
How Trump's Man In Beijing Swung From Trade Globalist To China Hawk
The new US envoy to China, Ambassador David Perdue, is a former champion of global trade turned China hawk who will emphasize his close ties to President Donald Trump as he seeks to restore crucial lines of communication between Washington and Beijing.
Perdue, a one-time Republican Senator for Georgia, arrives in Beijing this week to replace career diplomat Nicholas Burns, a pick of former President Joe Biden, who left in January.
Perdue's arrival will be closely watched after both sides reached an unexpected truce in Geneva last weekend, pausing a trade war between the world's two biggest economies that had stoked fears of a global recession.
"I want the world to know that I know this man personally," Perdue told Trump at a White House event last week. "I am glad to be your man in China."
Analysts say Perdue, who was a prominent Senate ally for Trump in his first term, will use his ties to Trump as he seeks to gain credibility with Chinese interlocutors to help push through a trade deal.
"I would describe David Perdue as having one of the closest relationships with the President of any of our ambassadors," Republican Senator Steve Daines told Reuters in an interview.
"President Trump has picked the right man, at the right time, for this most important responsibility."
Perdue is also tasked with helping to convince Beijing to stop the flow to the US of ingredients used to manufacture the deadly opioid fentanyl, the reason behind 20% of Washington's remaining tariffs on China.
Daines said he and Perdue have discussed the issue "at length," including a proposal offered by Chinese Premier Li Qiang in March during Daines' visit to Beijing.
Daines suggested both sides could structure a tariff reduction deal around whether Beijing commits to effectively stopping the precursor flow within a set timeframe, though it remains up to the two countries' negotiators to hammer out such steps.
China's foreign ministry said Wednesday it is "willing to facilitate" Perdue's arrival in Beijing to take up his duties. Reuters has contacted the US Embassy in Beijing for comment.
China Links
Perdue, 75, was once a global trade evangelist, who leveraged outsourcing manufacturing to Asia during his 40-year international business career.
He later became a China security hawk in the Senate, and backed, if initially reluctantly, Trump's first term tariffs on the country.
Perdue and Daines co-led congressional delegations to China in 2018 and 2019, meeting then-Premier Li Keqiang and Liu He, President Xi Jinping's former economic tsar and lead Chinese negotiator for the US-China Phase One trade deal to reduce tariffs during Trump's first term.
Chinese officials expect Perdue to be more "pragmatic" and economics-minded than his predecessor, who was more focused on "ideological issues" such as human rights, said Wu Xinbo, director of the Center for American Studies at Fudan University.
"Given his business background, he can ... work to resolve specific issues in areas such as trade, economic and people-to-people exchanges," said Wu.
They are also hoping he can act as a direct communications channel between China and the US, he added.
Outsourcing Career
Perdue was raised in Warner Robins, Georgia by two teachers from a farming community.
He studied at Georgia Institute of Technology before joining consultancy Kurt Salmon Associates, where he helped American clothing manufacturers source products from Asian factories.
He helped consumer goods company Sara Lee establish its Asia operations while living in Hong Kong 1992-1994. The firm cut thousands of jobs in 1994, including at plants in Virginia and Georgia. The pattern repeated during his subsequent stints at Haggar Clothing, Reebok and Dollar General.
In a 2005 deposition, Perdue said he was "proud" of his outsourcing record and blamed government policies for the decline of US manufacturing, according to a transcript.
He won his first Senate race in 2014 as a self-styled "job creator" and global trade evangelist.
While senator, Perdue was focused on military and security issues, becoming the head of the Senate Armed Forces Committee's Sea Power Subcommittee in 2019.
He advocated for bolstering US maritime power and shipbuilding efforts, and boarded US Navy warship transits in the South China Sea. He visited Taiwan in 2018, meeting the island democracy's then-President Tsai Ing-wen.
Following his 2018 visit to China, Perdue told a forum in Washington that he didn't like tariffs but believed Trump's "instincts are right" because they were disruptive enough to get Beijing's attention.
