Dems 'Project 2029' plan met with mixed reactions, concern over upsetting left's 'interest-group Borg': Report
Goldmacher revealed on Monday that while many Democratic strategists are on board with the project's vision, some are skeptical that the agenda set forth could upset the left's "interest-group Borg" and deepen the divide within the party.
The creator of Project 2029, former Chair of the Arizona Democratic Party Andrei Cherny, is working on organizing Democratic thought leaders to ensure there is a set-in-stone agenda ready.
"The title is an unsubtle play on Project 2025, the independently produced right-wing agenda that Mr. Trump spent much of last year's campaign distancing himself from, and much of his first few months back in power executing," Goldmacher noted in the piece.
Cherny's plan takes more inspiration from the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 than just its name. Similar to Project 2025, the goal of Project 2029 is to turn Cherny's publication, "Democracy: A Journal of Ideas," into a book — and rally the party's presidential candidates behind those ideas during the 2028 primary election season.
"The undertaking, which has not previously been reported, strikes at the heart of a raging debate consuming Democratic lawmakers, strategists and policymakers: whether the root of the party's problems is its ideas or its difficulty in persuading people to embrace them," Goldmacher stated.
According to Celinda Lake, a prominent Democratic pollster quoted in the story, the party "didn't lack policies," but rather "lacked a functioning narrative to communicate those policies." She criticized the Democratic Party for offering voters "agencies and acronyms and statistics" rather than presenting a clear story about "what we're going to fight for."
On the other hand, some Democrats contend that the party has been faltering due to stale ideas that fail to inspire voters to get behind them.
Neera Tanden, CEO of the Center for American Progress and advisor to Project 2029, argued that liberals "underestimate the power of Trump's ideas" and that the focus has been his personality.
"We get wrapped up in his personality. But he puts forward an idea like 'No tax on tips,' and that's an important signifier that he is championing working-class people," Tanden told the New York Times.
Cherny's plan to assemble "the Avengers of public policy" — a coalition of Democrats aiming to set the agenda for their party's next presidential candidate — did not sit well with some who believe that coalitions are to blame for the party's current predicament.
"Developing policies by checking every coalitional box is how we got in this mess in the first place," stated Adam Jentleson in the piece, the former chief of staff for Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa. "There is no way to propose the kind of policies the Democratic Party needs to adopt without pissing off some part of the interest-group Borg. And if you're too afraid to do that, you don't have what it takes to steer the party in the right direction."
Even though Democrats were successful in rallying their base against Project 2025, Michael Tomasky, editor of The New Republic, claimed that those efforts will not have a negative effect on Project 2029 because — unlike the Heritage Foundation — their "ideas aren't radical or extreme."
Tomasky stated that he hoped the project would help rejuvenate the public's view of the Democratic Party among the less fortunate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Dismisses Canada Trade Talks
President Trump says Canada trade talks aren't a priority, so those 35% tariffs set to kick in on August 1 will likely stay put. He told reporters Friday we haven't really had a lot of luck with Canada and added I think Canada could be one where they'll just pay tariffs, not really a negotiation. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NVDA. That follows his Truth Social announcement earlier this month warning of 35% levies on Canadian importsand potential hikes if Ottawa retaliatesup from the prior 25% rate. The Canadian dollar barely budged on the news, echoing his point that a deal isn't in the cards right now. Why it matters: Keeping high tariffs in place without fresh negotiations could strain U.S.?Canada trade ties and hit cross?border industries. Investors will be watching any Canadian response and the impact on sectors like autos and energy once those tariffs take effect. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Entrepreneur
8 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Cancel Culture Isn't Going Anywhere — Here's How Smart Leaders Respond
Cancel culture can derail B2C and B2B thought leadership efforts, as public scrutiny gets amplified by social media. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Today's leaders are expected to speak up — not just for business, but for society. According to the 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer, 73% of people believe CEOs should step in when governments fail, and 68% feel empowered to pressure organizations into change. This isn't just about leadership — it's about leverage. Public expectations are high, and the cost of silence or missteps can be steep. Thought leadership now exists in a landscape of hypervisibility. Social media amplifies every comment, every slip. There are no warning shots — just consequences. So where does that leave leaders? Caught between the demand to lead and the fear of being "cancelled." This article explores how cancel culture is reshaping the rules of engagement—and how modern leaders can navigate it with clarity, credibility and confidence. Related: Cancel Culture Is Lazy. We Need Revision Culture Instead. Understanding cancel culture At its core, cancel culture is amplified public accountability. It's the collective decision to disengage from individuals or organizations seen as offensive or unethical. Social media often fuels the outrage, which can quickly damage reputations and opportunities. Some see it as justice. Others, as mob rule. A 2022 Pew Research Center study revealed a divide: 58% believe calling out others promotes accountability, while 38% see it as unfair punishment. It's a tense environment for leaders. Share an opinion and risk backlash. Stay silent and risk irrelevance. That hesitation is reshaping thought leadership—and not for the better. Leadership voices on thin ice Public sentiment shifts fast. What's acceptable today might spark outrage tomorrow. That unpredictability keeps leaders in the crosshairs. As a result, many opt for silence —but that's risky too. Diluted ideas turn thought leadership into thought followership: safe, bland and forgettable. The real risk isn't saying the wrong thing. It's saying nothing at all. Modern leadership requires clarity, conviction and the courage to speak from a foundation of values and insight—even as the ground shifts beneath you. Cancel culture and B2B: the hidden impact Cancel culture headlines usually spotlight consumer brands, but the effect in B2B is quieter and more insidious. Imagine this: Business A approaches Business B for a promising deal. Then, Business A backs out over a years-old tweet from Business B's founder. No press, no hashtags — just a lost opportunity behind closed doors. This is micro cancel culture. And for smaller companies without the PR or legal teams to manage reputation risks, it creates serious vulnerability. The result? Companies start choosing "safe" over smart. Innovation suffers. Integrity is replaced with risk aversion. Related: Here's the No. 1 Thing Brands Can Do to Avoid Public Outrage and Cancel Culture Cancel-proof thought leadership strategies In today's climate, it's not just what you say — it's how, when and why. Here's how to lead with courage and credibility: Embrace a micro-program strategy: Skip rigid campaigns that age fast. Break bold ideas into short, agile pieces that can evolve with current events. Test messaging early and often. Stay true to your values: Speak up only on issues that align with your mission. A 2023 Weber Shandwick study found one-third of consumers believe companies should only take stands when it's relevant to their business. Balance instinct with inclusion: Speed matters, but so does perspective. Build diverse voices into your decision-making process and vet your partnerships carefully. Use research as a shield and spotlight: Data makes bold ideas harder to dismiss. Root your opinions in real-world research and trend analysis to shift the conversation from emotion to evidence. Own your mistakes—fast: Perfection isn't required. Accountability is. PwC reports 38% of consumers will forgive a brand that apologizes and takes action. Act quickly, correct transparently and move forward. Final thoughts Cancel culture isn't going anywhere. Public expectations around business responsibility are only rising. The real challenge for leaders isn't avoiding controversy — it's staying relevant and trustworthy in a shifting world. Let values guide your message. Let data back it up. Let courage drive it forward. Cancel culture can feel like a threat — but it can also serve as a filter that pushes leadership toward greater clarity, integrity and long-term credibility. The goal isn't to dodge scrutiny. It's to build a brand that can withstand it. Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.
Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
AOC Will Pay $3,000 For Ethics Violations Over Met Gala Appearance
The House Ethics Committee on Friday found Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., violated ethics rules after she 'impermissibly' accepted gifts during her appearance at the 2021 Met Gala—including her white dress with the phrase, 'Tax the Rich'—and said the lawmaker must pay roughly $3,000 to settle the claims. A yearslong probe found Ocasio-Cortez 'impermissibly' accepted gifts for the event, including a ... More white dress with the phrase, 'Tax the Rich.' GC Images The bipartisan Ethics Committee found Ocasio-Cortez 'impermissibly' accepted a gift of free admission to the Met Gala for her now-fiancé Riley Roberts, valued at about $35,000, and failed to pay the full market price for some of the items she wore to the event, though a probe found she did not intentionally violate ethics rules. An investigation found Ocasio-Cortez coordinated with Met Gala staff to ensure she would not violate House rules, which the staff confirmed, and that Ocasio-Cortez was offered a guest ticket to attend, the committee said. Ocasio-Cortez paid just over $990 for the dress, shoes, handbag and jewelry she wore to the event, and must pay the remaining $2,733 to cover the fair market price of the items and settle the claims, according to the committee, in addition to $250—the price of a meal at the Met—to cover Roberts' attendance. Mike Casca, Ocasio-Cortez's chief of staff, said in a statement she 'accepts the ruling and will remedy the remaining amounts, as she's done at each step in this process.' An early inquiry found designer Brother Vellies originally billed Ocasio-Cortez $1,300 for her 'Tax the Rich dress,' and a later invoice requested $300. It's not immediately clear why the price tag was reduced, though a former campaign staffer for Ocasio-Cortez told the Ethics Committee they discussed her complete attire totaling about $1,000. Key Background The House Ethics Committee opened an investigation into Ocasio-Cortez's Met Gala appearance in December 2022, months after the American Accountability Foundation filed an ethics complaint. Experts told Forbes at the time that Ocasio-Cortez's acknowledging she wore 'borrowed items' to the event indicated she violated House gift rules, which prevent lawmakers from accepting gifts like free attendance to events and travel. In an Instagram post, Ocasio-Cortez defended attending the Met Gala for free, arguing elected officials in New York City are 'regularly invited to and attend the Met due to our responsibilities' overseeing the city's cultural institutions. Forbes Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Likely Violated Ethics Laws With Met Gala Appearance, Says House Ethics Office By Zach Everson
