Central Bank revises down housing and growth forecast
It expects 32,500 will be finished this year, a reduction of 1,500 on its previous forecast last March.
It says 37,500 will be completed next year, down 2,500 from its last projection, and 41,500 will completed in 2027, down 2,500.
It would mean the Government would miss its targets for house completions each year.
The Central Bank says the reasons for the downward revision is that completions of homes are below expectations in the first three months of the year, while commencements "dropped sharply".
The housing projections are "subject to considerable downside risk given the current bottlenecks in housing supply and infrastructure," according to the bank.
The Central Bank highlights a lack of water and electricity connections and a shortfall of construction workers as key challenges for increasing construction.
It says increasing productivity in the sector is "essential to enable it to fulfil the increasing demand for housing".
The bank is also downgrading its forecast for growth for the domestic economy for this year and next year due to US tariffs.
It expects the growth, as measured by modified domestic demand, will be 2% this year, a drop 0.6 percentage points on the previous projection.
It has reduced its forecast for next year by 0.4 percentage points to 2.1%.
While the outlook for the domestic economy is down, the expectations for gross domestic product, which includes the impact of multinationals, is being raised due to a surge in exports to the US ahead tariffs being imposed by the Trump administration.
This is largely being driven by a rise in the export of weight loss and diabetics drugs produced by the pharmaceutical sector in Ireland.
Robert Kelly Director of Economics and Statistics at the Central Bank says: "with the global economic backdrop continuing to shift, there is heightened uncertainty on the outlook for the Irish economy."
The bank examines the threat to the public finance from a collapse in the windfall corporation tax receipts collected by the State.
It finds that in a severe scenario, there would be a €17bn deficit by 2030.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
an hour ago
- Sunday World
Conor McGregor refuses to pay pal's legal fees but has €17.5k red wine on Black Forge menu
McGregor charges €6.50 for a pint of Guinness in his pub, compared to his own-brand Forged Irish Stout's €6 price point Conor with Stephanie Simons in the Black Forge with two bottle of Petrus worth €35k Conor McGregor has been whining this weekend about losing his appeal case against Nikita Hand but he also enjoys a wine of a different nature — which is undoubtedly the most expensive served in an Irish pub. The MMA star has on his drinks menu at his Black Forge pub a bottle of Petrus 2005 red wine for an astonishing €17,500. Other bottles of red wine are in the more affordable bracket for most punters, ranging in price from €32 to a still pricey €690, while the cheapest bottle of white is €32. A rosé starts at €36, while bottles of champagne range from €150 to €780. McGregor charges €6.50 for a pint of Guinness in his pub, compared to his own-brand Forged Irish Stout's €6 price point. Most lagers in the pub are priced at €7.30. The Black Forge wine list 'I was taken aback at how someone going to a pub in a working class area like Crumlin would be even thinking about spending nearly twenty grand on a bottle of wine,' remarked one person in the pub, who highlighted the startling price on the menu. 'I was told that of course no one from Crumlin or Drimnagh would spend €17,500 for a bottle of wine, but that it is 'Conor's favourite', and he drinks it from time to time when he's in the pub.' It's unclear whether McGregor actually puts the huge cost of the French wine on his bill, but he would still be hit deep in the pockets either way. That's because online wholesale prices for that same bottle of wine show that it's fetching around €5,600 on the open market, leading to a profit of just over €12,000 if any customer decided to fork out for it in the Black Forge. The 2005 Petrus on the Black Forge wine list for €17.5K . 'Petrus is often considered the pinnacle of the Pomerol appellation and is undoubtedly one of the most revered wines in the world,' says one expert. 'The 2005 Petrus is dazzling. Rich, ample and explosive, the 2005 possesses magnificent density from start to finish.' Rambling McGregor is currently on holiday with his family on his yacht in the Mediterranean. On Friday he issued a rambling statement after Nikita Hand's latest victory, in which he vowed he would not be paying his pal James Lawrence's legal costs after the High Court threw out both of their appeals. McGregor had tried to challenge the outcome of a civil rape case Nikita Hand won against him last year when a jury found he had assaulted her in a Dublin hotel in 2018 and awarded her almost €250,000 in damages. McGregor had asked the Court of Appeal to allow in new claims that Ms Hand was punched and kicked by her then partner just hours after she says she was raped by McGregor in 2018. However, the allegations, made by Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins, former neighbours of Ms Hand, were dramatically withdrawn by McGregor's legal team on the morning the case opened in July. Nikita Hand slammed the allegations as 'lies' and is now suing both the couple and McGregor for damages, claiming they had been involved in 'malicious abuse' of the processes of the Court of Appeal. The Sunday World called to the home of Samantha O'Reilly in south Dublin on Friday but a neighbour told us: 'She doesn't want to talk.' Conor with Stephanie Simons in the Black Forge with two bottle of Petrus worth €35k News in 90 Seconds - Monday, August 4th
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Media's role in fighting corruption must be defended
This summer marks the 30th anniversary of the enactment of the Ethics in Public Office Act 1995. Although commended for introducing statutory disclosure obligations for designated public office holders, including politicians, and the establishment of Sipo's predecessor, its significance runs deeper. The act ended a 79-year hiatus in Ireland's anti-corruption legislation. From the foundation of the Irish Free State, the legislation governing corruption in Ireland was housed in the Prevention of Corruption Acts 1889 to 1916. That legislation remained unamended on the Irish statute book until 1995, when modest revisions were introduced under the Ethics in Public Office Act. That act was introduced partly as a response to political indiscretions exposed in a number of scandals that gripped Ireland during the 1990s, including the Greencore affair, Telecom Éireann's site purchase, and the Beef Tribunal. But behind that legislative response lay another powerful force — the media. From the 1970s onwards, investigative journalism in Ireland began to develop, which led — among other things — to the exposure during the 1990s of conflicts of interest and ethical lapses among public officials. The media reports unearthed a culture of impunity and lack of oversight, and were significant in embedding corruption in the public discourse. The Greencore affair, for example, which arose out of the privatisation of Súicre Éireann, revealed weaknesses in the anti-corruption legislative architecture that had never been focused on before, namely conflicts between public duties and private interests. It centred on a small number of executives who bought a 49% stake in a subsidiary of the company for £3.2m and sold it back to the State a year later for £9.5m, prompting concerns over corporate governance and abuse of trust. Although statutory investigations found breaches of company law and corrupt practices by some of those involved, no criminal prosecutions followed. Then there was Telecom Éireann, a semi-state company, which found itself the subject of much media attention in 1991, arising from irregularities surrounding its purchase of a piece of land for use as its headquarters. The Beef Tribunal, established in 1991, on foot of an ITV World in Action programme, would go on to reveal questionable and uncomfortably close connections between big business interests and Irish political interests. These revelations helped shift public sentiment, fostering a climate more receptive to investigative journalism and expanding the public understanding of corruption. Before then, corruption was regarded as an overt form of bribery. This understanding was reflected in the legislation criminalising corruption, which dated back to 1889. Events throughout the 1990s showed that corrupt behaviour could constitute more clandestine activities where private interests and public duties collided, and an awareness of the connection between conflicts of interest and corruption. This growing public awareness, aided by the media, created the necessary political pressure for reform. The Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 was the first enacted legislative response. However, it was not the first attempt to introduce accountability into Irish public life. Four years previously, Labour TD Brendan Howlin initiated the Ethics in Government and Public Office Bill 1991 as a private members' bill. Although the bill was defeated, its principles were incorporated into the 1995 act. The Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 sparked a series of incremental reforms over the next 15 years, including the introduction of freedom of information laws, regulation of political donations, and the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Acts 2001 and 2010. Running in tandem with these legislative developments was persistent media scrutiny, reporting on events that formed the subject matter of various tribunals throughout the 1990s and 2000s. The media played a pivotal role in the establishment of the tribunals. However, its influence extended beyond this initial contribution, in that it was instrumental in informing the public about the proceedings and findings of the tribunals. The particular significance of the Moriarty, Planning, and Morris tribunals is that, for the first time, findings of corruption were made against individuals who were the subject of the investigations. The momentum for change, driven by media vigilance and Ireland's commitments under international and European instruments such as the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery, ultimately culminated in the Criminal Justice (Corruption Offences) Act 2018. The 2018 Act repealed Ireland's outdated corruption laws and replaced them with a unified modern framework. It introduced offences of active and passive corruption, trading in influence, knowingly giving gifts or advantages to facilitate the commission of a corruption offence, intimidation, and substantially increased penalties for corruption offences. The legislative inertia that had persisted for most of the 20th century eventually gave way to a resurgence of reform, driven in no small way by the media's persistent focus