Germany train crash: Everything we know after derailment kills three and injures dozens
Emergency personnel were deployed to the scene, where rescue dogs searched throughout the night for survivors. No more casualties had been found as of Monday morning.
About 50 people are believed to have been injured, of whom 25 were seriously injured, German media reported citing local authorities.
German chancellor Friedrich Merz expressed his shock over the crash. He said in a post on X: 'I am in close contact with the Interior Minister and the Transport Minister and have asked them to support the rescue forces with all available means. We mourn the victims. I express my condolences to their relatives.'
The Independent takes a look at everything we know about the German train crash.
What happened and how did the train crash?
Around 100 people were on the train when two carriages derailed in a forested area at around 6:10pm local time, German news agency dpa reported.
The crash happened near the town of Riedlingen, dpa reported, roughly 158km west of Munich. According to reports, there had been a storm in the area shortly before.
'Two carriages of a regional express train derailed on the railway line between Sigmaringen and Ulm early Sunday evening. According to current investigations, three people were killed and other passengers were seriously injured,' Ulm Police said in a statement.
Authorities believe that a landslide is the likely cause, after significant rainfall struck the area shortly before the train passed through.
'There have been heavy rains here, so it cannot be ruled out that the heavy rain and a related landslide accident may have been the cause. However, this is currently the subject of ongoing investigations," said Thomas Strobl, interior minister of the state of Baden-Württemberg.
At least two wagons are believed to have derailed at the site of the crash, which is around 45 kilometres southwest of Ulm.
Police continue to investigate the possible causes of the crash, district fire chief Charlotte Ziller told German outlet Bild.
Who died in the crash?
Three people died, with the number of injured estimated at 50. Around 25 are believed to be injured seriously, emergency services told Bild.
Ms Ziller said the dead include the driver of the train and another employee of Deutsche Bahn, Germany's second largest rail company.
"It was terrible to witness," resident Karl Figler, 76, told the outlet. "Two people were lying dead next to the train. They were carried away in blankets. At the same time, seriously injured people were being cared for."
A collection point for relatives has been set up at a local community centre, and Deutsche Bahn has set up a special hotline for the affected people and their families.
What was the aftermath?
Scores of emergency services personnel swarmed the site to search urgently for survivors, using rescue dogs in case some remained trapped in the rubble.
As of Monday morning, no further survivors or dead bodies had been found in the search.
A number of high-profile figures also rushed to the scene after the news broke on Sunday afternoon.
This included the CEO of Deutsche Bahn Richard Lutz, the minister-president of Baden-Württemberg Winfried Kretschmann, of the GReen Party, and the federal and state transport ministers Patrick Schnieder and Winfried Hermann, of the CDU and Green Party respectively, Bild reported.
Emergency workers continue to work at the site of the crash.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Zoo urges people to donate their unwanted pets to feed their predators
A zoo in Denmark has appealed to the public to donate their small pets as food for its predators. The Aalborg Zoo has asked for donations of healthy and live chickens, rabbits, and guinea pigs to feed its predators, such as the Eurasian lynx. In a post on social media, the zoo said it is trying to mimic the natural food chain of the animals housed there 'for the sake of both animal welfare and professional integrity'. It also offered assurances that the donated pets will be 'gently euthanised' by trained staff. The zoo in northern Denmark explained that 'if you have a healthy animal that needs to be given away for various reasons, feel free to donate it to us.' After being euthanised, the animals will be used as fodder, the zoo said. 'That way, nothing goes to waste — and we ensure natural behaviour, nutrition and well-being of our predators,' the Aalborg Zoo said. The online call for pet donations is accompanied by a picture of a wildcat baring its teeth with its mouth wide open and a link to the zoo's website, noting the facility is also interested in receiving horses. The social media post has had mixed reactions, with one describing the scheme as 'deeply perverse and degrading' and a 'sick invention'. Another user said she had taken her horse to the zoo to be euthanised a few years ago. She described the experience as 'peaceful' for her horse. 'The sweet staff took care of it in the nicest way, and they were grateful for the donation,' she added. Owners who donate their horse are also eligible for a potential tax break, the zoo's website says. The zoo always keeps other predators such as lions and tigers, according to its website. The small animals can be donated on weekdays from 10am to 1pm, with no more than four at a time without an appointment. The zoo says it can arrange a pick-up and delivery service for those willing to donate more than four. Any horse donated to the zoo must have a horse passport, its website said, and this donation comes with the opportunity for a tax deduction on the horse's value, which is calculated based on its weight.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'Pornographic' mermaid statue is to be removed in Denmark after it was deemed 'a man's hot dream of what a woman should look like' due to its large breasts
