
Trump seeks to expand his influence over arts and culture with Kennedy Center moves
A Friday announcement that Trump is naming himself chair of the Kennedy Center's board is a step toward giving his administration a much bigger role in and influence over the world of arts and entertainment overseen by the federal government. Political experts say the unprecedented move by a commander in chief could be just the beginning.
'It's like an assault on every kind of norm that has existed in American social and political and cultural life that he's engaging in,' said Mark Wheeler, a political communications professor at London Metropolitan University in England.
The surprise Kennedy Center news from Trump, Wheeler said, is one that both plays to his GOP base and is part of a 'shock and awe' strategy he's pursuing in 'many different kinds of fronts in terms of public policy but also the cultural precepts.'
'It's the kind of disruptor process that Trump is engaged in, in terms of the kind of celebrity and political outsider image that he's constructed or has been constructed for him,' said Wheeler, the author of 'Hollywood: Politics and Society.'
Trump, who on Sunday became the first sitting president to attend the Super Bowl, has made it clear that he wants to prevent the Kennedy Center from putting on cultural works with which he disagrees, criticizing 'drag shows' in a Truth Social post and raising questions over how much politics might influence Washington's leading performing arts center, which opened in 1971.
'Since bursting onto the political stage in 2015, President Trump has made culture the dominant issue in American politics and society — with some unwitting support from the Democratic left,' former Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.) said. 'Appointing himself to this position will allow him to continue casting himself as a cultural warrior undoing the excesses of the left and restoring what he would call traditional American culture.'
Trump and the GOP on the campaign trail in 2024 successfully leaned into issues such as drag shows and transgender surgeries as talking points about how liberals had taken 'wokeism' too far.
And Republicans say growing the influence conservatives have in cultural institutions is essential.
'I think there is a keen sense that conservatives should have a place at the table in cultural institutions again. And cultural institutions should welcome this,' said Patrick Wilson, a political appointee from Trump's first term.
'As this present era should remind everyone, including higher education and arts organizations, you need to be bipartisan and recruit friends and have patrons from across the political spectrum. It's just smart. I think that's actually what this is about,' Wilson added.
In response to the president's Friday night post, the Kennedy Center highlighted its historically 'collaborative relationship with every presidential administration,' noting it had not received any information from the Trump administration about his move, which also involved terminating the terms of multiple board members.
Trump is moving quickly to put his allies in positions at the Kennedy Center. He named Richard Grenell, his envoy for 'special missions,' the interim executive director of the institution Monday.
Even some Democrats pointed to the president's authority to make changes at the Kennedy Center, while expressing weariness about what a Trump-controlled future might look like.
'He is president, and he gets to make these decisions. To many people like me, the Kennedy Center and its shows are the city's cultural icons,' said Ivan Zapien, a former official at the Democratic National Committee. 'So, I'm rooting for it to continue to be cool.'
But Trump suggested there could be an overhaul of the shows that are featured at the Kennedy Center.
'Just last year, the Kennedy Center featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth — THIS WILL STOP,' he said.
He added that he thought the Kennedy Center was 'an American Jewel' and should reflect the 'brightest STARS' from across the U.S.
'I think it's part of his larger effort to remove DEI and diversity from sports, other things, and pieces of American culture,' said Amy Bree Becker, a professor of communication and media at Loyola University Maryland.
'And so, if the Kennedy Center is Washington's hub for culture, he wants it to reflect his vision of what culture should look like. Not, I think, what maybe it has been in the past,' Becker said.
Former President Biden's White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, responded for the first time publicly Monday to Trump's vow to reshape the Kennedy Center's board. Jean-Pierre, one of several Biden-era names on the board, wrote in a post on the social platform X: 'I love everything about this remarkable institution and will always hold many precious memories close to my heart.'
'I'll be fine,' she said, 'But we all must continue the work to ensure that the arts and humanities remain a core fabric of our society and culture.'
Trump is seeking broader influence over other parts of American culture, too.
In the days before he was sworn in, he named new eyes and ears in Hollywood to keep tabs on the traditionally left-leaning moviemaking business. He gave Mel Gibson, Sylvester Stallone, and Jon Voight — all actors who have expressed political support for him — roles as 'special ambassadors' to the entertainment industry.
He attempted to target another D.C. institution, the National Cathedral, after Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde last month publicly called on him to be merciful toward transgender people and immigrants. But the cathedral can't be financially threatened by the president — it doesn't receive any federal funding and relies only on private donations.
During his first term in office, Trump rarely explored D.C. establishments.
While other presidents visit local restaurants during their time at the White House, Trump would opt instead to go out to his golf club in the Virginia suburbs or dine at his own hotel property in downtown Washington before it was sold in 2022.
He delivered remarks at a gala at Ford's Theatre in his first year in office but never attended the Kennedy Center Honors; he bucked tradition and declined to go after several of the award's recipients criticized him.
Trump also skipped the White House Correspondents' Association dinner — one of the buzziest events of the year in Washington and which typically includes remarks from the sitting president — for the entirety of his first term. The headliner for this year's dinner, Amber Ruffin, said earlier this month that 'no one' wants Trump to be at the April 26 gala. Trump hasn't indicated whether he'll attend.
It's still unclear how much Trump's actions may leave a mark on the nation's cultural and artistic institutions. But Becker said 'small changes' have already happened, and more could be on the way.
'I think that you could see subtle cultural shifts across a variety of areas, in part because of his administration, but in part because maybe certain leaders in different organizations or companies are also responding to that as well.'
Becker didn't hesitate when asked if Trump will actually chair the Kennedy Center's board, pouring cold water on the idea that the president would do so and questioning the media's coverage of it.
'Part of it is to draw attention and to distract from other things,' she said, and the press 'is covering it as this big story.'
While Trump can be unpredictable, Wheeler agreed that between time constraints and other pressing issues, it seems unlikely that the president will actually take on the role of heading the Kennedy Center's board.
'This does seem to be more a question of, 'I'm going to be doing these shots across the bow and getting everybody kind of concerned,'' the author said.
'Maybe he feels that this will make people, therefore, march to his demands.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
6 minutes ago
- New York Times
Targeting Obama, Trump's Retribution Campaign Takes Another Turn
This is what Washington thought retribution would look like. When President Trump started his second term, there were deep fears among current and former Justice Department officials, legal experts and Democrats that Mr. Trump would follow through on his repeated promises to 'lock up' or otherwise pursue charges against high-profile figures like Liz Cheney, James B. Comey and former President Barack Obama. Mr. Trump quickly went after perceived enemies — but not always the anticipated ones and often not in the anticipated ways. Displaying a willingness to weaponize the federal government in ways that were as novel as they were audacious, he took on a wide variety of individuals and institutions — from law firms and universities to journalists and federal bureaucrats — that he felt had crossed him, failed to fall in line or embodied ideological values that he rejected. But on Tuesday Mr. Trump reverted to earlier form, resurfacing — in a remarkably unfiltered and aggressive rant — his grievances against Mr. Obama, prominent figures in past administrations and others he associated with what he considers a long campaign of persecution dating back to the 2016 election. Seeking to change the topic at a time when he is under bipartisan political pressure over his unwillingness to do more to release investigative files into Jeffrey Epstein, he said the time had come for his predecessors to face criminal charges. 'He's guilty,' he said of Mr. Obama. 'This was treason. This was every word you can think of.' But if his enemies list was familiar, his capacity to pursue retribution appears to be expanding. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Market Structure Proposals May Not Capture Crypto Momentum In Congress