At the same event, Perdue warned of US complacency over Beijing's growing economic and military might and expressed concerns about China's direction as it grew in power.
"We all got it wrong. We thought as China became more affluent... that they would open up and liberalise," he said. "That just hasn't happened."
Seven years later, the US-China relationship remains dogged by the same issues Perdue raised in his visits to China - equal market access, forced tech transfers, intellectual property theft, compliance with world trade norms and cyber warfare.
His rhetoric on China has also hardened in recent years, mirroring a bipartisan hawkish shift in Washington toward its top geopolitical rival.
Last year, Perdue condemned Xi as a "modern-day emperor," writing in an essay that Beijing wanted to "destroy capitalism and democracy" and that US supply chains should decouple from China.
However, during his confirmation hearing last month, Perdue called for a "nuanced, nonpartisan and strategic" approach to Beijing.
Yun Sun, a China expert at the Stimson Center, said Perdue was named by Trump early on as a trusted emissary to Beijing.
"The challenge between the US and China is structural, so no one expects a single person to change the world," said Sun. "But having an effective communicator is always going to help."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
"Have we become so weak?" Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat on Trump's 25% tariff on India
Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat has criticised PM Modi's silence on the 25% tariff imposed by the US, questioning the government's vulnerability to US interference in strategic matters. Trump's announcement of tariffs and threats of further penalties for importing Russian oil have sparked concern. The government is examining the impact and engaging with stakeholders to safeguard national interests. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his silence on the 25 per cent tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on questioned whether the BJP government has become so vulnerable that discussions regarding strategic initiatives or oil procurement are subject to interference from US President Trump."Trump has created a state of confusion. Neither the government nor PM Modi made any statement in the House or took responsibility... Have we become so weak that even discussing strategies prompts interference from Trump?... The saddest part is when we discuss the trade balance, especially since we have about 130 billion dollars worth of trade with the US. Our position is strong on this, so there is no reason for America to dominate us... PM Modi should come forward and clarify the entire situation regarding India's decision... We are a sovereign country, but such interference contradicts the dignity of the nation," he on Wednesday made a shocking statement on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement of 25 per cent tariffs against India and threatened an additional "penalty" for importing Russian oil."I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world," Trump later signed a fresh executive order imposing revised tariffs for 70 countries, including imposed on India's neighbouring countries are less than India's 25 per cent, except for Myanmar at 40 per cent. The new tariffs for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, and Sri Lanka are 19%, 15%, 20%, 19%, 15%, and 20%, new tariffs, outlined in a sweeping order signed on Friday (IST), will come into effect from 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on August the government told the Parliament on Thursday that it is examining the impact of the recent events and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in the lower House of Parliament a day after Trump announced the tariff. He later made a similar statement in the Rajya said the Ministry of Commerce and Industry is holding talks with exporters, industries and all stakeholders and gathering information on their assessment of this issue.


Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
China's Brahmaputra hydropower project raises alarm among Tibetan experts, downstream nations
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Dharamshala: The construction of a mega hydropower dam by China on the Brahmaputra River in Tibet has triggered serious concerns among Tibetan experts in exile, who warn of its potential impact on the environment, regional geopolitics, and the livelihoods of downstream countries like India and proposed dam, expected to be larger than the Three Gorges Dam, is coming up in the seismically active Medog region. Experts say the project could alter the river's natural flow and place downstream nations at risk of floods and Palmo, a researcher at the Tibet Policy Institute of the Tibetan government in-exile, told ANI, "This is not surprising at all. For the past many decades China has been looking into ways to exploit these water resources. Last year China announced that they had approved the construction of the dam and now recently Chinese government have announced that they are going to start the construction."She pointed out the lack of transparency around the project's design and impact. "The more concerning issue is that they have not announced that how this dam will be constructed and what impact it will have on the people. They should also take into consideration the concerns of lower downstream countries."Palmo emphasized that China has not shared key details about the project. "Overall they have not shared the information about the project it can have impact on the environment, the people who are living along the river and it can also have geopolitical impact on the region."Highlighting environmental risks, she said, "The region is itself seismically active and there are many recent incidents where there are number of landslides and earthquakes happening in the region. So, by constructing such a huge dam which would twice the size of Three Gorges Dam, can create huge impact on environment and the people."She added, "The secrecy and the Chinese government not sharing this information also make people more concerned about what impact it has. If there is a transparency from the Chinese government side, it can also ease the tensions among people and other countries."Palmo warned that downstream countries remain vulnerable. "Since it is transboundary river, many of the downstream countries like India and Bangladesh, they are heavily dependent on rivers. So most of the agriculture in Assam are also dependent on the rivers. Rivers are also considered a lifeline for Bangladesh.""So by holding so much of water in these dams it can cause anytime floods and droughts in downstream countries. It is like downstream countries are at the mercy of Chinese government," she Tsering, deputy speaker of the Tibetan parliament in-exile, echoed similar concerns, stating, "It is a great concern. China has the maximum number of hydro dams in the world and still they are not satisfied with that. The Three Gorges Dam was supposed to be the biggest Dam, now they are building bigger than Three Gorges Dam over Brahmaputra."She stressed that the project's location in a seismic zone could pose dangers to all riparian nations. "I think it is a very serious concern the world needs to take note of because it is in a seismic prone area of south Asia, if something happens to dam what will happen to all the riparian nations."She also pointed out China's potential use of the project as a political tool. "China might use hydro power as leverage to have any deal with rest of countries where these waters are flowing and next to that the world must take into consideration that by building all these power grid they are selling power to different countries."Tsering said the Tibetan parliament-in-exile has been trying to raise the issue. "Whenever the Indian parliament session is held, we always go there and try to bring it in the notice to the members of the parliament. Since more than two years we have been talking about this dam the one in Medog is coming up. India should take a note of it and we are sure that they will look into it."Explaining the meaning of "leverage", she added, "When I say leverage, it means they are going to weaponise the hydropower dams. When the tap is in their hands towards the northeastern side, whenever they want they can use it as a flood generating dam or whenever our crops are good they may just close it and bring drought to our farmers. These are related to the livelihood and existence of communities in the south Asian countries."


Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why Smithsonian removed Donald Trump impeachment references from an exhibit
The Smithsonian Institution has quietly removed a reference to US President Donald Trump's two impeachment proceedings from a key exhibit at the National Museum of American History. The decision comes as the White House exerts pressure to offer a more positive and selective view of American history. A Smithsonian spokesperson confirmed its removal.(AFP) The label referencing all Presidential impeachment proceedings was added in 2021 to the museum's "American Presidency" exhibit under the section "Limits of Presidential Power." It also addressed Trump's unprecedented dual impeachments. A Smithsonian spokesperson confirmed its removal, which comes as the new Trump administration has called for intensified efforts to reshape how federal cultural institutions portray American history. Why were the impeachment exhibits removed? Smithsonian spokesperson Phillip Zimmerman said Friday that the section, which includes materials on President Bill Clinton's impeachment and the Watergate scandal that led to President Richard Nixon's resignation, needed to be overhauled. He said the decision came after the museum" reviewed our legacy content recently." "Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance," Zimmerman said in an email. He said that in September 2021, the museum installed a temporary label on content concerning Trump's impeachment. "It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time," he said. But the label remained in place. "A large permanent gallery like The American Presidency that opened in 2000 requires a significant amount of time and funding to update and renew," he said. "A future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments." Did political pressure play a role? While museum officials framed the decision as part of routine exhibit maintenance, the timing has raised eyebrows. Since his return to the Oval Office, Trump and his allies have called for efforts to eliminate what they describe as divisive or unpatriotic narratives. In March, Trump issued an executive order entitled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," in which he alleged that the Smithsonian was beholden to 'a divisive, race-centred ideology.' He has placed Vice President JD Vance in charge of an effort to ensure no funding goes to "exhibits or programmes that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programmes or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy."