Dakota students to receive at least $1,000 would bring the cost to about $120 million per school year.
In an interview, Axtman acknowledged $120 million per year would be a conservative estimate. She added she doesn't expect every North Dakota student will use the entire amount in their savings account every year.
Alexandre Fall, a senior associate with Pew Charitable Trusts who has studied school choice programs, said Education Savings Accounts have increased in popularity since 2020. The costs can be difficult to estimate because budget analysts don't know how many students will use the programs or transition from public to private education or homeschooling, he said.
'Once these programs become more popular, we'll have a better understanding of the cost mechanisms and the shifts in enrollment,' Fall said. 'But it's a very new policy and it is surrounded by a lot of uncertainty.'
Archuleta said siphoning of tax dollars to fund something that isn't for a public purpose, like private school tuition, means less money for public education, roads or anything else providing a public good for the state.
He said future Legislatures would need to continue funding the program, even in years with tight budgets.
Armstrong's first budget proposal addresses prison crowding, invests in housing
In Gov. Kelly Armstrong's budget proposal, he calls for a 2% annual increase to the K-12 funding formula, or an additional $60 million, which would bring total K-12 education spending to $3.12 billion for the 2025-27 biennium.
'We don't think it's enough,' Archuleta said. 'I think we can do better.'
Armstrong's budget also included $44.3 million for Education Savings Accounts.
Supporters of school choice, including Armstrong, have said the initiatives can be funded in addition to the traditional K-12 system.
Page Forrest, a senior associate with Pew Charitable Trusts, said education systems across the country have faced budget crunches, in part due to the expiration of federal pandemic aid.
'If budgets continue to tighten across the country, that means it may feel like public schools and nonpublic alternatives are competing for an increasingly smaller piece of the pie, even if they are being funded as separate entities,' Forrest said.
A separate proposal from Rep. Pat Heinert, R-Bismarck, takes a different approach. House Bill 1590 would establish what he calls education services accounts that would require matching dollars from families.
Families can deposit up to $2,000 per child and the Bank of North Dakota would provide funds to match 50%.
The dollars could be spent on private school tuition, dual-credit courses, vocational and technical courses, online courses and other approved programs.
Students could use the money in the accounts to pay for school meals, tutoring, mental health counseling and special needs programs, higher education entrance exams, other educational materials and education-related camps.
'Every student in the state of North Dakota is eligible to participate at whatever dollar amount they are comfortable putting into an account,' Heinert said. 'The idea of a match is not acceptable to many, but I think it makes the program go farther.'
Legislative Council estimates the program would cost $41.2 million.
Heinert's bill is a pilot program that would run through the 2026-27 school year.
'We've got two years to look at this,' he said. 'We've never done this before in North Dakota. We've tried. We've never got it accomplished. It's time though.'
Two similar proposals would provide state funding to be used toward private school tuition or homeschool expenses.
Senate Bill 2303, sponsored by Sen. Mike Wobbema, R-Valley City, and House Bill 1540, sponsored by Rep. Ben Koppelman, R-West Fargo, would deposit 80% of the amount allocated to public school students, or more than $8,800, into an Education Savings Account. Another 20% would be transferred to the student's home public school district. The dollars could be used for education-related expenses, but the participating student must be counted in their home school district to provide accurate state aid payments.
The proposals don't have any income requirements. The Bank of North Dakota would administer the accounts.
The estimated cost for each bill is $243 million for 2025-2027 based on the current enrollment of private and homeschooled students.
More 2025 legislative session coverage
House Bill 1607, sponsored by Rep. Matthew Heilman, R-Bismarck, would provide state dollars for private school students. His proposal would provide the full per-pupil state aid payment, or about $11,000, for each student to be used on eligible education expenses. The families would receive the dollars on a debit card. The estimated cost is $179 million for 2025-2027. The proposal does not have income requirements.
In all cases, the actual cost of the school choice programs would depend on how many people participate.
No action has been taken on the proposals, which had public hearings last week. The Senate and House education committees are expected to discuss education savings accounts this week.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Texas governor says Dems can't do ‘anything about' GOP plans
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) said Monday that Democrats cannot do 'anything about' Republican redistricting plans amid tension between the two parties over the plans. 'What is your response to Kathy Hochul, who says that 'We are at war over Texas and the redistricting push that's going on in Texas,'' Fox News's Sean Hannity asked Abbott on his show. 'That's a bunch of crazy bluster. Democrats are freaking out because they are realizing Texas has the authority to redistrict, and we're going to do so in a way that's going to lead to these additional seats that will vote Republican, and they will be serving in Congress in the next session,' Abbott replied. 'And so Democrats are freaking out about it, engaging in rhetoric, but I don't think they have the capability of actually living up to it and doing anything about it. Texas will continue to fight for what is right, and that's exactly what we are doing,' he added. Texas Democrats on Sunday left their state to deny Republicans a legislative quorum as part of an effort to halt Republicans from redrawing Texas congressional maps. The action deprives the Texas state Legislature of the numbers required to operate, halting progress on the maps. Members of the Texas state House pledged to keep going with their fight against Republicans' efforts to redraw the congressional district map after Abbott ordered their arrests for leaving the state to deny the chamber quorum. On Sunday, Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin said that his party is 'absolutely' well-positioned to fight back against Republican redistricting efforts.


Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
'All-out war': Fleeing Texas Dems side with Newsom as redistricting standoff continues: 'fire with fire'
California Gov. Gavin Newsom said he is ready to fight "fire with fire" as state Republican lawmakers try to enact redistricting in Texas, opposing the move though promising to pursue similar measures if needed. At a press conference on Monday, Newsom said he supports independent redistricting, as well as a national framework, and a proposal being advanced in the legislature reinforces what he supports. "The proposal that we're advancing with the legislature has a trigger only if they move forward, to dismantling the protocols that are well-established," the governor said. "Would the state of California move forward in kind? Fighting? Yes, fire with fire." When asked about a meeting between California Democrats on Sunday night, during which time they drafted or were almost done with the draft of redistricting maps, and whether he had seen those maps, Newsom said he had not. But he said there has been an ongoing series of conversations into the evening last night, which continued on Monday morning and will continue until Democrats land on a process. "That process has to have the concurrence, the support of two-thirds of the legislature," he said. "The maps, we believe, should be transparent. They should be provided in a transparent way to the public, and as a consequence, those maps are being processed and will be brought to light." At the end of the day, though, Newsom said the people of California will have the ultimate say. "We will offer them the opportunity to make judgments for themselves, again, only if Texas moves forward," Newsom said. "I'll reinforce that we believe it should be a national model, independent national redistricting, and it would revert back to its original form, but it's done in response to the existential realities that we're now facing. Things have changed, facts have changed, so we must change." "They've triggered this response and we're not going to roll over and we're going to fight fire with fire, but we're going to do so not just punching with the weight of the fourth largest economy, the most populous state in our union, the size of 21 state populations combined," he continued. "We also will punch above our weight in terms of the impact of what we're doing, and I think that should be absorbed by those in the Texas delegation. Whatever they are doing will be neutered here in the state of California, and they will pay that price." California GOP Chairwoman Corrin Rankin told Fox News Digital that Newsom's actions could threaten the constitutional rights of Californians while also setting a dangerous precedent. "While Governor Newsom frames this redistricting as a defensive move, it undermines California's nationally respected, voter-approved Citizens Redistricting Commission, and if successful, sets a dangerous precedent that voters' choices can be overruled whenever politicians find it politically convenient," Rankin said. "Our primary concern is safeguarding Californians' constitutional rights against partisan manipulation disguised as defending democracy; true democracy means empowering voters, not politicians, to decide representation." Dozens of Texas Democrats fled their state and went to Chicago and New York on Sunday night in an effort to block a redistricting vote on Monday. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has since threatened to arrest and expel the lawmakers if they do not return by Monday afternoon. Shortly after Abbott released his statement, the Texas House Democratic Caucus issued a simple response, writing: "Come and take it." The statement also described Republicans' proposed districts, which would potentially secure five new GOP U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections, as a "racist mid-decade redistricting scheme." Abbott criticized the Democrats' dramatic departure, saying that "real Texans don't run from a fight." On Monday evening, Illinois lawmakers hosted Texas Democrats for a press conference, during which time none of the lawmakers took a single question from the press. Still, Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Ill., welcomed her colleagues and said they could stay as long as they wanted because they believed in what they were doing. "What you're doing and what…they're trying to do in Texas affects you guys, but it affects the whole country," she said. "When you want to remove five Democrats…that hurts us in the House." She explained that when there are not enough Democrats, things like the Big Beautiful Bill, or as she referred to it as "the Big Ugly Bill," and other Republican initiatives get through. "They are trying to destroy our democracy, destroy fairness in our country," Kelly said. "And unfortunately, they're starting with Texas. But we want you to know, we stand by your side." Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., accused Abbott of not stepping up for the people affected by devastating floods in the Hill Country region of Texas. Specifically, he accused Abbott of not having a special session to help families rebuild, but instead of doing "the bidding" of President Donald Trump to "banish Democrats" from the federal delegation. Krishnamoorthi then directed his comments to Abbott, saying, "don't mess with Texas," because the people standing with him represent Texas. "You can silence them. You can smear them. You can saddle them with debts and fins. But you cannot intimidate them," Krishnamoorthi said. "You can gerrymander the hell out of that map. Guess what? Two can play that game. That's right. Other states will do exactly the same thing and neutralize what you're trying to do in Texas." Other lawmakers standing side-by-side in Illinois chose to accuse Trump's policies of being race-driven. Texas State Rep. Ana-Maria Rodriguez Ramos said Trump's policies hurt working families. "That is nothing short of racism," she said. "He is coming after all of us who don't look like him and his Republican colleagues in the Texas House." Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, followed Rodriguez Ramos with more accusations of racism, saying Republicans are doing what Trump has insisted be done. "I want you to know that we didn't introduce the race card when this message was sent by and through the Justice Department to the State of Texas, to our attorney general," he said. "They mentioned the race card because they talked about racial gerrymandering. They brought it up, and when they brought it up, they did it, knowing that this was a buzz word. It was a trigger." "They know that that's a buzz word that people would respond to in Texas, but we are going to respond to that buzz word by telling them that your racism is not going to change democracy in the state of Texas," Green continued. "In the United States of America, racism is going to be met with our taking a stand for democracy. You take a stand for racism, we will stand for democracy, and we will win." Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, said she was pleased that states like California and New York were standing up for Texas Democrats because, once it happens in Texas, it will spread to other states. She called the issue a "national war," and "an all-out war" in which everything is on the table. "We come from a state of great pride, and I never thought as a Texan, as an elected member of the Texas House of Representatives and now as an elected member from Texas to the United States House of Representatives, that I would see the governor of the proud state of Texas bend a knee to a felon from New York," Johnson added. "I never thought I'd see the day, but here we are." Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, was also standing with fellow Democrats in Illinois and accused Abbott of talking "a lot of noise." She also accused Republicans of being "weak." "The difference is they expect Democrats to kind of be the nice guys that we are," Crockett said. "They expect us to take the punch and say thank you. Well, I am here to tell you not only are we going to punch back, but we about to beat you down." Still, Abbott told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Monday that Texas is doing what it is allowed to do by law. He also accused state Democrats of doing something "un-Texas" by turning their back on Texans and not dealing with the flooding issues still echoing across the state. Abbott said four of the five seats that could change because of redistricting will be primarily Hispanic. "These are seats where Democrats are having to come to grips with reality," he said, explaining that Democrats are losing votes to Hispanics and Black voters in Texas. He also said Democrats are "freaking out" because they are realizing Texas has the authority to redistrict. "Texas will continue to fight for what is right," Abbott said.


Politico
6 hours ago
- Politico
Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests
A White House official told POLITICO Trump's team is taking 'a pretty hands-off approach' to the brewing battle, deferring to Texas Republicans. 'We made our case and now we're counting on them to get it done,' added the person, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss a matter being privately negotiated. State Rep. Ana-María Rodríguez Ramos, chair of the Texas Legislative Progressive Caucus, captured her group's predicament in an interview. 'We really do not have a choice,' she said. 'What is our alternative? Rolling down and rolling over for Trump's economy to continue to destroy America?' The risks are big for Texas Democrats — from $500-a-day fines, to extradition, to the more unlikely scenario of Abbott replacing them with hand-picked legislators, to facing civil arrest for violating the Legislature's rules. They do not, however, face any civil or criminal charges and can only be forced back into the Capitol to take votes. It's unclear who would foot the bill for the hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines members are collectively racking up by abstaining from the legislative session. There are also political risks. Texas Democrats are not just missing votes related to redistricting, but also on legislation that would provide relief following last month's devastating floods. 'No one is fooling around this time in Texas,' said Dave Carney, an adviser to Abbott. 'In the past, it was like, they came back. Everything was forgiven. It was like kumbaya. That's not happening. There's no appetite to say, 'Okay, never mind. We're going to let you do this anytime you fucking want.' Abbott also threatened to arrest Texas Democrats in 2021 when they used the same walkout tactics. If Abbott chooses to call multiple special sessions to pass the redrawn map that would net five GOP-friendly seats, lawmakers could run into time constraints: New lines must be adopted by early December in order to take effect for the 2026 midterm cycle. The Legislature could collide with filing deadlines for the midterms. Under state law, candidates can declare their intent to seek office from Nov. 8 through Dec. 8, but the state legislature has the authority to extend the deadline. Each side lacks good options to resolve the stalemate. Earlier in the day, appearing on the MAGA influencer Benny Johnson's show, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton acknowledged the struggles ahead for Abbott and his fellow Republicans, saying his 'first move would have been to chain them to their desk and not let them out of the door,' before adding, 'I think the governor is going to be forced into calling several special sessions.'