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 18: U.S. President Donald Trump, surrounded by lawmakers, signs the 'GENIUS ... More Act' into law during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House July 18, 2025 in Washington, DC. The act, formally known as the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, was passed this week by the U.S. Congress. (Photo by) The cryptocurrency industry has achieved its most significant win in Congress to date, winning passage of the GENIUS Act, which would regulate stablecoins, earlier this month. Now, lawmakers and lobbyists are looking to capitalize on the momentum to pass other bills into law. However, the targets for doing so, with the most notable measure being a bill to formalize digital asset market structure rules, are likely to prove tougher to send to President Donald Trump's desk. Support from Senate Democrats for the cryptocurrency means there is a chance of doing so, but the process is likely to take several months and could stretch into legislation was always perceived as the low-hanging fruit for Congress on crypto, making its passage a key bellwether for the amount of bipartisan support for digital assets legislation. Market structure legislation, on the other hand, is seen as a much more complex undertaking. This is in part because some of the divides between lawmakers concern building-block definitions of the proposals, such as which tokens are considered commodities and which are securities. The answer to this question will determine whether the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission will be responsible for overseeing a given addition to debates over the text, there are possible political issues that could slow the progress of market structure legislation. One of these hurdles was on display during the House's crypto week in July, when conservative Republicans held up proceedings to advocate for the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, a measure that divides lawmakers along party lines, to have a path to law. The concession, as reported by Punchbowl News, was for the House to include the proposal in its draft of the annual defense policy bill. However, it could still be stripped out by the Senate and reignite this debate when future crypto legislation is considered. Another challenge will be Trump's crypto businesses, with some early Democratic supporters of stablecoin legislation in the Senate, such as Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), expressing reservations about the market structure bill in a recent hearing due to the president's involvement in the cryptocurrency there are reasons for optimism that the current Congress will be able to pass crypto market structure legislation, even if the process is longer than some lawmakers would like. Notably, the House version, the CLARITY Act, attracted support from nearly 80 Democrats, a sign of the bipartisan interest in addressing the issue. Additionally, some of the newer Senate Democrats, including Senators Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), and Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), appear to be potential supporters, with some having backed the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act last year. These members are joined by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), who has been leading Democratic support in the upper chamber this year. At least seven Democrats will need to support the measure for it to pass the Senate, with this group of lawmakers likely to be among those Republicans look to for the House having passed its version of market structure legislation, the fate of the bill is now in the Senate's hands. However, the upper chamber does not appear to plan to take up the House-passed version simply, which Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee, voiced concerns about in a recent hearing. Instead, leading Senate Republicans released a discussion draft, accompanied by a request for industry feedback, earlier this week. The text includes some differences from the House proposal, such as the creation of a new category of digital tokens called 'ancillary assets.'Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) has said he hopes to pass the measure in the upper chamber by the end of September. However, pushback from Democrats could delay this process, even if the bill can be passed by the committee before then. Scott had pushed for a similarly ambitious timeline for the stablecoin bill, aiming to pass it within the first 100 days of Trump's presidency, and, likely, he will again miss this target. A more realistic goal could be the passage of market structure legislation in the Senate by the end of the year, but achieving this will depend on the ability to garner support from Democrats, as none are currently sponsoring the will ultimately get sent to Trump's desk is more likely to resemble whatever the Senate ends up passing, making it a process well worth following closely. When lawmakers return in September after the August recess, committee action in the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee and the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee will offer critical insight into just how likely Democratic support is and what it may take to garner the votes needed for market structure legislation to reach Trump's desk.

Wall Street Journal
6 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
WSJ Opinion: Are Republicans Capable of Cutting Spending?
Donald Trump scored a victory with the passage of his 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' and lawmakers recently approved a rescissions package that cuts $9 billion in spending. Yet Republicans remain far from their campaign promises to rein in the Joe Biden-era spending spree. On this episode of All Things, Kim Strassel speaks to one of the Senate's fiscal conservatives, Florida's Rick Scott, about the prospects for more reconciliation or rescission bills that cut government largesse, whether Senate Democrats will join to pass slimmer GOP appropriations bills (or provoke a government shutdown) as the September 30 funding deadline looms, and the criticisms surrounding Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell. Photo: Monica Espitia