A revealing mermaid statue in Denmark is set to be removed after it was deemed 'a mans hot dream of what a woman should look like' due to its large breasts. The Danish Agency for Palaces and Culture is reportedly taking down the massive 14-tonne Den Store Havfrue (the Big Mermaid) from Dragor Fort after criticism from locals. Politiken's art critic, Mathias Kryger, branded the statue 'ugly and pornographic', while Sorine Gotfredsen, a priest and journalist, wrote in the newspaper Berlingske: 'Erecting a statue of a man's hot dream of what a woman should look like is unlikely to promote many women's acceptance of their own bodies.' She said it was encouraging to know that many people find the statue 'vulgar, unpoetic, and undesirable, because we're suffocating in overbearing bodies in public space'. Peter Bech, the man behind the 4x6 metre sculpture, and Torben Bodtker, the Fort's owner, both believe the artwork is not of a pornographic nature. 'I hear that many times. It's pure nonsense. The face is big, the upper body is big, the tail is big, and of course the breasts are big,' he said. 'The mermaid has completely normal proportions in relation to her size. Of course the breasts are big on a big woman'. While the statue, which was carved in Beijing, drew sharp criticism from many locals, some backed the artist and Fort owner in their position to keep the statue erected. For Aminata Corr Thrane, Berlingske's debate editor, the scrutiny of the mermaid's breasts was equivalent to body shaming. 'Do naked female breasts have to have a specific academic shape and size to be allowed to appear in public?' she wrote. Bech also said the rejection of his statue is a shame during a time where there is increasing focus on how women are underrepresented in public art. 'It is placed in its high position to show that women have gained an independent place over time and to show the respect that women have achieved,' he said. 'I think it is well in line with the desire for more statues of women in general'. He said that Dragor Fort 'benefits greatly' from the on-site statue, with the statue raking in more stars on Google Maps than the 'real' Little Mermaid at Langelinie in Copenhagen. But the assessment from the Danish Palaces and Culture Agency does not mention anything about the size or appearance of the statue's bust. Instead, the assessment states that the statue 'is not considered to fit into the cultural-historical environment,' because it does not align with the cultural heritage of the 1910 Dragor Fort landmark. Since the removal of the sculpture has been in the works, Bech said he offered to donate his artwork to the municipality. This was swiftly declined. Helle Barth, chair of Dragor muncipality's climate, urban and business committee, told Berlingske: 'It was a really nice offer, but it's hard to fit into Dragor - so we politely declined the offer. 'But the matter was discussed thoroughly and at length'. Following the announcement of its planned removal, the Fort's owner, Torben Bodtker, said: 'I'm sorry that it has to be removed. There are many people who come out here to see it. 'I've been very happy to have it standing as an attraction. Very happy. People have shown great interest in it'. The artist explained that he has now received an offer from a private sculpture park offering to buy the work. However, he said: 'It has gradually become part of Dragor's history. So I think it belongs here'. Therefore, Bech is now considering a citizen proposal as a possible way to preserve the statue's place somewhere in Dragor. 'It would be sad if it ended up in a parking lot somewhere. It's so much more than just a garden gnome,' said Bech.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
The kindness of strangers: out of the blue, an older woman handed me a well-thumbed book
A few years ago I decided to improve myself physically and mentally. I did that by setting a couple of new year resolutions. One was to exercise regularly, the other was to read a book a week. The exercise part didn't go so well because on 1 January, I went for my first walk and stepped on a branch that punctured my leg. But my plan to throw myself into reading was much more successful. Later that year I was on a long train trip from Sydney to Melbourne with a friend and told him about my reading goal. I was pretty stoked with how well I was going and was excited to talk about it. I didn't think this was particularly interesting chat to anyone else on the train, so I certainly wasn't worried about anyone eavesdropping. But at some point on this journey, an older couple stood up to get off the train. As they walked past, the woman handed me a well-thumbed copy of The Man Who Was Thursday by GK Chesterton. She smiled at me but didn't say anything. Before I had time to process what had happened, she was gone. I didn't even get a chance to say thank you. That was our only interaction on the train and her gift was completely out of the blue, with no pretext and no expectation. It was a simple, quiet gesture of humanity – kindness just for the sake of it. I didn't quite hit my goal of reading a book a week that year, instead maxing out at about 30 books for the year, which was still a lot more than I'd ever read before. But what makes the memory even fonder is that The Man Who Was Thursday went on to become one of my favourite books – it now has pride of place on my bookshelf. That woman on the train had great taste. From making your day to changing your life, we want to hear about chance encounters that have stuck with you. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you're having trouble using the form click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here