on corruption. As Mr Justice Humphreys recently observed, the media plays a vital role in shaping public discourse, a role that mirrors Percy Bysshe Shelley's famous description of poets as "the unacknowledged legislators of the world". This is not to suggest that the media alone dictates policy and legislation; rather, media coverage can influence legislators' behaviour, as Ireland's experience with corruption legislation has shown. Irish legislation is a product of the Oireachtas, which essentially comprises directly elected politicians. Dependent on public support, politicians risk losing political power if they ignore public opinion. Media reporting and commentary often guide public opinion, which in turn can influence the legislative agenda. The evolution of Ireland's anti-corruption laws is a testament to the enduring importance of the Fourth Estate. Ireland's path towards transparency and reform may not have been so meaningful without it. In a world facing growing threats of free-speech intimidation, protecting an independent Fourth Estate capable of speaking truth to power is more important than ever. Gail Nohilly is a barrister and knowledge lawyer and recently completed her PhD at the University of Limerick, tracking the evolution of Ireland's corruption legislation and the role of the media.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Twelve times more properties available for short-term lets than for renters, new figures show
There are 12 times more 'entire' properties available for rent on short-term letting platforms than there are available for long-term living, new figures show. Nearly 22,000 properties advertised on short-term letting websites are offering tourists, holidaymakers, and those heading to concerts and events the opportunity to rent 'entire' houses or properties. This compares to just 1,800 properties or fewer that were available for hard-pressed renters countrywide on Tourism Minister Peter Burke confirmed 34,000 short-term lets were advertised across four platforms in May — up from 33,000 in April. He said 'approximately 64% of these properties are advertised as 'entire' houses and apartments' — about 21,760 properties. In Dublin, some 3,850 (55%) of 7,010 properties available for short-term let offered the entire property. In response to a parliamentary question from Social Democrats housing spokesperson Rory Hearne, Mr Burke said as there was no register, there was 'no way of knowing whether these are people's principal private residences or otherwise'. He also noted there was an annual 10% increase in the short-term letting sector. The number of properties available for renters across the country on has differed over the last week. On Wednesday, there were 1,800 properties countrywide. This dropped to 1,688 properties on Thursday. By Friday, this had fallen further to 1,669, and decreased further to 1,633 on Monday. There were 868 properties for rent on Daft in Dublin on Friday. This fell to 838 on Monday. In May, the same month as the short-term letting data was captured, there were 15,747 people classified as homeless. This included 4,844 children. There were 2,273 families in emergency accommodation. The latest homelessness figures for June rose to 15,915, including 4,958 children and 2,230 families. Mr Hearne told the Irish Examiner the number of properties available shows the 'real negative impact of short-term lets on the housing disaster'. 'There are twice as many entire properties being let as short-term lets (21,760) as the number of households who are homeless (2,320 families and 7,060 individuals),' he said. That we could house everyone in homelessness twice over in the number of full homes being let short-term is a shocking indictment of the Government's housing failures. 'The increasing impact of short-term lets is a result of a rampant lack of regulation and enforcement, resulting from a policy failure on the part of the Government. 'These houses did not just spring up on the market like mushrooms. They were allowed to by policy and a lack of enforcement.' A short-term let is when a property is rented out for periods not exceeding 15 days. Currently, people must apply for planning permission to rent out their principal private residence for less than 14 days at a time. This is not required if the owner rents out the property for fewer than 90 days a year. If the property is not their principal private residence, the 90-day exemption does not apply, and planning permission is needed for the property to become a short-term let. In April, Mr Burke secured Cabinet approval to progress the general scheme of the new Short-Term Letting and Tourism Bill. However, it will not go through the full legislative process in the Oireachtas until later this year. The proposed legislation will introduce a register for all short-term lets from May 2026, with Fáilte Ireland put in charge of implementing and managing the register. Hosts offering accommodation for periods up to 21 nights will be obliged to register and hold a valid registration number. This must be displayed when advertising their property. The legislation will restrict short-term lets in towns with populations of more than 10,000 people. However, people in these towns will still be allowed to rent out their primary residences for up to 90 days. The bill will also introduce sanctions for hosts who do not have a registration number. An administrative financial sanction procedure will also be introduced for platforms that do not comply with their obligations.
